The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Lies, damned lies and The Scotsman

Posted on November 07, 2011 by

The Scotsman presents a deeply twisted spin on the latest Scottish constitutional poll today as their headline story. Under the headline "SNP under pressure as Scots back change", they report the TNS poll for the BBC which shows the results of a three-option either-or question asking voters to pick their favourite from the status quo, devo max and independence. The poll essentially shows a three-way tie, but the paper reports it highly misleadingly, particularly in this passage:

"…independence, support for which, according to the poll, has fallen 11 percentage points from the 39 per cent backing in a survey published in September."

The September poll being referenced, however, asked a radically different question – it offered respondents just two options, independence or the status quo, with no devo-max. It's hardly surprising that independence scored higher in a two-option poll than a three-option one (the status quo did too), and as such the Scotsman's interpretation borders on an outright lie. Even by their normal standards, it's an unusually clumsy and blatant effort at misrepresenting the reality.

In fact, as quietly noted by the Herald in the middle of a piece on new Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson, "The nearest comparison with the latest poll was a three question one by Ipsos-Mori a year ago which had 22% for independence, 44% for more powers and 32% for no change." In other words, the BBC survey represented support for independence growing significantly, at the expense of both devo max and the status quo – the exact opposite of the Scotsman's spin.

It's also interesting that a poll showing devo max as – albeit narrowly – the most popular option is described by the paper as putting the SNP under pressure. The SNP have repeatedly expressed their willingness to include a question on devo max in the forthcoming referendum, while all the opposition Unionist parties oppose one. It is they, not the SNP, who are refusing to countenance offering the people the thing they continue to favour the most, and one might imagine that it would be they rather than the nats who would therefore be placed under pressure by this poll.

2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 06 06 18 17:21

    If it goes, it won’t be missed, well not by me | Grumpy Scottish Man

  2. 10 06 18 19:49

    If it goes, it won’t be missed, well not by me | Grumpy Scottish Man


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,690 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Angus on Faces In Sand: ““16th century Scots would have driven them all into the sea by now.” Scots had real spines in those days.” Oct 18, 02:24
    • Cynicus on Faces In Sand: “Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Or- to mark the end of the Mòd, in the tongue of those called…” Oct 18, 01:47
    • Lothianlad on Faces In Sand: “Just did something i rarely do an looked at whingy scot goes pop mealy mouth. Interesting he says nothing about…” Oct 17, 22:47
    • Lothianlad on Faces In Sand: “Proof if any were needed that the SNP is utterly owned by the british security sevices. They allow no prospect…” Oct 17, 22:37
    • Anthem on Faces In Sand: “Q Manivannan, did he ever get a visa extension? The illegality of that seems to have gone quiet.” Oct 17, 22:37
    • Andrew scott on Faces In Sand: “THIS IS BEYOND AWAFUL DOOMED AH TELL YE DOOMED” Oct 17, 22:14
    • Red on Faces In Sand: “Looking at the SNP conference now, they’re just human biotrash. The least intelligent, the least honest, the least courageous and…” Oct 17, 20:02
    • Jim Thomson on Faces In Sand: “In other news – “A Ministry of Defence analyst has been elected rector of the University of St Andrews. Dr…” Oct 17, 19:32
    • Jim Thomson on Faces In Sand: “They’ve obviously never heard of VPNs. “Choose Scotland”, our reframing group developed that slogan way back in 2013 and have…” Oct 17, 19:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Hmmm. Listening to the BBC tonight, I got the impression that Swinney has just announced that Indy is as good…” Oct 17, 18:52
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Crivens, James. Is it usual for yer maw tae stay oot sae long? Hope she’s nae been lifted! Wha’s pitting…” Oct 17, 18:45
    • Tommo on Faces In Sand: “‘The truth is simple: the SNP exists for power’s sake alone. As long as it can keep funnelling fat salaries…” Oct 17, 17:53
    • Ian on Faces In Sand: “I suppose we should look on the bright side. 1. If everyone who still thinks independence is coming via the…” Oct 17, 17:17
    • Alison on Faces In Sand: “Nothing about this surprises me except that Facebook has a 70% reach.” Oct 17, 16:51
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “The smugness emanating from that FAT BALDHEADED TWAT is almost bile inducing” Oct 17, 16:46
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “We can only hope that the Alex Salmond trial and the EXPOSURE of the vile , despicable actions of Sturgeon…” Oct 17, 16:40
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “My word, some horrendous imagery coming out of France right now, the place seems to be on fire. Tsk, all…” Oct 17, 15:42
    • James on The fight about to come: ““….hurled at those whose ability to construct a coherent, cogent, written statement…” Site Prick. When’s that happening then, wee man?…” Oct 17, 14:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““The talent is there” Where? Serious question. Where are they hiding? Help me out here. Name 20 talented Scots capable…” Oct 17, 14:15
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “SSRG 2026 Saturday 17th October on youtube is working well today. Please watch. Sensible, principled people talking constructively. They are…” Oct 17, 13:49
    • Wally Jumblatt on The fight about to come: “Your perseverance with the moribund SNP is praiseworthy, but I’m sure we are all way past the point where we…” Oct 17, 13:36
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “” What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit” Well, son, “if you have to ask” and all of…” Oct 17, 12:17
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “@James says: 17 October, 2026 at 10:21 am “Prick”? Naw, James, that ane hasnae been devalued. Its meaning remains clear,…” Oct 17, 11:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““Still read the rag though” Me too, the online version. Some good journalism occasionally, although hell will freeze over before…” Oct 17, 11:13
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Yeah, got some sympathy with this, the way what are not unreasonable calls for at least recognition of past crimes,…” Oct 17, 10:32
    • James on The fight about to come: ““Prick”?” Oct 17, 10:21
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Many Scots who are related to the descendants of the thieving, genociding Scottish colonisers of the Canadian province of Alberta…” Oct 17, 09:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““turn German into inhuman gibberish” In our own time, we see the same (quite successful) attempts to turn English into…” Oct 17, 09:04
    • Willie on The fight about to come: “Small diversion on a Saturday evening. Now we know budgets are tight and we know that transport for some children…” Oct 16, 22:44
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “« The Nazis were only too anxious to secure the lustre of Thomas Mann’s presence and the prestige that mere…” Oct 16, 21:00
  • A tall tale



↑ Top