The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Lamont offers Scots [BLANK] tomorrow

Posted on January 31, 2012 by

We're supposed to live in an age where politicians are trained to within an inch of their lives by media advisers, in order that they can spout bland pre-programmed soundbites about any given subject at a second's notice. (With the infamous nadir of the phenomenon being represented by Ed Miliband's toe-curling broken-robot impression at the time of the public-sector strikes.) So perhaps we should be happy on the rare occasions when we discover a couple of elected representatives still willing to appear like clueless idiots in front of the public.

First came a few comments in the Scotsman from the leader of the SNP group on Glasgow City Council, Alison Hunter. With the SNP hoping to take control of the Labour stronghold this May – or at least deprive Labour of its majority – she was asked which policies she would seek to implement if her party pulled off such a titanic feat. Hunter's scarcely-believable and less-than-inspiring response was "I haven’t thought about that yet. Actually, I’m not an out-there leader. I’m a team leader. So we haven’t actually thought about that yet."

Before you ask, we have no idea what the difference between an "out-there leader" and a "team leader" is either, and we imagine Ms Hunter will soon be leaving SNP HQ with a well-skelped erse and a disinclination to say anything quite so stupid out loud ever again. In her defence, however, we suppose we could offer up the fact that she's highly unlikely to ever have to consider such a scenario – with Labour currently holding 45 seats (out of 79) to the SNP's 22, even denying Labour a majority in Glasgow this time round would be a huge and significant achievement for the Nats. Winning outright or even plurality control this year is surely beyond its reach.

We're not sure what Johann Lamont's excuse is, though.

Lamont is the leader of the opposition in the Scottish Parliament, with ambitions to be the First Minister of Scotland (go on, picture it). She leads a party which has formed the government as recently as five years ago. She's the figurehead (in Scotland, certainly, albeit largely by default) of the No campaign for the independence referendum – the side which is starting out well in the lead. In that latter battle at least, you'd have to say that she had a plausible chance of victory.

Her much-asserted position is that she and her party oppose both the status quo and independence. Lamont insists that Scotland needs greater devolution, but that (for some reason) the middle option cannot be part of the referendum. Devolution, says Labour's leader, is a "separate path" (does that make her a separatist?) rather than a point on a line, and the people of Scotland must first reject independence before they can be allowed greater powers within the UK.

So what ARE these powers with which Lamont hopes to tempt the electorate? They must be pretty attractive, you'd think, if they're going to persuade Scots to vote for the deeply unpopular status quo in autumn 2014 and trust Labour to create a better alternative at a later date. So when Lamont stood beside Ed Miliband in Glasgow yesterday and was asked to outline her vision for the future of Scotland, her reply – as reported by the Guardian – was all the more startling:

"Given that Labour lost the election last year, it would be presumptuous to have a firm answer to that now. [We want] to consult on this, particularly with business."

Sorry? Lamont's already-opaque position has been derided in the press previously as offering "jam tomorrow", but it appears that now she isn't even committing to anything that specific. Is it in fact jam that Labour's offering us tomorrow? Is it marmalade? Peanut butter? Economy lemon curd? Low-fat vegetable-oil spread? Week-old cat-vomit? In fact, are we getting any toast at all? (And when, actually, is tomorrow?)

Labour recently spent 14 months in the Calman Commission, formulating (alongside the Lib Dems and Tories) its official views on how to move forward with Scottish devolution. The outcome of these lengthy deliberations was the toothless, vague and increasingly doomed-looking Scotland Bill. So what are we to believe? That Labour was holding back on its true thoughts about constitutional developments all that time, but has now forgotten what they were and has to start again?

Lamont's response is an absolutely extraordinary display of both intellectual bankruptcy and arrogance. What does losing the election have to do with Labour's position on the constitution? Isn't that supposed to be a matter of principle? Why do you need to "consult", and who with, to know what you believe in? Why is it business, rather than Labour members or voters, who get to have the biggest influence on where Labour stands? How do you know that independence is the wrong choice if you don't even know what your alternative is?

We were distinctly unimpressed with Alison Hunter last week, but Johann Lamont occupies a position of far greater responsibility and has fumbled that responsibility much more dismally.  She might not have noticed, but the referendum campaign has started. If she still doesn't even know what she's arguing for, we're not sure how she hopes to persuade the people of Scotland.

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 01 08 14 10:24

    The Eternal Promise of Jam Tomorrow | We'll never be fooled again!

4 to “Lamont offers Scots [BLANK] tomorrow”

  1. Rolf says:

    "Vote Labour, go nowhere."
    They can have that slogan for free. Any more and I'll invoice them.

    Reply
  2. Subrosa says:

    Don't encourage Ms Lamont and her colleagues to form a strategy please. The independence cause is profiting well from her current stance.

    Reply
  3. An Duine Gruamach says:

    How do you know that independence is the wrong choice if you don't even know what your alternative is?
    Brilliant.

    Reply
  4. Shodan says:

    "If they want it then that's enoug for us to be against it!"
     
    In that mindset you don't need alternatives. I just wish Sottish Labour and other voters would wake up to this farce.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,790 Posts, 1,222,606 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Xaracen on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Stuart; “The Treaty was entered into without limitation of time and some articles express quite plainly that they were intended…Jul 24, 22:27
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “For general info, here is a link to PROF ROBERT BLACK KC’s presentation about the UNION: Professor Robert Black KC…Jul 24, 19:33
    • Stuart on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Xaracen. 2:14 How wrong can one man be? Well in your case very. Your argument (feeble though it is) re…Jul 24, 18:43
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “When their buttons and switches and knobs – and they have many – are pushed or flicked or twiddled… they…Jul 24, 18:40
    • twathater on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@ Lorn you said “I believe implicitly, that those men who transgress the rules of normal, decent behaviour have a…Jul 24, 18:14
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@ Lorn at 4:15 pm It’s definitely okay to blame the Scots for the prevailing Union, and jist ignore things…Jul 24, 18:02
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Dan – I mean the cost per MwH quoted as £150, Hinckley Point see originally struck at c.£85. Yeah I…Jul 24, 17:59
    • twathater on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Oh there’s Bastard TAX MOAN back from his holidays in Is rahel, has he been updated on the plans to…Jul 24, 17:56
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Chas spotting across the yooniverse…Jul 24, 17:33
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Hmm… but when did pretty much anything built in the UK ever come in on proposed cost? HS2, a couple…Jul 24, 17:30
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Hats off to that! Respect.Jul 24, 17:09
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “It’s been a busy week for the Eton rifles. “What a catalyst you turned out to be. Crashed your van…Jul 24, 17:03
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “The favourite rant from the Parasite Class; ” It’s good for the economy!” Who’s economy?Jul 24, 16:55
    • Chas on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Rather than the readers ‘chipping in’ Andy, you could gift him some of yours!Jul 24, 16:35
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “LABOUR MP CALLS GENDER-CRITICS ‘SWIVEL-EYED FANATICS’ A Labour MP has revealed his contempt for those who believe in the reality…Jul 24, 16:32
    • Chas on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Alfie Boy can’t lose. Either we accept we are living in a colony. Or, if we don’t, it is proof…Jul 24, 16:22
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “I think that it is less that we are colonized than that we have allowed ourselves to be treated as…Jul 24, 16:15
    • Chas on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “It’s competition time. Spot the Loony.Jul 24, 16:07
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Young Lochinvar: no, decent men did not barge into female spaces in the past, and any who were indecent enough…Jul 24, 16:06
    • Stuart on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Name checking your own homework does not count Professor Baird. Your narrative (feeble though it is) is inaccurate and clutching…Jul 24, 16:06
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Who is “Scotland”, every single person in Scotland who has been polled on the subject, or a tiny bunch of…Jul 24, 14:49
    • James on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““Aidan”; “I think we’ve all just got to face up to that fact…” Who’s “we”?Jul 24, 14:32
    • James on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Good old “Aidan”, the true BritNat defender on every subject. Scotland doesn’t need (or want) nuclear, but hey, when did…Jul 24, 14:15
    • Xaracen on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Stuart; We are talking of a union of two sovereign kingdoms, neither of which in 1706 owed any obeisance to…Jul 24, 14:14
    • James on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Can you elucidate what these “fish” might be? England has been meddling in Scotland’s affairs for nigh on 1,000 years…Jul 24, 14:01
    • Rob on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “The simple fact is that Scottish politicians have shown over the last 10 years that they are simply so incompetent…Jul 24, 13:54
    • James on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Willie; Witness; your point is made.Jul 24, 13:48
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “It’s a case against nuclear power, I don’t know where she got the numbers from re costs, they seem around…Jul 24, 13:08
    • sarah on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Further to my comment at 11.18 a.m., coincidentally Gareth Wardell, Grouse Beater, has retweeted today the speech that he would…Jul 24, 12:59
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Put your colonial feet up on the colonial stool. Make some colonial tea and have some Corbyn and Sultana cake.Jul 24, 12:40
  • A tall tale



↑ Top