The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?

Posted on April 28, 2010 by

One of the most striking things about the current election is the BBC's total abandonment of even a pretence at impartiality with regard to the nationalist parties in Scotland and Wales (and other smaller parties like UKIP too), which is most obviously visible in the Corporation's determined exclusion of them from the defining theatre of the campaign – the leaders' debates.

In the light of protests pointing out that excluding what Ofcom defines as "main parties" in Scotland and Wales during an election is against broadcasting regulations, the BBC (and ITV and Sky, although the latter subsequently broke ranks – see above) hastily rebranded the programmes as "Prime Ministerial debates", and insisted that they were only for the politicians contesting the keys to 10 Downing Street.

The gigantic irony, of course, is that it looks increasingly as if NONE of the participants in the debates will actually be the next Prime Minister.

Indeed, only one of them even has a vaguely realistic chance. Nick Clegg won't be the next PM, because our crooked electoral system ensures that the Lib Dems will have by far the smallest number of seats. Gordon Brown has no chance of achieving a majority, and Clegg has already explicitly ruled out supporting Brown as a minority PM.

So right away, of the three debaters, we're down to David Cameron. His chances of achieving a majority also look slim, but are still just about within the realms of possibility, especially with the support of the Ulster Unionists. But time is running out for the Tories to build the sort of margin they need to secure a majority against the Labour bias built in to the constituency system.

If the polls stay roughly where they are, the most likely next Prime Minister of the UK is a Labour MP who isn't Gordon Brown. The exact identity of this hypothetical person is currently unknown. Alan Johnson has considerable support within the party, and has recently made fairly unambiguous overtures towards the Lib Dems about PR – something he also has a previous record of favouring and seems to be genuine about.

But other candidates including David Miliband and Ed Balls might also challenge for the leadership in the event of Clegg demanding Brown's head as the price of his support. The one thing that seems certain about this least certain of elections is that one way or another, Brown is going to require the services of a removal firm come May 7th.

An interesting thing about the governance of the UK is that the Prime Minister, like other ministers, doesn't have to be an MP at all. (Which negates another of the BBC's attempted defences, namely that Alex Salmond isn't standing for a Westminster constituency this time round.) If a ruling party – or coalition – wants a particular person in its Cabinet and they haven't been elected, all that's required is a swift ennobling so that they're a member of the House Of Lords, and they can serve in government.

In such a way was the Sith Lord Baron Mandelson elevated to a position of administrative power, and so could anyone else be. Were Labour to find itself with the fewest votes but the most seats, and with Clegg blackballing Brown, they could anoint anyone they liked as their leader. They could go for national treasure Dale Winton as a unity candidate if they wanted, and with Lib Dem approval Lord Winton of Sweepshire would find himself discussing the next Queen's Speech with Her Majesty.

Alternatively, they could go for a sporting hero loved in many parts of the UK. Kenny Dalglish would have support in Scotland, in the North-East (Blackburn, Newcastle), the North-West (Liverpool) and more, and he certainly has top-level managerial experience.

He's a born winner, but also statesmanlike in a crisis. The SNP would back him if their votes were also needed in the new coalition. (He's a national hero, and imagine how much it would upset all those Union-loving Rangers fans.) And he'd be at least as honest and straightforward in debates and interviews as the candidates we have now.

"Prime Minister, are you going to renew Trident?"

"Mibbes aye, mibbes naw."

We can but dream our dreams.

0 to “Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?”

  1. Dean says:

    I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them.

    So the SNP are on, they win the debate, they're clearly the best party… oh.
    If they stood people in every constituency I imagine they'd have a claim that couldn't be challenged.

    Reply
  2. Grant says:

    I'm beginning to worry about what's going to happen.
    Take a look at this page, written by an Nate Silver, an American statistics nerd(who correctly forecast 49 out of 50 of the state results in Obama/McCain and whose prediction came within 0.1% of the popular vote):
    link to fivethirtyeight.com;
    Look at the second table in particular. Based on some very realistic assumptions, he has the Tories really close to victory with Ulster support. This, or anything worse (just 10 more seats for the Tories) and we have the nightmare scenario of a Tory win, and the end of the electoral reform debate. Because you can be sure the news narrative will be that the people have spoken, we wanted the Tories, and in the end we didn't want a hung parliament. Your average joe will go back to being totally disillusioned, and probably voting Labour again in 5 years time for more of the same.
    It's probably too difficult to finesse this now, but I believe that if you're in a Labour/Tory marginal, no matter how much you want to up the Lib Dem vote to make a statement, you have to vote Labour to keep the Tory seat total down and bring about the Lib Dem/Labour coalition we want. I
    For what it's worth, this guy makes the same argument:
    link to guardian.co.uk

    Reply
  3. Grant says:

    That first link should have been:
    link to fivethirtyeight.com

    Reply
  4. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    "I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them."

    The sensible solution is to have a half-hour show after the debate, shown only on BBC Scotland, in which Alex Salmond is asked the same questions the other leaders were asked.

    Reply
  5. Dean says:

    That sounds perfectly reasonable. I'd also have been in favour of a fourth debate with the three of them plus the Scottish and Welsh ministers.

    On the other hand, it's amusing that the Tories were part of the Scottish debate – do they even bother standing candidates there anymore?!

    Reply
  6. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Mm, indeed. The SNP's proportion of Westminster seats is only about 1% below the Tories' proportion of Scottish seats, despite the Tories standing in 100% of Scottish seats and the SNP only standing in about 8% of Westminster seats. So it's hard to see by what criteria the Tories were allowed in the Scotland-only debates, if the SNP weren't allowed in the "British" (actually English) ones…

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,848 Posts, 1,231,959 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Lorncal on The Valley Of The Dolls: “If you do, those spaces become mixed sex spaces, not single sex spaces. Would you allow women who have had…Dec 9, 23:08
    • James on The Long Walk To Freedom: “Good point, Northy.Dec 9, 23:02
    • Lorncal on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Because, Kate, we let them get away with the “stunning and brave” bulls**t instead of calling them out as that…Dec 9, 23:00
    • sarah on Off-topic: “NHS dentist, Tinto? No chance, I’m afraid. Though it sounds as if we have been let off lightly compared with…Dec 9, 22:16
    • Lorncal on The Valley Of The Dolls: ““… The argument was essentially of a man using the façade of gender reassignment for improper purposes, including for sexual…Dec 9, 21:55
    • McDuff on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Congratulations rev on another powerful article.Dec 9, 21:27
    • GM on The Valley Of The Dolls: “It will be.Dec 9, 21:25
    • Jay on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Sarah: Agreed that Rev Stu has conducted a masterly exercise of demolishing the position taken by the Tribunal, a wonderful…Dec 9, 21:16
    • Tracey on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Thanks for this. Excellently written and explained. I am glad I am already subscribed. You are worth it!Dec 9, 21:06
    • sarah on The Valley Of The Dolls: “You missed your calling, Rev. You could have been a senior judge in Scotland or England. There was a wonderful…Dec 9, 19:29
    • Hatey McHateface on The Valley Of The Dolls: “As always, a masterful analysis from Scotland’s greatest living journalist. Just one tiny quibble: “It’s not often you see a…Dec 9, 19:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The Valley Of The Dolls: “They’re aiming for the institutionalized watering down of women’s rights. It’s a war. The trannies are the leading shock troops…Dec 9, 19:21
    • Kate L on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Thank you for this breakdown, even though it may lead to a breakdown of my own. This is legitimately bonkers.…Dec 9, 19:20
    • agentx on The Valley Of The Dolls: “There will be an appeal from both sides and the decision will go to the higher courts. But please note…Dec 9, 19:18
    • diabloandco on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Excellent idea! The whole thing is stratospherically ridiculous.Dec 9, 19:17
    • Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: “Forgot to mention that thoughts of Gruinard Bay and its seals always make me think of the incomparable Julie and…Dec 9, 19:10
    • diabloandco on The Long Walk To Freedom: “I think I must have met that man in Edinburgh one lovely sunny afternoon in the gardens when a great…Dec 9, 19:07
    • Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: “I don’t give up, Sarah, I adapt 🙂 . Despite the best efforts of the security services, the Edinburgh Proclamation…Dec 9, 18:59
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Walk To Freedom: “Fit’s a Clydeside Welder?Dec 9, 18:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Walk To Freedom: “Ah, the fragrant James has dragged himself once again, out from under his stone. You can choose to believe that…Dec 9, 18:51
    • Craig on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Any chance for a copy of THAT dogs breakfast to be sent to the Supreme Court judges so they may…Dec 9, 18:46
    • twathater on The Valley Of The Dolls: “I would believe that judges decision had been made at the start of the tribunal , anyone who uses the…Dec 9, 18:32
    • Craig on Ain’t Got Time To Bleed: “Any reply from the “Big Fella”?.Dec 9, 18:29
    • 100%Yes on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Trying to fit a square into a circle is never going to work. I’m afraid the SNP and the Greens…Dec 9, 18:07
    • Iain More on The Valley Of The Dolls: “It is a toxic world for any white heterosexual males and females.Dec 9, 18:04
    • Vronsky on The Valley Of The Dolls: “It’s too easy to point out the madness, we need to understand that to your average politician this apparent silliness…Dec 9, 17:57
    • panda paws on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Indeed it isn’t. It is illegal for someone who in an official capacity knows another person has a GRC to…Dec 9, 17:44
    • Colin Dawson on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Given the avalanche of litigation that is likely to result from the Scottish Government’s allegedly unlawful gender self-ID policies over…Dec 9, 17:40
    • Jill on The Valley Of The Dolls: “English women here who follows you for your reporting on this issue. A huge thank you again for your time…Dec 9, 17:25
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Remain in your home. Officers will be with you shortly.Dec 9, 17:24
  • A tall tale



↑ Top