The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


How modern journalism works

Posted on November 25, 2014 by

It is, in fairness, a fairly slow time for politics news at the moment. But it’s striking all the same to open this morning’s papers and see almost all of them running what’s not only basically the exact same story, but also the exact same groundless spin on it.

THE SCOTSMAN: “Jim Murphy tells Scots Labour to back tax powers”

DAILY RECORD: “Labour leadership frontrunner Jim Murphy set to back full income tax-raising powers for Holyrood”

THE GUARDIAN: “Scotland [is] to be offered total control over income tax after Labour U-turn. Labour’s policy shift will be confirmed on Tuesday by Jim Murphy, the favourite to become the next Scottish Labour leader.”

THE HERALD: “Murphy to support handing full income tax powers to Holyrood”

THE TIMES: “Murphy calls for full income tax devolution”

BBC NEWS: “Scottish Labour leadership candidate Jim Murphy is calling on his party to support the full devolution of income tax to Holyrood.”

STV NEWS: “Labour candidate Murphy calls for ‘full devolution of income tax'”

EVENING TIMES: “Murphy in call for full devolution of income tax”

There’s only one thing conspicuously missing from all of the stories – a quote from Jim Murphy saying he backs the devolution of full income tax powers to Holyrood.

murphyblank

Murphy was asked the question directly just two days ago on Sunday Politics Scotland and completely bodyswerved it with some vague non-committal waffle that amounted to a fobbing-off of responsibility for the decision to the Smith Commission. And if you search the stories in today’s papers, the only thing you’ll find that even approaches a concrete quote is this:

“Even before the Smith Commission reports, we should agree to the full devolution of income tax to Scotland, if that is what emerges.”

Our emphasis, there. But it’s exactly what he said on Sunday, and in essence it’s nothing but an abdication of responsibility. Yet every newspaper makes an unqualified statement of Jim Murphy’s personal view that’s backed by no visible evidence.

It’s almost as if, cynical readers might be forgiven for thinking, Murphy’s press team had sent out an identical press release to all of the media’s most sympathetic Labour hacks – Magnus Gardham, Torcuil Crichton, Severin Carrell, Andrew Whitaker – and they’d all printed it with only the most superficial of edits.

It seems abundantly clear that none of the bylined reporters have been given the full speech. All the stories carry the same inconclusive quotes, such as “It is a clear signal to Scotland that we have changed” without any quoted indication of what “it” is, or “This will result in there being no hiding place for those who want to talk about radical politics but then fail to deliver them” with no quoted indication of what “this” is. Yet all of them magically reach identical conclusions.

Not a single word that’s actually quoted couldn’t equally be applied to Labour’s official devolution plan of partial control of income tax. When the speech is delivered later today it might turn out to be more unequivocal but on the basis of the actual evidence supplied it’s still the same hedged, fudged, evasive, base-covering position. After all, if Murphy was going to unambiguously back full income tax devolution, why not just say so clearly and simply on Sunday in front of a nationwide audience?

The fact that none of the stories in the media this morning press Murphy for such a straight answer illustrate that none of the reporters actually spoke to him. They were fed exactly what Murphy wanted them to print and they ran it obediently.

(The Scotsman in fact did it two days running. Yesterday it ran a piece headlined “Jim Murphy backs full devolution of income tax”, in which diligent readers would have read on to find the reality was the rather less definitive statement “Mr Murphy refused to rule out supporting the devolution of all of income tax”.)

It’s perhaps also worth noting in passing that Jim Murphy’s view on the full devolution or otherwise of income tax to Holyrood is a matter of supreme irrelevance to anything. He’s currently just a backbench MP with no particular influence on Labour policy, and if he does succeed in becoming Scottish branch-office leader he’s pledged that he’ll sit at Holyrood rather than Westminster, so if Labour win the 2015 election he’ll have no say at all in the government that actually passes the devolution legislation.

Anyone seeking an explanation for why people have reacted so enthusiastically to the launch of The National might like to reflect not on whether it supports one particular position, but perhaps on the fact that readers are just desperately clinging to anything that might offer the hope of something approaching actual journalism.

4 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 25 11 14 11:42

    How modern journalism works - Speymouth

  2. 25 11 14 12:59

    All things to all men | FreeScotland

  3. 25 11 14 15:03

    How modern journalism works | Politics Scotland...

  4. 27 11 14 15:37

    How modern journalism works | Total Journalism ...

91 to “How modern journalism works”

  1. Malcolm says:

    Perhaps he will change his mind on Trident too? He appears willing to do anything for a vote. Can’t wait for the DR spin on that.

    Reply
  2. Mae Carson says:

    Evidence?? Evidence? Since when did the press need evidence before spouting propaganda? Evidence based journalism is rare nowadays.

    This is SLab promoting Murphy’s leadership, nought more, nought less.

    Reply
  3. Lanarkist says:

    Is this proof that newspapers are now staffed with establishment scribes just echoing the press releases from Party Central?

    There seems to be no attempt at analysis, no questioning the statement, no unique insight or editorial.

    It smacks of an Editorial cartel! Who is now pulling the strings on what seems to be a central press agency control office and what is their agenda?

    Project Fear has now mutated into Project Control.

    The masses, the press next up the Internet A!

    Reply
  4. scotsbob says:

    This is one of the key reasons that the referendum was lost. There were daily press releases from the no campaigners and all were obediently printed in the newspapers without any investigative process.

    Here is another example, Murphy’s PR people send out press release and it’s printed without any in depth analysis.

    Reply
  5. Betty Boop says:

    It is as though the unionist media is telling the Murph what to say…

    Have we been here before?

    Reply
  6. Osprey MacIntyre says:

    I was wondering if I’d missed something. The Grauniad does the same thing: link to theguardian.com

    Reply
  7. Brian Powell says:

    There is the tale of a man who ends up in hell. He has a choice of three doors.

    Approaching one he hear terrible screams, and decides he won’t go in that one.

    At the next there is the crackling sound of fire and the smell of burning, he decides not to look in.

    At the third there is quiet and just he sound of clinking cups. He opens the door and there is a vast room of people drinking tea and standing up to their ankles in shit.

    He thinks, “Well I can cope with this for the rest of eternity”, and goes in. No sooner is he in and the devil in charge says, “Right, tea break over, back to standing on your heads.”

    With the help of the media the Labour Party are still at the tea break stage.

    Reply
  8. Juteman says:

    The parcel o rogues continue to this day.
    Is it for silver or fear that they all toe the party line?

    Reply
  9. Macart says:

    Who gives a flying ….

    … squirrel what Jim Murphy’s personal view is.

    On two counts this story and its spin, falls flat on its face. Firstly regardless of Mr Murphy’s personal opinion (and I doubt he would support any powers or responsibilities heading to Holyrood) and regardless of whether he becomes the local branch manager, Labour HQ will decide what Labour’s policy is.

    Secondly full responsibility over income tax (even if gifted), would seem the biggest of fiscal, political and constitutional bear traps waiting to happen. It would surely prove a burden on the Scottish budget and tax payer, harmful without full tax varying powers and full control of all revenue streams and welfare. The whole fiscal powers of a country are required for the effective and balanced running of an economy, yet the papers peddle this bullshit line that income tax responsibility on its Jack Jones is a big deal.

    Reply
  10. heedtracker says:

    It’s just more UKOK press grooming. It’ll be a miracle if they devolve all income tax to Holyrood so they won’t but they’ll sell it like they have. Our imperial masters know what’s best for us and what we should think, BBC says pooling and sharing resources across teamGB for your own safety and security. You did vote NO for it silly little Scotland region.

    Reply
  11. Restlessnative says:

    Succulent lamb for the truculent bam.

    Reply
  12. Grouse Beater says:

    Will The National refuse to accept or reprint (spin) press releases from political parties?

    Reply
  13. Haggis Hunter says:

    All this Murphy media attention tells us that London has chosen its man, and the ‘media’ is being used to achieve their selection

    Reply
  14. Another Union Dividend says:

    Why does no serious journalist in Scotland refer to this article where Murphy opposes devolving 100% income tax but it was ancient history on 3rd November 2014 as a week is a long time in political journalism

    link to thetimes.co.uk

    Reply
  15. Doug Daniel says:

    To: Blair McDougall
    From: The Scottish MSM
    Subject: Today’s News

    Message:
    Hi Blair

    Can you tell us what today’s news is?

    Thanks

    The Scottish MSM

    Reply
  16. david agnew says:

    Are these media outlets even aware that they are writing cheques murphy can’t cash?

    Reply
  17. Pin says:

    This is as much a disservice to No supporters as anyone else. It’s tiresome to find these fibs in an article. Makes you wonder what information they leave out

    Reply
  18. kendomacaroonbar says:

    Big Jim Murphy doesn’t like getting besmirched.

    I think all you besmirchers will be on the Big Jim Murphy besmircher list. wooooohoooohooo!

    Reply
  19. Alan Mackintosh says:

    From your piece above Stu,

    “Even before the Smith Commission reports, we should agree to the full devolution of income tax to Scotland, if that is what emerges.”

    Huh? So they’re going to agree to full devo before Smith reports, but only if thats what emerges? So how does that work then? How can they agree to anything before its published when they’re waiting to see “what emerges”.

    How could any “journalist” even pass this without a query? Maybe their wee brains started to hurt with the circular argument spinning around.

    Colour me confused…

    Reply
  20. MJack says:

    Full control over income tax seems like a distraction from what we really need which is control over things like VAT even if it means keeping it at the same level as the UK but collecting and keeping and spending it here. Then if our economy is doing well and people spend more Scotland benefits through tax collected.

    The block grant will be reduced whatever is devolved so it is probably a no win situation except that indyref2 will be easier if we already collect our own taxes, run our own welfare and distribute all our pensions!

    FFA/DevoMax is the easiest and least messy solution.

    Reply
  21. sandra says:

    Doesn’t really matter what he thinks, does it? Once elected he’s getting his orders from London.

    Reply
  22. H says:

    Thankfully we have The National now !
    I have came to the conclusion that scottish Labour party leadership has come to this, lets start saying say we back everything the SNP openly backs, whatever ! we are just a branch office we have no real power to think for ourselves because we aren’t genetical capable of making political descions so let us just let our smart westminster collegues sort that out for us even if there are people starving to death we will give them a year to think about it, so Jim is the man for the job he will sort out all the confussion, great front man, amazing fake tan, grey coverage so natural ! and those eyebrows needed a litte tweeking, good this will just make Independence happen quicker than you can say Irn Bru crate!

    Reply
  23. HandandShrimp says:

    A cynic might say think that the Westminster Labour machine have already installed Murphy regardless of what the other two think. Boyack takes the Brown position on this. If any of the three appeared sanguine about full income tax powers it was Findlay (of the Labour will not replace Trident fame)

    Reply
  24. think again says:

    Wings over Scotland, does what it says on the tin, politics with jokes.

    @Brian Powell 10.21. I have embarrassed myself in an incident involving tea, dippy biscuits and your vision of hell.

    Did Jim make a submission to the Smith Commission, has he had to send in revisions as each day passes. The Beeb says he calling on his party to… fill in the blanks yourselves, much as Neil is calling on Labour to end Trident. I call on all wingers to lend me a couple of grand.

    Only two more sleeps and the commission will be in print and the media will be in a state of flux and the unionists will be in a state of panic, knowing that even any small “concession” to the Jocks will have headquarters in a state of apoplexy.

    Roll on the general Election.

    Reply
  25. gillie says:

    Murphy is to repeat the same line in his speech: “Even before the Smith Commission reports, we should agree to the full devolution of income tax to Scotland, if that is what emerges.

    If that doesn’t emerge from the Smith Commission, then what will be Labour’s position?

    Reply
  26. Jim Mitchell says:

    Maybe he will make it a vow!

    Reply
  27. Les Wilson says:

    Yup, a general release to the press by the Slab spin office.
    We know well what our MSM are, how can we forget. They are continuing the anti SNP line and Murphy is their present puppet, who they hope, with little chance, to dent the SNP.

    Labour, Slab, MSM, seem to forget we have their number, recent history proves their deceit, we will not forget.

    Reply
  28. handclapping says:

    I think the National ought to print these press releases AND head them up as a press release received from XYZ.

    Reply
  29. Karmanaut says:

    Yes, but given the lower wages in Scotland (compared to London), devolving full income tax will mean far *less* money for Scotland once the Barnett formula is cut by population share, which is why we need our oil income to offset it.

    Reply
  30. ClanDonald says:

    Are any of these so-called journalists going to investigate how having control of just income tax without all the other sources of revenue might actually be harmful to Scotland? Do they even care or do they just want an excuse to be able to blame the SNP government for all Scotland’s economic and social woes?

    Full income tax powers is an economic poison chalice for Scotland and these so called journalists dont give two hoots. They would rather Scotland experienced further economic hardship as long as it means Labour regaining power, it’s all they care about.

    These tax raising powers will only result in Scotland being forced to raise the amount we spend on our so called “freebies” via extra income tax. How does that sound, no voters? You will be paying tax twice for exactly the same public spending as we get now, and Westminster will get off the hook again by telling middle England that we only get free tuition and prescriptions because we pay a higher rate of tax than they do. Despite the fact that Scotland already contributes more per head than we get back. We’ll be contributing EVEN MORE.

    Suck it up no voters.

    By the way, if I were the Scottish Government and we do get these powers, the first thing I’d do is raise the level of tax that private landlords pay on their unearned rental income.

    Finally, don’t Labour voters realise that this push to have Murphy elected as Scottish Branch leader Is about securing Westminster control of the Scotland branch? Why do you think the London owned media are pushing so hard for it? It’s not in your best interests, Labour people. If you can’t see that you deserve all you get.

    Reply
  31. James A says:

    It gets worse when you reflect on the fact that when Murphy has confessed to holding an actual policy position on devolving income tax it has been to parrot the Lamont/Brown spin on ‘pooling and sharing’. Brown and Darling clearing the decks helps Murphy dance his way round round jaggy nettles. Smith will undoubtedly go for income tax despite this not being Labour’s preference – the backing of the Tories and Lib Dems as well as Greens and SNP make it a given. Whoever becomes branch manager will want to appear progressive rather than be judged as reluctantly dragged to a accepting a position they tried to block. Labour are not listening – they are playing leadership games. Murphy knows there are plenty of MPs hostile to full devolution of income tax and others in the party who were convinced by the Gordon Brown line that “Scotland” (eh…Labour) would be weakened by Holyrood acquiring the tax. So what does ‘The Prince’ (aspiring) do? Uses his Court to disseminate a counter-intuitive yarn that paves the way for Jimbo to unflinchingly accept the conclusions of Smith as if it embodied his position all along without actually saying it publically and risking electoral college alienation. Helps to have more faces than the town clock; though I did think the two-headed Labour-llama cartoon I saw this morning was fitting. You are 100% correct Stuart. Mainstream meeja in Scotland is suffering A Poverty of Political Journalism. It is not the SNP that’s intent on rerunning the politics of the referendum – it is Labour and allies such as Gardham and Clegg.

    Reply
  32. Clydebuilt says:

    BBC radio Scotland 10am newsadded to Murphy wanting Income tax powers devolved…then added the official Labour position is they want Tax spread throught the UK …

    It’s another dirty trick, trying to hang on to votes . If they get into power they will perform another U Turn (via an inquiry / report) and Scotland won’t get full income tax power.

    Reply
  33. The Man in the Jar says:

    @gillie
    at10:49am

    “If that doesn’t emerge from the Smith Commission, then what will be Labour’s position?”

    Easy peasy. Labour will blame the Smith commissioner!

    Reply
  34. Taysideterrier says:

    (MsM establishment collective) “oh shit, the nats are ahead in all the polls lets see what we can do to get our puppet masters back in front!”

    Quite funny watching them all squirm, if we get more pro Scotland MP’s than rule Britannia unionist benefit claimants in the GE it will be comedy gold to see the reaction. Until then keep up the good work folks.

    Reply
  35. Another Union Dividend says:

    As a former part time newspaper reporter, couldn’t join NUJ as only part time, so was not a journalist and at the time at my newspaper you couldn’t get full time job unless you were a member of the NUJ!

    That’s by the way …point is that even then reporters met up and discussed stories / sports events etc before typing their stories (it was long time ago!)which meant that often a similar emphasis was put on a story.

    As in other jobs journalists are under pressure to do more in less time so don’t research stories when given press releases. However no excuse when Google and other tools, including Wings back catalogue, now exist rather than relying on their own newspapers archives which is the first and often port of call.

    The same applies to the BBC in Scotland, having got rid of the good experienced journalists, who are relying on fresh faced interns who haven’t a scooby.

    Reply
  36. The Man in the Jar says:

    Commission not commissioner

    bring back the edit button.

    Reply
  37. Jim Thomson says:

    ” …abrogation of responsibility.”

    There, fixed it for you 😉

    You’re welcome 🙂

    And anyway, as mentioned on Twitter, unless the Scottish Government has its own treasury into which tax and duty revenues can be paid DIRECTLY, it’s all a smoke and mirrors affair.

    There is practically no chance of Westminster agreeing to that (our own treasury), along with the full decoupling of economic activity up here from that of the London based treasury functions. That needs to be the starting point for any meaningful self funding state. Only then would scrapping the Barnett Formula (that is looks nothing like its original form) make sense.

    Reply
  38. Clydebuilt says:

    Unionist Parties have taken one lesson from the Referendum…..In Scotland They get away with big lies …lots of them….. Why stop!

    Reply
  39. Luigi says:

    Aye, Murphy rides to the rescue yet again, dragging the Red Tories behind him. He has a pretty good PR team. Combined that with a bunch of lazy, useless, non-investigative unionist journalists, who are only too happy to publish his spin, word for word (almost), then you have a formidable Murphicator machine.

    The other candidates for the SLAB leadership (I can’t even remember who they are now!) may as well throw in the towel. They have nae chance.

    Reply
  40. desimond says:

    Press Release?

    more like

    Press Contain!

    Reply
  41. Grant says:

    Did he offer a Vow yet?

    Reply
  42. Cuilean says:

    We’ll all be watching, agog, when the three UK Labour (Jocks’ branch) are wheeled out again tonight onto the telly, this time STV’s turn, to give UK Labour a freebie party political broadcast, and derogate the SNP (bad) unchallenged. They all have yet another cjance to say, ad nauseum, why they should be the glove puppet to follow puppet-master Milliband’s covert orders.

    The SNP’s imperial masters are the voters of Scotland (and possibly Berwick)…

    UK Labour’s ‘imperial masters’ are millionaire Ed Milliband [who refused to answer BBC questions on his actual wealth]. Furthermore, Ed’s shadow cabinet has at least 7 more hand-picked millionaires. Look at the Shadow Depute Prime Minister, Harriet Harman. British EStablishment through and through. Her great grandfather was Joseph Chamberlain, the leading imperialist of his day, in charge of the 2nd Boer War (concentration camps introduced for men, women & children), also of course related to Neville Chamberlain Tory PM, her uncle was Lord Longford, her cousin, novelist Lady Antonia Fraser. harman’s father was a Harley St surgeon and she went to exclusive public girls’ school, St Paul’s and graduated in lawyer from York Uni., but like many in govt has never held a REAL job in her life. Just what DOES Harriet Harman have in common or empathy with a single mum getting by on Maryhill’s foodbank?

    Then there is Ed Balls, educated at private, boys Nottingham High whilst his ‘socialist’ dad advocated abolishing the 11+ exam in England!

    Murphy has also never held a REAL job in his life either, spending 9 years at uni, leaving with ‘b a’, ie bugger all, he went from NUS, helping Blair to abolish free higher education in Scotland and being rewarded with a show-in Labour seat. PLease, oh please, STV, tonight, SOMEONE ask Murphy just what he did for 9 years at Uni before dropping out, without a single qualification, straight into a cushy trough of expenses etc. on which (despite his skeletal, lantern-jawed vizog, he has gorged upon ever since, on a breathtaking scale.

    Should the Scottish tax payer not get a refund for these wasted 9 years? After all, Murphy benefited from a free higher education system, which he then helped abolished for future generations of Scottish kids. That’s Murphy’s right wing Blairite, Red Tory, legacy to Scotland.

    Reply
  43. desimond says:

    Scottish Labour: no longer can we be accussed of being led by Westminster, oh no, we now lead by following a Tory Lord who is acting purely in Westminsters interests.

    Confused, we are, you soon will be.

    Reply
  44. Big Mac says:

    Regarding tax raising powers in Scotland.
    Will we be able to keep tobacco taxes, alcohol duty, fuel duty, VAT, Motor Vehicle Road Fund Taxes,TV licence fees, airport / flight taxes, betting / gambling taxes, inheritance taxes?
    Will we get power over what is presently called Crown Estates and the income from this?
    Will we be able to raise cash by having Scottish Premium Bonds, Scottish National Lottery?
    Will we establish a Scottish Bank that we trust?

    How many more income streams do Westminster have that can be kept in-house in Scotland.

    I think we can kiss the Barnett formula bye bye at some point!

    Reply
  45. Ken500 says:

    Tax and spending powers. The majority in Scotland are waiting for the promised full fiscal autonomy.

    Total tax raised in UK £490Billion. Total taxes raised in Scotland £53Billion+ (revenues going through UK City of London HQ’s). Scotland loses £10Billion+ to Westminster rule. £4Billion lost in Oil tax revenues (increased 11% ie £2Billion in 2011), £1.5Billion on illegal wars/Trident. £1.5Billion could be saved by a tax on ‘loss leading’ cheap alcohol. £4Billion repayments on money Scotland doesn’t borrow or spend. Westminster borrows and spends £110Billion – £10Billion more pro rata. The repayments on Westmister borrowing is £52Billion a year.

    ConDems have just increased by £Millions the spend on nuclear weapons in Scotland, without Westminster consent. People are being sanctioned and walking to food banks. It’s disgusting.

    Reply
  46. cearc says:

    Handclapping,

    What an excellent idea.

    ‘I think the National ought to print these press releases AND head them up as a press release received from XYZ.’

    Have you suggested it to them?

    Reply
  47. iain taylor (not that one) says:

    Jim knows what the Smith Commission is going to recommend. Smith’s report was attached to his job spec.

    Reply
  48. Restlessnative @ 10.31

    Chapeau sir – post of the day by a mile.

    Reply
  49. Anne Meikle says:

    They’re counting on the hard-of-thinking, also being hard-of-remembering. People will still swallow labour lies hook line & sinker and it’s long past time we get on the front foot and stop being mealy mouthed about exposing labour lies. (wings being the exception of course).

    Reply
  50. muttley79 says:

    Why do the SNP support full income tax being devolved if it is a poisoned chalice?

    Reply
  51. Ken500 says:

    ‘Pooling and sharing’ has cost Scotland a £220 Oil Fund. For naught.

    Unionist politician free by 2016
    Vote SNP/Alliance 7/5/15

    Independence by 2020

    Reply
  52. galamcennalath says:

    I’ve come to the conclusion that the poor level of journalism in these pro-Union comics shouldn’t be a problem because readership is low and dropping. However, it is a big problem because broadcast media have lowered their standards of journalism so far, that all they do is repeat what the newspapers say. Together the BBC, STV, Sky influence a lot of people. And, it is a big issue for democracy when they just trot out the same unresearched rubbish. There can be no democracy without balanced investigative journalism to hold all public office bearers to account.

    Reply
  53. David says:

    I fully supported The Murph’s labour leadership bid. Can anyone think of a better representative for a band of thoroughly discredited, selfish, greedy, lying, career-politician have-been parasites on the verge of getting their dirty arses thoroughly kicked?

    Go for it Murph, its almost poetry.

    Reply
  54. gus1940 says:

    Yeaterday morning scotsman.com had 2 Devo Income Tax stories in the Scotland Section – one quoting Darling as being opposed to Full Devo of it and the other quoting Murphy as supporting Full Devo of Income Tax accompanied as usual with yet another new photo of Mr. Sincerity.

    Funnily enough on accessing the site in late afternoon the Murphy item had been disappeared (not even moved to the Politics Section).

    General Dreedle would be pleased.

    Reply
  55. Bill McLean says:

    Muttley, muttley – it’s another crack in the wall that’s why. Personally I don’t think tax will be devolved – Westminster will block it – another crack in the wall!

    Reply
  56. Macart says:

    @muttley79

    I suspect because they committed themselves to taking back any and all powers, as and when on offer. However in this instance I also suspect we’ll have a fair bit of horse trading to go through yet before we see what form WMs final offer will be. Most importantly the number of MPs sent down in May will play a huge deciding role in those negotiations vis a vis bargaining power available to the SG.

    Its also a safe bet that of the 14k+ submissions very few would have backed the gifting of responsibility for income tax only. 😀

    The commission, to have any legitimacy, must reflect the bulk view of those submissions as well as taking into account the opening positions of the political parties and two governments involved. If it doesn’t, then HMGs credibility and the result of the referendum would suffer an almost immediate hammer blow.

    Reply
  57. msean says:

    “Radical politics”,that old chestnut. We had an opportunity to move on with radical politics,but a party was posted missing when the people were ready to be radical,and one prominent member was actually against “radical politics”.

    Reply
  58. Nana Smith says:

    I wonder if smurph has read this and if he has I doubt he gives a damn.

    Dear Messrs Cameron, Clegg & Miliband

    Living up to the vow: the wholesale devolution of welfare

    As your party representatives enter the final week of Smith Commission negotiations, we want to remind you about the vow you made to the people of Scotland to give Scotland significant new powers.

    link to scvo.org.uk

    Reply
  59. michael says:

    muttley79 says:

    25 November, 2014 at 11:25 am
    Why do the SNP support full income tax being devolved if it is a poisoned chalice?

    It puts us on collision course with Westminster. If we have control of income tax it will mean the Barnet Formula will constantly come under pressure from Westminster. My guess is Nicola is looking forward to Westminster trying to remove or reduce Barnett.

    It sets us on a path towards a choice of stay in UK and loose Barnett or Indy or at least constant winging from Westminster about Barnet. Which gives us a constant platform to inform the voter why Barnet exists…to give us some of our own money back.

    Reply
  60. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Best thing to do here is to point out that the devolution of income tax powers to Scotland is very much an irrelevance as it represents a very small part of Scotland’s revenues, it is already collected anyway and the only power it gives is to allow us to tax ourselves more highly (with the certain effect of having our Barnetts cut (ooo that sounds painful).

    We are lending credibility to a sleight of hand by discussing it in the wrong terms.

    O/T
    I note a big punt coming steadily in the media for Ruth Davidson. As the Labour Party collapses in Scotland they are preparing another line of defence for the union.

    Reply
  61. Schrödinger's cat says:

    Surely the opinion of the branch manager elect is no substitute for a press statement from miliband? The fact that the unionist regurgitate this press release from mcternan without questioning it or indeed asking the Labour Party head quarters in London to even clarify their position, is actually quite scary

    Reply
  62. David Stevenson says:

    What %age of the total Scottish tax take is realised by income tax? Anyone know?

    Reply
  63. fred blogger says:

    it’s all maybe’s and might be able too’s.
    saying that they have changed means they were wrong before.
    he says slabs have changed, but what is the end product of that change, that they will end poverty?
    will they now tell us how they will end poverty?
    why did they not think ending poverty was a good idea before their “change”?
    how does their change of heart and/or mind, redistribute wealth, create real jobs, bring social economic and environmental justice?
    what is it that they think they have heard?
    we don’t need them to listen anymore, we already have strong communication’s with powerful and influential others, the snp, ssp, scotgreens, RIC, etc etc, who agree with us.
    we are the change.

    Reply
  64. msean says:

    They may give some income tax control,but you will pay for it elsewhere. Deep inside the deal,some wee clause will scupper any real power just as is usually the case. Only independence will get Scotland the powers needed to serve our society.

    Reply
  65. G H Graham says:

    The very last thing publishers of propaganda such as The Herald, The Scotsman or the Daily Record need, is verifiable facts.

    All that is required is a mannequin which they can dress up in whatever fancy or ridiculous costume they please.

    In this case, Murphy seems only to happy to play the part & allow the editors to window dress him.

    Although one would be forgiven for thinking that the pantomime season apparently runs all year.

    Reply
  66. Schrödinger's cat says:

    The national should ask London labour to clarify, when they ignore them, run a front page exclusive pointing out that ed millibanc refuses to back the commissions findings. The unionists need to be forced into stating thier positions, the opinion of a no mates back bencher are worthless

    Reply
  67. Dan Huil says:

    Independence supporters will easily recognize unionist propaganda in favour of Westminster’s Murphy. Murphy is hoping some Findlay supporters will believe the propaganda and vote for him, the parachute boy. Either way the Labour party in Scotland is decisively split.

    Reply
  68. Tattie-bogle says:

    Unspinning the spin no one does it quite like the Rev.

    Reply
  69. Linsey Young says:

    You would appear to be confusing unionist hacks from msm with journalists.

    Reply
  70. Marcia says:

    How now Brown Vow.

    Reply
  71. Mealer says:

    Murphy backs the bombing of brown people.

    Reply
  72. rod says:

    What’s in a name?

    Magnus Gardham, Torcuil Crichton, Severin Carrell – good comrades all…

    Reply
  73. Alex Clark says:

    @David Stevenson

    Income tax as a % of total tax income in Scotland is given as 27.4% according to HMRC figures for 2013/14.

    HMRC uses different accounting methods than the SG GERS figures, these methods result in an appearance of Scotland raising less tax of course!

    link to gov.uk

    Reply
  74. Training Day says:

    Good to see the variety and diversity of our free press here, as opposed to the McPravda launched yesterday.

    Reply
  75. MochaChoca says:

    @David Stevenson

    Income tax in Scotland 2012-13 was £10.87bn out of a total of £53.15bn.

    Or 20.4%

    This is 7.4% of UK income tax, so quite a bit lower than the 9.1% of overall UK taxation paid by us.

    Reply
  76. Free Scotland says:

    The Scotsman and the Daily Record both promoting Murphy? Why? Oh, yeah, I forgot: the tory-backed Scotsman thinks he’ll damage labour in Scotland and want him in at all costs, and the Record is daft enough to think he’ll be an asset to labour in Scotland, and want him in at all costs. The sooner this pseudo-politician is consigned to the dustbin of history the better.

    Reply
  77. HandandShrimp says:

    They seek them here
    they seek them there
    those dedicated followers of policy

    Oh yes he is (oh yes he is), oh yes he is (oh yes he is).
    There’s one thing that he loves and that is flattery.
    One week he’s in Westminster, the next week he is in Holyrood.
    ‘Cause he’s a dedicated follower of policy.

    Reply
  78. Robert McDonald says:

    From BBC Scotland’s report on the Mitchell Library Murphy speech:

    Mr Murphy told an audience of supporters at the Mitchell Library in Glasgow that full devolution of tax powers would be as important for the Scottish Labour party “as the changing of Clause IV was for the UK Labour party”.

    Note the careful use of a quoted part linked to a non quoted part to make it look like Murphy actually said something.

    BBC/ SLab collusion? You bet.

    Reply
  79. gillie says:

    Would you trust Jim Murphy?

    Now that is a question that everyone connected to the Labour party in Scotland will be asking.

    Murphy is like a weather vane – a large cock that follows the direction of the political wind.

    Reply
  80. jackie g says:

    just spotted a copy of the National on a work collegues desk.

    smiled as i went past but maybe a Labour supporter finding out what all the fuss is aboot.

    Either way publicity seems to be working.

    Reply
  81. Tam Jardine says:

    Isn’t it obvious that Jim Murphy has been deliberating on the devolution of income tax long and hard, and at 2 minutes to midnight has finally worked out the best way forward for the Scottish people.

    He must be waiting with bated breath on Citizen Smith’s findings. If only he had some inside information on what the findings would be, he could have made this monumental volte face with some confidence that he wasn’t going to end up with egg on his shirt!

    But no sir. Here is a man of integrity, not afraid to speak his mind and put the electorate first. In this age of spin, briefing, self interest and party politics we finally have a man of principle!

    How lucky we are to have the gentlemen of the press ramming Murphy’s coupon in our face and bigging him up. After all, without them we might not understand Murphy and might just mistake him for the worst kind of Blairite red tory zealot and show him the door.

    Reply
  82. Chools says:

    The power of a Murphy press release, the new Darling of the media

    Reply
  83. Famous15 says:

    To repeat what others have said ; anything short of full fiscal powers is a BEAR TRAP.

    Any variation of tax upwards is suicide unless advantageous social outcomes are obvious. We cannot have good social outcomes unless all revenue streams and all social security is within our control. To exemplify we only need to look at Alex Salmond arguing for better child care so that the increase in tax take from more women in work can be returned to the Scottish economy.If that money is returned to the UK Treasury they continue to rob us.

    Reply
  84. Cherry Loudon says:

    Please don’t shoot me down, but, do we the people not have the last word on whatever the Smith Commission and HoC cobble together. Do we just accept whatever crumbs that are thrown our way? I believe that if we don’t like it we take to walking en mass to Westminster. They would surely notice 1.6 million very loud,rebellious Scots making as much noise that it would be heard all the way to the Highlands and Islands. This is how we tell them..you do our bidding, we employ you and if you don’t you will be standing in the queque for the dole.
    I think I’m a bit of an activist…never realised that before!

    Reply
  85. Lollysmum says:

    @ Macart at 11.40

    Good post but one point- I wasn’t aware that HMG had any credibility! At the ripe old age of 62 you’d think I would have noticed it by now. Nah-epic fail.

    Cuilean -excellent rant & I bet you enjoyed that-I certainly did 🙂

    Reply
  86. Macart says:

    @ Lollysmum

    Awe hell, we know it has zero credibility, but apparently there are a few bods out there who require convincing otherwise. 🙂

    Reply
  87. cirsium says:

    @Muttley79, 11.25

    The SNP don’t just want all income tax devolved. Here’s an extract from the Scottish Government’s submission to the Smith Commission, More Powers for the Scottish Parliament

    Full fiscal responsibility for the Scottish Parliament: all tax revenues should be retained in Scotland. The Scottish Parliament should have policy responsibility for all taxes unless there is a specific reason for a continued reservation. In particular, the Scottish Parliament should have full autonomy for income tax, national insurance, corporation tax, capital gains tax, fuel duty, air passenger duty and inheritance tax

    The Scottish Parliament should be responsible for all domestic expenditure – including welfare – and make payments to the UK Government for reserved services

    It’s a good read. If we had full fiscal autonomy, we would not need the Barnet formula.

    Reply
  88. murphy knows fine well we will not get full tax powers.he is only advocating this nonsense because he wants elected.

    Reply
  89. Paula Rose says:

    Can we have some pics of journalists working?

    Reply
  90. Katie says:

    Only one word to describe the new Slab leader. Jim Muphy is a complete… Tosser!!!

    Reply
  91. h_johnny says:

    Rev – “Slow time for political news” what?! The last couple of months have been anything but slow imo.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,726 Posts, 1,215,008 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “41% Tariffs on Falkland Islands. What did they do to piss off Fuhrer Trump? I had no idea that the…Apr 3, 08:15
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another cunning plan based on a whole heap of made up legal arguments which no court, anywhere, is going to…Apr 3, 06:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “@Zimba Regarding moral inconsistencies. I believe a meaningful debate between fair-minded individuals acting in good faith first needs some kind…Apr 2, 21:17
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “IMPORTANT: Leah Gunn Barrett attended the Public Petitions Committee at Holyrood today in order to see what would happen to…Apr 2, 19:40
    • agent x on The Gender Of Mountains: “Caroline Lucas says: “He helped transform the fortunes of the Scottish Green party – taking the party into government for…Apr 2, 18:13
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Have a wee look at her post and highlights of committee meeting today at Holyrood today, she’s a fighter, well…Apr 2, 18:08
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:04
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:00
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Soz, double post…Apr 2, 17:41
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – to understand why the geographic separation requirement is so important you have to look back at the context…Apr 2, 17:31
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Was & still am a follower of the Rev, but starting to question myself why, isn’t it about time he…Apr 2, 17:27
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Was & still am a follower of the Rev, but starting to question myself why, isn’t it about time he…Apr 2, 17:27
    • twathater on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another piece of evidence to EXPOSE the continued ongoing lunacy that we must find some way to address https://open.substack.com/pub/iainmacwhirter/p/trans-cat-msp-cleared-of-non-crime?r=5catlo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=emailApr 2, 16:38
    • Zimba on The Sacrifice: “First off, apologies for essentially posting the same (or similar) comment twice. I’m not a frequent poster here (or anywhere…Apr 2, 15:59
    • Zimba on The Long Future: “This is not a portrait of what Scotland’s politicians alone have become. The malaise is sadly European generally and is…Apr 2, 15:21
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Is Greer related to Chapman. Strange shaped head sneering mouth with studs for teeth and eyes that sit suspiciously in…Apr 2, 14:35
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Teletubbies have to say bye bye Dipsy. Dipsy likes bouncing on his bottom. But now Dipsy has a sore…Apr 2, 13:45
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “Ah, Zimba, always good to hear from the kind of poster who believes that any number of dead men, women,…Apr 2, 13:17
    • Zimba on The Sacrifice: “Good job, Hatey, our kindly bombs and bullets can help them learn to see their own moral failings before it’s…Apr 2, 12:14
    • Zimba on The Sacrifice: “Good thing, Hatey, our bombs and bullets are there to help them see their moral failings while being clinically slaughtered.Apr 2, 11:57
    • Andrew scott on The Gender Of Mountains: “Good news the green gnome is standing down as co co chair scot greens BAD NEWS NOT STANDING DOWN FROM…Apr 2, 11:40
    • Louise Hogg on The Long Future: “ALBA Party exists: 1. So voters HAVE a genuinely pro-Independence option to vote for on the ballot paper. As Young…Apr 2, 11:15
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Hear, hear. The Rev is doing a great job in not letting this all go unreported.Apr 2, 11:04
    • Louise Hogg on The Gender Of Mountains: “Absolutely agree, Lorn. This utter infestation of porn-addict driven filth needs cleared out of any organisation directly or indirectly receiving…Apr 2, 10:40
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “@Aidan; No, Aidan, I’m not trying to argue that a ChatGPT summary overrides the explicit language of a UN declaration.…Apr 2, 08:49
    • Alf Baird on The Gender Of Mountains: ““‘jellyfish legislation’” The Welsh term for jellyfish is ‘wibli wobli’, which seems to well describe this type of legislation.Apr 2, 08:49
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Just two? You’re not paying enough attention 🙂Apr 2, 08:37
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “While many in the world are celebrating the “end of woke”, the legions of woke, fully insinuated into positions of…Apr 2, 08:33
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““Colonialism is over” But wait, Geri. Haven’t you to duly punish them at the ballot box first? You’re trying to…Apr 2, 08:21
    • Chas on The Gender Of Mountains: “I suspect that Geri and Billy Carlin are the same person, with two user names?Apr 2, 08:19
  • A tall tale



↑ Top