The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Dial-a-debate

Posted on August 02, 2013 by

As alert readers will be aware, we’re having an inexplicably hard time getting hold of “Better Together” campaign chief Blair McDougall at the moment. Although the No camp constantly claims to want “debate” and we’ve already got the Yes side’s agreement, for some reason Mr McDougall still hasn’t accepted our invitation to have BT’s official spokesman, Alistair Darling, go up against his Yes counterpart Dennis Canavan in a public head-to-head at a mutually convenient time and location.

btcontact

Despite our trying to get in touch with Mr McDougall every day for the last week, he always seems to be out or “in meetings”, even if we call 60 seconds after he’s just posted a tweet. And when we leave messages with BT staff, he never gets back to us.

Obviously we’re pretty busy and can’t just sit here redialling every two minutes, so if any of you get a spare moment to call the BT office today, can you ask them – very politely, please – if he’s in, and if so whether he’s got an answer for us yet? Ta.

That number again: 0141 225 6288.

28 to “Dial-a-debate”

  1. ianbrotherhood says:

    It’ll just be one of those recorded messages, in between 20-second blasts of ‘Jerusalem’:
    ‘All of our lines are busy right now. If you want to speak to Blair McDougal press One. If you want to ask us where Johann Lamont is, press Two. If you want to make a donation press Three. One of our advisers will be with you eventually’

    Reply
  2. martyn says:

    not in the office at the moment, i said i would call back later

    Reply
  3. Luigi says:

    Oh, you cold caller, you!

    Reply
  4. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Rang a minute ago. Apparently he’s not in, but they’re expecting him to be “in and out” throughout the day, so we left a message again.

    Reply
  5. john king says:

    “Rang a minute ago. Apparently he’s not in, but they’re expecting him to be “in and out” throughout the day, so we left a message again.”

    He’ll be gaun fur the pies, jist hing aboot ootside Greggs and ye’ll get him 
    a gofur is aboot a he’s guid fur onywiy
      

    Reply
  6. Marcia says:

    In the present day of mobile phone technology, does he have to be ‘in and out’?
    If he has the runs – fine he has an excuse. I don’t think he has an excuse to not say either aye or naw. Perhaps if he would accept the kind invitation he would then have the runs.

    Reply
  7. CameronB says:

    I think you’ll have a very long wait, as I reckon Blair McDougal will be waiting for the momentum to swing towards BT. Snigger.

    Reply
  8. So, how long until we get tweets about ‘Vile Cybernats encouraging the harrassment of BT volunteers’, followed by articles in the Scotsman and Daily Record, a segment on Reporting Scotland and then a ‘discussion’ on Call Kaye, do we think?

    Reply
  9. Vronsky says:

    I suggest you place a counter at the top of your site showing the days, hours, minutes and seconds that Blair McDougall has declined to debate. Would also suggest that you use it as a fundraiser, asking readers to bet on what the reading on the counter will be when he finally responds, except I think we all know the answer to that.

    Reply
  10. Macart says:

    @Vronsky
     
    The Rev could probably retire on the proceeds of that. 😀

    Reply
  11. DMyers says:

    Something makes me suspect that McDougall, like his pal, La-mont, likes to use the word ‘debate’ without understanding its meaning.  It’s been heard in context, so they use it in a similar context without realising its implications.

    Reply
  12. BALEFIRE says:

    Tell him you’re a rich Tory businessman with a wish to donate £500,000 to the BT campaign…that should get his attention. 🙂

    Reply
  13. Max says:

     
    Just say you are from BBC Scotland, Daily Record, Downing Street, Tory HQ, etc; they will call back.

    Reply
  14. Bobby Mckail says:

    Will give it a try and if they say he’s not in, I’ll ask for his mobile number. 🙂

    Reply
  15. Max says:

     
    I see Labour and the Tories did spectacularly badly in Wales in the Anglesey by election.
     
    link to bbc.co.uk
     
     
     Plaid Cymru romped home with a  14% swing to them from Labour. 

    Vaughan Roderick, BBC Welsh Affairs Editor

    “It’s a stunning result for Plaid Cymru. The best in the party’s history. Interestingly the techniques and tactics used here have been relentless positivity. This was a retro campaign and it got the results they were used to 40 or 50 years ago.”

    Relentless Positivity seems to work in Wales.

    Reply
  16. Doug Daniel says:

    It’s not even like he can pretend he’s busy making up scare stories, because they’re just recycling old ones now.

    Reply
  17. Max says:

     
    The next Better Together event is in Baxter Park in Dundee, Saturday, Aug 3rd, 12-4pm.
    Perhaps Blair MacDougall will turn up.  If he does perhaps some Yes campaigners can put him on the spot. 
     
     
     
     

    Reply
  18. martyn says:

    tried again, he is away from his desk and will call me back…..

    Reply
  19. Tris says:

    I can’t believe he is giving you such ammunition.
     
    Clearly a man in his position has a smart phone and, on a reported salary of £100,000, you’d think he’s be able to use it. 
     
    So why will he not, on his way to the pie shop, or the toilet, or whatever, give you a quick call, text you, or send an email.
     
    Goodness, he seems to find time to tweet, so he could just tweet you saying ‘yes’, or ‘no’, or ‘maybe’, or ‘would you like a pie, I’m on my way to Greggs and it’d be no problem…’
     
    Maybe of course he is waiting for a reply from Alistair, and Alistair has taken himself off to the  Johann bunker, never to be seen again.
     
    I expect our Blair is watching this with interest, and not a little amusement.
     
    Good point there, Doug. He’s maybe out putting up border posts as we speak.

    Reply
  20. Tris says:

    Max. 
     
    I live opposite Baxter Park. I will pop over and ask if he’s there. It cuts out all this new technology, like phones and stuff…

    Reply
  21. Jeannie says:

    Well Done, Plaid Cymru!

    Reply
  22. The Man in the Jar says:

    @Horace Says Yes
    at 10; 24am
    Let’s hope so. Lets hope that this is reported by those that you mention in your post. It will just serve to illustrate the sheer hypocrisy of BTs calls for a debate.
    If anyone from BT or one of their supporters reads this, one question.
    Well? What are you waiting for? If McDougal dose not reply he is a coward a snivelling lickspittle and a miserable liar.

    Reply
  23. Vincent McDee says:

    OMG!   Even the BBC is dooming BT in the long term:
    “Evolution punishes mean people”
    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  24. Lewis Benzie says:

    A pleasant young gentlemen answered the phone.  I enquired why Mr McDougall was not willing to allow political debate.

    I was told Mr McDougall is not a public servant, I then enquired why Mr McDougall represented a political body if he was not of the body politic?

    I received a waffley answer which reaked of avoidance.  Interrupted I asked for clarity in a ‘he does doesn’t’ format.

    I was then told he was not there to answer questions or debate this (the receptionist)  we had left Mr McDougall far behind by now. 

    Was then told to have a nice day as I asked why no public debate?

    Reply
  25. Steve Shepherd says:

    Does he still exist or has he decided to defect and throw up his career prospects, tell the real truth, join Edward Snowdon and seek asylum in Russia. It’s becoming comic book. There will be no debate because they have nothing of value to say. 

    Reply
  26. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I think the definition of Better Together’s “debate,” is in their own wee heids they will think about it and not bother. That is a handsome debate for them.

    Reply
  27. Beastie says:

    You could try phoning up and saying you’re someone from a suitable unionist publication; I think you’d be amazed at where you can reach if you just say you’re a journalist with a suitable newspaper or magazine.

    Of course, he’d hang up when he found out you weren’t looking to print propaganda in ‘your’ paper, but actually talking to him could probably be considered a step in the right direction. 🙂
     

    Reply
  28. Patrick Roden says:

    Every day that BT don’t respond to this request is more evidence that BT do not want a debate and their only tactic is smear and fear.
     

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,253,025 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “Yes and a local authority opinion poll where the franchise allowed non Scot – blow ins to vote with a…” Oct 24, 05:57
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: ““I’d call the legal mechanism a referendum. Like 2014.” That was an opinion poll using a local government franchise not…” Oct 24, 00:05
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““You get repeatedly told indy is a matter for the people of Scotland, yet find there is no “legal mechanism”…” Oct 23, 21:54
    • TURABDIN on Faces In Sand: “Andy (duck n dive, never a straight answer) Burnham thinks we all ought to stock up on food and, in…” Oct 23, 19:39
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “What seems to be missing from these conversations of seasonality of our foodstuffs which is grown locally and doesn’t need…” Oct 23, 19:14
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “of course there is no such thing as “equal partner in the union” – that’s the BULLSHIT THE ENGLISH TELL…” Oct 23, 18:54
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “I think a good exposition for prepping is shown in trainspotting, when renton is getting off the skag www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm4fsi6OvFI note…” Oct 23, 18:52
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Yes Dan – humanity is off down the pan because we buy food from Spain rather than growing it in…” Oct 23, 18:41
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Ach, what does food self-sufficiency and being better insulated from outside events matter anyway… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckr5yz2pqqppo It’s recommended to have 3…” Oct 23, 18:05
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “@Dan That is not a manifesto for independence, it’s a collection of bullet point assertions and facts (the veracity of…” Oct 23, 17:57
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “I can only speak from personal experience. I (or the missus) has had Evoques, Range Rover Sports and a full…” Oct 23, 17:52
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “CC says: “People love to moan about Land Rover stuff, possibly with justification, but whenever anything’s gone wrong they’ve always…” Oct 23, 16:18
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “It’s easy to mistake a list of social, economic or cultural problems for proof of colonisation, but that isn’t how…” Oct 23, 16:15
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Chuckle at site prick Main complaining that I counted coal in the resources list. https://wingsoverscotland.com/return-of-the-fear/#comment-2778087 A day later site prick…” Oct 23, 15:48
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Yawn at CC’s no credible plan bs… If it’s a credible enough strategy for the UK to be run with,…” Oct 23, 15:42
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Much of it was faulty” An oft-repeated statement, but I have yet to identify what it means. My best guess…” Oct 23, 14:39
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “To be honest I’m not sure many people *need* it explained to them, because the facts are blatantly obvious to…” Oct 23, 14:32
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Half or more of the population living in or close to poverty levels” Ah Alf, as an academic you’ll understand…” Oct 23, 14:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “What you write is all true, Northy, but where’s the fun in being all grown up when we can be…” Oct 23, 14:11
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code, Regards Scotlands Constitutional position in a modern democracy it is to realise there is no requirement for Scotland…” Oct 23, 13:15
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “I know there is not an equal union. It would be both stupid and undemocratic. More importantly, nobody has been…” Oct 23, 13:09
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North Code. Again appreciate your response and keeping the debate polite and clean, They are not actually my own personal…” Oct 23, 12:37
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: ““Independence would bring political responsibility closer to voters, strengthen democratic legitimacy and allow Scotland to adapt its institutions over time…” Oct 23, 11:24
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “James, I haven’t replied to you. My earlier comment was a general observation about the modern independence argument, not a…” Oct 23, 11:10
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, I suspect that the non – treaty of union issue and Colonisation issue will merge, for they become…” Oct 23, 10:53
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “MaryB: they also infected people already in hospitals by placing them in wards with uninfected patients. I remember the huge…” Oct 23, 10:48
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Thank you for your reply, I will answer your points one by one if I may. Firstly, We…” Oct 23, 10:43
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: ““A convincing case for independence doesn’t need the colonial frame” How else can we explain to Scots: – the ‘union’…” Oct 23, 10:20
    • James Chey on Faces In Sand: “Fact checker. You are entirely correct in stating that there is no equal union, What you omitted by default through…” Oct 23, 10:10
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “I’ve been thinking about why the “Scotland is a colony” argument is actually counter-productive. A convincing case for independence doesn’t…” Oct 23, 09:43
  • A tall tale



↑ Top