The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Considerable restraint exercised

Posted on July 14, 2013 by

We were passed this Scottish Government document through our sinister network of cyber-agents, from an operative who wished to remain anonynous. It’s a list of official complaints made about inaccurate and misleading articles in newspapers since the 2011 Holyrood election. As we’re talking about bias today, we offer it up for your perusal and interest. We’re only surprised it’s so short.

42 to “Considerable restraint exercised”

  1. Juteman says:

    I find it difficult to believe that is all the complaints. What is an ‘official’ complaint, i wonder?

    Reply
  2. handclapping says:

    When you think of all the pieces in the Press in that time its actually been pretty good for avoiding factual inacuracies. The interpretations however have been something else again!

    Reply
  3. Murray McCallum says:

    I guess they do not want to get “trapped” in constant complaints and being perceived as defensive on a wide range of issues.  The project fear publicity, humour, growing public skepticism, ridicule approach is better.

    Reply
  4. Marker Post says:

    Surely this can’t be the full list? Some are obviously informal emails, some are formal correspondence, I am wondering if there really is a formal list of “official” complaints, I suspect some MSPs complain by email every day, they are just not catalogued.
     
    Of the ones included in this document, some of these are far too nicey-nicey, with the sender requesting “a chat” to clear up any misinterpretations, while others demand a full published apology. I suspect few if any apologies have been published. Does anyone monitor and chase these up? I suspect not, and I suspect that the “mole” is pushing for a stricter stance.

    Reply
  5. The Man in the Jar says:

    I’m with Juteman on this. Once the document was loaded my immediate thought was “Is this it. Is this all that there are?” I also concur with Murray McCallum that the SG would not wish to appear as a bunch of moaning Minies but even at that I am surprised at how few complaints have been made.

    Reply
  6. DanTDog says:

    It would perhaps be more revealing to have access to the responses, if any, which were received to these complaints…is there no way this might be effected…?

    Reply
  7. The SG does seem to have let the press off lightly. Mind you, do we want to pay for an entire Dept of civil servants to make innefectual complaints about all the bias? At least Blair McDougall has succeeded in giving himself the jitters, though.

    Reply
  8. Dal Riata says:

    Dear MSM,
     
    Every one of your deliberately misconstrued, falsified, scaremongering stories, articles and editorials are being kept in a digital archive, which, upon independence and hence forth, will be available for access by future Scottish generations, and, indeed, anyone with an interest in such matters.
     
    Every organisation and its owners, editors and journalists who contributed, have contributed, and continue to contribute to undermine, and to prevent, the democratic and constitutional right for Scotland and its people to self-determination will be forever named in infamy in the digital archive of an independent Scotland.
     
    Yours most sincerely,
     
    The people of Scotland.

    Reply
  9. Jiggsbro says:

    the democratic and constitutional right for Scotland and its people to self-determination
     
    Scotland and its people also have the democratic and constitutional right to remain in the union, of course. And within that union, Scotland’s newspapers and journalists have a democratic – but not constitutional? – right to free speech, including trying to persuade Scotland’s people to choose one democratic and constitutional future over the other.

    Reply
  10. Jim Mitchell says:

     
    DanTDog, I agree, I think the reply’s to these requests might have been very enlightening, that’s if any were received.  It’s also a pity that nobody can check what difference, if any, the various papers actually made to their stories after they received these requests. 

    Reply
  11. Jim Mitchell says:

    I forgot to add that perhaps those papers mentioned should consider these polite requests in relationship with their dramatically falling sales figures.

    Reply
  12. Dougthedug says:

    The problem for the Scottish Government and the SNP is that the only thing they can complain about in the press is innaccuracy.
     
    The press are not obliged either legally or morally to be even handed about a party or Government.
     
    It’s also very dangerous to complain about the BBC being biased because paradoxically it will then be used by the BBC to launch further attacks on the independence movement.
     
    Revenge as far as the BBC is concerned will be best tasted cold after independence day.

    Reply
  13. The Man in the Jar says:

    Like Rev. Stu mentioned in a recent article it is sites like Wings and others chipping away at the bullshit that is making a real difference. It is up to us to keep on spreading the word. “The Truth is Out There”

    Reply
  14. CameronB says:

    @ The Man in the Jar
    I thought this was place where the truth could be found. 🙂

    Reply
  15. The Man in the Jar says:

    @CameronB
    “Wings” where the truth that is out there can be found? 😉

    Reply
  16. CameronB says:

    @ The Man in the Jar
    That’s acceptable. 🙂

    Reply
  17. Tony Little says:

    @Jiggsbro
     
    I have no problem, as such, with the entire Scottish MSM being anti-Independence.  These are privately owned papers with CEOs who have their own agendas and I suspect that when the tide of opinion really turns (I predict a small and consistent YES majority by March 2014) a number will follow suit.  It’s about profit, not principle.
     
    I DO have a beef with the BBC in Scotland as it is a publicly owned organisation paid for by the taxes of everyone in the uK.  as such it has a duty to be impartial.  It isn’t. 

    Reply
  18. Listening to “Headlines” on Radio… err um Scottyland this morning. I think we are going to regret Derek Bateman’s retirement. Can anyone stand that smug sneary voiced David Torrence? He is a sickening character.

    Reply
  19. annie says:

    I have noticed for some time now that the Sunday Post has gone downhill especially since the referendum became a reality however was sickened today to read about the funeral of Kay Matheson who liberated the stone of destiny under the headline ” Funeral of Stone thief “.  Totally disrespectful to this elderly lady.

    Reply
  20. Tris says:

    @ annie 5.36
     
    I suspect that that will lose the Sunday Post yet more of its readership. And once upon a time it was said to reach every household in Scotland.
     
    We should remember headline that when the next MP or Lords that was on the take dies.
     
    Death of a Thief.

    Reply
  21. CameronB says:

    I always saw the pages that came with the Broons and Oor Willey, as the complimentary Sunday supplement. As such, they were generally ignored, as I have little interest in adverts for stair lifts, puff-piece articles concerning royalty, sport (mainly football) and fictional short stories. Doh!

    Reply
  22. Atypical_Scot says:

    Scot Gov. gave up complaining, just a shake of the head and a tut, move on.

    Reply
  23. tartanfever says:

    Jiggsboro says:
     
    Scotland’s newspapers and journalists have a democratic – but not constitutional? – right to free speech

    I would appreciate you pointing me in the direction of any piece of legislation in UK law that says I have a right to free speech. 

    Reply
  24. Shinty says:

    Gutter journalism Annie,
    Words fail me.
    My condolences to her family and friends.

    This is how it should be
    link to heraldscotland.com

     

    Reply
  25. Jiggsbro says:

    I would appreciate you pointing me in the direction of any piece of legislation in UK law that says I have a right to free speech.
     
    I hadn’t realised you were a newspaper.

    Reply
  26. AnneDon says:

    We’re subjects, not citizens, and as such we have no rights. We have occasional privileges granted by Her Majesty’s Loyal Government.
     
    If there was no other reason for voting Yes, that would be enough.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We’re subjects, not citizens”

      I believe this was changed in recent years.

      Reply
  27. Shinty says:

    sorry, back to Kay Matheson – there was supposed to be a film about Reclaiming the Stone – I’ve never seen it – anyone else?
    link to guardian.co.uk
     
     

    Reply
  28. ianbrotherhood says:

    What’s the name of that wee island on the WoS Twitter page?

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Ooh, I did know this, but forgot to write it in the filename. Sorry. (It’s definitely Scottish, though.)

      Reply
  29. ianbrotherhood says:

    It’s picture-postcard perfect. Wonder who lives on it…

    Reply
  30. Atypical_Scot says:

    @ianbrotherhood;
     
    Mr & Mrs P. Perfect?

    Reply
  31. Iain says:

    @ianbrotherhood
    ‘What’s the name of that wee island on the WoS Twitter page?’
     
    Possibly Berneray (off top of N.Uist)?

    Reply
  32. Atypical_Scot says:

    @Iain;
    Don’t think it’s Berneray.

    Reply
  33. dee says:

    “PROJECT FEAR” presents “CARRY ON SCREAMNG” oooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhh  classic!
    They will be sorry we found out about this LOL..

    Reply
  34. Adrian B says:

    Twitter picture – Westray?

    Reply
  35. BuckieBraes says:

    It’s the south end of Gigha.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      So it is. How could I have forgotten that?

      Reply
  36. Adrian B says:

    It’s the south end of Gigha….. has a look on Google maps. Mystery solved.
     
    Thanks BuckieBraes.

    Reply
  37. Taranaich says:

    See, this is the sort of thing which makes my friend call this site a haven for conspiracy nuts. 😛

    Reply
  38. Jeannie says:

    I’m ashamed to say that in all the times I’ve clicked the Wings Twitter button, I’ve not once even noticed the island at the top.

    Reply
  39. ianbrotherhood says:

    Now that we’ve established the name of the place, here comes the acid test –
     
    Any WoS readers on Gigha?
     
    ‘Come in Gigha…come in Gigha…’

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,731 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Yes, worthless treaties simply used ‘to legalize colonialism’, at least in the eyes of an Imperial justice system. A hoax…Jul 9, 22:59
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Piss off troll.Jul 9, 22:24
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “How’s the carp fishing going James?Jul 9, 20:26
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““–the chair of C-24 is quoted in a Guardian article explicitly saying that C-24 cannot.” Irrelevant, Aidan, because it doesn’t…Jul 9, 19:56
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “I literally asked you to provide evidence for any single one of your dumbass, unsubstantiated assertions. That’s not a “rebuttal”…Jul 9, 19:39
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Treaties are worthless, not unlike cease fires. How many treaties did the imperialist British sign before annexing the other signatories…Jul 9, 19:30
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Aidan She didn’t participate in acts of terrorism, and certainly not of treason (this was in Syria). This same murderous…Jul 9, 19:26
    • Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Ah, jist noticed this post by Aidan trying to diminish understanding of how much energy is exported from Scotland’s geographic…Jul 9, 19:22
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Andrew – I suggest she had her life destroyed by the decision she took to join a murderous death cult…Jul 9, 19:09
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Hatey – “… you expect me to feel sorry for the people who slaughter and abuse my country’s and my…Jul 9, 18:29
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Sam – did the university poll a wide range from the UK? Scotland only would probably throw up different results?…Jul 9, 18:17
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “What, that was your rebuttal? Lol. You surely don’t think I’m wasting any of my time on any of that…Jul 9, 18:11
    • agent x on Too Tight To Mention: ““Police preparing for Donald Trump to visit Scotland The Scottish government said it was working with the UK government to…Jul 9, 17:49
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: “See following Wings over Scotland article ‘Death from above’ (March 13, 2012). Stu writes: « We have a paid subscription…Jul 9, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Midgies tae. When oor junkies and jakies start being stealed an a’, we’ll ken we’re in the end game.Jul 9, 17:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “@AndrewR Sorry, but when it come to that kind of people, being heartless is the only language they understand. We’ve…Jul 9, 17:42
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Captain caveman, 12:04 pm. Actually the programme I am watching is How to Save England, -. The word England being…Jul 9, 17:03
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Does any left of centre politician care about the young people born in the UK, sam? Much of the evidence…Jul 9, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “TL;DRJul 9, 16:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sae true, NC, the scribblin is oan the wa. In fact, it’s only going to be (checks notes) 4-5 years…Jul 9, 16:40
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “When you don’t know what you think you know. Cambridge Journal of Economics Cover Image for Volume 44, Issue 2…Jul 9, 16:36
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “I’ve just run a couple of searches on ChatGPT for for similar search criteria. Which is helpful and revealing because…Jul 9, 16:32
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Not many people agree with you. https://www.derby.ac.uk/blog/margaret-thatchers-legacy/ Survey results In January and February 2019, researchers at the University of Derby…Jul 9, 16:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Great stuff sam. Now do the type of “personality” that posts interminably about pricks, penises, wanking, shirt lifting, glory holes…Jul 9, 16:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “James says: “Brexit” Aw, we need to crowdfund the boy a dictionary. Turn doon the page corner on the letter…Jul 9, 16:16
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Heh. So you couldn’t back up any of your earlier bullshit claims then. Imagine my surprise. Whatever, dick.Jul 9, 16:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Aren’t we gonna be keeping the Pound, Confused? How does that fact fit into your fevered fantasies?Jul 9, 16:10
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Yet more bollocks. Give it up, pal. No-one is listening.Jul 9, 15:58
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “@Aidan; “@Xaracen – you beautifully highlight the major challenge with AI. Because people like yourself are filling the internet with…Jul 9, 15:45
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Your quoted post fails to consider the alternative under Michael Foot’s Labour. I think we can safely assume it would’ve…Jul 9, 15:38
  • A tall tale



↑ Top