The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Assessing the earthquake

Posted on September 02, 2014 by

If anyone was still harbouring any doubts as to the significance of last night’s poll news, they would surely have been dispelled by this serious, thought-provoking and perceptive analysis on the BBC news channel’s “The Papers” roundup last night.

Of course, the poll might be a rogue. It might just be a temporary bounce from the second Salmond-Darling debate. And it still shows No in front. The Yes campaign will have to redouble its efforts in the last couple of weeks, not start congratulating itself.

But the one thing we can surely all agree on, right across the political divides, is that the most important aspect is whether someone might at some point have been slightly rude to Andrew Lloyd Webber on Twitter or not.

750 to “Assessing the earthquake”

  1. Lesley-Anne says:

    Shock horror!

    Who’d have thunk it, when the oil is gone the oil is gone! Well I never. 😉

    Reply
  2. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Oil is a terrible burden again.

    LOL

    Reply
  3. Thepnr says:

    @Nana Smith

    Seems like some commentators are waking up before the 19th 🙂

    Reply
  4. msean says:

    Well,even more important that we better take what oil is left before the uk wastes the entire lot.

    Reply
  5. heedtracker says:

    The burden of oil, Scots oil. If Ian Wood’s such a superstar why was the billionaire trying to get young Scots to join his industry one week BUT telling us that there is not much left on the other the next.

    Reply
  6. muttley79 says:

    Anyone know how you get the debate on STV Player?

    Reply
  7. CameronB Brodie says:

    fred blogger
    What’s the proposed dowry like?

    Reply
  8. msean says:

    Has anyone mentioned how poor westminster has made us by mismanagement of the land and its economy yet?

    Reply
  9. heedtracker says:

    So there’s no Norwegian style oil pension fund here because SNP MP’s voted for Margaret Thatcher. Alexander’s doing really well here.

    Reply
  10. heedtracker says:

    A new Scottish income tax! oooh Mr Alexander you spoil us.

    Reply
  11. Joe Swan says:

    muttley79

    Try TV Catchup App.

    Reply
  12. fred blogger says:

    a2
    just listened to forsythe.
    well worth listening to, they are in disarray.

    Reply
  13. Marian says:

    Lard Michael Forsyth was interviewed by Eddy Mair on R4 at 5pm ref the YouGov poll.

    This covers the essence of what he claimed:-

    He claimed the YouGov poll was all wrong and that No would still win because of the votes of the silent majority who were not being heard yet as they were being intimidated by their vote NO posters being torn down!

    He also claimed that Alastair Darling was doing a great job and that it was a disgrace that the BBC had been so biased at the Salmond/Darling debate last week that they allowed that AlicSammin to shout down Darling so much that he couldn’t get to speak to get across his points about how great the union was for Scotland and the rest of the UK!

    He acknowledged that Labour were struggling in Scotland and claimed that this was because the “Nationalists” were making it very difficult for Labour because they had adopted the role of Labour in fighting the Tory Party over issues like the NHS etc.

    He also claimed that there was no need for David Cameron to intervene to save the UK as nothing needed to be done by him as everything was going according to plan!

    It was good to hear that all is well in La La Land!

    Reply
  14. Bruce says:

    First time I’ve felt compelled to comment here. Even though it’s the BBC you could see the presenter gamely trying to coax some kind of meaningful analysis out of those two but my god it must’ve felt like kicking two wet mattresses down the beach! That was toe-curlingly difficult to watch.

    Reply
  15. fred blogger says:

    CameronB Brodie
    all the brown ale you can drink.

    Reply
  16. Lesley-Anne says:

    Shock Horror!

    Boy I’m glad that guy was in the audience, if we vote YES the Barnett formula goes! Well I never, best think seriously about voting NO then. 😛

    Reply
  17. muttley79 says:

    Apologies for swearing but this STV live Player or whatever it is, is absolutely fucking useless. Either that or I am doing something wrong…

    Reply
  18. Lesley-Anne says:

    Well I never, wee Douggie quoting the IFS which just coincidently is run by none other than his brother in law!

    Reply
  19. msean says:

    Lord Forsyth,is that the guy who ruled Scotland for Maggie without a mandate? The one who called Mr Salmond,who has a mandate, the king of Scotland /dictator or something?

    Reply
  20. muttley79 says:

    Anyone got some advice about watching this debate on STV Player before I smash my PC up?..

    Reply
  21. msean says:

    Lol,shouldn’t have had this referendum line.

    Reply
  22. Joe Swan says:

    muttley79

    It’s not you it is sh..

    Reply
  23. muttley79 says:

    @Joe

    Is it down again? Christ sake…

    Reply
  24. The Rough Bounds says:

    All these cracks(!) about eggs reminds me of the old First World War joke about the Scots soldiers in the trenches in France.

    The sergeant tells Wullie ‘Nip ower tae yon fermhoose Wullie an’ get us a couple o’ eggs…here’s the money.”

    ”But Sergeant, Ah dinnae speak French.”

    ”Och, it’s nae bother laddie. Ye jist say ‘Twa oofs’, they’ll gie ye three, and ye gie them wan back”

    Reply
  25. Marian says:

    What I recall of Thatchers poodle Michael Forsyth when he was Scottish Secretary was that he always appeared to be wanting to punish Scotland for something but never quite got round to explaining exactly what it was they were to be punished for.

    Reply
  26. Lesley-Anne says:

    Amazed that Douglas Alexander thinks that using the pound without CU means we would be using a FOREIGN currency. What a numpty!

    Reply
  27. fred blogger says:

    Lesley-Anne
    my calender must be wrong, sounds like STV are in pantomime season!

    Reply
  28. Joe Swan says:

    If it’s Yes which currency option would you support?

    What is YOUR plan B Duggie? That was the question.

    So no plan A or plan B if it’s a Yes. Hmmmm.

    Reply
  29. bookie from hell says:

    Woman on NO side said YES wasn’t about Independence but Devo Max

    nice

    Reply
  30. muttley79 says:

    How is the debate going? STV have a lot to answer for, their live Player is utterly, utterly shit, and they have Hothersall all over their live updates page, puke! 😀

    Reply
  31. Lesley-Anne says:

    You noticed Fred. Well in all honesty what did you expect with wee Dougie Alexander, Kezia Dugdale, Ruth Davidson up against Nicola Sturgeon, new granny Elaine C. Smith and Patrick Harvie!

    It will be a BLOODBATH! 😛

    Reply
  32. Simon Brodie says:

    You go right ahead and build Hadrians wall again love,I’m sure the people 60 miles inside England might need a job. It’s nowhere near the border.

    Reply
  33. msean says:

    Yes,poverty exists in England too,problem is,they keep voting Tory. They can change it too if they wish.

    Luckily,we can and will change this.

    Reply
  34. muttley79 says:

    Finally got it to work. The old saying careful for what you wish for, as the wretched Kezia Dugdale is on…

    Reply
  35. Thepnr says:

    Elaine C Smith hammering Dugdale 🙂

    Reply
  36. CameronB Brodie says:

    Marian
    Not being English?

    Reply
  37. Thepnr says:

    Every single Slab MSP and MP reads Wings. They must, they are compelled and they are demoralised!

    Well done the Rev and Wingers.

    Reply
  38. David Stevenson says:

    Kezia has been to Finland. Don’t the Finns run their own country?

    Reply
  39. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    “Get to the back of the bus and vote Labour!”

    Elaine is the new Margo.

    Reply
  40. David Stevenson says:

    The old subsidy junkie line again…. The crowd don’t like it….. Boundaries and constitutions line repeated ad infinitum by Dugdale and batted away by the amateur….

    Reply
  41. Lesley-Anne says:

    Sounds like an undecided just moved closer to a YES vote there. 😉

    Reply
  42. msean says:

    Elaine C. Smith speaking very well here,and talking real sense.

    Reply
  43. muttley79 says:

    @David Stevenson

    Dugdale really is a piece of work, a shameless careerist.

    Reply
  44. Scotsbob says:

    Kez is just giving a party political broadcast for Labour, it’s her vote Labour speech

    Reply
  45. geeo says:

    Dugdale is being handed her arse by mary doll !!!

    Was that ” i just dont agree” from dugdale a help me rhona moment ?

    Reply
  46. Lesley-Anne says:

    Boy Elaine certainly has the passion there tonight as against being totally bored with Kezia dugdale!

    Reply
  47. Joe Swan says:

    Bernard is going to have to howk Elaine she is going for her big style.

    Naw to hell with it .. wire in Elaine.

    Reply
  48. Luigi says:

    Elaine on fire tonight. What a rabble rouser!

    Brilliant.

    Reply
  49. sinky says:

    Get to the back of the bus and shut up lol

    Reply
  50. Jim says:

    link to player.stv.tv

    Reply
  51. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    “If this is the best of both worlds, then Goad help us”

    Yeehah.

    Reply
  52. CameronB Brodie says:

    Any signs of pitchforks yet? 🙂

    Reply
  53. Lesley-Anne says:

    Defence is up next, Patrick Harvie against Ruth Davidson. Come on Patrick follow Elaine’s lead we want PASSION! 😛

    Reply
  54. bookie from hell says:

    Dugdale sounds like a robot,stats on stats

    Reply
  55. Joe Swan says:

    Kezia “So here’s the thing. Blah Blah .. race to the bottom.

    Stay there Kezia.

    Second tag round to Yes.

    Reply
  56. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    @ Lesley-Anne

    She’ll be on a hiding to nothing with Trident.

    Reply
  57. Kezia Dugdale is the personification of why I will never vote Labour again.

    Reply
  58. john macdonald says:

    Leave Dubai for Scotland tomorrow morning to do what I can to help realise a lifetime cause. Several jobs lined up with like-minded old mates but still plenty spare time. If any Wingers need more hands on deck or feet on the ground, count me in. I’d love to meet you in person after so many months of sharing these posts and pages. Email: john (at) trimediame (dot) com. We were ploughing a relatively lonely independence furrow 50 years ago when producing the Highland Nationalist monthly newspaper. Anyone left who remembers? Does it matter. Rev Stu and the current non-MSM generation have carried the banner so much further. Otherwise I would not be on a plane to Glasgow tomorrow.

    Reply
  59. geeo says:

    Maybe its just me but without the ability to just be all angry and shouty, BT are looking as piss weak as a cheap tesco teabag in a swimming pool.

    Taxi for Dugdale!!!!!

    Next !!!

    Reply
  60. Midgehunter says:

    Nicola and Elaine are both giving Scotland a future and boy are they passionat 😉

    Reply
  61. heraldnomore says:

    Is it just me or is Paddy looking better than Ruthie?

    Did I just say that? More tea vicar.

    Reply
  62. bookie from hell says:

    Davidson praising tony blair

    #sickbag

    Reply
  63. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    Harvie won the first exchange hands down.

    Reply
  64. Famous15 says:

    Dugdale goes large on Corporation Tax and a race to the bottom.International experience proves her wrong. If only the Brits collected the damned tax owed they would not have a problem.

    Dugdale on “cuts” in college courses. Not one hour has been cut by the Scottish Government but brief and lightweight courses were turned into more solid courses,but heyho Labour have a sound bite just as they have with the living wage is mere posturing. Nail this crap!

    Reply
  65. geeo says:

    heraldnomore says:
    Is it just me or is Paddy looking better than Ruthie?

    Did I just say that? More tea vicar”.
    Think i would rather wake up next to Patrick!

    Reply
  66. heraldnomore says:

    Looking like 3-0 in this one.

    That’ll be another score draw then

    Reply
  67. Joe Swan says:

    FFS Ruth are you suggesting nuking Ukraine?

    Putin’s back in town. GAFG hen.

    Reply
  68. Lesley-Anne says:

    Has anyone ever such utter gumph as Davidson just made. Once Putin has finished with Ukraine he’ll be coming after Scotland. The look on Patrick Harvie’s face was a real picture! 😉

    Reply
  69. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    @ geeo

    I think you have more chance of waking up next to Patrick…

    Reply
  70. Luigi says:

    Go Patrick!

    Reply
  71. msean says:

    Mr Harvie is seems to be our third winner tonight already. Very clear views.

    Reply
  72. geeo says:

    Taxi for Ruthie…”Putin is coming”…Comedy gold.

    Reply
  73. bookie from hell says:

    Duncan Hothersall

    Not sure I’m quite with Ruth Davidson that we need nukes to defend against Putin. A bit Dr Strangelove. #scotdecides

    Reply
  74. The Scottish Government wouldn’t need to make choices about college places if it wasn’t for the austerity agenda that the Labour Party are fully committed to. If we control our own finances, the choices become less difficult.

    Reply
  75. Joe Swan says:

    My lie detector has just overheated.

    Reply
  76. TD says:

    Did Ruth Davidson just say that the Tories are not going to win the General Election next year?

    Reply
  77. geeo says:

    @conan, you huvnae seen my pretty face…lol

    Ah widnae touch ruthie if she was into guys anyway !

    Reply
  78. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    “Kezia Dugdale is the personification of why I will never vote Labour again.”

    It’s like New Labour have a production line constantly churning out horrendous Blair clones who clearly haven’t the faintest idea that sincerity and the truth do actually matter A GREAT DEAL MORE than westminster spin.

    Ruth Davidson is proving to be another vapid talking head given a few spin lines and expecting that to somehow see her through. Harvie sounds like he means it in his heart, while the somewhat comical Ruth sounds well out of her depth and just like Cameron’s talking head placewoman. Which of course she is.

    Reply
  79. balaaargh says:

    Forget the recycling of the old lies, what’s Ruthie on about with this no central bank?

    Reply
  80. Joe Swan says:

    Is that a second comment from the same No guy? Why? There’s a big audience there.

    Reply
  81. boris says:

    Scare stories routinely surface that an Independent Scotland would see it’s universities starved of research funding. The attached says otherwise

    link to caltonjock.com

    Reply
  82. clochoderic says:

    Did wee Ruth just write a “tories will not win the next election” headline there?

    Reply
  83. CameronB Brodie says:

    Pushed for a response recently, one senior pro-UK strategist could not have been blunter – people with mattresses in their gardens do not win elections.

    Oh do you really think so?

    link to blogs.telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  84. Robert Peffers says:

    @Brotyboy says: 2 September, 2014 at 12:07 pm:

    So this; ‘ The rather well tanned male broadcaster‘ isn’t racist? He’s black and you call him well tanned and it’s not racist?

    Oh!Stop talking utter crap! I’m sort of pinkish – so if you call me a white man when I’m not actually white are you being racist? I’m only 5’4” tall, if you call me wee are you being sizeist? The guy’s actually brown, not black, if he was green it wouldn’t make a whit of difference. There’s only one race in this World – it is called The Human Race and good, bad or indifferent, we’re aa Jock Tamson’s bairns and if you knew a tiny bit of what you were talking about you would know that the the people most likely to call another person, “Nigger”, are the coloured people themselves.

    Racism has nothing whatsoever to do with a person’s colour nor has it anything to do with what country they belong to. It quite simply is one person attempting to imply that, due to colour, ethnicity, religion, sex, height, bulk or mental capacity, or any other factor, another person is inferior to themselves. You might as well say that it is racist to call a person a blonde, a redhead, ginger or whatever. I do not give a damn what another person is physically – as far as I am concerned that person is neither inferior or superior than myself or any other person.

    There is ONLY one characteristic that makes a person worse than another – how they behave towards other people.

    Reply
  85. Training Day says:

    The Russians are coming.

    Or a sizeable attack coming ‘from anywhere’. That’s right, ‘from anywhere’. Rigel 7?

    Reply
  86. TD says:

    clochoderic

    That’s what I thought I heard.

    Reply
  87. Tinyzeitgeist says:

    “To vote no is to choose to live under a political system that sustains one of the rich world’s highest levels of inequality and deprivation. This is a system in which all major parties are complicit, which offers no obvious exit from a model that privileges neoliberal economics over other aspirations. It treats the natural world, civic life, equality, public health and effective public services as dispensable luxuries, and the freedom of the rich to exploit the poor as non-negotiable.” George Monbiot
    link to theguardian.com

    Reply
  88. heraldnomore says:

    geeo, leave off, oh he’s mine tonight; it’s Ruthie for you chum.

    Go Paddy

    Reply
  89. Labour defending Tory cuts and privatisation, a Tory saying they are not going to win the GE in an effort to stop a Yes surge. We have truly gone through the looking glass. Sic a parcel o’ rogues.

    Reply
  90. geeo says:

    Lol…big hard sojur getting handed his arse now, go yersel man !

    Reply
  91. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Some had better mention Iraq soon as this is getting ridiculous.

    Reply
  92. David Stevenson says:

    Ruthie using her OTC background….. Still no threat identified. Para guy full of shit. Checked shirt guy in tune with the crowd. Hope this is reflective of the nation. If so, we’ve got this.

    Reply
  93. Chic McGregor says:

    Dugdale not a hardline Unionist? Still cleaning the coffee off.

    Reply
  94. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Good, though you could have just said IRAQ LIES Patrick as that soon shuts up the warmongers and chickenhawks.

    Reply
  95. CameronB Brodie says:

    Robert Peffers
    Robert, please don’t spend all night replying to posts you do not agree with. If you want to do that, might I suggest you post your comment in Quarantine as Off Topic is WBB space right now.

    Reply
  96. Training Day says:

    @Sinclair Macleod

    Beat me to it. Davidson endorsing Labour at the GE to try and stop a Yes vote. Red Tory, Blue Labour.

    Reply
  97. heraldnomore says:

    Gosh, was that last word to the NawBags at the end of each session? Surely not…

    Reply
  98. CameronB Brodie says:

    Rigel 7?
    🙂

    Reply
  99. bookie from hell says:

    yes ruth did say Tories won’t win next election

    Reply
  100. heedtracker says:

    Ruthie babes cringe factor’s a lethal weapon. The UK.gov has decimated Scottish military capacity but at least a Tory girl is proud of the Black Watch.

    Reply
  101. geeo says:

    My my, the 2 big hard guys looked Soooo angry, good job they were patted down for eggs..

    This format is quite good, and it is utterly killing BT.

    Reply
  102. Big Del says:

    Big Ruthie ” I watched Scottish soldier’s stopping bullets in Kosovo”. Eh?? I was there never seen a bullet proof man in my 2 tours.

    PS I love Elaine C.

    Looking forward to the ” fourth half” everyone?

    Reply
  103. heraldnomore says:

    There is a snap poll at the end of this isn’t there?

    Reply
  104. cearc says:

    Conan,

    Will anybody remember who they woke up next to in National Hangover Week?

    Reply
  105. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    A paratrooper trying to think, talk and breathe at the same time…

    Reply
  106. geeo says:

    “And then you Win”

    Imagine the next poll after this stunning Yes performance.

    Reply
  107. Midgehunter says:

    The Scot defence force needs the means to defend Scotland and that means jobs – not nukes.

    Not sure that a green is best to represent defence.

    Reply
  108. HandandShrimp says:

    Dougie is a bit bland isn’t he?

    Reply
  109. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    If it was Quinie from Angus I hope I’d remember 🙂

    I certainly wouldn’t forget Paula Rose…

    Reply
  110. heedtracker says:

    What does 10% tax variation mean though Mr Alexander? Shut up, vote NO

    Reply
  111. msean says:

    Team Tory lol. Canny beat it 🙂

    Reply
  112. heraldnomore says:

    Ah, move over Patrick, here comes wee Nic and Mary Doll

    Reply
  113. msean says:

    He sounds like a Toff actually.

    Reply
  114. Joe Swan says:

    Ruthie going for the silver surfers with that shameless plug.

    Reply
  115. heraldnomore says:

    Wrong Ruth, it’s walking away from the UK f*cking us up, I’m sure you meant to say

    Reply
  116. Lesley-Anne says:

    Holly Molly! Independence kills Devolution stone dead! WHIT are you sure? in that case it’s a definitive YES from me then!

    Who told Davidson that independence would kill devolution stone dead is a liar. 😛

    Reply
  117. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Patrick is damn good. Incidently he is rated very highly by the scottish public. Must be why the loathesome Dugdale is trying to smear him and put words in his mouth.

    Reply
  118. Lesley-Anne says:

    Oh boy, here’s Dugdale rabbiting on about something or other.

    Get in there Elaine. Get stuck in! push their buttons they have no answers! 😛

    Reply
  119. Joe Swan says:

    Go Patrick. he’s got the audience.

    Kez double whammed by Elaine there.

    Reply
  120. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    “The people delivered the Parliament”

    Elaine for President.

    Reply
  121. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Now Elaine is on fire. Very nice. Why should anyone trust westminster indeed? LOL 😀

    Reply
  122. Robert Kerr says:

    I am confused. Wee Douggie is wearing a blue tie. I was led to believe he was a red tory.

    This debate is superb with the sound muted.

    Reply
  123. Archie [not Erchie] says:

    @ Lesley-Anne 9:14pm – Totally agree PH’s face said it all. On top of that the groan from the audience was if I can borrow your words [ahem] [cough] deafening. 🙂

    Reply
  124. Lesley-Anne says:

    Absolutely Archie [not Erchie] Nice to see the NAW side still trying to treat the audience and viewers as numpties. The only problem for them is WE are not numpties THEY are the numpties!

    Reply
  125. Ian Brotherhood says:

    Let me get this straight…

    Ruth Davidson believes that Vlad Putin is going to destroy Ukraine, and after he’s done so, his next target will be Scotland, and that’s why we need Trident – so we can nuke Russia?

    Mmmmkay…

    Joy Division, ‘She’s Lost Control’ –

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  126. bluedog says:

    Here’s the latest from the EU, see attached correspondence:

    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  127. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Wee Duggy pretending to understand about social justice again. Very bizarre and about as convincing as his boss Miliband.

    Reply
  128. ronnie anderson says:

    @ ConanTL & speaking of oor Paula Rose where is she she canny be canvasing at this time of night.

    Reply
  129. Black Douglas says:

    No Bluedug 👿 its the latest from the Torygraph. Yawn!!

    Reply
  130. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Dugdale having the gall to talk about poverty and who is getting richer while westminster MPs vote themselves through an 11% pay rise. Utterly clueless.

    Reply
  131. msean says:

    Walk away,its forever. Now she’s getting the hang of it lol.

    Reply
  132. Midgehunter says:

    The YES side is positive and looking for answers and not talking everything down.

    Kezia wants more funding for councils to weaken the snp SG, keep the troughers in cash.

    Reply
  133. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    @ Ronnie

    Tartan Tory’s no here either…

    Reply
  134. Kezia get on message. Tougher than the Tories on welfare. Oh wait… That’s for a different constituency.

    Reply
  135. Joe Swan says:

    Patrick I love you man.

    Brilliant.

    Reply
  136. cearc says:

    Ronnie,

    Polishing her heels for the final assault?

    PS. I shall be wearing your blue rose from CH1 on my hat at the Highland count.

    Reply
  137. Midgehunter says:

    Go Harvey go… 🙂

    Reply
  138. Thepnr says:

    Patrick Harvie too political in the closing debate. Elaine should have been chosen. That was my only disappointment.

    Reply
  139. dennis mclaughlin says:

    Well said Patrick Harvie,from the heart works for me and the studio audience too!.

    Reply
  140. cearc says:

    Conan,

    Whooo…

    Big, back seat of the Bentley!!

    Reply
  141. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    Elaine best obviously. Ruth tried to justify Trident: worst.

    Reply
  142. Chic McGregor says:

    What is Kezia’s real first name?

    Reply
  143. mr thms says:

    #bluedog says:

    Here’s the latest from the EU, see attached correspondence:

    link to telegraph.co.uk

    ………………………………………………

    When the Treaty of Union is terminated, Scotland will also be a continuing state and inherit the treaties of the old UK.

    Reply
  144. Chic McGregor says:

    Good finish from Patrick.

    The troughers have nothing but vitriol, lies and weird logic.

    Oh and they all seem so happy within themselves – not.

    Reply
  145. Onwards says:

    This “We walk away FOREVER” line is interesting.

    Not strictly true, because we could vote for a new union if everyone wanted that.

    The real reason is because the unionists know that Scots would never WANT to give up our independence !!

    Just like every other country that gained their freedom from Westminster.

    Reply
  146. ronnie anderson says:

    @cearc hhiv you still got that,ah thing a couple of rooster feathers would be nice in your hat lol,an paula Rose will be jelous of you if your running around in Tartan Torys bentley
    lol

    Reply
  147. Midgehunter says:

    3 – 0 for YES, but still some opportunities lost.

    Nicola, when DA says Scots get 1200 quid more – suggesting we’re subsidised – why say we put more in instead of ramming home that we PAY 1700 quid in.

    Hit them with facts baby!!

    Reply
  148. ronnie anderson says:

    Ah know a man that knows, Thepnr where’s Paula Rose.

    Reply
  149. CM says:

    Dugdale is Scottish Labour’s “Education Secretary”? Hell’s teeth, she spoke like fullstops were never invented.

    Reply
  150. bookie from hell says:

    ITV saying SNP currency union is facing a setback

    will wait to see what it is

    Reply
  151. Jim McIntosh says:

    I’m not sure Davidson mentioning Putin and Ukraine was hinting that

    1. Scotland might be next if we gave up our nukes – which is laughable
    2. If Ukraine had not disarmed they could have nuked Russia to prevent invasion – which is really scary logic.

    Jesus she is in our parliament.

    Reply
  152. john king says:

    Anyone notice Davidson describing Faslane as “the biggest single site employer in Scotland”?

    Reply
  153. Ann says:

    That closing speech by Patrick Harvie was exceptional.
    He wasn’t just speaking with emotion and passion to the camera, but straight to us watching viewers.

    Absolutely brilliant.

    Have to say that this debate was 100% better than STV’s first one.

    Reply
  154. Ann says:

    Oh! and Elaine C Smith, definately filling the boots of Margo. So full of passion that one.

    Put her in a ring with Dugdale and Wishart and she would have wiped the floor with them without breaking into a sweat

    Reply
  155. Big Del says:

    Totally agree midgehunter 3-0, Elaine was outstanding and I bet won us quite a few votes. Well done to team Scotland out there.

    Reply
  156. geeo says:

    I think PH was a good choice to sum up at the end.
    As soon as he stood up, stepped forward and announced quietly..”i am a not a nationalist”, he had the room.

    Reply
  157. Big Del says:

    geeo, good point.Are you on onef??

    Reply
  158. Ann says:

    Sorry that should be Davidson. Where on earth did I dig up Ruth Wishart from!

    Reply
  159. Findlay Farquaharson says:

    Ann, i knew you meant davidson.

    Reply
  160. Colin Church says:

    Is there another post debate poll? Would be interesting. YES engagement +++ vs NO pontificating +++. Douglas Alexander sanctimonious and Kieza Dugdale clueless (even having pretendy cribbed on Shettleston). Surely worth another percent.

    Reply
  161. BigRik says:

    Usual guff from Ruthie …. in a nutshell , bombing civilians in a foreign country is defending this one.She is just missing baggy trousers and giant shoes.

    Reply
  162. HandandShrimp says:

    I will be interested to see what sort of draw it was 🙂

    The applause at the end clearly went with Patrick and Yes.

    Reply
  163. Findlay Farquaharson says:

    A over promoted wannabe tory telling us to vote no.

    Reply
  164. Colin Church says:

    Sitting down thing much better. Remember that format when Dewar, Lang, ?Beith and Salmond went head to head. Really nice touch that YES moved first across stage to shake hands (offer commiserations!).

    Reply
  165. Bob Sinclair says:

    Did a wee bit of canvassing tonight. An uplifting experience, sure, there were Naws, but not many.

    Got chatting to a lovely woman who was undecided because ‘all politicians are the same’ and she then went on to talk about how we should run our own affairs, how we could & should be in charge of our own destiny. I suggested to her that I thought she really wanted to vote yes and whipped out our (not so) secret weapon & explained that the facts & figures in the WBB were in the main UK government figures. I’d say she’s a 8-9 now. What a buzz.

    Evening’s figures discounting undecideds look to be around 75% YES.

    Just loving these last few weeks thanks to the long, tireless and mainly uncredited hard work of others who deserve all the credit and thanks we can give them.

    Reply
  166. McTim says:

    No supporters in the audience ill-behaved again. Ponsonby should have reined them in. Disgraceful stuff from the Unionists. Good retort by Patrick Harvie to the idiot pretending we’re facing another invasion as to where that invasion is coming from. Maybe it’s just me but I got the impression that the audience was not buying the spiel from Team Tory about new powers at all. I think this debate might not give us as big a boost as last week’s demolition of Flipper by Eck but it’ll solidify our support. 52% to 48% in the next few polls, anyone?

    Reply
  167. BigRik says:

    Dougie trying to claim that it was the SLAB that “gave” us the Scottish Parliament…. strange , i was at the first meetings of Scotland United and i can’t seem to recall him there. Once the bandwagon got moving , yes ,then it was hijacked .

    Reply
  168. cearc says:

    Ronnie,

    Yep, sure do.

    I attached it to the dashboard of my car for the long drive home (eating the sweeties) and it is still there.

    So, never mind trident, there are serious decisions to make re. decorating my hat. Definitely some feathers as well. Probably rooster and guinea fowl, few tasteful badges etc.

    Most important of all. Which hat?

    Reply
  169. BigRik says:

    A Peer Stalker surely 🙂

    Reply
  170. Stevie boy says:

    Please again if anyone can donate to Will McLeod to get the total to $5000.. almost at $3000 now!

    Reply
  171. McTim says:

    O/T but a column by George Monbiot guaranteed to make the Unionists either cry or seethe with anger, and it’s in the fucking Grauniad of all places. Someone must have slipped a sleeping bill in Alan Rusbridger’s coffee.

    link to theguardian.com

    Reply
  172. McTim says:

    meant, sleeping pill.

    Reply
  173. David Stevenson says:

    The thing that struck me about that debate was that the audience seemed to be “ordinary people”, i.e not overly party-affiliated. As a result, the questioning and responses from the audience were much more real. And the good thing about that was that they seemed more impressed by our guys! Lib Dems must be viewed as poison for the Naws if Alexander was the better option for them.

    Reply
  174. galamcennalath says:

    geeo says:
    “As soon as he stood up, stepped forward and announced quietly..”i am a not a nationalist”, he had the room.”

    The three NaeSayers at different times stuck to the narrative that it’s all Alec Salmond’s and the SNP’s fault. YesScotland, like all three Yes speakers, have moved a long way from that standpoint …. And so have most Scots.

    The NaeSayers had two strategies starting a year back.

    Firstly demonise AS and the SNP. That quickly became irrelevant in the real world. But they made the mistake of sticking with it, and still do.

    Secondly Project Fear. That had some success in slowing the leakage to the Yes side a few months back, but not so now. We saw more discredited Project Fear guff tonight. They are still trotting out old debunked arguments.

    Conclusion, Yes will continue to gain votes. On balance, this debate will have contributed to the flow.

    Reply
  175. BigRik says:

    They would have kept the LibDems away in case they offered to sign a pledge…

    Reply
  176. clochoderic says:

    Wee Doogie stil looks like the posh ba’faced, brylcreemed, blazer-wearing grass bastard prefect who gets all the badges and honours in the BB because his auld man is the minister.

    Nae wonder the country is in uproar when utter no-marks like Doogie can slither so far up the greasy pole. He has no history of ever saying anything illuminating or even memorable. His expertise seems to lie in his organisational skills – yet his track record is a catalogue of failure from his mishandling of elections in Scotland to internal politicking in the Labour party.

    Reply
  177. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    Kezia being tipped for the next Labour leader…

    “Bring it on” 🙂

    Reply
  178. dennis mclaughlin says:

    Kezia Dugdale fur Furst Minister……..yon guy’s aff his head! .

    Reply
  179. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Blair McDougall heaping praise on tory Ruth ‘the russians are coming’ Davidson.
    Not very bright, is he?

    LOL 😀

    Reply
  180. Findlay Farquaharson says:

    Dugstail is electable as lament.

    Reply
  181. McTim says:

    Please make Kezia the next Labour leader. If Allan Grogan and the LFI guys can create a new proper social democratic Scottish Labour Party in the aftermath of a Yes vote, Grogan & Co will overtake a Kezia Dugdale-led “Labour” party so fast that “Labour” will be relegated to a fringe party in the new independent Scotland and I can’t imagine greater justice for the pathetic lot running the party right now.

    Reply
  182. Post a Yes vote, the Blairites like Dugdale and Alexander will have to be banished from the Scottish Labour Party if it is ever again to be regarded as a serious force in Scotland. I won’t be holding my breath.

    Reply
  183. Ian Kirkwood says:

    That is the best one the boys at Dateline Scotland have done yet. Truly hilarious although the level of satire was a wee bit OTT at times.
    I am still shaking my head……

    Reply
  184. HandandShrimp says:

    The body language of the two Blairs after these debates gives away a lot. Blair McDougall was jubilant after the first Salmond Darling debate and has looked deflated since. He is still plugging away at the same scare stories though and heaping praise on Nuke’em High Ruthie.

    Was there any kind of poll taken on the audience?

    Reply
  185. McTim says:

    It was very telling that Dougie refused to engage with the question of whether Independence could be an opportunity to revitalise the Labour Party in Scotland. Given Dougie’s non-answer, they’ll remain in total denial of the need to reinvent themselves irrespective of the outcome of the vote. Someone else is going to have to step in fast after a Yes.

    Reply
  186. Clootie says:

    Well the two teams painted different picture of Scotland. I know which appealed to me.
    Only one team had passion and that was the YES team.

    Passion for change versus “sound bite” Labour politicians with their new Tory pal.

    Dugdale takes lying to a new level.

    Why do so many Scots have such a low opinion of their fellow countrymen’s abilities?

    Reply
  187. Thepnr says:

    @ronnie anderson

    Paula is fine, high heels a bit worn down with distributing the WBB.

    Reply
  188. Thepnr says:

    Every bookies odds shortened again after the debate. Best available now is 11/4.

    Westminster so called mandarins are muppets hahaha.

    Reply
  189. Iain Gray's Subway Lament says:

    Scotland Tonight trying to boil down the civil war in Iraq into simplistic nonsense. Do some fucking research and stop pretending this is only about ISIS when it quite obviously isn’t. What is it with the media and Iraq War’s?? Do they all empty their brains and memories before each new carnage filled phase of the Iraq catastrophe?

    Reply
  190. Paula Rose says:

    Oh gosh dears – just in after a rather exhilarating ride, anything happened?

    Reply
  191. Snootie_Paulo says:

    David Stevenson says:
    2 September, 2014 at 10:36 pm
    The thing that struck me about that debate was that the audience seemed to be “ordinary people”, i.e not overly party-affiliated.

    Except the former Labour Councillor from Embra who was concerned about local government spending?

    Reply
  192. darrener says:

    Dear me – more of the appalling ignorance of Scotland from the two women. I wonder if Penny Smith has ever set foot in Scotland. SHe seems to have learned how nasty the Yes people are from chatting to Scottish friends in England

    Reply
  193. Chic McGregor says:

    OT Re targeting dist of WBB.

    Leaflet I did which I’m delivering along with Yes newspapers.

    i.e. Prioritise those who want to know or who knows someone who does.

    link to dropbox.com

    Reply
  194. liz says:

    My take on the debate was – I thought Ruth Davidson did well.

    She believed in what she said and therefore was convincing.

    Wee Dougie and Kezia are Labour clones – talk mince and seem like your saying something.

    When Kez was banging on about the council tax she made it personal – Nicola has saved more than you – unforgivable and the audience was having none of it.

    Labour are desperate to move powers back to the cooncils and god help us if that happens.

    Dougie waffles on and no-one has a clue what he’s on about.

    Nicola was professional as usual and Elaine C was great -the only non-politician BTW.

    All in all – a good debate

    Reply
  195. Macsenex says:

    It’s getting very frustrating that YES spokesperson don’t challenge nonsense about Faslane closing. As a result of the management of the Base Helensburgh’s population has dropped by 2000 in the last ten years; house prices are 15% less than Bearsden’s or Newton Mearn’s and 85% of 3000 service personnel in the Base don’t live in Scotland so the local economy loses at least £60 million each year.

    Yes Helensburgh and Lomond has exposed the great lie of Faslane. We speak to folk in the Zbase and they confirm what we have exposed. It’s time for the YES leadership nationally to slap down any claim that the Base will clause or Helensburgh will suffer. The reverse is the case.

    Reply
  196. Midgehunter says:

    MacKay said post debate, Kez is one of the stars of the ref campaign…!

    Which leads to the question, how low is the quality of the NO side?

    Reply
  197. Chic McGregor says:

    Thought I’d asked earlier, but what does Kezia stand for? I mean her name. Is it for Catherine? or is it actually a name rather than a nickname. I’ve never heard of it before.

    Reply
  198. X_Sticks says:

    Midgehunter says:

    “how low is the quality of the NO side?”

    We were trying to think what labour MSPs we would throw a lifeline to after indy on twitter last night.

    We got stuck after two.

    Reply
  199. CameronB Brodie says:

    ain Gray’s Subway Lament
    The meeja are part of the war machine, IMO.

    Reply
  200. CameronB Brodie says:

    Sorry Iain Gray’s Subway Lament

    Reply
  201. X_Sticks says:

    Chic McGregor says:

    “but what does Kezia stand for?”

    Self gratification?

    Reply
  202. kendomacaroonbar says:

    @Chic

    I think it may be a Hebrew name.

    Reply
  203. Chic McGregor says:

    Oh right, Never heard of it before in my puff. Thought it might have been a new version of Kaz.

    Reply
  204. Jim says:

    @HandandShrimp
    Blair McDougall was jubilant after the first Salmond Darling debate and has looked deflated since.
    _________
    How in heavens name do you deflate something that big?

    Reply
  205. CameronB Brodie says:

    “how low is the quality of the NO side?”

    I think they might have to invent a new unit of measurement for that. 😉

    Reply
  206. kendomacaroonbar says:

    @Chic

    Could be a new version of a Honda Civic though..:-)

    Reply
  207. Free at 63! says:

    Chic,
    My 27-year-old daughter-in-law’s best friend is called Kezia and apparently it is a biblical name. New one on me too.

    Reply
  208. kininvie says:

    O/T

    WBB Distribution update.

    We are almost there. With a bit of luck and a following wind we shall have shifted the last of 230,000 copies out from the printers by this time tomorrow.

    Our hub managers all over Scotland are even now working to fulfill Wingers’ orders. Not everyone will get what they wanted – it can’t be helped. Demand outstrips supply. We are trying to put books into the hands of those who can get them to undecided voters as efficiently and as quickly as possible.

    Today, we re-stocked Glasgow and Edinburgh, delivered to Perth and Dunblane. Tomorrow we hit Fife, West Lothian & D&G. Arbroath continues to ship boxes to those far afield.

    From responses from our hubs, we now have WBB going out to Aberfoyle, Stirling, Perth, Aberfeldy, Carse of Gowrie, Dunkeld. They are in Dundee, Kirriemuir, Cambuslang, Strathpeffer…

    Indeed, they are spreading like a virus (copyright, you know who)

    Well done everyone….

    Reply
  209. Chic McGregor says:

    Kendo
    Nope, you’ve lost me there.

    Is there a car called Kezia?

    Reply
  210. Alan Mackintosh says:

    Jim,
    “How in heavens name do you deflate something that big?”

    Uh,very carefully…

    Reply
  211. Alan Mackintosh says:

    Kininvie, all Inverness pre-orders done

    Reply
  212. Free at 63! says:

    Got my WBB from a local SNP councillor today – don’t know where he got them. In the Yes shop we don’t ask – just take and distribute all Yes goods.

    Reply
  213. Chic McGregor says:

    Free
    Thought I was quite well up on biblical names i.e. of a generation which had to endure Sunday School, but no bells ringing on that one whatsoever.

    I thought like Kaz is used for Catherine, it might be for Catriona or Catherina or something like that.

    Defo scans like a nickname.

    Reply
  214. Thepnr says:

    CameronB Brodie says:

    “how low is the quality of the NO side?”

    I think they might have to invent a new unit of measurement for that.

    LOL loved that Cameron B, well an engineer would 🙂

    Reply
  215. Marco McGinty says:

    Murphy the Liar has just been interviewed by Andrew Neil on Newsnight, and he managed to utter the following statement;

    “Well Alistair Darling is leading this campaign really very effectively. He’s brought together a Labour Party, a Conservative Party, and Liberal Democrats, who normally punch one another on the nose.”

    What? Does that mean that before the referendum, those three parties planned and coordinated events in which to attack each other? Did these three parties organise aggressive mobs to intimidate rival parties and party members?

    Reply
  216. Marco McGinty says:

    @Thepnr @CameronB Brodie
    “how low is the quality of the NO side?”

    “I think they might have to invent a new unit of measurement for that.”

    Just keep it simple and call it the lie. 10 lies equals a Lamont, 25 a Dugdale, 50 a Murphy, 100 a Darling, 1000 a Cameron, rising in scale till you hit the million – the Thatcher!

    There is a degree of flexibility at the moment, but we could sort it all out after the 18th.

    Reply
  217. kendomacaroonbar says:

    @Chic

    Nah, I was just joshing.. (badly)

    Reply
  218. Thepnr says:

    @Marco McGinty

    “A Thatcher”

    That’s the money pocketed by the unscrupulous when awarding contracts during the privatisation of the NHS.

    Reply
  219. Papadox says:

    Well done Nicola, Elaine & Patrick you did us proud on STV debate tonight. You won hands down.

    Well done Alex you showed Sara how professional you are and did Scotland proud, Sara was out of her depth then some.

    Laugh of the night was the brain box on the STV debate who informed all and sundry that if we vote YES then we will lose the Barnett formula. Nae flies on him presume he is a naw. Priceless.

    Reply
  220. CameronB Brodie says:

    Thepnr
    I think the smallest unit starts interfering with one’s perception of time, but I’m just not sure if that will be enough. 🙂

    Reply
  221. CameronB Brodie says:

    Sorry, I meant when you get down to the scale of the smallest unit. Apparently you can get squillions of them into an atom. Like the Incredible Shrinking Man, only time starts to speed up, or slow down. I’m not sure if it will be enough though.

    Reply
  222. Chic McGregor says:

    Thepnr

    Wasn’t an Archer a £5000 bribe?

    Or was that Sarwar?

    Reply
  223. handclapping says:

    @Chic
    Keziah was one of the three daughters of Job that he got after his plagues.

    We’ve Kezia as one of ours

    Reply
  224. Marco McGinty says:

    @Thepnr
    “That’s the money pocketed by the unscrupulous when awarding contracts during the privatisation of the NHS.”

    Now, now, come on. Everyone must know by now that there will be no privatisation of the NHS. Various BT members have told us as much, endorsed by the media, so it must be true.

    Reply
  225. cearc says:

    Cameron,

    On a quantum scale everything they say can simultaneously be both a lie and a truth… until you look at it.

    Reply
  226. kininvie says:

    @alan Mackintosh

    Well done – keep up the good work! Been enjoying the pixs on Twitter!

    Reply
  227. msean says:

    Saw that Mr Alexander kens folk in Brussels. We have our own currency Mr Alexander,its called The Pound.

    Reply
  228. h_johnny says:

    I know you love having a laugh at these videos, can we not just ignore them though? Who gives a f what Penny Smith thinks, she is utterly brainless.

    It’s a distraction, we could be concentrating on more important things.

    Yes just handed No their arses tonight(again). Patrick Harvie was great. I love Mary Doll even more.

    Reply
  229. CameronB Brodie says:

    cearc
    I think you’ve crcked it. 😉 We don’t have a clue what No Better Together Thanks are on, but I suspect it’s hardcore De Broglie–Bohm theory. :0

    Reply
  230. Thepnr says:

    Hello h_johnny

    I don’t think we should ignore them, I think we should make them more available to everyone who will vote in the referendum. Why?

    Take my wife instance, hasn’t been at interested until say start of August even though I’m the opposite.

    Well believe me my wife is a very polite women and at one point watching this this she actually ah FFS. She does not do this in normal circumstances.

    Don’t forget if anyone can persuade her mother to vote Yes rather than No. It will be her.

    My view, just you keep supplying the ammunition Rev and we will deliver it. Words are more powerful than bombs!

    Reply
  231. CameronB Brodie says:

    Oops 🙂

    The de Broglie–Bohm theory, also known as the pilot-wave theory, Bohmian mechanics, the Bohm or Bohm’s interpretation, and the causal interpretation, is an interpretation of quantum theory. In addition to a wavefunction on the space of all possible configurations, it also postulates an actual configuration that exists even when unobserved

    link to en.wikipedia.org

    Reply
  232. Thepnr says:

    Note to self, stop typing so fast and read before posting. Bedtime, goodnight all.

    Reply
  233. Chic McGregor says:

    handclapping

    lol

    Reply
  234. geeo says:

    @big del.

    I am indeed a onef legend.
    A land of 2 trolling nawbags and possibly one or 2 more soft No’s.
    Onef for independence..

    Reply
  235. Chic McGregor says:

    Kendo

    “Nah, I was just joshing.. (badly)”

    At last I sussed it. Kaz = Cars right?

    Sorry, us auld yins still pronounce cars as Karrrrrz. So never made the connection.

    Reply
  236. CameronB Brodie says:

    I hope there might be a quantum physicist amongst us, who could confirm that it is only possible to postulate the existence of a positive case for the Union, if you use the de Broglie–Bohm theory to interpret the universe?

    Alternatively, beam me up Scotty. 🙂

    Reply
  237. geeo says:

    41.

    All you need to know about everything.

    Sorted.

    Reply
  238. Ken500 says:

    Scotland might agree to giving Westminster a loan, if they keep out of trouble. The murdering, troughing, greedy liars. Causing death and destruction the world over.

    The hostages are being killed because Westminster/US will not pay a ransom. The other European countries do.

    Reply
  239. Greannach says:

    735 comments on this item (mine is 736). This must be a record. I wonder if any MSM outlet gets this level of response.

    Reply
  240. Laura G says:

    Watching STV debate last night, the following exchange occurred. My Mum didn’t have her specs on:
    Mum: That’s never Teddy Taylor, is it.
    Dad: Too young. He died anyway, didn’t he?
    Mum: It is.
    Dad: He’s dead, Isobel.
    Me: It’s Douglas Alexander, the brother.
    Mum: Oh that windbag. Thought they got Teddy Taylor back to help them out.
    Dad: He’d do a better job and he’s dead.

    They were No till about a fortnight ago.

    Reply
  241. SquareHaggis says:

    @kendomacaroonbar,

    From earlier.

    I notice (unless it’s a spoof) that there’s a 200 quid donation from one Blair McDougall.

    Reply
  242. Jim says:

    @Ken500
    The hostages are being killed because Westminster/US will not pay a ransom. The other European countries do.
    _____
    This is a very difficult situation, do you pay a ransom then the terrorists kidnap someone else when they need money?
    Then you think, If it was my child then I would definitely want a ransom paid for their release. No easy answer.

    Reply
  243. Big Del says:

    @ Geeo. Aye I thought so. Read it everyday but not a poster. Totally agree you about the two trolls lol.

    Reply
  244. Will Podmore says:

    Handandshrimp wrote, “Then we can set about rebuilding the bridges and bringing people on board. Once we are independent most No voters will want to see Scotland do well.” So first you blow up the bridges, then you want to rebuild them. Save yourself the effort – don’t break down the bridges, don’t break up our country!
    No voters want Scotland to do well, that’s why we want it to stay part of Britain. Smaller is weaker, smaller is poorer.

    Reply
  245. Jim says:

    @Will Podmore
    First of all we wont be breaking up our country rather breaking away from the grip of Westminster.
    Secondly, we are not leaving Britain as we are a constituent part of the landmass.
    No voters I am sure want to see Scotland do well, why would they not and they can also do this as part of an independent Scotland. We are weaker as part of the UK when it doesn’t matter how we vote we will never get the Government we want unless the rUK are like minded because we are only 8% of the UK electorate when we would be 100% in an Independent Scotland.
    Scotland would be the 14th richest country in the World so poorer we will not be and even without oil as part of our revenue, Scotland would still qualify for a triple A credit rating according to the financial services company, standard and poor’s.

    Reply
  246. scunner says:

    Sorry if this has already been discussed, but did anyone watch Scotland 2014 after yesterday’s debate?

    Derek Ogg QC managed to be almost as patronising as the BT Woman.
    When asked whether he believed there was any widespread excitement outside the core independence movement (SNP):
    “I don’t sense any great excitement anywhere…”
    “I don’t think there’s a huge conversion going on… I don’t particularly trust the polls on this”

    On polling day with ballot paper and pen in hand:
    “I think a lot of people are going to be saying “It’s a pig in a poke – Nah” and they’ll vote No”.

    Is he that out of touch?

    Reply
  247. Rock says:

    Jim,

    “This is a very difficult situation, do you pay a ransom then the terrorists kidnap someone else when they need money?
    Then you think, If it was my child then I would definitely want a ransom paid for their release. No easy answer.”

    Westminster wouldn’t have any problem paying ransom if the Prime Minister’s son had been kidnapped for example, or a Royal.

    There is an easy solution: We should not be there.

    Reply
  248. Will Podmore says:

    Jim writes, “we are not leaving Britain as we are a constituent part of the landmass.” Oh really, do you seriously think that those who sincerely urge you not to leave Britain believe it’s about leaving the landmass?
    If you left, you would be leaving the British nation, of which we have all been parts since 1707.
    And yes, 8 per cent do not outvote 92 per cent.
    In the 1951 and 1955 elections, Scotland voted Conservative and got Conservative governments. Since the 1959 election, Scotland has voted Labour, and in the 1964 election, the 1966 election, the two 1974 elections, and the 1997, 2001 and 2005 elections, it got Labour governments. Many other parts of Britain have also consistently voted Labour, and have not always got their way. Should a minority of the British people decide the outcome of British general elections? Should a minority of the British people decide the shape, size and future of the whole British people? What is democratic about the Scottish minority of Britain’s population determining the future of the whole country, while the majority of us have no vote on the matter?
    We are all part of Britain. States have a legitimate interest in maintaining their territorial integrity. There is no general right to secession.

    Reply
  249. Caroline Corfield says:

    Will encapsulating the British as a nation perspective for us all.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,727 Posts, 1,215,168 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • PacMan on Mad caps: “To be fair, most of us where taken in by this be-Kind, inclusive, civic nationalism nonsense. Look where it is…Apr 7, 19:35
    • twathater on Mad caps: “@ Robert Hughes TBQH Robert I have more or less stopped responding tae these pricks , it is the same…Apr 7, 17:48
    • Jay on Mad caps: “I wonder what Belarusian govt would say if a US military vehicle drove across the border from Lithuania? Viv. OB,…Apr 7, 14:56
    • sarah on Mad caps: “Couch as in grass not as in putting ones feet up!Apr 7, 12:42
    • Mark Beggan on Mad caps: “Scottish media in panic about Universities and their subsequent bankruptcy. Page after page, comment after comment. Children are trapped in…Apr 7, 12:34
    • sarah on Mad caps: “The “age” question is interesting. Can you remember if younger people were very visible in the 2014 campaign? From memory…Apr 7, 12:03
    • agent x on Mad caps: “Not much in the Scottish press about Swinney’s trip to New York!Apr 7, 10:25
    • Vivian O’Blivion on Mad caps: “An excerpt from an article on the website of the Atlantic Council (see also Radio Free Europe); “Lithuanians paid tribute…Apr 7, 10:21
    • Aidan on Mad caps: “Exactly Robert – it’s full of people who rant and rave like you do. Nobody wants to be associated with…Apr 7, 08:56
    • Robert Hughes on Mad caps: “” it’s also that the campaign is too closely associated with anti-Englishness, sympathy for the Kremlin sometimes and increasingly wild…Apr 7, 08:25
    • Hatey McHateface on Mad caps: “Don’t overlook the ingrained antisemitism which a close read of the clannish, self-congratulatory backslapping posts reveals. But yes, if they…Apr 7, 07:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Mad caps: ““We voters would be in the driving seat – that would be wonderful” Would it though, sarah? In all of…Apr 7, 07:05
    • Aidan on Mad caps: “@Ian – as someone who is around half the age of the average suggested above, it’s not just that many…Apr 7, 07:03
    • Ian Brotherhood on Mad caps: “@Sarah (9.16) – Thanks for that and aye, totally agree, there’s nothing like meeting folk in the flesh. Sometimes they’re…Apr 7, 00:09
    • diabloandco on Mad caps: “IanB, I do hope so , I am definitely in need of meeting up with the cheerful , positive folk…Apr 6, 22:10
    • sarah on Mad caps: “MaryB, it is encouraging that you read para (a) the same way that I do i.e. that it empowers People’s…Apr 6, 21:27
    • sarah on Mad caps: “I miss the way btl was. It was always relevant to independence, and pleasant on a personal level. OK Robert…Apr 6, 21:16
    • MaryB on Mad caps: “Sarah @ 4.48 & Duncx I tried to post this earlier today, but it didn’t appear. So here it is…Apr 6, 21:07
    • Ian Brotherhood on Mad caps: “Hi D, Yes, it was good. Not just because the atmosphere was relaxed (because the Eagle Inn is Robert Slavin’s…Apr 6, 20:18
    • Tinto Chiel on Mad caps: “Had forgotten all about that, Robert. No idea what we were discussing. Love, Samantha 🙂 .Apr 6, 19:44
    • Ian Brotherhood on Mad caps: “Hoots aplenty sah, you’ve got me off the hook as Tinto was fingering me for that one! 😉Apr 6, 19:41
    • Aidan on Mad caps: “@Hatey – you aren’t supposed to look into things, you’re supposed to sign the petition and possibly donate money regardless…Apr 6, 19:39
    • diabloandco on Mad caps: “Sorry I missed the night too – it sounds as though a good time was had by all. Next time!Apr 6, 19:27
    • Robert Hughes on Mad caps: “ha ! you told me your name when you emailed me a while back – including your surname – which…Apr 6, 18:51
    • Tinto Chiel on Mad caps: “@Robert Hughes 3.23: nae probs, Robert. See you next time. Had to head off early. Don’t know how you know…Apr 6, 18:26
    • Hatey McHateface on Mad caps: “Please tell us, sarah, that when you say you haven’t had a proper look at this thing you are enthusiastically…Apr 6, 17:46
    • Mark Beggan on Mad caps: “The First Minister in crucial trade talks confirms someone, no knows who, is very much interested in business.Apr 6, 16:54
    • sarah on Mad caps: “@ Dunx at 8.46 a.m. “..had a look at the blog. Article 25 of the ICCPR…nothing there about referendums..” Well…Apr 6, 16:48
    • Robert Hughes on Mad caps: “Ah ! likewise , T.C ( Peter ): I never realised you were there , if I had I would…Apr 6, 15:23
    • Tinto Chiel on Mad caps: “Sorry I couldn’t stay long, Ian, but thanks for all the effort you and your fellow insurgents put in to…Apr 6, 14:56
  • A tall tale



↑ Top