The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A thing we just noticed

Posted on July 22, 2012 by

In the debate over whether the SPL buys the broadcast rights to SFL games featuring Rangers, we’ve just spotted a rather interesting quirk. Sevco Scotland Limited was accepted to the SFL as an Associate Member, and will not be eligible for full Member status for four years. Rule 19 of the SFL Constitution says:

“An Associate Member shall have no financial interest in the assets of the League and shall not be accorded any voting rights.”

We assume “the assets of the League” include its media rights. (Indeed, as far as we can see those would be pretty much the only assets jointly owned by the League.) Rule 19 would seem to suggest that if the SFL does want to sell “Rangers” games to the SPL – or indeed to anyone else – not only will the newco not be entitled to a vote on the matter, but it won’t be entitled to any of the money either.

We haven’t seen anyone else mention this. It seems quite significant.

(EDIT 23-7-12: See comments for SFL response.)

15 to “A thing we just noticed”

  1. Seb Co says:

    Or maybe your ‘assumption’ is just incorrect.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Or maybe your ‘assumption’ is just incorrect.”

      Feel free to suggest why.

      Reply
  2. andy_ek says:

    the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL”

      Pay attention, Andy. SFL membership != SFA membership. I know it’s all a bit hard to follow (follow), but try to keep up, eh?

      Reply
  3. Jim Torbett says:

    Err you seem to be forgetting our membership was transfered. We are not a new club.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Who is “we” in this case, Jim? I ask because you’ve given a “celticfc.net” email address, and also because NOBODY’S membership has been transferred anywhere as yet.

      Reply
  4. Appleby says:

    Amazing to see the passion and intrigue that this game inspires. And the gamer/computer geek types are meant to be bad but football seems worse. Rev Stu  makes a comment about a new team and the financial failings and drama of an old one and people take it very much personally.

    Reply
  5. FCF1983 says:

    Rangers are dead and don’t ever forget it ! Ha ha !

    Reply
  6. Christian Wright says:

     
    andy_ek says:
    July 22, 2012 at 3:05 pm

    “the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL “

    Clearly that is demonstrably false. Below is the first sentence of the statement released by Scottish Football League chief executive David Longmuir. A link to that statement is thoughtfully provided in the article. The truth shall set ye free, and is but a click away. I commend it to you.

    The member clubs of The Scottish Football League have today voted to willingly accept The Rangers Football Club as an associate member of The Scottish Football League.” (the emphasis is mine)

     

    Reply
  7. jimmyarab says:

    Newco are being treated as oldco by the SFA ( 12 month transfer ban etc) so I don’t think it’s worth getting excited about any further trangressions that occur.
    Newco shouldn’t even be in the SFL.
    Until the ‘leaders’ at the SFA and SPL resign then it’s not really worth following Scottish football as it’s totally corrupt and a dark stain on our country. A total waste of money.
    I watched the Open golf today and saw true sportsmanship and integrity.

    Reply
  8. Barbarian says:

    A few people (not here) are making the assumption that Newco will race up the leagues and get into the SPL in 3 years. They need to win Div 3 first…….

    Reply
  9. charlie says:

    i can’t see them doing that at the moment (and i suspect ‘coistie’ can’t either). I wonder how fast the fan base will evaporate on the second season in that division, I know Hibs would be in trouble if we hadn’t gone straight back up when we went down.

    cheers charlie

    Reply
  10. McHaggis says:

    Some of you obviously don’t watch too much div 3 games… I’ve seen Cowden through div 3, 2 and 1 and am fairly certain that the new Rangers will stroll div 3 and probably 2 as well. Div 1 will be tougher but by that time with spl just around the corner and a team being constructed for that purpose, it is likely they would be challenging at the top.

    Div 3 is very much a different game, but a combination of talented youth and one or two old guard should see them through. Seriously, div 3 is not that much better than the huffing and puffing fat part timers i see hoofing the ball in the Sunday league in my local park.

    Reply
  11. Doug Daniel says:

    “Seriously, div 3 is not that much better than the huffing and puffing fat part timers i see hoofing the ball in the Sunday league in my local park.”
     
    That just makes it even worse that Aberdeen have regularly been punted out of cup competition by such sides. How Aberdeen lost to Queen’s Park a few years ago I’ll never know.

    Reply
  12. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    I dropped the SFL a line this morning asking them to clarify Rule 19. They replied saying that “The ‘assets of the League’ relate to any financial assets should the SFL be wound up”. For super-extra clarity I mailed back saying “So not the media rights, then?”, and got another response reading “Wouldn’t have thought so”.

    Probably best if we file that one under “semi-authoritative”, then.

    😀

     

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,872 Posts, 1,235,601 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on A Stitch In Timing: “Must have struck a nerve eh, Prick? “This has driven right-wingers into a frenzy with completely false claims about the…Feb 6, 23:08
    • Hatey McHateface on A Stitch In Timing: “Sorry, Northy, but I couldn’t understand any of that. Please translate into Scots and re-post. Thanks in advance.Feb 6, 22:41
    • Hatey McHateface on A Stitch In Timing: “Woo Hoo, James manages to put both hands on his keyboard. Giving your usual hobby a night off, James? You…Feb 6, 22:39
    • Northcode on A Stitch In Timing: “The ancients – being the ancients – had a name for when words are used out of their ordained order…Feb 6, 21:40
    • James on A Stitch In Timing: ““….life changing injuries….” Yet more bollocks from the Site Prick. To quote Craig Murray; “The final question was the charge…Feb 6, 20:45
    • GM on A Stitch In Timing: “I see that argument quite clearly Lorna when you put it as you just have. There are plenty women in…Feb 6, 20:15
    • PC Foster on A Stitch In Timing: “Scottish Executive- correctFeb 6, 20:03
    • agentx on A Stitch In Timing: “They chose to be “activatists” let them fund it themselves.Feb 6, 19:41
    • Hatey McHateface on A Stitch In Timing: ““we are reminded here that: “colonialism is based on psychology”” Is that because it’s Friday, Alf? Seems like only Wednesday…Feb 6, 19:41
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Stitch In Timing: “Or Scottish Executive?Feb 6, 19:34
    • Hatey McHateface on A Stitch In Timing: ““finding none of the activists guilty on any of the charges” Given they committed burglary, assault and grievous bodily harm…Feb 6, 19:27
    • agentx on A Stitch In Timing: “We all know that Swinney stayed with Mandelson on his whisky trip to USA in Sep 25. I have done…Feb 6, 19:17
    • Lorna Campbell on A Stitch In Timing: “Alf: I know it will take a lot more than that. The point I was trying to make is that…Feb 6, 18:19
    • PC Foster on A Stitch In Timing: “It was always known as the Scottish Parliament. However the machinery was called the Scottish Administration until Salmond renamed it…Feb 6, 18:04
    • Willie on A Stitch In Timing: “Couldn’t help but reflect on the latest reports about our out beloved Labour party politico one Mr Peter Mandelson. Its…Feb 6, 17:40
    • Alf Baird on A Stitch In Timing: ““try to rehabilitate Scotland before independence” I suspect that’s not generally how decolonization and ‘self-recovery of culture’ works, which is…Feb 6, 17:18
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Stitch In Timing: “Re Sven. Point taken.Feb 6, 17:06
    • Alf Baird on A Stitch In Timing: ““Not the Crown” ? Hardly. The root of the despicable colonial situation is that elites in Scotland aye tak thair…Feb 6, 16:48
    • sarah on A Stitch In Timing: “Scottish court cases are hugely expensive, another obvious impediment to seeking “justice”. The case in the Scottish courts for a…Feb 6, 16:37
    • Sven on A Stitch In Timing: “Fearghas Macfhionnlaigh. My own view on that would be that by misnaming a devolved administration as a Parliament a clear…Feb 6, 15:24
    • Lorna Campbell on A Stitch In Timing: “With a heavy heart, I have to agree with you, Southernbystander, but not all Scots are anaesthetized by colonialism. Truth…Feb 6, 15:24
    • Lorna Campbell on A Stitch In Timing: “I’m not privy, GM, as you might imagine, to what the powers-that-be are up to, but I think that the…Feb 6, 15:12
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Stitch In Timing: “I would assume that Alex Salmond, and Winnie Ewing (‘The Scottish Parliament, which adjourned on March 25 1707, is hereby…Feb 6, 14:50
    • barelybare on A Stitch In Timing: “Thanks for the explanation am firinn. I have a feeling only the initiated are going to truly understand what is…Feb 6, 14:46
    • Alf Baird on A Stitch In Timing: “It is surely colonialism that makes a colonized people ‘dependent’. For “without colonialism there would be no colonized people” (Memmi).…Feb 6, 14:25
    • Alf Baird on A Stitch In Timing: ““a devolved administration” That’s what the colonizer calls it. To the colonized it is always a colonial administration.Feb 6, 13:47
    • Marie Clark on A Stitch In Timing: “Well said LornaFeb 6, 13:43
    • TURABDIN on A Stitch In Timing: “@ALANM. AIDAN, HATEY All true, the political classes, not just in Scotland & England, seem stacked with those who couldn’t…Feb 6, 13:28
    • Sven on A Stitch In Timing: “James Cheyne @ 12.59. Only initially renamed a ‘Parliament’ over a weekend owing to the vanity of Mr Salmond, “James”,…Feb 6, 13:18
    • James Cheyne on A Stitch In Timing: “If the parliament in Scotland today was a real Scottish parliament it would not have reserved matters restrictions placed on…Feb 6, 12:59
  • A tall tale



↑ Top