The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A good day to bury bad news

Posted on May 23, 2013 by

This story was on the front page of the Scotsman website when we were checking the papers at 7am. It’s now not only vanished from the front page, but from every index we can find. We tried finding it with the site’s Search function using the words in the headline, but none of them bring it up.

woolwich2

We eventually managed to locate it via Google, hidden two-thirds of the way down the Business page, but in case it gets deleted for good, you can find it below.

—————————————————————————————————

Next Chancellor must cut deeply, economists warn

By PETER RANSCOMBE
Published on 23/05/2013 00:00

WHOEVER wins the next general election will have to make deeper public sector cuts in order to avoid a “financial crisis” in which international money markets lose confidence in Britain, economists will warn today.

Measures introduced by Chancellor George Osborne in March’s Budget will help the economy to grow but will also mean that the deficit reduces more slowly, according to the Centre for Economic & Business Research (CEBR).

The think tank now believes the economy will grow by 0.9 per cent this year, compared with its previous estimate in February of 0.5 per cent, while 2014 will bring growth of 1.4 per cent instead of 1.2 per cent.

Douglas McWilliams, chief economist at the CEBR, said: “The good news is a welcome return to growth for the UK economy.

“The bad news is that the relaxation of the Chancellor’s austerity programme risks a ?financial crisis. And the chances of this happening would get higher if the markets think that the government after the next election gives reduced priority to getting the deficit down.”

McWilliams’ comments came a day after the International Monetary Fund (IMF) used its annual report on the UK to call for the coalition to boost infrastructure spending in order to stimulate faster economic growth.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) also showed public borrowing rose to £10.2 billion in April from £8.9bn a year earlier.

The coalition had aimed to eliminate the deficit by 2015 but has been forced to push its forecasts back by two years due to weak economic growth.

Separate ONS data showed UK retail sales fell by 1.3 per cent in April, with economists warning that – even with the cold weather and Easter falling in March this year – the UK economy “isn’t out of the woods yet”.

The CBI’s monthly industrial trends survey revealed that confidence is continuing to grow among manufacturing businesses, with output expected to grow strongly over the next three months.

—————————————————————————————————

For some curious reason, the story isn’t being presented as a blow to the “Stay in the UK” campaign in the independence debate. The headline isn’t “Business calls for more austerity if Scots vote No”. There is no demand for Alistair Darling or Michael Moore to answer the difficult questions about the uncertainty over the future of the economy under Westminster control which arise from the warning.

Odd, that.

26 to “A good day to bury bad news”

  1. Max says:

     
     
    If we don’t cut, cut and cut, and cut even more we will never be Better Together. 

    Reply
  2. mealer says:

    I think this reminds me that now is a very good time to choose independence.In the early days of independence,a wave of confidence and optimism and ambition will sweep over Scotland.The economic climate around the globe will mean that our ambitions are tempered a wee bit with a realisation that we’re best to move the country forward resolutely and sure footedly.Everyone together.

    Reply
  3. handclapping says:

    It goes to show that Gordo is right! We cannot allow the poor Liverpool granny to suffer alone the omni-shambles that is Westminster, we must gamely stand beside her and suffer too. We may be some time.

    Reply
  4. Robert Kerr says:

    Rev. This is not Off-Thread but a totally relevant comment on the above.
    The UK deficit still is a positive number. Therefore the total UK debt increases continuously. This debt either is repaid or defaulted upon or the interest payments continue for ever thus increasing the total UK debt for ever.
    I cannot see any politically acceptable solution in a democracy.
    The UK is broke and shall remain so for a very long time.
    Time to seriously think of the futures for Scotland…. oblivion or disconnection from the mess… 
    This is in my opinion the core argument for Independence.

    Reply
  5. Macart says:

    They really are going to have some problems presenting that positive case for the union. Stay attached to Westminster and help us pay for a monumental screw up our management of the country helped bring about.

    Reply
  6. Bob Howie says:

    Independence could solve all our problems because it would make Westminster sit down and assess it’s position. They would probably have to scrap their Trident plans and save the country £100bn it cannot afford to spend on such a foolish venture. If Westminster and the BoE are sensible and don’t cut their noses of to spite their smug faces then a currency union would help the economy, it could lead to negotiations with the EU getting better deals which suit both countries.
    It would not be the end of Britain but it could be the start of a better Britain, a Britain where there is more money and better services as the British would be asking Westminster why we can’t do what the Scots are achieving, you told us they were scroungers?

    Reply
  7. Scott Minto (Aka Sneekyboy) says:

    In fairness though its not like they planned the distraction.
     
    My thoughts and sympathies to the soldiers family -truly a horrible crime.

    Reply
  8. Ananurhing says:

    Robert Kerr
     
    “This debt either is repaid or defaulted upon or the interest payments continue for ever thus increasing the total UK debt for ever.
    I cannot see any politically acceptable solution”
     
    Quantatative easing buying bond issues to cover interest payments on bond issues seem to be Gideon’s answer. A Ponzi scheme with a magic printing press, and it’s us that are being Ponzied
     It will be our children and their children that reap this whirlwind.

    Reply
  9. Tris says:

    I wonder who told them to pull that.

    Reply
  10. Scott Minto (Aka Sneekyboy) says:

    So sticking with the UK will mean guaranteed higher taxes and cuts to services…
     
    Compared to Scotlands chance to actually maintain where we are at righ now with Independence…
     
    Decisions, decisions…

    Reply
  11. CameronB says:

    Doctor CEBR, doctor CEBR, the patient is bleeding to death.
    Calm down, I am CEBR and I have more leaches.
     
    Here is a lecture given by CEBR founder, Professor Douglas McWilliams. It regards his analysis of the shift in global economic activity from west to east, in which he assess the largely western corporate colonisation of the far east, as being generally positive for society. I think this guy would support using China as a measure of progress. It is a bit turgid, as well. As Robert Kerr says, “I cannot see any politically acceptable solution in a democracy”.
     
    link to youtube.com
     
    Vote Yes to give yourself the best possible protection against free-trade neo-liberals.

    Reply
  12. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I think that you will find the new Bank of England Governor, Mark Carney, is quietly sounding  major QE exercise which would make the £ STG sink like a stone in the Money Markets but would inflate away a proportion of this unrepayable accumulation of debt.
     
    Serious thought to a very dangerous and politically suicidal policy that could set the seeds for a popular insurrection as everything imported jumps in cost, petrol, feed, feedstuffs, cars and everything else that Thatcher ensured we no longer make.
     
    Time to get out and ASAP.

    Reply
  13. Melissa Murray says:

    I can see why it’s no longer front page news, but why was it hidden?
    Ignorance is bliss.

    Reply
  14. pmcrek says:

    A comparable headline would be “Economy will deteriorate if Scots remain in union warns economist”.
     

    Reply
  15. Mairi says:

    Interesting, it seems that they’ve removed links to the article on the site – but the article is still indexed by Bing: link to scotsman.com

    Reply
  16. Dcanmore says:

    Yup, you can still comment on the story it if anyone can find it …
    link to scotsman.com

    Reply
  17. Kevin says:

    “For some curious reason, the story isn’t being presented as a blow to the “Stay in the UK” campaign in the independence debate. The headline isn’t “Business calls for more austerity if Scots vote No””

    I’ve been reading this site for a while now, and I mostly agree with what you say, the one thing I would say is the reason for this could also be attributed to the fact that no-one from Yes Scotland or SNP are jumping up and down screaming about it.  A lot of the time the media don’t bother themselves with making a reasoned argument from facts, they just report people talking whatever nonsense they feel like.  This is not to say I don’t think the media has a bias, its just that it’s unfair to say they’re not reporting when there may be nothing to report on.  So lets have someone politician make the statement you’re talking about and complain only if that isn’t reported.

    Reply
  18. The Man from Del Monte says:

    Perhaps Beggared Together would be a more fitting name for the No campaign.

    Sadly, it has so far been my experience that my colleagues react, by and large, with indifference when shown how we in Scotland have not received the benefit of our advantageous economic circumstances. I have little hope that illustrating the future Scotland is facing as part of the UK will be met with any serious concern. I often wonder why so many people seem not to care about our economic future. I’m sure they would look differently on the matter if the Chancellor was personally to remove the money directly from their wallets.

    Reply
  19. Juteman says:

    @TMFDM.
    Maybe it’s because the folk you are speaking to are (work) colleagues?
    It’s the unemployed and disadvantaged we need to reach. Folk that are doing ok might be more wary of taking the step.
    Unfortunately, the folk most likely to benefit from independence are living in Labour fiefdoms. They are the folk we need to reach.

    Reply
  20. The Man from Del Monte says:

    @Juteman
     
    My colleagues are some of the inhabitants of these Labour fiefdoms, which is why I am worried. Living in Edinburgh on the salary we are paid is just about doable, and no more. These are people (amongst whom I count myself) who would stand to gain the most from the improved pay and conditions that independence will enable us to achieve. Without the working-class vote, the referendum won’t be won. So we need to enthuse them about the long-term potential for improvement in their own circumstances.
     
    P.S. Feel free to address me as @Del Monte; it took me a moment to work out TMFDM was me!

    Reply
  21. clochoderic says:

    This link may help to explain why John “not a bullet fired in anger in Aghanistan” Reid was all over the air waves last night.
     
    John Reid, the security industry’s salesman in the House of Lords:
     
    link to opendemocracy.net

    Reply
  22. Juteman says:

    @Del Monte.
    The folk you work with are doing ok, just, so they are naturally worried about how independence will affect them. If you are just managing to make ends meet, then every decision is a gamble. It can be scary to take that step if you are struggling financialy.  You need to convince them the biggest gamble is staying in the bankrupt uk.
    The ‘vanished’ and non voting slaves to Labour are the real winners, if only they could be informed.

    Reply
  23. Hetty says:

    Thats correct Juteman, some, perhaps many of the people with jobs, especially half secure ones, some with property, with savings and with good pensions in the bag, simply are not interested in how the economy is disproportionately and negatively impacting on the poor, sick vulnerable and disabled who might not have jobs, savings, property or pensions…and yes, the people that feel left behind, disenfranchised and scuppered are the ones we need to reach to go out and exercise their right to choose between more of the same or a chance to have at the least, access to jobs and good healthcare and decent wages and good housing etc…
    I think any party in place within an Independent Scotland, will need to pull their socks up, manage everything with impeccable precision and cut the lies that normally envelops the political climate these days. Otherwise they’ll have me to answer to…and lots and lots of other folk as well I hope!!

    Reply
  24. Juteman says:

    Get the Yes troops into the 1.000s of folk who aren’t even on the electoral register. That’s where a win lies.
    Mind you, most of them are probably already on the electoral register and vote Labour on a postal vote without even knowing they do.

    Reply
  25. Holebender says:

    @Kevin, how do you know no-one from YES is saying anything? If they’re issuing press releases and nobody’s reporting it are you any the wiser?

    Reply
  26. Gordon Bain says:

    My condolences to the soldier’s bereaved family but….
    i smell shite!
    link to scriptonitedaily.wordpress.com
    Hail Alba!

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,775 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Possible good news about John Swinney – according to Robin McAlpine, JS wants out of the leadership. Of course there…” Oct 19, 22:45
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I have been appreciating the regular updates from the Francis Dearnley and Dominic Nicholls duo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CM6l79O3cQ&t=1080s” Oct 19, 21:45
    • sam on Faces In Sand: ““Who are the ‘they’?” If you are talking about “crimes against humanity” “they” could be the clan chiefs who harmed…” Oct 19, 19:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “One can often gauge the measure of a person by the company they keep. Flies are attracted to shite and…” Oct 19, 19:15
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Factchecker – as I said further up the thread, it’s pointless trying to apply logic to the hopelessly illogical. I…” Oct 19, 19:13
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Thank you for your polite and insightful comment, twathater. It was indeed sometimes brutish. And I didn’t blame anybody. People…” Oct 19, 18:42
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Fine, James, have it your way. All the Scots who colonised and exploited foreign lands all over the globe, often…” Oct 19, 18:31
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “As usual yir wrang fuckchecker it was NOT the British empire it was and still is the BRUTISH empire ,…” Oct 19, 18:01
    • James on Faces In Sand: ““…the people of Scotland…” Which people would that be? Oh aye, the anglophone elite or ‘unionists’ if you prefer.” Oct 19, 17:58
    • sam on Faces In Sand: “Crimes against humanity? Plenty of those, historical and modern. Kincora boys home and the many r4pes (a crime against humanity)…” Oct 19, 17:25
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “It goes without saying, of course, my last comment above was directed at Alf, not Factchecker….” Oct 19, 17:04
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Mr Lavrov is about as popular in the free world as the coronavirus. Quite why any political campaign would want…” Oct 19, 16:27
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird says: 19 October, 2026 at 3:20 pm “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies…” Oct 19, 15:55
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “I wasn’t aware that it was “U” that kicked this whole thing off by bombing “R”, Alf. Anything else you’d…” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “I find Bill Browder’s personal story rather compelling… www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlF0ZzH6C9s” Oct 19, 15:54
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Nope, no get out of jail card for you I’m afraid. Historical facts are facts, deal with them.” Oct 19, 15:37
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “The empire colonies you refer to were never ever ‘Scotland’s’ colonies at all; many pre-dated the 1707 English annexation of…” Oct 19, 15:20
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Yeh but no but yeh but no but yeh it’s ok because we’re Scottish, which absolves us of anything apparently,…” Oct 19, 11:50
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “I do agree Alf, albeit with the almighty caveat that Ru**ia is currently the poster boy of imperialism and warmongering.…” Oct 19, 11:08
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: ““Life under the union Jack stinks and associates us with the crimes against humanity they have committed over many hundreds…” Oct 19, 11:05
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “”Most of the French thinks it’s a great thing, tearing down the system of centuries old colonialist racism and all…” Oct 19, 10:54
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “The French have a tradition of using street protest to get political change (I won’t comment on whether that is…” Oct 19, 10:25
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Its you and your hypocritical imperialistic kind who aye advocate bombing other countries Hatey, for which there are always consequences,…” Oct 19, 10:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “If only Scotland could find a Scottish coke heid of his calibre to lead us. Not that you’ll agree. You…” Oct 19, 09:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “How odd that 20 million people would want to flee from the same people who are helping out Scotland at…” Oct 19, 08:44
    • Colin Dawson on Faces In Sand: “Collette Stevenson’s mistake is quite understandable, given the SNP’s total obsession with transgender issues over the past decade or so.…” Oct 19, 00:00
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Is this migration coming from that war torn country that was serving conscription papers on beaches? That is just another…” Oct 18, 23:05
    • Elmac on Faces In Sand: “The title of Faces in Sand would be more appropriate as Faeces in Sand. How anyone with a brain, a…” Oct 18, 23:02
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “Let’s try again to get through moderation. The potential for huge white immigration from a European country looms large. They…” Oct 18, 21:41
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “20 million Ukr##nans are wanting to leave. With Britain in lockstep political alignment, if not blood brothers, the UK might…” Oct 18, 21:35
  • A tall tale



↑ Top