The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Your rules, our rules

Posted on April 09, 2012 by

We couldn't help but note the Bill Walker story floating back to the top of the media agenda again this weekend like – well, you can finish that metaphor for yourself.

After an embarrassing week in which Labour had scoured Twitter and Facebook with a fine tooth comb trying to find obscure SNP councillors/candidates saying anything mildly contentious that they could fake some pious outrage about (of which this surely represented the pitiful, embarrassing nadir, as a fully-grown man tried pathetically to manufacture some kind of offence at a handful of primary-school-playground jokes that wouldn't have upset even the primmest Victorian maiden aunt), the beleagured party and its increasingly-desperate activists went back to some safer ground.

As we've said previously, we don't think the MSP for Dunfermline has any place in the SNP, on account of his prejudiced views about gay marriage. And the party is well within its rights to expel him purely for not telling them that there were allegations of domestic abuse in his past. But that remains all they are – allegations. Walker has denied the claims, and no court has ever been asked to reach a verdict on them.

In this country, however inconvenient it may be for the Unionist parties and the nationalist bloggers who have jumped on the bandwagon, a person is innocent in the eyes of the law until proven guilty. The "court of public opinion" has no legal weight, and just as well – if it did, Christopher Jefferies would have been hanged from a Bristol tree long before he was ever found innocent of any connection with the brutal murder of Joanna Yeates, as would a great many more of the country's numerous victims of infamous miscarriages of justice.

And yet despite this blindingly obvious basic principle of any civilised society, everyone's decided that Bill Walker is guilty anyway, and must resign from the position to which he was democratically elected. The Herald has openly demanded it, as has a Conservative spokesman, while Labour have bizarrely insisted that the SNP must determine Walker's guilt rather than a court of law. Neither party, seemingly, is aware of the beams in their own eyes.

Eric Joyce (Labour) and Jeffrey Archer (Conservative) both still sit in the UK Parliament despite having actually been found guilty of crimes. Joyce was left to resign from Labour – rather than being expelled – even after being convicted of multiple violent drunken assaults, while as far as we're aware Archer remains a member of the Conservative Party (as well as a peer in the House Of Lords) despite serving jail time for the serious offence of perjury. Indeed, he's continued to enjoy close relationships with party officials both after and during his imprisonment.

We will, yet again, make our position absolutely clear: as supporters of independence we don't want Bill Walker in the SNP, we're glad he's been expelled (even if it's only for reasons of convenient expediency), we would be delighted from a political viewpoint if he did resign and bring about a by-election, and if he's guilty of domestic abuse we want to see him charged, convicted and severely punished under the law. But we will NOT be part of a lynch mob of screeching witch-hunters gleefully ripping up the most fundamental foundations of British justice at the drop of a hat.

Without a trial or admission of guilt, the demands for Walker's resignation are inappropriate, unseemly, hypocritical and wrong, and all those making them – whether for party political or kneejerk ideological reasons – should be ashamed of themselves. One day it might be you, or someone you care about, that the tabloid-reading public has judged in the absence of facts, just because they don't like the look of their face or because they've assumed that all allegations of vile crimes are automatically true because "there's no smoke without fire". And if it does happen, don't be surprised if there's nobody left to give a damn about your rights any more.

8 to “Your rules, our rules”

  1. G. Campbell says:

    Christopher Jefferies never admitted to hitting young women over the head with cookware. Bill Walker has. He also admitted to striking one of his wives because she was “hysterical”. Interesting choice of word, that. Says a lot about him, I reckon. I mean, what are the chances that Bill would ever attack another man because he looked a bit “hysterical”. Even gay men would probably have nothing to worry about.

    Reply
  2. John White says:

    In all the excitement you have forgotten Labour's Lord Watson…………….

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Didn't Walker essentially claim self-defence with the cooking pot? But yet again, I'm in no way whatsoever standing up for him. I want him out. But I want him out for legitimate and fair reasons, not unproven allegations he strenuously denies but which the mob has decided are true anyway.

    Reply
  4. Holebender says:

    You describe the man as a "list MSP" for a constituency. That can't be right. He's either a list MSP or he's a constituency MSP and I believe he is a constituency MSP.

    Reply
  5. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    You're right, he's the constituency MSP. Fixed.

    Reply
  6. 22bstar says:

    link to labourlist.org
     
    we should keep a close eye on future Labour byelections due to the mayor/police commissioner elections

    Reply
  7. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    This comment was rejected by Better Nation today on their story about Walker. Since it contravenes none of their other comment policies, it must qualify as "dickish":

    ============================

    Bill Walker is innocent. Fact.

    I have no idea whether or not he committed the despicable crimes he’s accused of, but until he’s accused of them in a court and found guilty, he’s as innocent as anyone reading this blog. The actions of a number of bloggers and – much worse – supposed professional journalists in connection to the matter is a disgrace.

    Kenny Farquarson of Scotland On Sunday waited until Walker no longer had the protection of a political party before indulging in cowardly “bully libel”, calling Walker a “wifebeater” in the knowledge that no individual can afford to sue for libel/defamation. Paul Hutcheon of the Herald demands his resignation without bothering to wait for a trial, let alone a verdict. Kate Higgins, less surprisingly, does the same.

    The “6.5%” figure for rape convictions is both a myth and infamously misleading, and is in fact the attrition rate – a very different thing. The conviction rate for rape cases actually prosecuted is almost identical to that for other serious assaults, despite the far greater difficulty of proof in a crime that’s rarely witnessed by anyone other than the perpetrator and the victim, and in which even forensic evidence is no smoking gun.

    link to guardian.co.uk

    (Presumably the Guardian will not be dismissed out of hand as a website prone to perpetuating misogyny or “rape culture”, the insults routinely and reflexively hurled at anyone pointing out the facts around this subject.)

    If Bill Walker is guilty of either domestic abuse or rape, let him be brought to court, let him be convicted and let him be locked up and the key thrown away. Until then, he’s entitled to keep doing his job the same as anyone else, and anyone joining the lynch mob is who we ought to despise.
     

    Reply
  8. Morag says:

    He did, however, lie to the SNP in his application to be considered as a suitable party candidate.  That's why he was expelled from the SNP, not for anything else.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,663 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “It’s a hot night, and a sad, insomniac old man’s thoughts turn to self pleasuring. Keep the noise doon, YL…Jul 9, 03:11
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Thanks for the link, NC. I enjoyed reading the article. “Our friends in Orcland”. The boys who wrote that are…Jul 9, 03:01
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Penisbreath It’s the Panama Canal, not the Suez Canal ya mong. Try asking for help from some of your Langley…Jul 9, 02:36
    • twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “Absolutely James he jist canny wait tae rubbish and decry genuine efforts for freedom, yet when asked how his big…Jul 9, 01:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Zat so, YL Sah! Then I was right. You couldn’t find Darien on a map without help. I recommend you…Jul 9, 01:11
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: ““Something inspired me” Ah, c’moan noo NC. It’s mean of you to deny Buckfast an honourable mention.Jul 9, 00:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Awa and not shite, Andrew R. Shout from the rooftops that you, and by extension Indy, support the kinds of…Jul 9, 00:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Nae eulogies fer Starovoit yet? How insensitive of me. The usual suspects will need time to process their grief.Jul 9, 00:46
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “More – if she committed any real crime she should have been prosecuted in an English court. It’s pure racism…Jul 9, 00:00
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “The treatment of Shemima Begum was outrageous and broke all international law. She was 15, a minor when she left,…Jul 8, 23:37
    • Northcode on Too Tight To Mention: “Something inspired me to write a wee poem. A hiv nae idea whit. Back door, front door, throu an open…Jul 8, 23:07
    • MaryB on Too Tight To Mention: “Re Craig Murray at the UN C24: If nothing else, it’s important for the rest of the world to know…Jul 8, 22:58
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: ““Appear to have issued a D notice” ???? You really are off the reservation today aren’t you. Do you think…Jul 8, 22:10
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: ““This whole thing is going to be an absolute gift to the unionists” Says the unionist….Jul 8, 22:05
    • Northcode on Too Tight To Mention: “Craig says this… again just for good measure: “Be very very happy at the extent of international support for Scottish…Jul 8, 22:05
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: ““This whole thing is going to be an absolute gift to the unionists” Actually our colonial rulers understandably don’t want…Jul 8, 21:49
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “Right, because whilst Scotland’s capital is more productive than Norway’s or Singapore, Scotland also has pockets of severe deprivation left…Jul 8, 21:39
    • Stuart on Too Tight To Mention: “Well Northcode that’s 52 minutes of my life I’m not going to get back… The upshot of it being no…Jul 8, 21:06
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “Great stuff. At least I am not a twat.Jul 8, 20:52
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “If Stu has any sense he won’t respond to your drivel. I suspect he has more sense than you. In…Jul 8, 20:47
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: ““does Edinburgh not have one of the highest rates of GDP per capita anywhere in the world, higher than Tokyo…Jul 8, 20:41
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Xaracen – no, its thrown it out. Secondly, again you miss the point. The UN recognises the U.K. as a…Jul 8, 20:13
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Easy Penisbreath. Stick your finger on the Atlantic side of the Panama Canal and you’re 9/10ths there.Jul 8, 19:52
    • Northcode on Too Tight To Mention: “On Craig Murray’s return from his ambassadorial mission to the United Nations in New York where he presented the case…Jul 8, 19:32
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““Right” Thank you, so, the C-24 hasn’t actually thrown out the Salvo Petition, it’s just shelved it until it becomes…Jul 8, 19:29
    • twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “Stuart you CLAIM to be an independence supporter yet you EAGERLY join with the yoonionists to try to demean and…Jul 8, 18:29
    • twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “YL try not to take much notice of Chas his comments usually consist of his sexual fixation with Prof Baird,…Jul 8, 18:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: ““has ever presented anything positive” Ah, c’moan noo Alf. Why not ask one of the many perennial gurners about oor…Jul 8, 17:58
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Your post above is a masterpiece, Chas. Or should that be “masturb piece”? 🙂 As for the TWAT, he’s fearfully…Jul 8, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sure, x, but it’s kinda lost its ability to hit home. Put it another way. Nae steaming schemie at an…Jul 8, 17:42
  • A tall tale



↑ Top