The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


We are Spartacus

Posted on April 02, 2012 by

In the light of the hoo-ha about the referendum consultation, we thought it was about time we submitted our own response. We couldn't really be bothered going through the whole palaver of the detailed questionnaire on the Scottish Government's website, though, so we thought we'd avail ourselves of the handy one-click form thoughtfully supplied by Scottish Labour for that very purpose.

Weirdly, despite asking for "your views" Labour had already typed out some views for us to have into the message box, but we weren't sure we wanted them to speak for us so we entered something else. And since we wanted to be sure it wasn't dismissed as a fake, we decided to use the name of someone trustworthy who knows that a name and email address provides foolproof identity verification and democratic accountability.

We clicked the Send button, and the rigorous monitoring process which the Scottish Labour deputy leader spoke of on The Sunday Politics Scotland yesterday duly authenticated our submission, and then asked us to get our friends to join in.

That's you, readers, so why not do your democratic duty and have a go too? (We had a practice run while pretending to be one of our friends, just to make sure it worked, and Labour's watertight security safeguards also ratified that submission, so you can rest assured that you shouldn't have any technical problems.) We owe it to Scotland.

12 to “We are Spartacus”

  1. MajorBloodnok says:

    No! I am Sarwar!
    And so is my wife!

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    I did ponder whether to go with the headline “We are Sarwartacus” 😀

    Reply
  3. archie guevara says:

    Looks like it works.  I am Spartacus as well.

    Reply
  4. anas sarwar says:

    can i have independence please

    Reply
  5. On reflection, I'm thinking it might not be so bad to let the jocks go.

    Reply
  6. Seasick Dave says:

    Its all bollocks.
    I let the fragrant Johann know my views a few weeks ago and no, I didn't use her pre prepared hogwash.
    Vote YES.

    Reply
  7. David Dailly says:

    The referendum on Scotland’s constitutional future is hugely important, and I want to have my say on how the referendum is run. I want it to be legal, fair, and decisive.

    Legal
    I voted for the Scottish Government to deliver the referendum.  Outside interference is undemocratic and abuses my human rights.

    Fair
    I want the referendum to be supervised by the Council of Europe.  Political parties in Scotland and England have disgraced themselves repeatedly over the decades when it comes to decisions on the future of Scotland.
    Decisive
    My choice on this matter will be made apparent when a political party outlines the alternative to Independence.  This has not happened so I cannot answer this question.  I cannot understand why people keep referring to the break-up of the UK.  That is not what is being discussed here.  We are discussing the union of Parliaments.  I want the people to be consulted on the topic of how many questions should be asked.  This is democratic.  It is what I voted for.  
    I think that the Scottish people need time to hear the debate about their future.  2014 is a very sensible timeframe.  I think pushing a vote before the people have had time to hear the argument and examine the evidence is extremely undemocratic and naziesque.  I will NOT vote for anyone who pushes the agenda of an early vote.

    Please take my views into account.

    Reply
  8. Sarwartacus says:

    Nay, I am Sarwartacus!

    Reply
  9. MajorBloodnok says:

    Interesting that the banner headline on Labour's site is written in crayon.  Now, what does that tell us?

    Reply
  10. John White says:

    I just noticed this on the STV site. The url says it all.
    link to news.stv.tv

    Reply
  11. MajorBloodnok says:

    Jings!  it's in the Hootsmon as well:
     
    link to scotsman.com

    Reply
  12. We are Cyber Nat!!!
    link to cybernatdepot.com

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,966 Posts, 1,248,741 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Southernbystander on Believers In The Ruins: “He was hounded by a relentless media onslaught, much of it driven but those made mad with rage by their…Aug 16, 21:59
    • john h williams on Believers In The Ruins: “Captain Caveman very well said,it is a disgraceful post from someone who has very little idea of Autism or disabilities…Aug 16, 19:57
    • James on Believers In The Ruins: “Look at yersel in a mirror, wee man; you’ll see yin.Aug 16, 19:37
    • DaveL on Believers In The Ruins: “That’s rich coming from the Nazi fanboy himself! Who’d be Hatey? What a winner!Aug 16, 18:59
    • agentx on Believers In The Ruins: “When you see “Confused says:” scroll on by.Aug 16, 18:44
    • Alf Baird on Believers In The Ruins: ““”In physics, the concept of “opposites attract” is a foundational principle.” It is well known that certain groups of colonized…Aug 16, 18:39
    • Red on Believers In The Ruins: “It’s regrettable when empathetic hearts are tricked into sympathy for the worst people. This is what Courtney Gartshore did, without…Aug 16, 17:43
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Pointless. Murrell endorses superglue for Scotland. Don’t be fobbed off with inferior substitutes.Aug 16, 17:21
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “C’moan Confused. Dae Restore next! Then the Jews aboot 9 PM after the second boattle kicks in. It’s nae lik…Aug 16, 17:19
    • robertkknight on Believers In The Ruins: “Hammer meets nail. Farage would sell his own Granny for glue.Aug 16, 16:34
    • twathater on Believers In The Ruins: “Keep on telling it like it is confused , don’t let the middle class claimants put you offAug 16, 15:40
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Light cannot exist without darkness? So if I turn on a bright light in a dark room, I can’t turn…Aug 16, 15:01
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Sorry, TURABDIN, you may not be fully up to speed with the lunacy here. Burnham is simultaneously letting real criminals…Aug 16, 14:54
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Hands up now! How many alert readers have twigged that a fatberg can’t ever know what a phallus is!Aug 16, 14:46
    • Captain Caveman on Believers In The Ruins: ““An appalling post stuffed full of ignorance and bile” Welcome to Confused.Aug 16, 13:43
    • James on Believers In The Ruins: “Adrian; noted and acknowledged. Meanwhile, as predicted the site phallus appears just like clockwork….. But you’re the one doing all…Aug 16, 13:26
    • Spartan 117 on Believers In The Ruins: “An appalling post stuffed full of ignorance and bile, aside from the closing point about the BBC and the Western…Aug 16, 13:20
    • Southernbystander on Believers In The Ruins: “TURABDIN, If there is irony there it is covered in too much of the blank variety, and so has become…Aug 16, 12:53
    • Confused on Believers In The Ruins: “er, the point I was making about “things can always get worse” – https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz977nxww1jo the main reason people hit the…Aug 16, 12:24
    • TURABDIN on Believers In The Ruins: “THE SCOTTISH ANTISYZYGY PARADOX AND PHYSICS. Understanding Oppositional Forces in Physics Fundamental Principles In physics, the concept of “opposites attract”…Aug 16, 12:01
    • Captain Caveman on Believers In The Ruins: “@Alf Well, there’s only one person around here “in perpetual darkness of their Colonial Echo Chamber®”, Alf – as you…Aug 16, 11:46
    • Jay on Believers In The Ruins: “Hi 100%, i typed in all those characters but youtube and this tablet do not communicate. Was keen to see…Aug 16, 11:39
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “I think Burnham shouldn’t have been daft enough to threaten people flouting the disposable barbecue rule with prison. Even if…Aug 16, 11:20
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Odd hoo mony times I post tae Northy and you reply, Alf. Or vice versa. Here’s an echo I just…Aug 16, 11:11
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “We can all see and understand those cases where a cold blooded killer is arrested, charged, tried and sentenced, and…Aug 16, 10:46
    • 100%Yes on Believers In The Ruins: “@ alurker and everyone else link to this conversation. Lets say for arguments sake, that Scotland doesn’t exist anymore just…Aug 16, 10:34
    • Alf Baird on Believers In The Ruins: “Here is a wee bittie licht for yersel an ithers Hatey, in the perpetual darkness of your colonial echo chamber:…Aug 16, 10:22
    • Alf Baird on Believers In The Ruins: ““These must be English elections in Scotland seeing as the English parliament was not dissolved 3 hundred years ago.” True,…Aug 15, 21:59
    • Aidan on Believers In The Ruins: “For once I have to agree with James, there are no jurisdictions to my knowledge where the death penalty is…Aug 15, 21:42
    • James on Believers In The Ruins: “Well said, Grace. “…When are we going to bring back the death penalty…” they wail. If they could, they could…Aug 15, 21:20
  • A tall tale



↑ Top