The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Vote No, say nothing

Posted on January 26, 2013 by

It’s a real bonus for us when other people dissect something so comprehensively, from a variety of angles, that we don’t have to bother. The solitary piece of what could conceivably be described as solid content in Ruth Davidson’s speech in Edinburgh yesterday appeared to comprise a well-known football chant, which we’ll paraphrase for sensitive readers: “We’re [not of a very high standard], and we know we are”.

Fortunately, we’ve been saved some time in pulling it apart in detail thanks to three excellent and forensic examinations by the unlikely trinity of Lallands Peat Worrier, Alex Massie in the Spectator  and – heavens above – Alan Cochrane in the Telegraph.  We’re off now to check our temperature and make sure we don’t have a fever.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Juteman

I can’t decide. Charlie Chaplin, or Norman Wisdom?

Doug Daniel

This is completely off-topic (well, not completely), but for some reason, towards the end of LPW’s piece, I got thinking about how beneficial it would be if the media would use the format from your attempted Straight Debates series. It’s amazing how something so simple is so effective at teasing out the truth from the bullshit folk spout. I would love to see such a debate between the two Blairs.

Oh yeah, I know why it came into my head. The media really needs to sit them down and say “look, just give us the answer without any waffling pish – why would English MPs vote to give the Scottish Parliament more power?”

dadsarmy

OT – can anyone remember how you check if a media article has changed? I could swear the Guardian article was different when I read it first! I may be paranoid …

Juteman

Nice one Stu! 🙂

muttley79

The No parties were adamant about having only a Yes/No question on independence.  For any promises of more powers to have any meaning they are all going to have to agree exactly on the powers, then have to ensure it is put in their British parties manifestos for the next general election, which happens to be after the referendum.  The likelihood of all that happening is almost 0%.  So basically they only want to defeat Salmond and the SNP, and “separation” as they call self-determination.  That there has not even been one critical critique of the main No campaign in the media is astonishing, if hardly surprising.  Basically it is a dog’s breakfast of a campaign.

James McLaren

A line drawn in the sand and washed away by the incoming tide.

A suitable metaphor for the “scottish” tories.

RIP,  

well not really 

Fekem 

Doug Daniel

As I said on LPW’s blog just now:

The whole premise of the idea of getting more power for the Scottish Parliament from Westminster is completely flawed. When are journalists going to pick up on this? It’s not just that they refuse to detail WHAT powers they would devolve – they won’t tell us HOW they would get them devolved either.

Devolution is a way of pretending to give the people what they want, while all the time keeping the process completely in the hands of politicians. Any further powers devolved would go the same way – a commission of “experts” would be formed, THEY would decide which powers we can be trusted with, and it would fall a long way short of what the people want. This will always be the case, because the politicians know that once we get what we want, we’ll ask for more, so they must always give us less than we want. This is why the Tories and Tory-minded Labour politicians have always been wary of devolution, because they know it’s put us on the one-way track to independence. Ruth’s attempt to draw a “line in the sand” was futile because she’s drawing it on a surface which is constantly moving forward. You can’t stop destiny.

If the devolution process was put in the hands of the people, we’d already be halfway independent by now, if not completely. The people want welfare and taxation controlled in Holyrood. This would challenge the authority of Westminster, as Holyrood would stop being subordinate to them. It would come to be seen as Scotland’s main parliament, and soon people would question why Westminster controlled foreign affairs and defence, and thus lead to independence. This is why English MPs will never vote to give Scotland anything resembling the level of powers people want it to have, and if we had been given the opportunity to vote for Devo Max, they would have been given the unenviable choice of doing something they didn’t want to do, or having to tell us “no”, and face the public outcry.

If we want politicians to decide when Scotland’s grown up enough to have certain powers, people can vote no. If we want to take the powers we want, then we have to vote yes.

muttley79

I was thinking, if Scottish Skier’s theory about Cameron is right, he is bound to dismiss the idea of more powers in the event of a No vote outright in the next year or so (perhaps even during the final few weeks of the campaign).  It is maybe something to watch out for to see if it happens or not.  After his speech on the EU, Cameron would probably need to make just one other untimely intervention, to ensure almost complete distrust engulfs the No camp.

@Doug Daniel

Journalists are not going to pick it up because they do not want to draw attention to it. They will make it all about independence.

James McLaren

Unashamedly plagiarised and modified from Piet Hein

It is the week-end anyway

For the Unionist

Our choicest plans
     have fallen through,
our airiest castles
     tumbled over,
because of lines
     we neatly drew
and later neatly
     stumbled over.Our choicest plans
     have fallen through,
our airiest castles
     tumbled over,
because of lines
     we neatly drew
and later neatly
     stumbled over.

A MAXIM FOR SCOTS
 
Here is a fact that should help you fight a bit longer:
Things that don’t actually kill you outright make you stronger.

A REPROOF
 
 
In view of your manner
of spending your days
I hope you may learn,
before ending them,
that the effort you spend
on defending your ways
could be better spent on
amending them.

 MAKING SENSE
 
Life makes senses
and who could doubt it,
if we have
no doubt about it.

 (on Denmark)
 
Denmark seen from a foreign land
looks but like a grain of sand.
Denmark as we Danes conceive it
is so big you won’t believe it.

and

Why not let us compromise
about Denmark’s proper size,
which will truly please us all,
since it’s bigger than it’s small.

for Rev Stu tongue in cheek

 A TIP
to members of the literary profession
 
Those who can write
have a lot to learn
from those bright enough
not to.

I stumbled across Piet Hein 40+ years ago in Denmark. His ^profession was that of architect.

Even then he penned mainly in English.

I have rediscovered them, by way of some his Grook books, as I sell up in France and clear my house.

Suddenly his simple philiosophy gives me hope and inspiration for Scotland in this phony war period. 

 

dadsarmy

Thanks Rev. That NewsSniffer is a great resource.

John Jamieson

Ouch!  A Scottish Tory Leader getting the Bronx cheer from Cochrane.  That must hurt.

Old Mikey

.Dadsarmy. If you find you are paranoid keep your guard up. Remember the old adage ‘just because your paranoid dosen’t mean their not out to get you’.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,697 Posts, 1,210,365 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Saying sooths: ““you’re going to have to fight for it” It’s always easier to say things like that from 1,000 miles away.Jan 28, 17:49
    • Aidan on Saying sooths: ““Why don’t they just endorse a proposal that I just invented, that is based on total nonsense and which has…Jan 28, 17:44
    • Aidan on Saying sooths: “Why would the U.K. government and Parliament agree to a measure like that? Aside from the odd position that apparently…Jan 28, 17:39
    • twathater on The Silent Revolution: “I don’t always agree with Robin because I view him as being eager to be part of the establishment but…Jan 28, 17:31
    • Mia on Saying sooths: ““The SNP will do anything to remain in power” Actually, I strongly disagree with this assertion. The SNP have been…Jan 28, 17:25
    • gregor on Saying sooths: “I’m with Mia. Unmitigated Scot Gov/SNP fraud can shove it. It has failed Scotland, miserably.Jan 28, 17:22
    • Confused on The Silent Revolution: “where will they all go? https://archive.ph/r4fYT Our wonderful leaders are already making arrangements – anglos to highlands and borders, BAMs…Jan 28, 17:21
    • gregor on Saying sooths: “My mistake (yet again) – Wings judges say FALSE. #AwesomeSNPForeverJan 28, 17:14
    • Mia on Saying sooths: ““Scotland leaving the UK could take decades” Yeah, but Scotland ENDING the UK could take just a few minutes. The…Jan 28, 17:13
    • gregor on Saying sooths: “My mistake (again) – Yesterday isn’t history. The future isn’t tomorrow. And we are not living today. Wings isn’t part…Jan 28, 17:11
    • MaryB on Saying sooths: “Stewart McDonald of the John Smith Centre?Jan 28, 17:08
    • gregor on Saying sooths: “My mistake, Wings readers must agree with Derek re. the source should be ignored (eyes roll). #WingsForDerekJan 28, 17:07
    • Graf Midgehunter on Saying sooths: “In a certain way, I thank God that Alex S. doesn’t have to endure any more, the complete and utter…Jan 28, 17:05
    • Michael on Saying sooths: “This is an interesting quote from the article, “a ministry with national credibility amongst voters beyond their core base… [is]… crucial…Jan 28, 17:02
    • gregor on The Silent Revolution: “BBC (2025): Scottish Water bills set to rise 9.9% in April: “Water bills in Scotland will increase by almost 10%…Jan 28, 17:01
    • Mia on Saying sooths: ““Why the SNP should form a pact with Labour” (Stewart McDonald asks) Because they are just two different brands of…Jan 28, 16:58
    • Jason Smoothpiece on Saying sooths: “I have said often and others have also said SNP is a Devolution only party. They almost admit it. No…Jan 28, 16:42
    • Vivian O’Blivion on Saying sooths: “Stewart McDonald doesn’t submit anything his handlers in Foggy Bottom haven’t approved beforehand.Jan 28, 16:41
    • Dek on Saying sooths: “Get rid of all of them.Jan 28, 16:34
    • Frank Gillougley on Saying sooths: “‘Let’s have a look at what you could have won…’ How prophetic it was. Angels come in many guises. Who’d…Jan 28, 16:25
    • David Holden on Saying sooths: “If we are at the stage of hoping for help from Trump we are Donald Ducked continuing the theme of…Jan 28, 15:58
    • Alf Baird on Saying sooths: “Yes, the reality here is there is far mair chance of Scotsman President Donald John Trump-Macleod liberating Scots than Swinney’s…Jan 28, 15:50
    • Alf Baird on Saying sooths: “Was there ever any plundered colonies with “a ‘good vibrant’ economy”?Jan 28, 15:35
    • George Ferguson on Saying sooths: “Having a look at the Scottish Labour MSPS return for each Scottish Parliamentary Election 2007 46, 2011 37, 2016 24,…Jan 28, 15:28
    • Michael Laing on Saying sooths: “You meant ‘tractor’ as in ‘Quizmaster’, indeed. Also ‘Anglophile’, not “Anglophobe”, I presume.Jan 28, 15:14
    • maxxmacc on Saying sooths: “It’s sad when our only chance now to break free from the Westminster stranglehold, is to hope that Trump decides…Jan 28, 15:09
    • gregor on Saying sooths: “The fundamental purpose of @SNP’s existence, is independence. Where can Scotland find @SNP’s unmistakable purpose. #LGBTIQ+EU+ScotIndy20025+MaybeJan 28, 15:07
    • Andy Anderson on Saying sooths: “I meant traitor not tractor as aboveJan 28, 14:59
    • Andy Anderson on Saying sooths: “Sadly the ignorant among us that have no idea what is going on will still vote SNP. Our voting system…Jan 28, 14:56
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on Saying sooths: “Bad for the electorate? Certainly. But the day after an election, nobody gives a shit about them. It would be…Jan 28, 14:48
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
66
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x