The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Too much news

Posted on May 25, 2012 by

We need to clone ourselves – there’s so much going on today we can’t possibly cover it all. The official launch of the Yes Scotland campaign was better than we expected, with particularly good contributions from Tommy Brennan, Dennis Canavan and a showstopping closing speech from Brian Cox all highlighting the broad base of support for independence – Alex Salmond was the only SNP politician on show, taking up just a couple of minutes of the hour-long presentation.

Online Labour activists were particularly keen to vilify Cox, unleashing a deluge of bitter attacks which succeeded only in drawing attention to how desperately the party wants to silence the 20% or so of Labour voters who actually back independence.

In an attempt to spoil the media coverage, the nascent No campaign chose the eve of the launch to release a YouGov poll they’d commissioned, with a headline figure of 33% in favour of independence and 57% against. Curiously, though – and little reported by the media – the poll didn’t ask the actual question that’s likely to be on the ballot paper, choosing instead the comparatively tortuous “Do you agree Scotland should become a country independent of the rest of the UK?”

Creating such an obvious hostage to fortune is a clumsy and guileless piece of work – especially given the enormous public fuss the Unionists have made about the precise wording and the possibility of bias therein – but the anti-independence parties presumably knew the media could largely be relied on to focus solely on the numbers and not mention what the actual question was.

Our favourite thing today, though, was an extraordinary outburst from Labour MSP Kezia Dugdale, who apparently wants the word “Yes” itself to be outlawed in the years running up to the referendum. On first reading of the piece we thought it was just a complaint that a democratically-elected government was daring to actively pursue the policies it had been elected on, but in fact it’s even nuttier than that – the leaflet and website Dugdale is objecting to isn’t actually anything to do with independence at all, but merely promoting a positive, “can-do” approach to Scottish enterprise.

To Labour, of course, promoting jobs and the Scottish economy is simply despicable populist cheating on the part of the Scottish Government – worse still when, in the immortal words of George Foulkes, the SNP are doing it deliberately. As Labour cling ever more tightly to negativity, as Ms Dugdale herself says: expect more of this.

9 to “Too much news”

  1. TheMaganator says:

    The wording of the question will undoubtedly sway some – that is why the SNP favour their own wording. Fair enough. 

    Are you at all surprised by the figures for people that voted SNP in last election that said they do not support Independence?

    “In another damaging finding for the pro-independence movement, the poll also suggested that only 58% of people who voted for the SNP in last May’s landslide victory for Salmond would back independence in a snap referendum, while 28% of SNP voters opposed it.” 

    Reply
  2. Doug Daniel says:

    “TSB: the bank that likes to say yes.”

    Or in Kezia’s world, “TSB: the bank that actively promotes the nationalist conspiracy, and how much of your precious tax monies are spent promoting this sick propaganda?”

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Are you at all surprised by the figures for people that voted SNP in last election that said they do not support Independence?”

    Not at all, no – I’ve drawn attention to it here before. I’ve seen it reported as high as 40%.

    Reply
  4. Shirley says:

    I have found no film on the BBC, radio or TV, of the Launch. Have they really not shown it, or have I missed it?
    And did people see the midday Politics show? I hope you will put it on your blog.
    Andrew Neil interviewed one person who had been at the Launch. This was introduced by a package which consisted of “unanswered questions about Independence”, and left viewers with the impression that we are being asked to vote without knowing what we’re voting for.
    After the interview the two studio guests were asked for their opinions – both anti-Independence. No pro-Independence views in sight.
    It was appalling.
     
     

    Reply
  5. TheMaganator says:

    @Shirley:

    I have not seen any myself – but judging by twitter – many were saying that STV had the best coverage. 

    Reply
  6. Longshanker says:

    Brian Cox was the best Hannibal Lecter by a mile as well. Didn’t catch everything he said, but yes, an excellent and fantastically eloquent proponent for the case of independence.

    I’ve always enjoyed listening to him on Question Time as well. Did he not give Starkey a bit of a booting?

    Denis Canavan was excellent on Good Morning Scotland this morning. I’ve always liked him – more so after he turned independent and didn’t have to worry about curbing  what he had to say. Reminds me of the Labour old school who recognised the value of a Michael Foot in the political sphere.      

    Are they enough for the leap of faith to be made? I don’t thinkso. But the more media time Canavan gets, the better.    

    Reply
  7. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “I have not seen any myself – but judging by twitter – many were saying that STV had the best coverage. “

    It was the best by a country mile. The BBC stayed at the launch for mere minutes before switching back to Leveson, and the YesScotland site was late starting and had dreadful muffled audio.

    Reply
  8. Suth says:

    I don’t know how the BBC manage to be so awful at covering these things or why they insist on only showing a handful of minutes of any big event to you before spending hours talking about it in the studio instead. I’d rather see it for myself. They did the same with the big international press event too.

    Reply
  9. Doug Daniel says:

    It’s almost as if they’re trying to undermine it…

    They certainly have no concept of the enormity of these events. Scotland is changing, regardless of the result in 2014. Depending on how things pan out, BBC Scotland staff could find themselves out of a job. I certainly see no reason why we should continue to fund a public service broadcaster that utterly failed in its purpose before we became independent. It’s a complete dereliction of duty on their part. 

    If they don’t buck up their ideas a bit, then perhaps indy Scotland should start from scratch with a brand new public service broadcaster, populated by people who have some sort of idea how to run such an institution properly, rather than running it like a village community TV station.

    Although we’d keep Isobel Fraser and Mark Daly on, obviously… 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,852 Posts, 1,232,331 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • william G Walker on How Far To Go, How Far: “Saffron Robe is right in his forensic analysis as led by Stuart. He is also right in “objective reality” and…Dec 13, 22:30
    • McDuff on How Far To Go, How Far: “Rev you are worth your weight in gold!Dec 13, 21:34
    • Saffron Robe on How Far To Go, How Far: “Forensic analysis of the highest order, Stuart, of immense benefit to all those interested in the pursuit of justice which…Dec 13, 21:00
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “Far more importantly, if the pattern on the carpet has left an indelible mark, what tartan is it? That’s the…Dec 13, 20:26
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “@Alf Baird When you write that the need for decolonisation is “absolute and urgent” I wonder how it is that…Dec 13, 20:22
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “You missed one, Northy, phallusy.Dec 13, 20:06
    • Hatey McHateface on The ginger stepchild: “Multiple accounts, Bilbo? How you must wish that was true. My “stalking” of you was me pointing out the quite…Dec 13, 19:58
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “I meant to do this earlier, but forgot. Here it is now, better late than never. Correction: “through-away” in paragraph…Dec 13, 19:05
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.Dec 13, 18:26
    • Andy Wiltshire on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mistakes tending to both sides of a controversial question roughly equally may well be just mistakes. If they all point…Dec 13, 16:49
    • James Barr Gardner on How Far To Go, How Far: “The real problem is ye jist cannae git the staff these days !Dec 13, 15:40
    • Marie on How Far To Go, How Far: “That’s EXACTLY what it looks like.Dec 13, 15:03
    • Sven on How Far To Go, How Far: “You’d know, I’m sure, I wish you well “James Cheyne”; were every independence minded Scot as single minded, determined and…Dec 13, 14:56
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “Nae bother, James. The longer you stay around here the better as far as I’m concerned. And thanks for the…Dec 13, 14:55
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““But that flame still burns.” I’ll tell you what ‘burns’… YOUR SHITTY RHETORIC! BOOM!!! Northcode drops the “Ad Hominem”, arm…Dec 13, 14:46
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “robertkknight, Better together, as the prime ministers statement once said. Why not have the upper ruling class grouped with the…Dec 13, 14:36
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “North code. Thank for those kind words, It would appear that I could be here for as long as the…Dec 13, 14:23
    • robertkknight on How Far To Go, How Far: “I don’t think that there are any depths left to which the NuSNP Govt. won’t stoop. For years they’ve been…Dec 13, 13:55
    • Jill on How Far To Go, How Far: “Me too.Dec 13, 13:45
    • Stu on How Far To Go, How Far: “Lomcal, I don’t think there is. Like I said, if a judge was hypothetically going to go for a specific…Dec 13, 13:17
    • Rob on How Far To Go, How Far: “I normally don’t normally give much credence to conspiracy theories, basic incompetence usually explains most of the screw up. However…Dec 13, 13:16
    • Jill on How Far To Go, How Far: “The most generous reading of this debacle is that the judge is incompetent. I’m inclined to be less generous. Trans…Dec 13, 13:09
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “I for one will be sorry to see you leave this place, James. Your stoical perseverance in acquiring and presenting…Dec 13, 12:58
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “Is that carpet burns on Swinney’s face?Dec 13, 12:50
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Thoughts for today, I will retire and make way for others after the two year long wait from DWP and…Dec 13, 12:36
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““…I write, as always, to educate the readers on the world’s most-read Indy website.” We uneducated plebians here on “the…Dec 13, 12:22
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “The gender issue of how to use women and children spaces as a trademark fetish is dangerous. I suppose if…Dec 13, 12:06
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “An excellent comment, Alf.Dec 13, 11:45
    • Bilbo on The ginger stepchild: “Who’s the loser? Me with the cut and paste jobs at every election or you and your multiple accounts stalking…Dec 13, 11:35
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Thought of today, For nearly a year now I have been stating I will retire from the efforts of independence…Dec 13, 11:17
  • A tall tale



↑ Top