The Wheels Of Reality
Posted on
August 28, 2025 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
…grind exceedingly slowly, but grind they do.
May 2021:
And now today, just four years and three months of struggle later:
As far as we’re aware, today marks the first time the Scottish Government has formally acknowledged that transwomen are men. For our next trick, we’re going to send in an FOI asking if they know what religion the Pope is, or where bears go to the toilet.
Do stay tuned.
They think very slowly don’t they – which is strange given all the talking they do:-)
Swinney’s taking a chance, allowing that one to get out. Did he run it past TWT for her approval first?
Yet again I’m lost in admiration for the commendable patience and persistence displayed by our editor.
In fact, had it not been irreedemably devalued by Mr Galloway, I’d be tempted ever so to say, “We salute your indefatigability.”
Chortle loudly
How small was the print?
These days I’m more interested in the religion of bears, and what kind of kludgy The Pope enjoys.
But it’s defo a great day for Scots in general and Scottish women in particular.
Looking forwards already to the first arrest of a bloke for perving in the ladies. A few good examples need to be made to encourage the rest.
Did you have a hard time at school with that name. Children can be cruel.
A transparent attempt to discover the name of the school I attended. And we all know why.
OK, maybe a wee hint. I have it on excellent authority that The Pope’s kludgy also has a ceiling painted by Michelangelo. But the public and even trusted art historians have never seen it. No known photos of it exist either.
I’m more interested in the religion of bears, and what kind of kludgy The Pope enjoys
==========
A commendably ecumenical concern.
The Bears are Protestant, if only nominally.
In the Glasgow constituency of our retiring, but not shy, non-binary former First Minister, . think rhyming slang and the local football team.
As to the TAIGH-BEAG facilities of His Holiness, I cannot help: not being privy to such matters.
But be careful: you risk the wrath of Professor Baird by your non-canonical use of the term, “kludgy“.
! feel confident that he will insist that the correct spelling is, “cludgie“ in his mither tongue.
Such a rebuke would be highly appropriate from a man sensitive to words, whose very surname is cognate with the Gaelic for “poet”
You’ve taken that one much further than I ever thought it could go, Cynicus.
I can’t decide if I should bluff it out – claim you’re the only reader who picked up on my concealed allusions.
Or fess up and admit you’ve found connections and links I was blissfully ignorant of.
OK, bluff it is. Well done for being the only reader smart enough to have really understood my post. I’ll do another one soon, hoaching with hints and references that only the smartest and best educated will cotton on to 🙂
P.S. Sorry about the “marble” jibe. I’ve just realised that perhaps your pic isn’t you. Superb chiseling though.
Cynicus says:
29 August, 2025 at 1:02 am
I’m more interested in the religion of bears, and what kind of kludgy The Pope enjoys
==========
A commendably ecumenical concern.
Ah, so that would be an ecumenical matter? 😀
The Flying Iron of Doom
“Ah, so that would be an ecumenical matter? ?“
Welcome to Scotland, Father Jack.
I vaguely remember someone proposing an amendment to include ‘sex’ as a protected characteristic when this Bill was going through Holyrood. A bit of googling brings up Johann Lamont as the proposer.
Link here, hopefully;
link to theyworkforyou.com
Once again I have to thank Nicola and the clique for pushing me to be in agreement with people I’d rather not.
Johann Lamont was never one of my favourite people but she gave a stonker of a speech in Holyrood which certainly upped my opinion of her and took a great deal of courage on her part given the response from the SNP benches.
Johann Lamont was always a bit of a rebel. Of course they didn’t want ‘sex’ to be added to the Bill because the whole point was to distinguish between ‘trans’women and women, and only the former deserved protection because of being the most put upon and discriminated against people I’m the history of the planet. You can’t set out to remove all female rights and hand them to men in frocks unless you first get rid of the female voices. If you can’t say what misogyny is, you can’t complain about it. Anyone who still believes that it was not a deliberate intention to remove all female rights is living in Cloud Cuckoo Land. Maybe the politicians didn’t get it – I think a lot of them did, and welcomed it – but the shadowy people behind this stuff knew perfectly well what they were doing. Everything has to be performative with the SG – look at what we are doing for females (51-52% of the population) but we’ll still insist that ‘trans’women are women as if that is not discriminatory, offensive and midogynistic.
@ Patsy and Brotyboy,I would agree with praise for Lamont for her stance but we must NOT forget EVERY party in HR voted this through, even some tories irrespective of the denials from their supporters,also the pursuit of this perversion and deviance was EAGERLY supported by ALL political parties in WM,the tories BLOCKED the bill because of the outrage against it and to shaft the Scum Nonce Party ,so never forget ALL the deviants and perverts from ALL parties in HR and WM were fully in support and eagerly embracing this LUNACY
Stanley Unwin is alive and well living at 6 Charlotte Square Edinburgh.
“Stanley Unwin is alive and well living at 6 Charlotte Square Edinburgh.”
=====
ALIVE? How can you tell ?
Their brains are so deep fried they could be served with a side salad and chips.
Do bears s##t in the forest? Just ask a bear who knows!
Winnie the “poo” is the worst of course, wherever he is – he goes!
There is a law in Rome that says if a “stray” cat takes up residence anywhere they are entitled to stay there undisturbed and must be fed in situ (true!). Allegedly from the very earliest foundations of the Christian city the pope has been a cataholic!
Similar to Britain’s immigration policy.
Is there any end to Scotlands addiction to flag waving. Like all addiction it starts off inocently but can spiral out of control and addicts find themselves waving any old flag just to get that hit. As all addicts know the first hit can never be repeated.
Progress!. Slowly moving from Nicola Sturgeons legacy to how much damage did she actually do.
Oh God save us, not another f*****g law! Use the Common Law, you morons. It already exists to deal with this stuff, with just a few tweaks. No hate crime law, full stop, in statute form, please. Completely and expensively unnecessary. Every eejit and his dog has jumped on these statutes to hound and harass people for telling the truth or for ‘offending’ snowflake tw*ts. Just gather them all up and put them under the Common Law of Breach of the Peace which can carry a fairly hefty sentence.
The very last thing that women and girls need is to be marked by having a law all to themselves. May as well hang a placard round our necks. I’m not saying that women and girls do not need to have protection against misogyny, but men need it against misandry, if we are to have equality. The Common Law would sidestep all the various, individual groups, and intersectionality, and cover the bloody lot! Statute law has been created and, when it is not enforced, people scream: two-tier policing or two-tier justice.
The Common Law avoids all that nonsense, taking into account every individual incident, as well as the general situation fort each case. The existing law of Scotland is held in contempt by our politicians. The police have a big enough job to do without adding more and more useless, and, often, unenforceable, laws to the list and they need to understand each one both separately and how it interacts with all the other statute laws. It is onerous and unnecessary.
Correct Lorn but the deviants and perverts in HR can’t be shown to have lost the ruling to FWS so they are trying, unsuccessfully, to rise above the result by introducing NEW unneeded and unwanted(by most normal people) laws, this is their attempt to appear relevant and undefeated, if we can’t get you one way we will do it another way,THAT is why these moronic fuckwits need to be destroyed
Absolutely agree, twathater. They have destroyed Scotland in order to appear that they are actually doing something relevant for Scotland. Oh, the irony. Well done to the Rev for digging out this stuff. His patience is a mammoth thing. I’m almost at the point of running amok in that hellhole they call a parliament and dismantling it in an orgy of destruction. maybe have a bonfire in the chamber. Just kidding, but I can dream, can’t I?
Contempt is the only thing the Scottish government has been very successful with. It’s not just the Scotgov that needs removed but the whole woke ideology has to be eradicated.
Lorn says:
“The very last thing that women and girls need is to be marked by having a law all to themselves. May as well hang a placard round our necks. I’m not saying that women and girls do not need to have protection against misogyny, but men need it against misandry, if we are to have equality.”
—————————————————-
It is not a law for women and girls only.
“the regulations will make it a criminal offence to stir up hatred against women and girls, as well as men and boys, because of their sex, which is defined as biological sex.”
Apologies; I posted the same without having read down to your comment.
Totally agree, Lorn. It is clear that the current set in Holyrood, of all parties, have no idea on the existing law nor on how to draft new legislation.
The MSPs may mean well, in some cases, but they don’t realise that “difficult cases make bad law” i.e. that there are sad situations which they want to put right e.g. assisted dying, but which is impossible to render completely safe from abuse. Same with troubled souls who want to be the other sex.
I agree with you, but the announcement shown above does say
(emphasis added)
so misandry is included, now that the Great Misandrist is partially side-lined. My memory is that the excuse for NOT including sex from the start of the Hate Crime legislation was that men might abuse the provision. Therefore, a separate misogyny bill was touted, never happened, and would have included fake women anyway.
The point is not whether the law is fixable. Making hate a judicial crime at all opens up an Orwellian rabbit hole of nightmare depths and bifurcations every which way. Making it an equal opportunities Orwellian nightmare fixes nothing. The ultimate direction of all this unnecessary law is postmodern neoliberal lawfare.
@Lorn
A balanced post Lorn. We won’t make any progress until we declassified the bull dyke view of men. I have both Grandaughers and Grandsons. I am more fearful of my grandsons future. Behind in Education and seemingly no role in society going forward because it’s not appropriate to help them. Nicola’s legacy unfortunately we have to deal with the consequences. I was seeing off my son today who is leaving Scotland. No longer can I have a pint with him watching the fitba or rugby. And the grandchildren showed their emotions. Are we doing the right thing?. Absolutely their long term prospects are better elsewhere.But it is tantamount to grief in this household. 2 Doctors leaving Scotland. Who cares? Nobody.
George, lots of people care about these issues you describe, unfortunately none of them are in powerful positions where they can effect positive changes.
This morning I’ve read two articles. One which touches upon the dangers FOR (primarily)working class boys living in Scotland (written by Annemarie Ward), and one which focuses on emigration from Scotland and immigration to Scotland (written by Leah Gunn Barrett).
Both highly relevant and informative articles.
link to dearscotland.substack.com
link to substack.com
“If agreed, the regulations will make it a criminal offence to stir up hatred against women and girls, as well as men and boys, because of their sex, which is defined as biological sex. The regulations will also enable courts to treat crimes motivated by hatred of someone’s sex as aggravated offences, which are considered more serious.
This would mean women and girls have the same legal safeguards available under the Act to groups targeted by hate crime because of their age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity and variations in sex characteristics. Freedom of expression is built into the Act, which was passed by the Scottish Parliament in March 2021.”
——————————————-
Defined as biological sex. But transgender identity is already in the Act.
Confusion will reign.
Somebody needs to petition Hollyrood to publish a list of the people and groups we’re still allowed to hate.
Probably gonna be a short list, but all this “Can I, Can’t I” is doing ma heid in.
Also, does anybody know if the difference between hating and stirring up hatred has been clarified in Scots law? I’m in my comfort zone hating various groups and individuals and I believe it’s my right as a Sovereign Scot to be free to do so.
But I don’t give a scooby if nobody else hates the people I hate. So I would be enormously pissed if somebody were to claim I’m stirring up hatred, just because I enjoy and share my own personal hates online.
I really dont know why our government just doesn’t make all crime a hate crime.
I mean who is to say that a dirty look is not a hate crime. Or a sarcastic word. Well of course they are
Better still why do we not make all crime a Terrorist crime. We do that quite well already as a work in progress.
Truly we live in a lawless evil vicious society. Only through our super, wonderful Scottish Government will we create our nirvana right here in the best wee country not in the world.
Our golden era led by the SNP lies before us. All glory to the great John Swinney.
And withbthat I must rejoin the SNP again as they Make Scotland Grate.
Lol
They really do make Scotland Grate, don’t they.
Swear allegiance to the flag
Whatever flag they offer
Never hint at what you really feel
Teach the children quietly
For someday sons and daughters
Will rise up and fight while we stood still
Can you hear me
Can you hear me running
Can you hear me running , can you hear me calling you?
“Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act: factsheet
Hate crime: what it is
Hate crime is a term used to describe behaviour which is both criminal and rooted in prejudice. This means that the law has been broken, and the offender’s actions have been driven by hatred towards a particular group. Hate crime has a hugely damaging and corrosive impact on victims, their families and communities.
Freedom of speech
The Act does not pose a risk to freedom of speech. It does not prevent people expressing controversial, challenging or offensive views, nor does it seek to stifle criticism or rigorous debate in any way. The right to freedom of expression is specifically built into the Act.
The Act is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, including Article 10 which protects everyone’s right to freedom of expression.
There is also a defence available that the behaviour or communication was, in the particular circumstances, reasonable.”
link to gov.scot
———————————————-
Perfectly clear isn’t it????
EHRC ACTS OVER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH SINGLE-SEX SPACE LAW
Organisations with policies allowing people to use toilets based on gender self-identification have been instructed to remove or amend them by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
The EHRC is taking regulatory action against 19 organisations for wrongly suggesting that men and women who say they are transgender have a legal right to access single-sex spaces and services “according to their self-identified gender”.
The previous British Government submitted 404 examples of “potentially problematic guidance” to the watchdog for review in relation to non-compliance with EHRC interim guidance on the practical implications of the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex.
‘MISREPRESENT THE LAW’
Baroness Falkner, Chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said it acted where it had “identified policies that misrepresent the law”.
According to the EHRC, the affected organisations — which span policing, education, health care and public services — “must respond with assurances that policies will be withdrawn” and “set out any proposed timetable to revise their policies”.
It added: “The EHRC will monitor compliance and consider further regulatory action if necessary.”
The watchdog is currently updating its code of practice which will address the issue of single-sex spaces following the Supreme Court judgment that the definition of a woman is determined by biology not ideology for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.
NON-COMPLIANCE
Whistleblowers from University College London have warned that the institution still allows biological men to use single-sex spaces reserved for women.
Its guidance states: “On campus, trans students can use ‘men only’ or ‘women only’ changing rooms or toilets according to which one they feel most comfortable in, or that they feel is most appropriate for them.”
Guidance on HMRC’s intranet also recently came under fire from gender-critical campaigners for advising employees who have ‘transitioned’ to “use the toilet appropriate to your new gender”.
And in Scotland, the City of Edinburgh Council has issued new EHRC compliant guidance for single-sex spaces in schools; it said the Scottish Government’s position on trans-identifying pupils was “in conflict with the law”.
(From The Christian Institute website, 28 Aug 2025)
Slug like in movement. It will be too slow to save them.
The SNP and Greens have cared more for themselves and identity politics the last 11 years and have consistently put Party before Scotland and the Scottish Working Class during those years. Have I just committed a hate crime?
Is reminding folk about the crushing defeat the Yoon Bear Team suffered the other night in Belguim a hate crime? Does that also make me a bigot?
I am old enough not to give a fuck.
Me too!
Lorn, I agree. There is also the guid Scots Law of “nuisance”, which would cover dangerous dogs, behaviour at football matches, etc. Politicians must continually make new laws, i.e. restrict the people, to be seen to be doing something. How about them making people’s lives better instead?
And I don’t agree with aggravated factors either. A crime is a crime. The reason behind it is thought police territory, unless there are mitigating factors, such as self defence.
I am reminded of The Two Ronnies’ yokels skits, as they said no-one could be offended by ridiculing yokels.
Breach of the Peace was and still is the catch offence used by Policec in Scotland to ‘ lift ‘ folks.
You can belive it or not be convicted for a breach of the peace when on your own.
An offence under good old Scots Law that can fit folk up for anything when needed.
HOLD THE FRONT PAGE!
AN EARTHQUAKE ROCKS SCOTTISH POLITICS – SLATER OUT.
GREENS ELECTION RESULT
“The party has around 7000 members, but only 950 voted.
The number of votes needed to be elected was 317.
Dominic Ashmore received 66 first preference votes, which represented 7% of the votes.
Gillian Mackay received 322 first preference votes, which represented 34% of the vote.
Lorna Slater received 264 first preference votes which represented 28% of the vote
Ross Greer received 298 first preference votes which represents 31%.
So Mackay was therefore elected at the first stage.
Ashmole’s votes were then transferred to the remaining candidates.
This meant that at stage three, Lorna Slater had 305 votes, and Ross Greer had 317, votes.”
(From The Herald)
SLATER OUT
I think the news can be filed under the category: “Small earthquake in Chile. Not many dead”?
Becoming co-leader of a party with just over 300 votes from a membership of 7000 says a lot about the health not just of the Scottish Green Party but about Scottish democracy and politics more generally, none of it good I’m afraid.
I’m reading a book about Weimar Germany at the moment called “Vertigo”, and whilst I don’t really hold with there being any direct comparisons between their situation and ours, there does seem to be something in the air right now: a sense of foreboding which doesn’t augur well for the chances of people taking a punt on independence rather than the bromides of remaining in the union, however dysfunctional we think it is.
Perhaps things really do have to get worse before they get better? A Reform victory, or at least the prospect of one (even the prospect of Reform being part of a coalition or the biggest opposition party) might be the only thing which galvanises enough “frit” Scottish voters to actually grow a pair.
Are TransConservation Areas Conservation Areas?
There looks to be the same kind of nonsense as the gender shite being rolled out by some faceless administrative bureaucrats with no mandate to do so in the “Scottish”
governmentAdministration of Devolved Powers, and planning departments.A prospectus has been created that looks to be 2 years in the making, packed with inaccuracies, falsehoods, and trying to re-write history, and also attempts to incorporate current woke bullshit like NetZero; And all produced without knowledge and therefore zero input from the actual residents that live in and know the area.
This will be a fun meeting to attend and give feedback…
There is pretty much unanimous rejection of the idea by the numerous directly affected stakeholders to extend conservation area status to include their non-conservation area conforming properties (and the entirety of their gardens).
Probably best if these gravy slurping administrators stepped away from their computer, got a spade and wheelbarrow, and cleared the pavements and roadside gullies & drains, so the bairns can walk to school safely.
In these times of manufactured austerity, they can’t even properly manage existing services and maintain what they already have responsibility for, so this is just yet more authoritarian overreach, constraining and burdening more folk with more bureaucratic hassle and expense, and further impinging on their liberties.
Never understood how lobbyists/activists representing less than 0.5% of the population who claim to suffer from an often self-diagnosed “Condition related to sexual health,” (WHO, 2019), can influence governments and public bodies to the extent that other 99.5% of society ends up turning itself inside out and upside down to accommodate the perceived needs of such individuals…
How did we get to this?
How did we get to this? Sexual perverts and fetishists have systematically entered political parties, and pushed themselves and their ilk into positions of power.
It is no secret!
O/t
Another perv
Labour msp accused of placing hidden camera in the toilets
And they rule over us
It is absolutely unbelievable to me that in the year of our Lord 2025, a person with a penis can be anything other than a man and a person with a vagina can be anything other than a woman.
That this announcement by the Scottish Government is anything other than stating the obvious is mind boggling.
I find it amazing how far society has regressed and can only hope that we have indeed turned a corner.
In the year 2025, if genetic mankind is still alive
And if women can survive
They may find in the year 2025
Ain’t gonna need to tell the truth, just hide behind a lie
Everything you think do and say
Was in the influencers post of the day
In the year 2025
Aint gonna need no teeth to stay alive
It’s all in the pill, the vape you take
So there’s no need to chew
And other than tats and loud hairdos
whos gonna bother looking at you?
In the year 2025
Beaker Queers arms hang limp at its side
It’s legs got nothing to do
Some machines doing that for you
Won’t need no husband, nor no wife
You’ll select your non binary progeny
From the bottom of a long plastic tube
In the year 2025
If Gods gonna come he should’ve made it by now
Maybe he’ll look around and say
It’s time for judgement day
And God is gonna shake his mighty head
And tear it down and start again
Cos in the year 2025
“Man” has progressively-regressed
To the realm of the androgynous slug and worm
And I’m kinda wondering if “Man” will be alive
Now it’s been thousands of year
For what he never knew
So in the year 2025
Now man’s reign is through
But through eternal night,
the twinkling of starlight
So very far away, maybe it’s best
All being just a brief flash of yesterdays light..
Slightly off topic but not much….the wackos at the Green Party have elected new co-leaders. What’s struck me was the number of votes cast. Less than a thousand equivalent to only 10% of the membership. Seems incredible to me.
Ever stop to think that maybe the Greens DON’T have their claimed 7,000 members? That maybe the 950 votes indicates the ACTUAL membership of the party?
Once you posit that the Green Party has exaggerated their actual membership (like the SNP does), then the voting numbers make more sense.
the mainstream press is, in its little nooks and crannies, knocking it out the park lately – “just coming right out with it”
link to archive.ph
“this country’s most disastrous infrastructure project”
– until the next one … the new supernuke is going to be a bobby dazzler, then there is that looming monster no one dares talk about – the long term dump for all the nuke waste (a metaphorically and literally toxic project that no one wants to touch)
“the country that invented the railways can no longer build one.”
– the chinese could have built you one, but you would rather cut your nose to spite your face
“Ultimately, the problem is that Britain does not go in for the kind of strategic planning that other countries carry out before setting out on a huge project such as this.”
– we don’t think good.
Rishi Sunak finally reduced it to a stump of a railway between Birmingham and Old Oak Common, six miles short of its intended terminus at Euston. It will probably cost about £80 billion, although as a House of Commons committee report points out, “We still do not know what it will cost, what the final scope will be, when it will finally be completed or what benefits it will deliver.”
– polite speak for : total absolute fuck up
“£100-million tunnel that everybody has heard of to protect a few hundred Bechstein’s bats”
“Amphibians are treated with similar sensitivity. There are to be 226 new ponds for newts. Patrick McLoughlin, the minister in charge of HS2 in David Cameron’s government, suggested it would be a lot cheaper to buy some herons to eat the newts. It didn’t go down well.”
– I love the nrvironmen as much as anyone, but … get a fucking grip
And you want to say better together for the broad shoulders of pooling and sharing … ???
– NO ONE can “PISH IT UP A WALL” like the english. Except the defence procurement apparatus in the US, but at least you get some cool shit there, like the F22, (plus global hegemony and then you print up dollars for nuthin and everyone has to accept them for real wealth, or you kill them … so it all works out)
The final HS2 will take 10 minutes off a short route London to Birmingham.
A billion here, a billion there … pretty soon you are talking real money. It is hard to get a grasp on this for the rubes – but 12B has been the “budget black hole”, or it could be 22B, or 40B; 12B was pledged by Kid Stonner for that silly eastern country on the verge of getting fucked; 100B is always the quoted number for new nukes (much higher); an aircraft carrier is about 5B, without the aircraft. The super expensive new nuke stations about 40B. Scottish budget for a year, 55B. Scottish GDP 200B USD. Ireland, Norway, Swiss GDP 600-800B USD. Just to calibrate your senses. A decent hospital 100M and one jet fighter 100M.
But the numbers don’t matter, they create it out of thin air (there is a magic money tree, for them), pish it up a wall, and make sure their pals all get directorships. What the country gets is dubious, e.g. the hi tech weaponry, no one really knows if it works well – e.g. all the shite we shipped to “that eastern country” never turned the war.
In contrast – those norwegs are connecting up their entire coastline (think how long that is) for 40B euros – connecting all the islands with tunnels, bridges, causeways, fast roads the entire length. Across the water the Faroese, are the worlds best tunnellers, amazing for a country of 40K people. That is a massive economic boost that just keeps on giving, year on year.
All the english are good for is – drafting a smooth memo – or “financial engineering” (i.e. we can construct a “yankee”, a financial derivate, that lets you bet on anything); in other words, bullshitting and swindling are the only things they are world leaders in.
– time to get all these nigels away tae fuck.
If you’re going to mention Norway and that eastern country in the same post, Confused, it must be confusion that’s stopping you from also mentioning that in terms of per capita donations, nobody has spent more than the Norwegians.
If I thought an Independent Scotland would also be a brave, generous and unbowed ally of our European neighbours who really do recognise raw imperialist colonialism when it’s blowing them up, I’d be a lot more in favour of Indy than I am. But until Indy gets its act together and sweeps you pathetic poot fetishists and yellow, lassie torturing scum enthusiasts out, it’s just going to have to muddle on without me.
As for the Covid Spreaders building HS2 faster and cheaper, get a grip. It’s not engineering problems that bedevil the project. It’s the kind of problems the Covid Spreaders would never see in their way, because they would round them up at gunpoint and incarcerate them.
Hey, I’m not knocking that – there’s a time and place for it. If you think an Independent Scotland is the perfect guinea pig for letting the state totally trample all law and all people’s existing rights when it wants to do something, shout it out loud and clear.
It will make a refreshing change from the tedious “what about my inviolate rights as a Sovereign Scot?” stuff.
Confused; Bravo!
“All the english are good for is – drafting a smooth memo – or financial engineering”
Hey, let’s play a wee game – let’s all pretend you speak truth.
Yet they seemingly have Scotland gripped tight. So just how pathetic does that make Scotland and the Scots?
Because you have yer heid sae far up yer erse, yer tache is tickling yer tonsils, I’ll answer for you, Confused.
Mair pathetic than a pathetic dying trans kid trying to win sympathy at a teetotal wake.
Now why don’t you accuse me of being an English Dew and then you’ll feel much better.