The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The trinity of cringe

Posted on February 10, 2013 by

Unionists can often be heard protesting that the phrase “too wee, too poor, too stupid” is a dreadful Nat calumny which nobody on the No side has ever actually uttered. And of course they’re technically right – not even “Better Together” is quite stupid enough (and certainly not honest enough) to come out and use the phrase in its overt form.

A Coalition source said the report would highlight the weakness of Scotland’s negotiating position with the EU if it was to leave the UK, given the size of its population and economy, which would relegate the Scots to Europe’s minor leagues.

“At these European summits, you see all the key players moving around, the French, the Germans and the British. But where are the Danish? They’re nowhere. It’s not that Denmark is not significant, but it’s not as important as these other nations, simply because of its size.”

That quote, taken from a story in today’s Sunday Herald, seems to be pretty closely related to the first two of the unholy trinity, though.

(And if you want to encounter the third, you don’t have to go too far either. There’s this piece from the Express, or this clip of David Cameron replying to the SNP’s Angus Robertson in the House Of Commons last year.)

The particularly odd thing about the Denmark example is that Denmark (whose population is slightly higher than Scotland’s and whose GDP per capita is more than 50% higher than the UK’s) just did something that the No camp regularly insist Scotland wouldn’t be able to do – secure an EU rebate.

But nevertheless, while we’ll never actually hear the six-word mantra that underpins the entire strategy of “Better Together” spoken aloud, it’s important to remember that it’s always there, sometimes closer to the surface than Unionists would like us to notice.

27 to “The trinity of cringe”

  1. HenBroon says:

    Just got back in and clicked in to Facebook to chat to someone and tripped over this wee nugget.
    link to on.fb.me
     
    Looking forward to reading about the Danish rebate and comparisons with Scotland, in the MSM tomorrow ;o)))) Douglas Fraser will doubtless headline it. And Call Kaye is bound to have it on her prog not that I would know as the last time I listened to her screeching I almost crashed the Jaguar.

    Reply
  2. James Morton says:

    Well oif course they won’t come out and say it precisely – they will hint at it…none to subtly, but the implications are there.
     
    Can’t run an army – we’d have to hire a norwegian – (too stupid)
    We can’t afford an intelligence agency (too poor)
    We don’t have enough planners for defense (too stupid & too poor)
    We wouldn’t have a big army or navy (too poor, too small)
    We couldn’t survived World war 2 – (too poor, too small & too stupid)
    We wouldn’t be able to compete in world trade because we would be scottish, not British (Again all three)
    We wouldn’t be able to compete in sports (too poor, too small)
    we wouldn’t be able to appreciate Britsh culture anymore (all three? yes I think so)
    There would be lots of treaties and forms to deal with (too stupid)
    We would not be taken seriously abroad as a world power (again all three I think)
    Can’t have the BBC (too poor)
    Wouldn’t be able to make our own TV (too poor, too stupid)
    so on and so on and so on.
     
    It’s always there – because in the end – its all they have.

    Reply
  3. M4rkyboy says:

    @Hen Broon
    I know one of the girls that asked a question on QT Stirling.She works for Falkirk council.The audience is obviously bussed in and weighted a certain way.

    Reply
  4. muttley79 says:

    Yes, the question is though: has Denmark got a better society?  To me that it the most important thing in achieving independence.  I honestly could not care less about UK’s influence at EU summits, the seat on the UN Security Council etc when the welfare state is being dismantled by a government we never gave a proper mandate to.  The No campaign have got a cheek bringing up EU summits, when it looks like we will be out of the EU anyway in the event of a No vote. 

    Reply
  5. Turnip_Ghost says:

    I saw on twitter one of the questioners was a Lib Dem councillor. Funny that…two people from councils!

    Reply
  6. Tatties says:

    I thinks its time these small countries in the E U are made aware of how British Unionists regard them.
     The sheer arrogance of these people is stunning.

    Reply
  7. HenBroon says:

    Turnip_Ghost says:
    10 February, 2013 at 8:28 pm

    “I saw on twitter one of the questioners was a Lib Dem councillor. Funny that…two people from councils!”

     
     
    Click my Link for the evidence. The BBC go to great lengths to ensure they get a unionist dominated audience. The SNP can only get on the audience by pretending to be something else. Most of the Stirling audience will have been vouched for by local representatives.
     
    link to on.fb.me

    Reply
  8. G. Campbell says:

    “Commenting on the publication of the first report from the SNP’s Willie Rennie Fiscal Commission Willie Rennie, Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats said:”

    link to glasgowlibdems.org.uk
     
     

    Reply
  9. G. Campbell says:

    “Commenting on the publication of the first report from the SNP’s Willie Rennie Fiscal Commission, Willie Rennie, Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats said:

    “The commission has found that I am too poor, too wee and too stupid to be taken seriously. I thank the SNP for this valuable report.”

    Reply
  10. CameronB says:

     
    As I said on a previous thread, the QT audience do not simply walk in off the street. They are carefully vetted and selected on the basis of their political beliefs. I have fallen at this hurdle on a number of occasions.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “As I said on a previous thread, the QT audience do not simply walk in off the street. They are carefully vetted and selected on the basis of their political beliefs. I have fallen at this hurdle on a number of occasions.”

      I can’t remember what I said on the form, but I got in first time.

      Reply
  11. Oldnat says:

    Alas, poor Wullie.
    link to bbc.scotlandshire.co.uk

    and the Rev Stu gets some credit!

    Reply
  12. frankieboy says:

    Despised, derided, patronised. That about covers it.
    At the 2pm news on Radio Scotland today boomed the almost gleeful report that ‘David Camerons says’ I stopped listening but then heard ‘Nicola Sturgeon says’ he was being negative and I am sure somewhere deep in my inner ear I could hear the BBC news reader saying ‘na na nana na’ whilst sticking out his tongue and wiggling his hands in his ears at what Nicola Sturgeon said. The BBC give the 2w2w2s message every day that I listen to them. They do it by saying somebody said, therefore distancing themselves enough to claim its not their words.

    Reply
  13. M4rkyboy says:

    @Hen Broon
    link to twibbon.com
     

    Reply
  14. CameronB says:

    @ Rev Stuart
     
    We do differ on a few issues though. How did you get on? Did you manage to get a question or comment in?

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We do differ on a few issues though. How did you get on? Did you manage to get a question or comment in?”

      I got a question in, though it was at the end and got pretty short answers.

      Reply
  15. Chic McGregor says:

    I read a few years back, that ROI had managed to get twice the legislation onto the books in the EU than the UK had.
     
    Also, who can forget David Cameron nervously having to ask the Irish negotiating team when they came out of a key EU meeting (from which Cameron was barred) whether the UK were still in the EU or not? He was obviously so concerned that they might have been ousted that he couldn’t wait for a san camera moment to ask them.

    The Irish delegate clearly relished Cameron’s embarrassment.

    Reply
  16. ewen says:

    I don’t have vote in the referendum. I’m relying on the people in Scotland as I can’t come home. I don’t have a cringe but so many Scots do. Too many have taken British gold,  have bought in to the British lie. Too many of us have had to leave and sometimes I despair that those who are left will vote no. 
    I want to come home, one day, to an independent Scotland. If I can’t come home to retire then I hope I’ ll be laid to rest in a free Scotland. I’ll be 50 in 2016 and  hope to pick up my Scots passport then. If the vote is no, then I won’t be back.
    Scotland has always suffered more from the cringers within than from our neighbours. Synthetic Scots make me grue.
     

    Reply
  17. ianbrotherhood says:

    @ewen –
    We’re going to win this thing mister. Seriously. We can’t afford not to. You could be coming back home a lot sooner than you thought.

    Reply
  18. ewen says:

    @ianbrotherhood
    I hope so. Needless to say ill be doing my bit. I come from nationalist stock. My parents put everything into the cause and it is all I’ve known and my core belief. 
     

    Reply
  19. Can anybody remember Robin Day asking the then Prime Minister Ted Heath what he thought about Scotland going independent on national tv, He would have been voting YES according to his reply. The BBC have a recording in their archives.

    Reply
  20. How different the media question the no campaigners and the yes group. It is now almost a complete farce. Do they really think that nobody will notice the bias,this attitude will divert a stream of voters to the yes side, so just keep up the goodwork.

    Reply
  21. Tamson says:

    Regarding the notion that Denmark has no influence in the EU, perhaps that “Coalition source” should recall the last international negotiation called the “Edinburgh Agreement”:

    link to en.wikipedia.org

    Denmark did more to put the brakes on Jacques Delors’ United States of Europe than Thatcher’s handbag ever did – and they did it democratically.

    Reply
  22. Soapy says:

    The various arguments that a country of 5 million would be unable to keep up with the paperwork, legislation, administration , removal of horse droppings from highways etc., may have some truth.
    But can we be sure if the 65 million presently in the UK are sufficient to do all the jobs necessary for their continued maintenance? Is it possible there is something we really should be doing that we are not?  What? Not one single thing? My, aren’t we good?
    Is it then, just credible that some of electron pushing and form filling so many people seem to be doing in the offices of power* these days could be ditched without anyone noticing? Might a smaller operation even prioritise that?
     
    *The only thing in the corridors of power these days seems to be people dying on trolleys.
     

    Reply
  23. David McCann says:

    I always find the Legatum Prosperity Index well  worth quoting when ever I get this argument. Note Denmark is number 2, with Norway number 1. UK is way below at number 13.
    link to prosperity.com

    Reply
  24. Chic McGregor says:

    Soapy,  what evidence there is for size versus success suggests that around the 5 million mark is the optimum.  Large countries suffer from bureaucratic inertia and complexity and its bedfellow corruption.
     
    There is an economy of scale factor for smaller countries but the big country syndromes start to kick in and override that effect at about the 5 million mark.

    Reply
  25. Ray says:

    If bigger was better we’d all be living on bloody Jupiter.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,737 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Undemocratic elections, Rigged elections for Scots. They knew they should give the Scots a vote ‘they” had discussed it in…Jul 10, 08:41
    • twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “It never ceases to amaze me how many fuckwits actually think they are in the same rich league as these…Jul 10, 03:05
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Wow! Did the paramedics get to you in time and are you alright? Would have sent you a posse of…Jul 10, 02:06
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “That I believe would be the Celtic mythical Tuatha de Danann, the Celtic equivalent of the Gods of Mount Olympus.…Jul 10, 01:48
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Reply to Chas @ 8.26 Oi Chas Leave James alone! It’s me that goes fishing and frankly, it’s no-one here’s…Jul 10, 01:38
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Well that would be you P3nisbreath; posting about “sucking blokes off” (your post), shafting blokes between “spread bum cheeks” (your…Jul 10, 01:13
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Yes, worthless treaties simply used ‘to legalize colonialism’, at least in the eyes of an Imperial justice system. A hoax…Jul 9, 22:59
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Piss off troll.Jul 9, 22:24
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “How’s the carp fishing going James?Jul 9, 20:26
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““–the chair of C-24 is quoted in a Guardian article explicitly saying that C-24 cannot.” Irrelevant, Aidan, because it doesn’t…Jul 9, 19:56
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “I literally asked you to provide evidence for any single one of your dumbass, unsubstantiated assertions. That’s not a “rebuttal”…Jul 9, 19:39
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Treaties are worthless, not unlike cease fires. How many treaties did the imperialist British sign before annexing the other signatories…Jul 9, 19:30
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Aidan She didn’t participate in acts of terrorism, and certainly not of treason (this was in Syria). This same murderous…Jul 9, 19:26
    • Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Ah, jist noticed this post by Aidan trying to diminish understanding of how much energy is exported from Scotland’s geographic…Jul 9, 19:22
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Andrew – I suggest she had her life destroyed by the decision she took to join a murderous death cult…Jul 9, 19:09
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Hatey – “… you expect me to feel sorry for the people who slaughter and abuse my country’s and my…Jul 9, 18:29
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Sam – did the university poll a wide range from the UK? Scotland only would probably throw up different results?…Jul 9, 18:17
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “What, that was your rebuttal? Lol. You surely don’t think I’m wasting any of my time on any of that…Jul 9, 18:11
    • agent x on Too Tight To Mention: ““Police preparing for Donald Trump to visit Scotland The Scottish government said it was working with the UK government to…Jul 9, 17:49
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: “See following Wings over Scotland article ‘Death from above’ (March 13, 2012). Stu writes: « We have a paid subscription…Jul 9, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Midgies tae. When oor junkies and jakies start being stealed an a’, we’ll ken we’re in the end game.Jul 9, 17:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “@AndrewR Sorry, but when it come to that kind of people, being heartless is the only language they understand. We’ve…Jul 9, 17:42
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Captain caveman, 12:04 pm. Actually the programme I am watching is How to Save England, -. The word England being…Jul 9, 17:03
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Does any left of centre politician care about the young people born in the UK, sam? Much of the evidence…Jul 9, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “TL;DRJul 9, 16:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sae true, NC, the scribblin is oan the wa. In fact, it’s only going to be (checks notes) 4-5 years…Jul 9, 16:40
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “When you don’t know what you think you know. Cambridge Journal of Economics Cover Image for Volume 44, Issue 2…Jul 9, 16:36
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “I’ve just run a couple of searches on ChatGPT for for similar search criteria. Which is helpful and revealing because…Jul 9, 16:32
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Not many people agree with you. https://www.derby.ac.uk/blog/margaret-thatchers-legacy/ Survey results In January and February 2019, researchers at the University of Derby…Jul 9, 16:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Great stuff sam. Now do the type of “personality” that posts interminably about pricks, penises, wanking, shirt lifting, glory holes…Jul 9, 16:22
  • A tall tale



↑ Top