The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The lockout

Posted on May 12, 2015 by

There was an interesting line in The National yesterday:

“The monthly Scottish Questions in Parliament looks set to be an odd affair.

Under the current system the Secretary of State for Scotland will answer six questions from the Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland, while 56 SNP MPs watch on from the back benches and are allowed to ask one question.”

In other words, business as usual.

Both the new Scottish Secretary, David Mundell, and his new shadow, Labour’s Ian Murray, were interviewed on today’s Good Morning Scotland. Mundell ruled out full fiscal autonomy, and indeed any suggestion that the SNP landslide had represented an expression by Scottish voters of a desire for more in the way of devolution than the feeble Smith Commission proposals.

Murray, meanwhile, stated his intent as being to oppose both the Tories and the SNP, refusing several times when asked to say that he’d work constructively with the MPs holding 95% of Scottish seats. (Indeed, despite reiterating his own opposition to the renewal of Trident, he wouldn’t say whether he’d actually vote against it.)

So Scotland knows where it stands. Two MPs from parties with just 3% of Scottish seats between them both plan to spend their time blocking the aims of a party with 95% of seats. Indeed, that party will barely even be allowed to be heard in the single brief Parliamentary session devoted to Scottish matters each month.

To onlookers, it seems that Scottish Questions will continue much the same as it did for the last five years – Labour setting up softball anti-SNP questions to give the Tories a chance to bash the Nats while both parties’ MPs sit on the government and opposition benches hooting and jeering in open contempt.

(Or simply drowning out the debate entirely with disrespectful chatter as they wait for the much more important business of Prime Minister’s Questions which follows it.)

The policies Scotland voted overwhelmingly for, in other words, will be sidelined and blocked by two parties who were both humiliated last Thursday with their lowest vote shares of all time, teaming up against the party which secured 120,000 more votes from Scots than any party has ever done at any election in history.

Are you feeling the love yet, readers?

4 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 14 05 15 18:49

    Westminster – Reform SNP voice distribution of new MP’s from Scotland | ShaunyNews - You are here now, why not comment?

  2. 14 05 15 18:52

    Ace Breaking News | Westminster – Reform SNP voice distribution of new MP’s from Scotland

507 to “The lockout”

  1. Rock says:

    Paula Rose,

    “@ Rock – do you have a problem with democracy?”

    Paula, “honey”, “dear”, do you believe that a Westminster election where millions of votes are wasted votes is an exercise in democracy?

    Reply
  2. Paula Rose says:

    I was referring to the democratic structure of the SNP and the Green Party – neither are top down, leader-knows-best systems.

    The FPTP voting system used for UK general elections is profoundly undemocratic and needs reform, something that the majority of parties that stood would agree on, but unfortunately the biggest two do not.

    Reply
  3. Rock says:

    Paula Rose,

    “The FPTP voting system used for UK general elections is profoundly undemocratic and needs reform, something that the majority of parties that stood would agree on, but unfortunately the biggest two do not.”

    Paula, “honey”, “dear”, surprise, surprise, we are of the same view on that.

    But that doesn’t make me any less angry about Patrick Harvie and the Scottish Green leadership for acting as spoilsports in the Westminster election.

    Patrick Harvie is a known SNP and Alex Salmond hater who didn’t miss any opportunity to criticise them during the referendum campaign.

    I wonder how Greens like yourself could be happy celebrating the SNP victory while posting on this site when your leaders’ stance could have easily hindered more than the one they almost certainly did.

    Reply
  4. Fred says:

    Hate disagreeing with Paula but Rock’s right about Clatty Pat, I’m as green as the next man but support for independence comes first and always.
    He didn’t like Salmond possibly because Salmond didn’t abide fools gladly and the business about appearing at Holyrood looking like Stig of the Dump is pathetic.

    Reply
  5. Morag says:

    I think Patrick’s nose is still out of joint over not being in coalition in 2011, and possibly being Deputy First Minister. This was after all widely predicted and I think even the SNP were anticipating it – possibly even hoping for it, not believing they could get an overall majority on their own.

    When the SNP got 69 seats, leaving no necessity for a coalition partner, he was reportedly quite disappointed. Especially as his party got far fewer seats than anticipated.

    Reply
  6. Paula Rose says:

    Patrick Harvie is not the Green Party folks, I thought I’d explained it all – but never mind I’m not going to dwell on this.

    Reply
  7. MrObycyek says:

    I am a bit disappointed that a previous post I made was not shown. In it, although it was off topic slighty, I attempted to answer Dr Ew in regards to his question to Brian Powell about JFK and Scotland.
    I have read the rules of this site but am not quite sure why it was not shown.

    Also, in The National on Tuesday it mentioned that the leaked memo inquiry is still ongoing according to official sources. Deary me. If as it has previously been stated the leak was from one individual and that individual is known to the powers that be then why is it taking so long to get the information out to people? This whole sorry episode stinks worse than my toilet after curry night, and that is honking I can tell you!

    Reply
  8. Rock says:

    Fred,

    “Hate disagreeing with Paula but Rock’s right about Clatty Pat”

    Morag,

    “I think Patrick’s nose is still out of joint over not being in coalition in 2011, and possibly being Deputy First Minister.”

    That is exactly what I have been pointing out but have been accused my many here of causing division and being a troll.

    If we want independence, the bitter truth will have to be expressed.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,205 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • TURABDIN on The shifting sands of memory: “SCOTTISH NATIONALISM is becoming like some abstruse theology concerned with the details of process at the expence of aim and…May 22, 10:53
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Lying to the Scottish people for hundreds of years that they were in a treaty of union with England and…May 22, 10:44
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““hoodwinked the rest of the world” Aye, James, with true, Scottish Exceptionalism of the highest purity, it’s only a tiny…May 22, 10:41
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Which part of the word “kingdom” do you not understand, Mia? Your lot chucked the Kingdom Of Scotland into the…May 22, 10:36
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “What word are you expecting from London?May 22, 10:32
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Lorn, If it is discovered that the 1707 treaty of union is indeed faux treaty it has ramification on all…May 22, 10:29
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Knuckle draggers gonna get friction burns from the nylon carpets in their bedrooms.May 22, 10:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “That’s right, Alf, there’s no union and there never has been. And so we Scots, with true Scottish Exceptionalism, are…May 22, 10:21
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Bbc might have a hairy fit and explode a zillion times, after all it is funded by the England Great…May 22, 10:18
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: “A country that is allegedly an “equal partner” in a “unitary two party state…..but; has no control over it’s own…May 22, 10:17
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Which is also why Westminster invented The Scottish referendum, (which if the treaty of union is not a hoax) and…May 22, 10:11
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: “Trolls gonna troll.May 22, 10:00
    • TURABDIN on The shifting sands of memory: “Scots Law: Domestic only, zero impact on English law regulated British state apparatus. Presbyterian Church of Scotland: Assured the Protestant…May 22, 09:56
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““The Kingdom of Scotland was extinguished” On this point, I have to disagree. I do not believe the Kingdom of…May 22, 09:51
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The shifting sands of memory: “In his latest musings, Robin McAlpine claims that Scotland is a feudal state rather than a democracy. He believes that…May 22, 09:49
    • TURABDIN on The shifting sands of memory: “THE VIEW THAT SCOTLAND is a part of England is the normative perspective of foreigners looking at the history of…May 22, 09:42
    • Oneliner on The shifting sands of memory: “Realism over romance? Absolutely Deception over truth? Certainly not In a parallel universe, Grangemouth Refinery remains open and Distillers plc…May 22, 09:40
    • Alf Baird on The shifting sands of memory: “It disna maiter when the ‘UK’ deceit occurred, the fact is the ‘union’ disna exist an haes nivver existed, apairt…May 22, 09:35
    • Chas on The shifting sands of memory: “This article is ‘manna from heaven’ for all the fringe nutters and cranks who habitually pollute Wings. Much gnashing of…May 22, 09:14
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “I think that that’s a reasonably accurate summary of the historical situation. So that’s how we came to be where…May 22, 07:51
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Strong, the “wanking on and on” is, in this one. Or should that be “wan” 🙂May 22, 07:33
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: ““the next ref” Aw, bless. Barbie’s pinning her hopes on there being another referendum! Ah well. Decades of pointless pish…May 22, 07:29
    • Big Jock on The shifting sands of memory: “The deid Queen called herself QE2. It was on the coinage. Yes I know she was QE1 officially in Scotland.…May 22, 01:00
    • Geri on The shifting sands of memory: “Not necessarily. Kosovo manages just fine. There are many countries who have ongoing disputes. It’s countries that recognise other countries,…May 22, 00:53
    • Geri on The shifting sands of memory: “It was meaningless because it wasn’t written down legally anywhere that they’d actually enact the result – just that they’d…May 22, 00:36
    • Geri on The shifting sands of memory: ““no matter what some nit picking academics poring over 3 centuries old dead parchments might argue.” Wait a minute there,…May 22, 00:26
    • robertkknight on The shifting sands of memory: “Scotland was effectively acquired, through hostile takeover, by England, who had threaten to cut off Scotland’s international trade through naval…May 21, 23:38
    • Oneliner on The shifting sands of memory: “What word from London, AI Dan?May 21, 23:22
    • Anthem on The shifting sands of memory: “Yawn….May 21, 22:49
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “” the laws that were not compatible with the Treaty fell into desuetude” Sorry, Lorn but on this, I have…May 21, 22:34
  • A tall tale



↑ Top