The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Crossing the floor 171

Posted on June 27, 2014 by

Until relatively recently I was very firmly of the mind that Scotland shouldn’t be independent. Born in England to English parents but growing up in Scotland since I was a baby, I was English to the Scottish and Scottish to the English. I’ve always considered myself British and still do. Not in a nationalistic way, just a matter of fact.

crossfloor1

In 2008 while in my second year at university I started an anti-independence Facebook group as a misguided joke, calling it ‘I Hate Alex Salmond’. I actually didn’t hate Alex Salmond, I’ve actually always thought he was a good politician, I just didn’t agree with some of what he stood for (and of course, one thing in particular).

So following a bit of negative press and some pressure from the university, I decided to change the name of the group to ‘No to Scottish Independence’. And then, gradually, some other things started to change too.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,919 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Careful, Aidan. The servants of the Nephilim may have been summoned to this thread.” Oct 21, 18:07
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “C’moan noo, MH. Within a small number of years of being Independent, we’ll be rich beyond the wildest dreams of…” Oct 21, 18:02
    • James on Faces In Sand: “Where did they find you?” Oct 21, 17:02
    • Onlooker on Faces In Sand: “Who’s the idiot looking smug and pleased with herself as she babbles on about the name of Scotland being the…” Oct 21, 16:49
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Does it not dawn on you, Geri, that it IS possible to have a legitimate concern for, and indeed “a…” Oct 21, 16:26
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “So, James Che, no Scottish Commissioners, no Scottish Jurists drafting the Scottish Treaty, no Queen Anne as titular head of…” Oct 21, 16:23
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Facts about: 1. the economic drain from Scotland because of the “Union”; 2. the legal proof that the “Union” is…” Oct 21, 16:07
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “John Swinney has today commented “Successive UK Governments have failed to establish a dedicated sovereign wealth fund using North Sea…” Oct 21, 15:37
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Geri – I can’t imagine what demons you’re fighting (or actively embracing) which would cause you to write something like…” Oct 21, 15:16
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 21 October, 2026 at 1:47 pm I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll…” Oct 21, 14:49
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “without even doing the slightest research, there are any number of possible reasons why the albertans voted that way -…” Oct 21, 14:15
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Sam was this case not related to holding slaves in Scotland i.e Knight himself who had been brought here by…” Oct 21, 14:00
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll be deid and forgotten. As for Canada being annexed…” Oct 21, 13:47
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Attaboy, James. Don’t you let Geri and Confused steal all the glory.” Oct 21, 13:37
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “give us your insights about alberta then, arse-piece. Looking further ahead, due to climate change cold northern lands will become…” Oct 21, 13:20
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “with the SNP in charge of “independence”, why would you need propaganda anymore – they are winding up the operation,…” Oct 21, 13:18
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, It is true that we are able to hold legal witness to the annexation of Scotland in 1707.…” Oct 21, 13:17
    • James on Faces In Sand: “Prick.” Oct 21, 13:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““shovelling yoon propaganda” Calm, mature reflection would lead one to consider that if that is true, and it is also…” Oct 21, 13:08
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Both Scotland and England supposedly remain as the Sovereign Countries that lend to the foundation of the State of Great…” Oct 21, 13:04
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nobody has much to say about Alberta’s thumping rejection of Indy. All that oil, King Charles on their banknotes, and…” Oct 21, 12:54
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “propaganda conduit, BBC Scotchland-shire, is being gutted – I hope all those journos have been made aware of their options…” Oct 21, 12:31
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Our findings have already been confirmed by expert legal opinion too, James. Scotland’s unlawful annexation and takeover (i.e. colonization) by…” Oct 21, 12:27
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Legal establishment issues: see caltonjock’s piece today about Lady Dorrian.” Oct 21, 12:15
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Thank you Northcode – that is exactly right!” Oct 21, 11:48
    • Oneliner on Faces In Sand: “No, it should read ‘United Kingdoms’ As in United States; United Arab Emirates etc.” Oct 21, 11:46
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “OK. If anything, I think my eyes are out on stalks. I have to go out now. I’ll keep my…” Oct 21, 11:37
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Scotland remains a sovereign country signed up to a voluntary union with and as does England if you…” Oct 21, 11:36
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aha! So “with one bound, Scotland was free”, morphs into “with one (encumbered, hence smaller) bound, Scotland was away, laden…” Oct 21, 11:32
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Scotland is no longer a minor player, it has become a Catalyst Country.” Oct 21, 11:23
  • A tall tale



↑ Top