The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Stories of the week, 15/6/2014

Posted on June 15, 2014 by

The top five most-read stories on Wings Over Scotland in the last seven days.

1. Voters less ordinary
Housewife turns out to be activist. What could go wrong?

2. Inaudible mumble amplified
A good week to bury someone calling a million Scots racists.

3. Becoming the story
Smearing the messenger.

4. To the editor of the Scotsman
Standing by for developments.

5. The unacceptable face of politics
Grumpy-Looking Man confronts Not Quite All There Woman.

This week’s theme: CYBERNATS! (Again.)

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 15 06 14 23:17

    Stories of the week, 15/6/2014 | Scottish Independence News

58 to “Stories of the week, 15/6/2014”

  1. Croompenstein says:

    Number 1 is a surprise 😀

    Reply
  2. Ian Brotherhood says:

    Rev,

    Do you happen to know the average number of comments per post since WOS started? Just wondering if WordPress allows you to see that.

    This past week must have seen a record high number of comments, or very close to it – every post seems to be getting well into the two, three hundreds, and O/T has gone mental since you revamped it.

    Reply
  3. eezy says:

    “Not Quite All There Woman.”
    Nicely put….as always.

    Reply
  4. joe kane says:

    Great to see WOS raising awareness for the plight of ordinary Scottish Labour politicians posing as extraordinary members of the public. I’m sure they’ll appreciate all the free publicity they’ve been getting this week from one of Scotland’s most popular sources of news and analysis.

    Reply
  5. Clootie says:

    Tony Blair is scary!!!

    I guess he is America’s mouthpiece this week. I doubt anyone is going to listen to him. I hope not.

    Reply
  6. heedtracker says:

    Its 5. for me. How you were able to sit there and not tell STV where to stick their “head to head” with that idiot is rather incredible.

    Even worse was both Dalgety and the interviewer blatantly lying about Alistair Darling and his “yes voters are blood and soil nazi’s” slander at the end. Darling’s head of UKOK campaign but imagine BBC/STV/Daily Sewer etc reacting to Blair Jenkins doing a Flipper?

    Not a good week for bettertogether at all:D

    Reply
  7. G. Campbell says:

    This doesn’t happen by accident.

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  8. CameronB Brodie says:

    My father has extraordinary difficulties comprehending and interpreting, do to a progressive degenerative disorder. Saying that, he was truly shocked when I went over some the above issues with him. He might have a pronounced aphasia, but it looks like he still has his sense of smell.

    Reply
  9. Ian Brotherhood says:

    One of the ‘stories of the week’ not listed is the WOS campaign material being sent out (possibly one of the reasons the Forces of Darkness decided to launch another futile attack) – I’ve got my boxes of leaflets, so if anyone wants some, thus saving postage costs for WOS, please come to the Wallace Tower on Ayr’s Main St tomorrow about 12.30 – 1.30.

    It’ll also be a chance to talk to Richie Venton, who’s the SSP Regional Organiser – that man has been known to persuade dogs and cats to deliver leaflets, put up posters and get otherwise politically active, so please, if you’re intending to ‘GOYA!’ (get off your arse) anytime between now and Sep 18th, why not make it tomorrow?

    Reply
  10. rab_the_doubter says:

    G Campbell
    Agreed – how could they not find 3 English England supporters. The minute I saw that alarm bells started ringing.

    Reply
  11. Macart says:

    @Clootie

    “Tony Blair is scary!!!”

    Understated post of the week there Clootie. 😀

    Reply
  12. Patrician says:

    Well this week has seen wings in the papers, on the radio and the tv, #wingsEverywhere.

    Is there really such a thing as bad publicity? I would bet the visitors and page view stats will have taken off again. You are quickly becoming enemy no1 for the British state, be careful man.

    Reply
  13. Adrian B says:

    Better Together needing a new diversion away from sliding support and missing case for the union:

    link to archive.today

    But Better Together has submitted what it claims is evidence of collusion, including an online message from Blair Jenkins, Yes Scotland’s chief executive, urging people to donate to the pro-separation Business for Scotland group.
    He is also accused of promoting fundraising for another registered pro-independence group representing students called Generation Yes.

    Reply
  14. Morag Graham Kerr says:

    Ian, sweetheart, is there any way you could post me a handful of these leaflets? Enough to put on the table for the punters at our Yes public meeting on 23rd June?

    I’ve tried to order them twice, but my PayPal is broken. It won’t let me pay for anything. And I really, really want those leaflets for the 23rd. Even a couple of dozen would be better than nothing.

    If there’s any way you can, remind me of your email address and I’ll email you my postal address.

    Reply
  15. Morag Graham Kerr says:

    My German guests all left this morning after a week of music-making and sight-seeing. This was the second leg of a choir exchange visit.

    They were all pro-Yes. They can’t believe the lies we’re being told. I told them about Barroso and one said “who was paying him?” and another said “but we want you to vote Yes because you will be better Europeans than England.”

    One asked to see the news one evening and I turned on the BBC just after ten. By ten past ten they were begging me to turn it off. They wanted international news, and news from and about Scotland. Instead they were treated to an interminable piece about Moslems taking over English schools – which they didn’t actually see as “news” as they understood it. They were incredulous that broadcasting wasn’t devolved and said they didn’t know how we put up with it.

    At the riotous ceilidh we put on last night, I heard one of our own members talking to a German guest. He was saying something about a big decision and having to wait for the verdict and “we can only hope the decision is positive.” I thought he was talking about something in his own personal life, and asked what the decision was. He looked at my prominent Yes badge as if I was mad and replied, the referendum of course.

    I just grinned and nodded. I should mention that this chap is a “New Scot”, originally from Sri Lanka, a highly intelligent and cultured gentleman of some means.

    Reply
  16. Ian Brotherhood says:

    @Morag –

    No probs ‘sweetheart’ (!) :

    ian@stevenston4.fsnet.co.uk

    How many do you want, for that event and beyond? Seriously – I’ve got 5,000 here.

    Reply
  17. Morag Graham Kerr says:

    Once the Germans had departed, I got going with leafleting the village for our big open meeting on the 23rd. We got a team together and had the whole place done and dusted in well under two hours. Now I have to sort the posters on the lamp-posts, and an ad in the local paper.

    We have Ivan McKee, Carol Fox and Derek Bateman, and it’s going to be great.

    Then. I have a retired colleague in the village, of English extraction. He does some work for my department when we’re very busy. He’s also active in the parish church. He’s said some stuff that had me pegging him as a convinced No.

    While we were divvying out the leafleting routes he happened to pass by and approached me. He wanted to know if I would be able to take some stuff he’d been working on at home in to work in the morning. I said sure, bring it round later, and he went on his way.

    After the leafleting was done, various people were reporting new Yessers they’d encountered. Calum, who had done my colleague’s street, said he’d been speaking to a woman who couldn’t make the meeting but would really have liked to go. He’d got her email and was going to keep her in the loop. Well, what do you know. My colleague’s wife.

    Then my colleague came round with the stuff he wanted me to ferry back to base. He mentioned Calum’s visit and asked if we’re related (because of the surname but we’re not). He said his wife was leaning to Yes, but she knew that his vote would cancel hers. I asked why he was a No.

    I’m not sure I got an answer but by the time we’d run through the McCrone report and the NHS it was revealed that he was persuadable, and I sent him off with an Aye Right leaflet.

    Pigs have taken Wing(s), I tell you.

    Reply
  18. Adrian B says:

    Ivan is really good – I saw him in Galashiels a couple of weeks ago. Sharp as a button and unwavering he is a great asset. I would love to see Derek Batman live. Going to miss all this after 18th September.

    Reply
  19. donald anderson says:

    Even if we do win in September does anyone expect the poison to desist? Labour placemen throughout Scotland will be natural saboteurs.

    Ruth Davidson and the previous Dover House, London, England, Office boy/lapdog, said he would work for the best deal for Scotland, but Labour Spokespersons were always incapable of answering the question put to them by soft TV interviewers, who might as well have sat on their laps..

    Reply
  20. CameronB Brodiie says:

    Kevin McKenna
    Apologies for any unkind remarks. Please keep it up and don’t forget “blood and soil”. 🙂

    link to theguardian.com

    Reply
  21. R whittington says:

    Rev- when are you going to do another sensible soccer? I used to love that game.

    Reply
  22. Re the Scottish football fans supporting England, it may send a message that we are not all anglophobes

    Reply
  23. goldenayr says:

    “This week’s theme: CYBERNATS! (Again.)”

    Naw Stu,this weeks story is Cameron going to Orkney today to try and divide our country into smaller parts without a mandate.

    Not one of the parties representing the islands stood on this ticket.

    Divide and conquer,the Romano/German way.

    Reply
  24. Ewan MacKenzie says:

    ronald russell says:

    Re the Scottish football fans supporting England, it may send a message that we are not all anglophobes

    This is exactly what I was thinking Ronald. And of course most Scots aren’t Anglophobes, but it can come across as that if you only look at people’s views on the England football team.

    Personally I’d be perfectly happy for England to win the World Cup again after we’re independent – with our own broadcasting service we wouldn’t have to listen to them go on and on about it for 60 years.

    Reply
  25. Robert Kerr says:

    If England felt the heat and humidity in Manaus they can look forward to real pollution in Sao Paulo. I Have been there.

    They suffer for their art.

    I’m in two minds as to whether it is better for them to fail or not.

    Well done La Belle France!

    Reply
  26. Dr JM Mackintosh says:

    Rev Stu,
    O/T
    For some comedy relief I had a browse at your Zany links.

    Alan Cochrane’s link was really funny. Initially I thought it was some kind of BBC Scotlandshire spoof – but No – it was the Telegraph.

    Here are his headlines on Gordon Brown…

    Quips at the ready, the former premier is a man transformed facing a fight that he can win
    Gordon Brown launches the Labour Party’s No campaign with an air of optimism
    (3rd June 2014)

    Who knew: Great Broon could be key in defence of the Union
    Former prime minister’s crowd-pulling enthusiasm may also rehabilitate reputation
    (4th June 2014)

    Scottish independence: If Gordon Brown wants to save the Union, he should avoid cheap attacks on his enemies
    David Cameron has not pitched Scotland against England in the referendum debate, as Gordon Brown claims, argues Alan Cochrane.
    (9th June 2014)

    For goodness’ sake Gordon, this is not all about you
    Former prime minister attacks Cameron and sidelines Darling instead of focusing on Better Together campaign
    (9th June 2014)

    Oops. Pretty well sums up Better Together – No thanks Campaign.

    Cochrane – What a complete numpty.

    Reply
  27. goldenayr says:

    Robert Kerr

    I’m in the,further England go in the world cup the better for us,camp.

    Saying that,after watching Italy not even coming out of first gear to beat them,I don’t fancy their chances against Uruguay and especially Costa Rica.

    Reply
  28. bookie from hell says:

    brilliant cartoon–Blair–Iraq

    link to mobile.twitter.com

    Reply
  29. heedtracker says:

    Its interesting watching millions of England supporters with England flag, strips and the Cross of Saint George face paint but vote no Guardian very weird Gordon Brown front page new book review says “Behind the crisis of the union lies the shattered postwar consensus. Woad-daubed Bravehearts are a symptom, not its cause.”

    Another United with Labour, Bettertogether, No Thanks, week kicks off.

    link to archive.today

    Reply
  30. manandboy says:

    Lord Reid of Cardowan presents the No case
    in a full page advert
    full page!
    He has a golden opportunity
    to promote the No arguments.

    This is his big pitch –
    We can have our own unique identity
    a-a-aaand
    benefit from the security
    that comes from being part of something bigger.

    Identity ? This is shooting fish in a barrel.

    “We can have our unique identity”
    So we can keep on calling the country Scotland.
    That’s very kind of Lord John and Westminster
    for allowing us the privilege
    and the benefit -would you believe –
    of continuing with our own name, our own unique identity.

    This is the first fruit and benefit of voting No.
    Hand over to England’s super-rich Tory ruling classes
    £4 Trillion worth of oil and gas and in exchange
    we get to keep the name ‘Scotland.’

    Have you ever heard such fuddle-muddle?

    Such contempt for Scots.

    A Labour Lord sending a message to the Labour rank and file whom he treats like imbeciles and idiots with this claptrap.

    Presented with this, my dog would walk away.

    Lord Reid of Cardowan himself seems a little confused about his own identity – he uses his old identity viz. John Reid
    for this full page advert.
    Addressing the punters, he’s John Reid, proud Scot, Celtic man, went to St Pat’s, C’brig, good Catholic school and Labour all his days.
    But in Westminster, among the important people of the English Establishment, and on the BBC, he’s Lord Reid.
    Enough said on the subject of identity.

    Next comes the other trade. Give us your 4 trillion pounds worth of oil and we’ll let you continue to live within 30 miles of the biggest nuclear weapons storage facility outside the US.
    We’ll let you remain as THE No 1 TARGET in the event of a nuclear confrontation with unfriendly nations.
    That’s “the security that comes from being part of something bigger”.

    And all Scotland has to do is sign over every last ounce of our massive wealth of oil & gas resources which are so great it will take 200 yrs to extract and that’s before you get to the limitless wealth attached to hydro, wind and tidal energy.

    And so much more – the finest whisky in the world made from the purest water in the world, and on and on.

    Lord Reid, is this really your best shot ?

    You would take everything and in exchange
    You offer us ‘identity’
    and what you call ‘security’?

    I’ll tell you something – were Scotland to vote No
    we would get a new identity –
    The world’s most stupid and most gullible nation.

    In this advert
    you have achieved something
    I’ll give you that.

    You’ve made yourself an object of ridicule.

    With a Yes in September

    Scotland will avoid doing the same.

    Reply
  31. scottish_skier says:

    I had a quick look at polling on footie. Yougov 2010 compared to MORI 2014.

    As Scotland moves towards independence, the level of support for the English football team is unchanged at ~20-24%, with ‘anyone but England’ reaching an all time low of 5% for this world cup, down from 24% in 2010.

    This is exactly what you’d expect, i.e. any ‘Oh no, England on the telly all the time again’ feeling reaching an all time low as the referendum approaches. How could it be any other way? England is going from being ‘That’s not my country – why do I have to hear about it all the time’ to being ‘All the best to the neighbours’ or ‘I’m not fussed’.

    I imagine this is annoying for unionists; doesn’t fit with the narrative, but it’s only natural in such situations. After all, England is becoming ‘Our new neighbour’ rather than the ‘Auld enemy’.

    If you have two groups of people with different views (in this case political) forced to live together in the same home (UK), they’ll argue. Give them their own homes and that will stop. It’s not rocket science.

    The auld rivalry the union created is dying as Scotland becomes its own country again.

    Reply
  32. bookie from hell says:

    He added that it was essential for economic and social reasons, and that the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta was an ideal time to restate British freedoms – and make it clear everyone had to respect them.

    Mr Cameron will also be holding a ‘one year to go’ Magna Carta reception at Downing Street

    Tony Hancock: “Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?”

    Lol

    Reply
  33. manandboy says:

    For the record.

    John Reid advert in the Scottish Catholic Herald

    link to tinypic.com

    Reply
  34. The Rough Bounds says:

    Just had a look through our Monday Dundee Courier. On page 17 they have a picture of a bloke standing in front of a couple of Yes posters. He is wearing a hoodie and is drawing on a fag (it gives sunken cheeks). He is unshaven and, to be frank, looks like an unkempt down and out.

    Of course he may be none of those things; he may be a very nice fellow and may just be a passer by pulled in to make a ‘shot’, or he may have been brought along specifically to make the shot.

    I have my own opinions. Make up your own mind folks.

    Reply
  35. bookie from hell says:

    how’s the Magna Carter British values,if the union wasn’t formed till 1707

    so for PM,British means England

    Reply
  36. Seasick Dave says:

    Re the England team, I’m offshore at the moment and have going from my usual couldn’t care less attitude towards England to a more positive supporting role, mainly because they haven’t had the sickening hype this year and they are almost the underdogs in their group and have some bright, young talent.

    The problem is, any encouraging noises I make towards the team is met with disapproval from England supporters on board as they think that I am taking the piss!

    You just can’t win 🙂

    Reply
  37. Seasick Dave says:

    going = gone

    PS The missus is from Engerlund.

    Reply
  38. Elizabeth says:

    Scottish Skier – it’s funny you should say that. I’m surprised at how non-fussed I am this time re England’s performance in the World Cup. I feel rather detached from it. I even doubt that will change if they get further and the jingoism of the commentary team increases! It’s another country.

    I

    Reply
  39. Faltdubh says:

    Interesting as always, Skier.

    I agree. I think through devolution, I certainly have become more confident and matured in wanting England to lose. I just don’t really care about them and if being honest, they were unlucky on Saturday to not get a draw.

    If anything, I’m spurned on a little especially the A.B.E crew who will vote no in September yet have the audicity to go back to Hampden and sing F.O.S.

    Reply
  40. Tamson says:

    @scottish_skier

    This, of course, is the nub of the Grit Nat establishment’s fight. Scotland leaves and they have one less option for the ‘divide and conquer’ strategy.

    Reply
  41. heedtracker says:

    link to bbc.co.uk Start the ukok week with one of the bigger BBC frauds on Scotland in action. The whole bettertogetherBBC vote no thing’s like watching con artists trying to bilk suckers day after day.

    Reply
  42. Schrodinger's Cat says:

    Tony Hancock: “Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?”

    ha ha ha ha ha

    Reply
  43. David Wardrope says:

    Re the football thing, I’m not sure I approve of the presenters asking politicians if they’re supporting England or not in the World Cup. When Blair Jenkins was asked I just got a flashback to my school days when you were asked if you liked rangers or celtic, and then had to answer correctly just to appease the person you were speaking to for fear of getting a doing. It grates with me that if a Scot says they’re not supporting England then they’re racist or anti-English. If I say I support England does that make me racist or anti-every other country in the tournament? I have no real affiliations with England so whats the trouble in supporting Brazil, Argentina or Germany instead, based on the fact that I like to watch great players in action and doing well? Just because I don’t agree with how unionists believe I should think, I (or anyone else) should not have to curb perfectly acceptable and reasonable opinions in order to seem supportive to others. Whatever happened to freedom of speech… Apologies if anyone sees this as an attack, it was not intended as such.

    Reply
  44. Bill McLean says:

    Does anyone know the date of the “Scottish” Daily Express article that indicated nationalist are more likely to be abused than unionists in the ratio 21:8. That dishonest Alexander McKay was in the Express on Friday with the lie that abuse is only from nationalists – today he is stirring the religion pot! My wife would like to drop the Express a line but wants the date of the abuse article. Unlikely they will print a letter as McKay is becoming their poster boy and less and less pro indy letters are appearing in that rag. I don’t read it anymore but buy it for my English wife. She is also a YESser – drew her own conclusions after living here for a while!

    Reply
  45. steveasaneilean says:

    What’s the Magan Carta got to do with the price of fish? As the British Library are keen to point out “Magna Carta never applied in Scotland, and the writ of habeas corpus, which was standardised in England under the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, has no meaning in Scotland”

    So invoking the Magna Carta in the Scottish Referendum debate is just silly and only serves to (deliberately) muddy waters.

    Talking of fish, a certain charter produced in Arbroath in 1320 might be more relevant to this debate…

    Reply
  46. heedtracker says:

    link to bbc.co.uk How to monster the Scottish YES vote by using only an email from a SPAD that got a Labour activist’s dad wrong, BBC style.

    Or, How to attack Scottish democracy using the third person, BBC style and ending attack with

    “Mr Salmond believes it was a blunder which has led to a manufactured spat.”

    For that good old BBC balance n shit.

    Reply
  47. Nana Smith says:

    @Bill McLean

    I believe this is the article re abuse published 9th March

    This quote taken from the article:

    “In a worrying development for the Better Together campaign, 21 per cent of those planning to vote Yes have received abuse or threats compared to just eight per cent of those planning to vote No”

    link to express.co.uk

    Reply
  48. Hood says:

    Bill McLean

    I archived it here

    link to archive.today

    Reply
  49. heedtracker says:

    link to thesaint-online.com

    Quick right click google of Professor Colin Kidd and his extraordinary Guardian puff for How I saved the world from Scotlandshire by Gordon Brown. Oh my god. If dudes like this are in uni’s marking actual essays, we’re all fcuked.

    Reply
  50. Proud Cybernat says:

    O/T but uplifting.

    The scene from my window this morning:

    link to scottcreighton.co.uk

    Reply
  51. TheItalianJob says:

    @Nana Smith and Hood

    Goodness. That was quick. What a fountain of retained knowledge we have on Wings.

    Reply
  52. scottish_skier says:

    ICM tables are out.

    Martin Boon has been fiddling the M/F figures again to boost No:

    45(-3)% Men
    55(+3)% Women

    If you correct, it’s actually 46%Y / 54%N / gap = 8 / 4% swing needed for parity rather than 45/55/10/5%

    4.4% to many people from England again too with not enough Scots (-3.5%), which would narrow things even further by a point or two.

    Interestingly, we know that Martin Boon of ICM was hunting for his mysterious shy No voters which he’s just sure must exist as he sits in his London office – someone who did the poll sent Scotgoespop screenshots.

    They asked the ‘uncomfortable/comfortable with giving VI’ again, this time right at the end where it could do no harm in theory and could be tied back to Y/N.

    Not in the tables. Maybe Boon didn’t like what he found? His last clanger of an attempt suggested a big shy Yes…

    Reply
  53. Hood says:

    Proud Cybernat

    Thats beautiful.
    A sure sign of what the future holds 🙂

    Reply
  54. Bill McLean says:

    Nana Smith and Hood – many thanks for your help. This site terrific as usual – it’s contributors, the information they provide and of course our blessed Rev! Wifie will be writing to the “Scottish” Daily Express although I doubt they will print as they have less concern for democracy than they do for Scotland. Thanks again!

    Reply
  55. Colin says:

    I’m a bit worried this morning, it’s 11:00am and I’m still waiting for the first daily scare story.
    Has project fear gone in to hibernation, run out of guff or have they all been up late watching the football?

    Reply
  56. IcySpark says:

    @Colin

    Never fear the BBC is here.

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  57. Brian Powell says:

    steveasaneilean

    Interesting though on Habeas Corpus, in 1834, Sir Archibald Alison, lawyer and historian wrote:

    “it is the glory of England that the Habeas Corpus Act, passed in the reign of Charles II., first established an effectual barrier against the evils of arbitrary imprisonment in the southern part of the island. Admirable,however, as the provisions of that justly celebrated statues are, they must yield the palm to the Scottish Act, which, a hundred and thirty years ago, provided an absolute security against the continuance of imprisonment, by any possible contrivance, beyond 140 days; whereas the English Act only gives the prisoner the right to insist that his trial shall be brought on at the next assizes, an event which may often be five or six months from the period of committal, and even then allows the prisoners to be remanded to the next assizes, if the prosecutor’s witnesses are not ready to attend.”

    He was writing about what was lost when the old Scottish Parliament was no more and we no longer had the powers to manage our own affairs.

    Reply
  58. Colin says:

    @ IcySpark

    That’s better, thanks.

    Another load of guff though. 😉

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,145 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Northcode. Give us our Country back, you must be joking, England will fight tooth an nail and avoid everything in…May 21, 17:19
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Thank you stu for taking this discussion up, it is sorely needing clarification, It is without doubt that England presumed…May 21, 16:47
    • Ian McCubbin on The shifting sands of memory: “Northcode has it clearly. The book legitimacy….self determination clearly sets out the legal routes for colonies like Scotland. The Independence…May 21, 16:28
    • Dek on The shifting sands of memory: “Well said.May 21, 16:08
    • GM on The shifting sands of memory: “Aye, it is a wonder Peter. I recall at the time being extremely frustrated at Swinney accepting what was on…May 21, 15:55
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “My understanding of Professor Black’s view is that Scotland was illegally annexed as a territory of England and that the…May 21, 15:48
    • Peter McAvoy on The shifting sands of memory: “As I have mentioned on previous comments to articles on Wings Why do the SNP and other independence supporting parties…May 21, 14:47
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The shifting sands of memory: “Scottish Sovereignty Research Group Conference (17 May 2025) KEYNOTE SPEECH BY PROFESSOR ROBERT BLACK KC Starts at 1.46.35 into youtube…May 21, 14:30
    • Skip_NC on The shifting sands of memory: “Can you extrapolate a Scottish sub-sample of Westminster voting intentions to Holyrood with any accuracy? Voters (well some at any…May 21, 14:30
    • Peter McAvoy on Just a couple more shots: “While watching the tv baftas,I wondered if someone would make a drama about For Women Scotland and their long and…May 21, 14:24
    • Effijy on The shifting sands of memory: “House Boy Kerr sits happily on the gravy train and no second class colony is going to take it away.…May 21, 14:13
    • PhilM on The shifting sands of memory: “Re: the inevitable comments of people unqualified to discuss the history of international law or the constitutional history of the…May 21, 13:59
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The shifting sands of memory: “Extremely rare for the SNP to hit 2%, four times in a row on UK wide, Westminster voting intention polls.…May 21, 13:53
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “Better Together ?May 21, 13:45
    • aLurker on The shifting sands of memory: “CJ that link is broken. 🙁 So use this one instead: “The UK – A Voluntary Union or Capture by…May 21, 13:20
    • Ian McCubbin on The shifting sands of memory: “Well it just clarifies to us all that Scotland is a colony . Thus seeking independence has clearer reasons to…May 21, 13:19
    • 100%Yes on The shifting sands of memory: “What ever happened to the new site layout, I preferred it.May 21, 13:17
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: ““We have catched Scotland and will hold her close” The Speaker at Westminster 1707 following the Treaty. Says it all…May 21, 13:17
    • 100%Yes on The shifting sands of memory: “I believe whats upset Mr Kerr is the fact he’s been running about like a tit all his life shouting…May 21, 13:12
    • Jennifer Livingston on The shifting sands of memory: “Robert the Bruce has made it clear by being accused of being a leper that he plans on being resurrected…May 21, 13:07
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “I’m not aware that anyone has ever said that ‘Scotland is a partner in the Union’ as a legal position,…May 21, 13:06
    • Robert Hughes on The shifting sands of memory: “One irony being the current SNP have studiously avoided referring to anything related to the * Union * , eg…May 21, 13:05
    • caltonjock on The shifting sands of memory: “https://caltonjock.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=27761&action=editMay 21, 12:54
    • BLMac on The shifting sands of memory: “If Scotland has been “absorbed” into England, why isn’t it called England? Or how about “North Britain”? – They tried…May 21, 12:48
    • Tormod on The shifting sands of memory: “Well, tories (of whatever complaexion) are going to tory.May 21, 12:36
    • aLurker on The Ace Attorney: “Mia 20 May, 2025 at 9:41 pm >I do not know if they were nutters or not. What I do…May 21, 12:35
    • Mark Beggan on Just a couple more shots: “Exactly Lorn. How did we survive in the past, how did we ever manage to survive. I agree with whoever…May 21, 12:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Just a couple more shots: “I know what you mean, but if you take a look at the manboobs on some of those lardy trans…May 21, 12:31
    • aLurker on The Ace Attorney: “@Captain Caveman Every day is a learning opportunity eh? It is indeed a well known political saying. Often attributed to…May 21, 12:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The Ace Attorney: ““religious differences, none of which matter today” If only that was true. I’ve been slow to pick up on this,…May 21, 12:22
  • A tall tale



↑ Top