The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Smear and smear again

Posted on March 29, 2012 by

So another 24 hours go by, and still absolutely nobody in the Scottish media thinks it at all newsworthy that the country's main opposition party has a deliberate policy of refusing to support ANY Parliamentary motion put forward by the SNP, regardless of its merits. We wish we were more surprised.

Scotland Tonight, which at least engages with its viewers on Twitter, claimed its reporting team were "not excited" by the astonishing revelation, openly and publicly made by a Labour MP, that Scotland's second-biggest political party was more interested in party advantage than the interests of the people. Newsnight Scotland and Reporting Scotland both ignored the story, as did all of the nation's newspapers.

The Herald and Scotsman did both run tiny pieces on the less-interesting prelude that brought the news to light (Labour's ham-fisted refusal to vote against George Osborne's 50p tax cut for the rich), but neither could find even half a sentence in passing to mention the much more significant discovery of the Bain Principle.

The other story covered by Wings over Scotland yesterday DID manage to secure a lot more media attention, though. Following on from the Telegraph and Caledonian Mercury, both Scottish broadsheets were able to find large amounts of space to repeat the powderpuff story about Alex Salmond offering a couple of long-standing SNP members a cup of tea and a biscuit in Bute House.

The Herald put it on the front page – in a piece so poorly researched and edited that it managed to knock £30m off the value of the Weirs' Euromillions jackpot (repeatedly giving the amount as £131m rather than the actual £161m) – and presented the story as dramatically as possible, giving plenty of space to Labour's Paul Martin to make lurid accusations which the paper depicted neutrally (Martin merely "said" things) while it portrayed the SNP spokesman's response as angry and defensive, using phrases like "The First Minister's most senior aide stormed…" and "reacted with fury" .

 

The Scotsman, meanwhile, outdid its rival with TWO separate stories, featuring on the front page of the website and as the lead item in each of the "Scotland", "UK" and "Politics" sections. And this, remarkably, happened despite the paper also running a leader column which explicitly noted that the Weirs' donation did NOT belong in the same category as those that have been solicited and/or covered up by Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems:

"At the heart of this affair there is a serious problem for political parties. They need money to run expensive campaigns. People who give large sums of money tend to be those who do not hand over cash without expecting something in return. There are people who simply believe in the party cause – the lottery winners who have given £1m to the SNP, for example – but they are few and far between."

It probably goes without saying that the Daily Record also managed to cover the Weirs' so-called "tea party", and it also ran it twice – though it should be noted that both pieces were handled rather more soberly and even-handedly than either of its two supposedly more grown-up counterparts – but didn't consider either Willie Bain's admission or Labour's tax-rate abstention to be worthy of even a few lines.

Supporters of independence are often accused of paranoia by the Scottish media, but no belief is paranoid if it's true. The embarrassingly transparent attempt by the press to bury the story of the Bain Principle, while devoting page after page after page to repeatedly casting aspersions on an entirely legitimate, open and above-board donation which the SNP conspicuously announced the moment it happened and which absolutely everyone accepts was not made with any ulterior motive or seeking any benefit, will do nothing but fuel the nationalists' fire.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bobby McPherson

The Scottish Sun covered it will try to find it n post it here

Longshanker

It's a non story. Bain was dumb to articulate what he did. But I think May's election results last year was notice that the average Scots voter acknowledges the Labouring party's shortcomings.
What do you propose the headline would be?
 
OPPOSITION PARTY PLEDGE TO OPPOSE PARTY IN GOVERNMENT
 
Hardly earth shattering in its dullness.
 
The only media conspiracy of silence on this one is, as the Scotland Tonight people alluded to, it's nothing to get excited about..
Whereas:
How many people know who Bain is? How many know who Salmond is?
Contrast and compare.
 
Largest single donation ever to The Sun King's political party – highly newsworthy.
Bullingdon Dave's troubles – highly newsworthy.
Hardly surprising that non-Murdoch vested interests have gone to town with their laughable attempts at making a comparison.
The Souter accusations voiced elsewhere are much more damaging but too old to be topical, so it only makes sense – in the media term of the word – to go with what they have; Bute house tea and caramel wafers and No.10 flat and 1/4 Million Pounders.
Basic stuff.
 
 
 

Peter A Bell

Longshanker seems to conceive of the role of a political opposition in much the same way as the British labour & Unionist Party's branch in Scotland. And he is just as mistaken in believing that this role amounts to no more than opposition for its own sake.
A significant part of the role of the opposition is to scrutinise government proposals with a view to ensuring that the measures under consideration serve the interests of the people of Scotland. The Bain Principle precludes all scrutiny and eschews any consideration. It holds that measures must be opposed regardless of anything other than the fact that they are proposed by the SNP. That the measure might be beneficial to the people of Scotland is explicitly rejected as irrelevant.
We saw a perfect illustration of the Bain Principle in action at FMQs today. Richard Simpson was tryin to justify his group's continued opposition to minimum alcohol pricing on the grounds that it would generate windfall profits for the supermarkets. He went on to insist that steps must be taken to "claw back" these windfall profits. He did so apparently oblivious to the fact that his party also opposes the so-called "Tesco tax" which is intended for this very purpose.
That the Bain Principle makes idiots of the likes of Richard Simpson is hardly a matter of concern for anyone. Other, perhpas, than Simpson himself. But the Bain Principle also exemplifies the contempt of the British Labour & Unionist Party for the people of Scotland and its total disregard for the solemn duties of its pariamentarians. That should matter to all of us.

Longshanker

RevStu
I knew I should have run with the first headline:
 
OPPOSITION PARTY PLEDGE TO OPPOSE PARTY THEY OPPOSE
 
Bain's so interesting and he's so well known that I missed that he was an MP and not an MSP. Oops. Banged to rights.
 
So what? It still makes for dull news – even if it could be called news.  I'm not even attempting to contradict your assertion that Labour hate the SNP to a degree which can only be called pathological. That's a historical given. Labour deserved May 2011. Reap what you sow etc.
And just for badness, I hope they get the kicking they deserve in Glasgow come May.
 
Your assertion however that the Scottish press would be compliant in burying this discovery stretches credibility though; The Daily Ranger or Mirror, maybe but highly doubtful. But the Herald and the Scotsman. Hmm. Set me straight on what their motivation to bury it would be. I fail to see it.
If they thought there was mileage in the (non) story they would have run with it. Their silence isn't complicity in some anti-SNP conspiracy, it's knowing what will interest their readers – dull stories don't.
It's the law of circulation figures – you know that.
 
Peter A Bell
 
Sorry to disappoint you. I'm not making that mistake at all. The only assertion I'm making is that the Bain tweet is a non-story.  Historically, Labour will oppose just about anything the SNP do or say. It's classic blackwhite mentality.

Longshanker

RevStu
I wouldn't use the word 'fact' regarding your implication/assertion that news stories are selected on an ideological basis.
Unless you've got some insider knowledge, which I'd be absolutely and genuinely  riveted to hear about, your assertion is only based on opinion shaped by your own SNP/pro-independence prejudices.
Otherways, if you can prove it, it's a story I'd be prepared to buy a newspaper to read.
Deadlines, topicality and reader interest are the main driving priorities behind a News Editor's selection of news. If it's newsworthy it goes in, if it isn't it doesn't.
Agree with you regarding the impact of the Internet, but that's a print media wide problem not just the problem of two struggling Scottish right leaning newspapers.
The Guardian, for example, is losing circulation and money hand over fist due to its current online giveaway bonanza.
 

Longshanker

RevStu said:
 "Ideology, in fact, DOES seem to be trumping business sense."
Looks like an implication/assertion of ideology led story selection to me.
I'm open to your explanation of what this sentence actually implies/asserts/means.
 
 

Erchie

I expect Longshanker, with his obvious Troll name, will ignore the times the SNP voted for Labour/LibDem motions in Holyrood when the SNP were in opposition, but they agreed with the motion.
 
And that the Daily Record, seeing the same effect that RevStu points out, decided to go lighter on the SNP and hired Joan McAlpine
 
By this line, if a puppy was drowning, and it needed a vote to send forces out to rescue it, poor dead pup I'd the SNP put forward the motion. It's that ridiculous

Longshanker

The word "fact" and the phrase "seems to be" are hard to equalise in the mind.
 
I see.
 
However, the word 'conclusion' and the phrase "seems to be" would be easier to equalise in the mind.
 
In fact, the basic misunderstanding of 'facts' speaks volumes about certain types' inability to distinguish between facts and conclusions.
 
In conclusion, it implies ludicrously pathological incapability to stick to previous points raised due to aforementioned inability.
 
Advice: Ideologically speaking, stick to doing comedy, your grasp of newspaper priorities plainly exceeds your talents. That's a fact.
 
Thanks for the laugh though. Cheers.
 
 

MajorBloodnok

Longshanker – will ye no ge' it a rest.  My eyes are bleeding wading through your inchoate guff.

Tormod

The media / labour / tory relationship is so bad we have got used to it.  Which is a shocking indicator of the inscestious relationship they have.
Christ on a stick even this is bad for them, so there are now folk tweeting and commenting on threads that this story has been given help by labour to the torygraph who are using it as smoke screen for the tories.

Longshanker

Rev Stu No surprise there.   MajorBloodNok   Inchoate guff is the belief that Bain's tweet was of any interest to anyone other than mad dog conspiracy theorists.

Kenny Campbell

It would seems that even on the internet every ying requires a yang. Here we have Longshanker(even has stereotypical anti Scots moniker). On the Herald comments page  its Michael McKeown from West Midlands(pseudo Scottish name) and on twitter #indyref its strongerunited1. One and the same, figuratively if not actually. Well they could actually be the same as well I suppose.

Kenny Campbell

If nothing else they keep the independence minded folk from getting carried away.

Longshanker

RevStu
Something to hide? Hypocricy in action. Why so predictable?

Longshanker

Kenny
 
You seem like one of the good guys. I know there's plenty of you out there.
 
I've only ever posted as Longshanker and I'm a West coast of Scotland native – born and bred etc.
 
If you don't mind me asking, why would you consider 'Longshanker' as a moniker to be anti-Scottish?

Kenny Campbell

Is Longshanks not a hommage to Edward I ?

Longshanker

RevStu
 
Missing link?

Longshanker

Kenny
 
The moniker is Longshanker. Not Longshanks. I've used it in varying forms since 1996.

AdolfHitlerer

Kenny

The moniker is AdolfHitlerer.  Not AdolfHitler.  I’ve used it in varying forms since 1933.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,666 Posts, 1,201,391 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • gregor on How it happened: “Elon Musk (07/11/2024): “For anyone, whether in America or other countries, who finds this result shocking, they should reconsider where…Nov 7, 06:16
    • PIND DADAN KHAN on How it happened: “Shouldn’t you be posting on the far right Guido Fawkes blog?Nov 7, 03:09
    • Peter McAvoy on How it happened: “Some people are surprised and shocked that Trump won yet his critics have abandoned and demeaned the white working class…Nov 7, 02:06
    • Skip_NC on How it happened: “Trump is a warmonger. He just doesn’t get his hands dirty. Witness the incursion by another country into Syria when…Nov 7, 02:03
    • Doug on How it happened: “Dysfunctional Trump should have had no chance but he won because the opposition was so inept it kept missing open…Nov 7, 01:49
    • Skip_NC on How it happened: “Anyone who wants to be President this soon after the election should be constitutionally barred therefrom. Being serious, he just…Nov 7, 01:19
    • Iain More on How it happened: “I would like to congratulate the Wokists and Alphabet Queers for getting Trump Elected. Thank fuck I am old and…Nov 7, 00:20
    • shug on How it happened: “If you think Trump is batshit crazy have you met Swinney and the trans cult coven of perjurers and those…Nov 6, 23:21
    • Ted on How it happened: “Quite a few people bear grudges as you will see from those who continue to support the reputation of the…Nov 6, 22:22
    • Sensible Chris on How it happened: “Could you speak in English for those of us bored with your faux ScoatishNov 6, 22:17
    • Ted on How it happened: “Also an excellent candidate. His book Hillbilly Elegy is brilliant.Nov 6, 22:16
    • Ted on How it happened: “They came out in force to vote for Trump. Their vote was anti woke, pro farmer and fundamentally anti gender…Nov 6, 22:14
    • Breeks on How it happened: “Hmmmmm… maybe. But I seem to recall Trump and Salmond weren’t exactly best buddies. What Trump should do is pretty…Nov 6, 21:54
    • Greg on How it happened: “What is the conspiracy nut obsession with Soros? Meanwhile JD Vance was hand picked by Peter Thiel, Elon Musk is…Nov 6, 21:21
    • wally jumblatt on How it happened: “Years ago when I transitioned into Wally (not Walid) I was stuck between going for Wakky Bakky (who was an…Nov 6, 21:13
    • Scott on How it happened: “Pete Buttigieg is interested in becoming the Democrat nominee for President in 2028. After yesterday, that surely cannot happen, at…Nov 6, 21:08
    • aLurker on How it happened: “Aye Andrew. The use of aggregate statistics which purport to show that ‘the economy’ is doing well rather than correctly…Nov 6, 20:58
    • Campbell Clansman on How it happened: “Not exactly an endorsement of Alba’s popularity, when the Reform Party was able to field candidates and Alba was not.…Nov 6, 20:57
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: “Why not address the points I make: “President Trump has already proven he is not a warmonger. He has proven…Nov 6, 20:57
    • Tenruh on How it happened: “Reform stood a candidate in every constituency, Alba in a minority of the constituencies.Nov 6, 20:40
    • Jay on How it happened: “Are you one of the Druze people?Nov 6, 20:22
    • Skip_NC on How it happened: “Admiral Levine’s post as an Admiral stems from being the US Assistant Secretary for Health. This is held at the…Nov 6, 20:20
    • sam on How it happened: “Hard to know how Trump will behave Early signs of dementia? He bears grudges. Very unlikely any criminal trials or…Nov 6, 20:09
    • Skip_NC on How it happened: “This cannot possibly be the same Alf Baird that spoke at the Alba International LACU meeting last week. Either that…Nov 6, 19:53
    • Skip_NC on How it happened: “I said they are not afraid to elect a moderate Republican. That doesn’t mean that they do on a regular…Nov 6, 19:49
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: “President Trump has already proven he is not a warmonger. He has proven he is a businessman and deal-maker, happy…Nov 6, 19:40
    • gregor on How it happened: “The Spectator: SNP members slam Swinney’s support of Kamala: “…now the SNP leader has found out he backed the wrong…Nov 6, 19:36
    • Campbell Clansman on How it happened: “In what alternate universe is Hawaii open to electing “moderate Republicans?” The state senate is 23-2 Democrat. The state House…Nov 6, 19:25
    • Confused on How it happened: “elon musk makes shitty electric cars that go on fire and crash, killing people; the chinese make them better and…Nov 6, 19:20
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: “We know of the sovereignty in England of Westminster and hence its MPs due to various legal decisions, not least…Nov 6, 19:20
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
52
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x