The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Respect agenda still strong

Posted on December 27, 2013 by

Since we’re talking about The Independent today, we thought those of you who don’t follow us on Twitter or Facebook might like to see their latest editorial cartoon.

indysalmond1

No, we’re not making that up.

62 to “Respect agenda still strong”

  1. jake says:

    I’m oblidged to the cartoonist for the insight; I’d been under the misapprehension that it was Mr Cameron et al that was unwilling to share the currency.

    Reply
  2. Murray McCallum says:

    What is the joke here? Is it that David Cameron uses a soup spoon for dessert?

    Reply
  3. Papadocx says:

    why does the establishment with its propaganda machines want to whip up anti Scottish feeling? Is this the BT message.

    Reply
  4. Les Wilson says:

    Well, I guess some of our brighter bods on here could do better in return, a lot better I would hope, time WE had a bit more fun on them. 

    Reply
  5. david says:

    that cartoon is about as funny as susan calman 

    Reply
  6. alexicon says:

    Cameron is lucky he can afford pudding. A lot of people in the UK have to rely on food hand outs just to get by.
     
    Any one up for a little correction? Ma heids too sore today.
     
    link to thesouthernreporter.co.uk

    Reply
  7. Betsy says:

    Sassenach? Do they honestly believe anyone in Scotland, let alone the FM actually uses that word?

    Reply
  8. gordoz says:

    Christ English folk used to be good at humour too …. all things change eh?
     
    That cartoon now passes for top end satire in english media?
     
    Still cant be offensive if its aimed at a seditious Jock can it?

    Reply
  9. DougtheDug says:

    Betsy:
     
    Well Gaelic speakers will use it as all it means is “englishman” although the correct spelling is sassanach.

     
    Can’t say I’ve heard anyone use it in English in written or spoken form apart from the British press trying to produce a mock scottish dialect for (non)humorous effect.

    Reply
  10. Bubbles says:

    @ David
     
    It’s way funnier than a Calman. I’d say it’s at least a McAuley. 

    Reply
  11. Barontorc says:

    There are plenty more good-for-purpose Anglo Saxon terms to describe these blood-suckers, but not for the ears of the Daily Torygraph’s genteel brigade and while we’re on the subject; Shureley Shirley – it’s another misnomer to call these rags -‘ The Independent’, or,  ‘The Scotsman’ – what a laugh and on par with the heinous BRITISH Broadcasting Corporation – which we all know to mean the ENGLISH Broadcasting Corporation. Like the Spectator’s Skintland gaff, from their cerebral mastermind and token Scot editor. So puny and perversely telling all of it is.

    Reply
  12. turnip_ghost says:

    I could genuinely say I had no idea what that was meant to mean. I thought perhaps it meant wanker.

    Reply
  13. DougtheDug says:

    “Ye’ll no get ya sassenach hands on ma poond!!!”
     
    Interesting how “referendum humour” from the British press almost always involves an unflattering Alex Salmond caricature and a rather racist and poorly understood depiction of Scots speech.
     
    I wonder if they get a black mayor of London if they’ll have him speaking in black London slang in their cartoons.

    Reply
  14. Yesitis says:

    I wonder which words they really wanted to use?

    Reply
  15. I take it their funny cartoonist is still on his Christmas break?

    Reply
  16. Dan Huil says:

    Yet another example of how the British nationalist media sees Scottish independence as a one-man show.
    How can a supposedly pro-united kingdom newspaper be so ignorant about the political scene in Scotland?

    Reply
  17. msean says:

    What has Eck done to them to deserve this treatment?They’ve been at it for ages now but still we keep electing him,so maybe it’s us?I don’t think so though.

    Reply
  18. Doug Daniel says:

    Wow, I had no idea Alex Salmond speaks like a Geordie…

    Reply
  19. silver19 says:

    Thought today’s EEN Frank Boyle cartoon: “Mrs Brown’s Boys” is quite good :- link to archive.is

    Reply
  20. kininvie says:

    O/T
    Humour in the debate…..
    Apart from the Wings Panto…..
     
    Can I suggest to anyone who hasn’t found them, that David Greig’s Yes/No plays on Twitter are sheer gentle genius in 140 characters:
     
    link to twitter.com
     
     
    Here’s an example:
     
    Going out
    Yes: Kilt?
    No: Yes.
    Yes: Nice.
    No: I’m a proud Scot.
    Yes: What’s underneath?
    No lifts kilt.
    No: Team GB thong.
    Yes: (sigh)

    Reply
  21. alexicon says:

    Sorry for the O/T but!
     
    It seems the BT war cry of NHS sharing across borders has floundered somewhat.
     
    link to dailymail.co.uk
     
    This comment from our educated cousins needs repeating.
     
    “As a reciprocal arrangement can we English prevent out organs being donated to a Scott?”
     
    Don’t you just love em.

    Reply
  22. Norrie says:

    Well they started it!
    Turkey or chicken?

    Reply
  23. john king says:

    “Wow, I had no idea Alex Salmond speaks like a Geordie…”
     

    Why aye man, divvent ye ken?———  like, 🙁
     
    All git ma granddads greatcoat,
    that he wore in the great war,
    best eiderdown we ever had as well .

    ps
    An ah’ll have that poond if ye dinna mind

    Reply
  24. john king says:

    “It seems the BT war cry of NHS sharing across borders has floundered somewhat.”
     
    Reminds my of a Friends episode where Joey had a hand twin. 
    “This hand is my hand, that hand is your hand”
    join in if you know the chorus

    Reply
  25. A wee bit OT
    The Unionist argument in a nutshell, I recorded this using my phone pointing it at the TV months ago when I still had a TV connection, well rough but couldn’t be more spot on,  swap Tea Party for Better Together/Unionists  and Fox News for BBC News and it’s a perfect match 🙂
    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  26. Rachel says:

    Yep.  They can’t even get their so called version of a dialect/language right ‘Ya’ for ‘Your’?  Sounds like a posh student at Edinburgh uni:  ‘OK yah!’

    Reply
  27. Bill C says:

    “Der Stürmer was best known for its effective antisemitic caricatures, which depicted Jews as ugly characters with exaggerated facial features and misshapen bodies.” (Wikipedia) I have lost count of the times I have seen our First Minister caricatured as an “ugly character with exaggerated facial features” and a misshapen body by cartoonists based south of the Border. Makes you wonder what type of propaganda machine we are up against.

    Reply
  28. Dal Riata says:

    Sorry to swear, but that cartoon is just fucking pathetic. It is not even midly amusing in any way.
     
    How the British Establishment sees ‘the (Scottish) other’. And how attempting to mock Scottish accents, and by extension, its people, is still viewed as being acceptable. Scratch a Britnat, and see the barely concealed racism rise to the surface. Scotland will be well rid of these lowlifes – well rid.
     
    And since when did any Scot use “ya” for your? They can’t even get their racist little epithets correct… 

    Reply
  29. Footsoldier says:

    A bit o/t but I have regularly seen  some local delivery Royal Mail vans in Stirlingshire displaying the EIIR logo. Scottish vans should display only the crown. More BT?

    Reply
  30. Macart says:

    Yep Respect.
     
    For those in Better Together and their tory paymasters who can’t spell.
     


    Reply
  31. Andy-B says:

    A rare insight into the workings of the minds with regards to Scotland,at the Independent Newspaper, and its not a pretty sight.

    Reply
  32. caz-m says:

    O/T
    Called in to a William Hill bookmakers in Glasgow today to get the latest price on a Yes victory in September.

    The best odds they could give me was 7/2. I asked if I could put £100 on that and they said they would have to make a phone call because it was such a large bet. I found that a bit curious, didn’t think £100 was a lot to a bookie.

    The price is definitely falling. I am not a gambler, but I might just have a wee flutter before we get to even money.

    I notice Councillor Terry Kelly still offering 7/1 on a Yes victory. He’s either an idiot or a….., aye, a was right the first time.

    Reply
  33. Kalmar says:

    I’m all for politicians being pilloried in cartoon form and am a big fan of Steve Bell’s work in the  Guardian.  But this is just pointless, unfunny shit.  On the plus side I’d hope most people would recognise that.

    Reply
  34. DougtheDug says:

    Kalmar:
     
    Steve Bell has attacked Alex Salmond and independence on many occasions, Tartan Tory, Murdoch lickspittle, etc, etc.
     
    I’m still waiting for him to create a cartoon attacking the Tory donor funded Better Together but as a Labour man he’s a fully paid up British nationalist so I’m not holding my breath.

    Reply
  35. turnip_ghost says:

    As an interesting side note I found this while wasting some time online…What each country in the world leads in…Uk one…take a guess, then have a look and see if you got it right!

    link to thedoghousediaries.com

    Reply
  36. velofello says:

    Sneering is what they do best, not just to Scotland , worldwide, except Uncle Sam. And of course they will have to remove China from their sneer list as China will be renting a nuclear power station to them.Following independence Scotland too will be hastily removed from their sneer list. It’s their sense of their inadequacy which causes them to be like that. 
     
    Nice one Norrie, sort of supports my point.

    Reply
  37. david says:

    Called in to a William Hill bookmakers in Glasgow today to get the latest price on a Yes victory in September.
     
    i got exactly the same bet couple months ago in w hills., the guy made a phone call also. i got 9/2.

    Reply
  38. ronnie anderson says:

    Alister Carmichiel, Said he would sent a CLOOTIE DUMPLIN fur Christmas, some disgruntled Postmen ate the DUMPLIN, hud a collective shit on the plate, NOO the moral o this story is When You Talk That Amount O Shit Your Nose Canna Tell The Difference

    Reply
  39. TYRAN says:

    Why the Independent not for independence?

    Reply
  40. caz-m says:

    @david

    That’s from 9/2 to 7/2 it’s falling alright.

    The price is falling and the YES vote is going up.

    o/t I also have a wee theory that there is going to be a big increase in Yes and DKs over the New Year holiday period.

    Last year we didn’t have the WP out to answer questions asked by undecided voters. Well this year is different. The Independence debate is higher on the agenda and we are able to answer a lot more questions.

    You get the feeling that it is more of a talking point this year and once people get the information they are looking for, then there is only one way that any sane thinking person will vote and that is a hard YES.

    Reply
  41. DaveyM says:

    @Barontorc: Just for the sake of accuracy, the ‘Skintland’ gaffe was committed by The Economist rather than The Spectator 😉

    Reply
  42. Gfaetheblock says:

    Caz-m – 7/2 on paddy power, slight movement back over the last week, but this is about as long as they have been over the last 12 months.  If you are confident, I would get your money down, as pretty generous for a two horse race.
    The cartoon is not overly funny, but political cartoons are meant to be challenging and have grotesque characteurs.  This site has had the unionist = skinhead or thug, offensive but I can see the humour in it. 

    Reply
  43. Rough Bounds. says:

    What next? Cartoons of Yes supporters taking bayonets to babies?
    Anyone who has ever seen that 18th century cartoon penned during the ’45 that shows a Highlander (Sawney) making a mess of himself in a toilet knows exactly what to expect from the English press. Credit where it’s due folks, they are very good at bile.
    You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

    Reply
  44. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Still 4/1 at Ladbrokes. I got a few bets on at 11/2 but 4/1 is still very generous.Most firms are offering less.

    Reply
  45. AnneDon says:

    I’m not retweeting that. It’s abusive, not humourous, and no-one will feel better for seeing it. It’s amazing how often lefties turn into Britnats when Scottish independence is the subject under discussion.

    Reply
  46. Krackerman says:

    It’s racist – end of…

    Reply
  47. Xander says:

    Great chieftain o the puddin’ race? If so, it’s a rather nasty piece of work.

    Reply
  48. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    They don’t understand and this is just more evidence

    Reply
  49. Ian Brotherhood says:

    @Dave McEwan Hill –
     
    re bookies, odds etc.
     
    Has anyone asked about odds for a specific result? e.g. over 60% of votes cast being Yes?
     
    I’m wondering if they’d even offer odds on, say the final confirmed result being between 62-67% Yes. That’s in the range Scottish Skier has been suggesting, and that many of us feel is likely ‘in our water/bones/guts’ etc.
     
    If bookies are getting twitchy about accepting £100 on a straightforward win (anything over 50%) then how jittery will they get if someone asks to punt a similar amount on a 65%+ Yes? I don’t ‘do’ bookies, online or otherwise, but I can’t imagine they’d refuse anyone’s dosh – but it’s up to them to offer odds, right?
     
    It would be interesting (purely as an academic exercise) if someone was to wander into a Glasgow city-centre bookmaker’s and ask to stake, say, £150K on Yes winning at least two-thirds of the confirmed vote – would they just knock it back? Methinks not. But they’d have to offer odds.
     
    (The mysterious BT-backer staked, what was it, £150k in two separate bets in Glasgow shops? The story was reported here, within the past year. And when he did it? The odds were so heavily stacked in the No campaign’s favour that it hardly seemed worth the effort.)
     
    If I was in charge of Yes Scotland right now, I’d get £100 from the petty cash, ask WoS, NNS, BellaC, National Collective, and anyone else up for it to commit a likewise amount, then take a friendly film-crew around central Glasgow and/or Edinburgh, going into bookies, sticking £1,000 in used notes on the counter, and offering it for a quote on a 70% Yes vote.
     
    No need to part with a penny of it – but the reaction, and prices quoted, might tell us a great deal.

    Reply
  50. caz-m says:

    Remember this vote winner from Simon Heffer from the Daily Mail.

    link to dailymail.co.uk

    Reply
  51. Juan Pablo Del Roomigrant says:

    At No.66/1 from BBC Syco’s vision of Glaswegian patter.
    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  52. caz-m says:

    Ian

    you got a wee chuckle from me there. I know, I asked her if she would take a £100 bet on a YES win and she said, almost in shock, “I would need to make a phone call”.

    Which shocked me. William Hills is a multi-million pound operation and they go weak at the knees over a £100 bet.

    Strange.

    So, it would be great footage if we could get someone asking to put on £1000 on a win.

    Reply
  53. bannock hussler says:

    Rory Bremner was just saying there needed to be more humour in the campaign.
     
    Oh boy.
     
    What are the odds he could do better than this? (Assuming the Herald story is accurate, of course…)

    Reply
  54. The Man in the Jar says:

    I just watched “Idris Elba: King of Speed on BBC2. The program wasnt bad but I did discover that Lanarkshire (Tinto Hill) is apparently “in the Highlands of Scotland”? Hoots mon whors ma bagpipes laddie? 😉

    Reply
  55. The Man in the Jar says:

    BTW The Idris Elba prog was about rallying (of the 4 wheel variety!) some of it was filmed in Finland. Worth watching for that alone.

    Reply
  56. sionnach says:

    @turnip_ghost (7:50)
    I didn’t guess right, but wasn’t overly surprised at the real British speciality. If there’s a NO vote in September I might just emigrate…to Estonia 🙂

    Reply
  57. Holebender says:

    Ian, and anyone else who’s interested, Ladbrokes (online) were offering 12/1 on yes getting over 55% just last week. I tried to put a grand on it, but they restricted my stake to 100. Then they immediately suspended the betting and shortened the odds. Today those odds are 9/1.
     
    They are also offering odds of 4/1 on a yes vote winning and, if you’re interested in free money, 5/6 on yes getting over 39% of the vote. I’ve got bets on both these scenarios, as well as my 12/1 bet on yes getting over 55%.
     
    link to sportsbeta.ladbrokes.com

    Reply
  58. HandandShrimp says:

    I consider myself quite good at understanding political satire but this one baffles me.
     
    Cameron calling Salmond a pudding? OK, I can see a satirist presenting that as a possible but the pound thing is obscure unless it is a suggestion that refusal to enter a currency union is a not an option for Cameron.

    Reply
  59. Albert Herring says:

    Tried putting £50 on YES at 9/2 with Stan James a while ago. Too scary for them, but they generously would accept £3.20.
     
    Also got on at 5/6 for over 35% with Ladbrokes. Free money indeed. Interesting that percentage is rising.

    Reply
  60. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    5/6 for “over 39%” is indeed free money. I got a bet on at “over 35%” at the same odds but if I was well off I’d be betting for “over 39%” every time I got my pension in.

    For the many innocents on this site at 5/6 you get £11 back for every £6 you invest.

    9/1 for “over 55%” is hugely generous. We’ll have some of that

    Reply
  61. Juteman says:

    I notice Ladbrokes online will allow you to bet a maximum of £2,500 on a Yes, but £6,000 on a No. Seems strange.

    Reply
  62. Joe says:

    It is a given that when it comes down to it the brit media is pretty much anti Scottish. The problem is it would never matter if we would just stop buying their newspapers or watching their news shows. We all know what they think so let’s stop giving them energy by getting upset by their shite. The English can’t vote in this referendum, so who cares what they think. Let’s all concentrate our energies on the “don’t knows” that we know personally and ignore all this britnat crap.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,852 Posts, 1,232,340 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Geoff Anderson on How Far To Go, How Far: “https://www.thetimes.com/article/608d90b4-6587-4f44-b942-e82bc49fa071?shareToken=5ced42e537780e7f15138ba275944069Dec 14, 11:44
    • Bilbo on How Far To Go, How Far: “I see that Moinbot has published an article in the Guardian the other day concerning immigration. I’m not linking it…Dec 14, 11:37
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “It’s the work of literally seconds to discover that public spending per head in Scotland exceeds that in England and…Dec 14, 11:22
    • aLurker on How Far To Go, How Far: “I visit here a lot less often than I used to, but nevertheless I have appreciated your contributions greatly over…Dec 14, 10:31
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “Alf Baird posted an excellent (I think so, anyway… and that’s all that really matters) comment yesterday. I feel it’s…Dec 14, 10:12
    • diabloandco on How Far To Go, How Far: “Moi aussi Madame Cheyne!Dec 14, 09:10
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “Even money that judge will be allowed to crawl away without facing the consequences of his actions. Due to the…Dec 14, 08:27
    • Cynicus on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mark Beggan says: 13 December, 2025 at 6:26 pm “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.” ======== Is that a…Dec 14, 00:21
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “No, Hatey, I get it completely because I’m a woman, and my survival as a woman depends on my getting…Dec 13, 23:37
    • william G Walker on How Far To Go, How Far: “Saffron Robe is right in his forensic analysis as led by Stuart. He is also right in “objective reality” and…Dec 13, 22:30
    • McDuff on How Far To Go, How Far: “Rev you are worth your weight in gold!Dec 13, 21:34
    • Saffron Robe on How Far To Go, How Far: “Forensic analysis of the highest order, Stuart, of immense benefit to all those interested in the pursuit of justice which…Dec 13, 21:00
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “Far more importantly, if the pattern on the carpet has left an indelible mark, what tartan is it? That’s the…Dec 13, 20:26
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “@Alf Baird When you write that the need for decolonisation is “absolute and urgent” I wonder how it is that…Dec 13, 20:22
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “You missed one, Northy, phallusy.Dec 13, 20:06
    • Hatey McHateface on The ginger stepchild: “Multiple accounts, Bilbo? How you must wish that was true. My “stalking” of you was me pointing out the quite…Dec 13, 19:58
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “I meant to do this earlier, but forgot. Here it is now, better late than never. Correction: “through-away” in paragraph…Dec 13, 19:05
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.Dec 13, 18:26
    • Andy Wiltshire on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mistakes tending to both sides of a controversial question roughly equally may well be just mistakes. If they all point…Dec 13, 16:49
    • James Barr Gardner on How Far To Go, How Far: “The real problem is ye jist cannae git the staff these days !Dec 13, 15:40
    • Marie on How Far To Go, How Far: “That’s EXACTLY what it looks like.Dec 13, 15:03
    • Sven on How Far To Go, How Far: “You’d know, I’m sure, I wish you well “James Cheyne”; were every independence minded Scot as single minded, determined and…Dec 13, 14:56
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “Nae bother, James. The longer you stay around here the better as far as I’m concerned. And thanks for the…Dec 13, 14:55
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““But that flame still burns.” I’ll tell you what ‘burns’… YOUR SHITTY RHETORIC! BOOM!!! Northcode drops the “Ad Hominem”, arm…Dec 13, 14:46
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “robertkknight, Better together, as the prime ministers statement once said. Why not have the upper ruling class grouped with the…Dec 13, 14:36
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “North code. Thank for those kind words, It would appear that I could be here for as long as the…Dec 13, 14:23
    • robertkknight on How Far To Go, How Far: “I don’t think that there are any depths left to which the NuSNP Govt. won’t stoop. For years they’ve been…Dec 13, 13:55
    • Jill on How Far To Go, How Far: “Me too.Dec 13, 13:45
    • Stu on How Far To Go, How Far: “Lomcal, I don’t think there is. Like I said, if a judge was hypothetically going to go for a specific…Dec 13, 13:17
    • Rob on How Far To Go, How Far: “I normally don’t normally give much credence to conspiracy theories, basic incompetence usually explains most of the screw up. However…Dec 13, 13:16
  • A tall tale



↑ Top