The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Monkeys obscured by peanuts

Posted on December 21, 2012 by

There’s been much hot air unleashed in Holyrood in recent weeks over various “wastes” of money by the Scottish Government. First the opposition accused the SNP of spending £100,000 (which turned out to be a wild piece of back-of-a-fag-packet guesswork vastly overestimating the actual £4,000 cost) in fighting a Freedom Of Information request over EU legal advice. Then there were complaints about £48,000 spent sending a team to the premiere of Brave, despite the obvious benefits to be had marketing Scotland’s tourism industry on the back of the movie.

And finally, Labour in particular screamed themselves hoarse (and were still doing so as recently as yesterday’s FMQs) about the £470,000 the Scottish Government delegation to the Ryder Cup cost, even though it was a contractual obligation, encompassed numerous other business engagements which generated Scottish jobs, and in fact represented a 30% saving on comparable trips by the last Labour-led Holyrood administration. (Which weren’t contractual obligations.)

But still. If just for the sake of argument you were to accept the Unionist parties’ line, that’s a whopping £522,000 the Scottish Government has cavalierly thrown away in recent months. Meanwhile, how has the UK government in Westminster been doing?

This month saw two pieces of information come to light, neither of which attracted a great amount of media attention. One revealed that the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition’s spectacularly inept handling of the bidding for the West Coast rail franchise is likely to cost the taxpayer somewhere in the region of £100 million. And only yesterday, the Ministry Of Defence admitted that it had already paid out £14 million in compensation and costs to Iraqis tortured by British forces during the last Labour government’s war in Iraq, with many millions more expected.

Scotland’s share of just those two sums comes to around £9.6 million, or more than 18 times the amount the Scottish Government spent on the three issues the Unionist parties successfully whipped up a media storm around. We don’t know about you, readers, but faced with a choice between spending half a million quid promoting Scotland and Scottish business in the West’s largest market, or £10 million on a shambolic tea-party of incompetent bureaucracy and torturing innocent civilians in a foreign country, we know who we trust most with our money.

6 to “Monkeys obscured by peanuts”

  1. Juteman says:

    And of course, the oil is running out.
    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  2. AndrewFraeGovan says:

    o/t Has the world ended yet? It’s a bit hard to tell round here.

    Reply
  3. bobby says:

    £100 million for a referendum on voter reform that no one understood or cared about.
    £100m on voting for new police commissioners for England that no one understood or cared about.
    £1.2Bn for a new submarine that no one wanted.
    £1Bn this year alone for Afghanistan war that no one understands or cares about 
    £1Bn worth  Nimrod Mk3 aircraft smashed to pieces to further the EU Defence plan
    £1Bn for a spare aircraft carrier and £1Bn for another one with no planes to put on it.
    £100m worth of Harrier aircraft sold to the US for £6m
    £20Bn a year for the next 40 years on useless windmills for the global warming scam.
    £10Bn a year for the next…..yrs on the useless EU
    £10Bn on the Olympics for London and BBC TV ‘personality’ show.
    £12Bn on foreign ‘aid’ while people starve or freeze to death or top themselves through despair in the UK.
    £3.4Bn on BBC that no one wants but must pay on threat of prison.
    £2m to pay off 3 useless BBC staff for covering up scandals.
    £100Bn to find for PFI scam payments.
    £400Bn to the banks that went bust through incompetence.
     
    there’s more but getting bored. We’re fecked basically.

    Reply
  4. Don Mc says:

    but but but Bobby, the snp WASTED taxpayers money, something we could only talk about Westminster doing if we lived south of the border and werern’t the feckless subsidy junkies that we are.

    Reply
  5. Adrian B says:

    If this is as bad as it gets having the SNP as the party in Government in Scotland, then the Conservatives, Labour and Lib Dems really are very bad at Government.

    When you look at the waste of money that some local councils manage to squander, then the SNP again are elevated miles above these other parties in terms of ability and focusing on things that help the nation on a day to day basis.

    Reply
  6. Arbroath1320 says:

    I’m surprised no one from Labour was accusing the Scottish government of genocide yesterday. After all as Tris points out over on Munguin’s Republic there have been a number of suicides. As we all know these extremely sad and regrettable circumstances MUST be the result of the Scottish government. If they were not then surely even the now right of right of centre Labour party would be asking questions of their new best friends the right of centre Tory party, wouldn’t they?
    At the very least they would be asking the Scottish government what they can do to stop all these senseless deaths wouldn’t they?
    I guess this is just another example of the “caring” principles of the Labour party, supporting the Tories in mass murder by the back door!
     
    link to munguinsrepublic.blogspot.co.uk

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,713 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “TL;DRJul 9, 16:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sae true, NC, the scribblin is oan the wa. In fact, it’s only going to be (checks notes) 4-5 years…Jul 9, 16:40
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “When you don’t know what you think you know. Cambridge Journal of Economics Cover Image for Volume 44, Issue 2…Jul 9, 16:36
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “I’ve just run a couple of searches on ChatGPT for for similar search criteria. Which is helpful and revealing because…Jul 9, 16:32
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Not many people agree with you. https://www.derby.ac.uk/blog/margaret-thatchers-legacy/ Survey results In January and February 2019, researchers at the University of Derby…Jul 9, 16:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Great stuff sam. Now do the type of “personality” that posts interminably about pricks, penises, wanking, shirt lifting, glory holes…Jul 9, 16:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “James says: “Brexit” Aw, we need to crowdfund the boy a dictionary. Turn doon the page corner on the letter…Jul 9, 16:16
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Heh. So you couldn’t back up any of your earlier bullshit claims then. Imagine my surprise. Whatever, dick.Jul 9, 16:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Aren’t we gonna be keeping the Pound, Confused? How does that fact fit into your fevered fantasies?Jul 9, 16:10
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Yet more bollocks. Give it up, pal. No-one is listening.Jul 9, 15:58
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “@Aidan; “@Xaracen – you beautifully highlight the major challenge with AI. Because people like yourself are filling the internet with…Jul 9, 15:45
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Your quoted post fails to consider the alternative under Michael Foot’s Labour. I think we can safely assume it would’ve…Jul 9, 15:38
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Scott-Samuel et al “The aggressive promotion of free market policies under Thatcher was accompanied by the growing influence of business…Jul 9, 15:15
    • Confused on Too Tight To Mention: ““here’s what you could have won … ” https://archive.is/mHvKx “- they are doing well enough, but imagine how great these…Jul 9, 15:03
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: ““An Intolerant Personality Type is someone who displays a very limited tolerance for differences in opinions or beliefs. They tend…Jul 9, 14:57
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “intolerance. “…we discuss the psychology of three understandings of intolerance that are concealed within the literature: (a) prejudicial intolerance based…Jul 9, 14:53
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: ““@CC – well exactly, does anyone think a website like this would be tolerated in the PRC?” Yes, exactly Aidan,…Jul 9, 14:30
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “In reply to P3nisbreath @ 3.11 am (yes 3.11am!!!!) And your point is caller, “whanging oan” yet again about the…Jul 9, 14:25
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Whoosh. Way to miss the point, pal, with your straw man boilerplate pish. I didn’t say “James” had to be…Jul 9, 14:23
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@CC – well exactly, does anyone think a website like this would be tolerated in the PRC?Jul 9, 13:48
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Xaracen – you beautifully highlight the major challenge with AI. Because people like yourself are filling the internet with nonsensical…Jul 9, 13:44
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Aw, thank you – we are indeed blessed by the munificence of the unionists! Thank you for inclusion in the…Jul 9, 13:34
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Hatey, have a heart. (Heartey!) Did you never do anything stupid, aged 15? Maybe not as stupid as going to…Jul 9, 13:26
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “This morning I asked three different AIs the following question; Has the JPTI/Salvo Petition to the UN been rejected? None…Jul 9, 13:09
    • Andrew scott on Too Tight To Mention: “For heaven’s sake james PUT A SOCK IN IT total word salad -same words just in a different order Sad…Jul 9, 13:00
    • Insider on Too Tight To Mention: “For heaven’s sake… SHUT UP, you crazy old bat !Jul 9, 12:43
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Thus we see that the UK ? Westminster parliament with continued English members of the old parliament of England running…Jul 9, 12:16
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: ““It is true in what you point out, a fact that a colonised people will have no voice” Gngh. GNGH!…Jul 9, 12:04
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Halsbury Laws of England and Wales. Statues and legislation in Westminster based on the Halsbury laws for England and Wales…Jul 9, 11:57
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Stu, It is true in what you point out, a fact that a colonised people will have no voice, will…Jul 9, 11:22
  • A tall tale



↑ Top