The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Kenny Dalglish for Prime Minister?

Posted on April 28, 2010 by

One of the most striking things about the current election is the BBC's total abandonment of even a pretence at impartiality with regard to the nationalist parties in Scotland and Wales (and other smaller parties like UKIP too), which is most obviously visible in the Corporation's determined exclusion of them from the defining theatre of the campaign – the leaders' debates.

In the light of protests pointing out that excluding what Ofcom defines as "main parties" in Scotland and Wales during an election is against broadcasting regulations, the BBC (and ITV and Sky, although the latter subsequently broke ranks – see above) hastily rebranded the programmes as "Prime Ministerial debates", and insisted that they were only for the politicians contesting the keys to 10 Downing Street.

The gigantic irony, of course, is that it looks increasingly as if NONE of the participants in the debates will actually be the next Prime Minister.

Indeed, only one of them even has a vaguely realistic chance. Nick Clegg won't be the next PM, because our crooked electoral system ensures that the Lib Dems will have by far the smallest number of seats. Gordon Brown has no chance of achieving a majority, and Clegg has already explicitly ruled out supporting Brown as a minority PM.

So right away, of the three debaters, we're down to David Cameron. His chances of achieving a majority also look slim, but are still just about within the realms of possibility, especially with the support of the Ulster Unionists. But time is running out for the Tories to build the sort of margin they need to secure a majority against the Labour bias built in to the constituency system.

If the polls stay roughly where they are, the most likely next Prime Minister of the UK is a Labour MP who isn't Gordon Brown. The exact identity of this hypothetical person is currently unknown. Alan Johnson has considerable support within the party, and has recently made fairly unambiguous overtures towards the Lib Dems about PR – something he also has a previous record of favouring and seems to be genuine about.

But other candidates including David Miliband and Ed Balls might also challenge for the leadership in the event of Clegg demanding Brown's head as the price of his support. The one thing that seems certain about this least certain of elections is that one way or another, Brown is going to require the services of a removal firm come May 7th.

An interesting thing about the governance of the UK is that the Prime Minister, like other ministers, doesn't have to be an MP at all. (Which negates another of the BBC's attempted defences, namely that Alex Salmond isn't standing for a Westminster constituency this time round.) If a ruling party – or coalition – wants a particular person in its Cabinet and they haven't been elected, all that's required is a swift ennobling so that they're a member of the House Of Lords, and they can serve in government.

In such a way was the Sith Lord Baron Mandelson elevated to a position of administrative power, and so could anyone else be. Were Labour to find itself with the fewest votes but the most seats, and with Clegg blackballing Brown, they could anoint anyone they liked as their leader. They could go for national treasure Dale Winton as a unity candidate if they wanted, and with Lib Dem approval Lord Winton of Sweepshire would find himself discussing the next Queen's Speech with Her Majesty.

Alternatively, they could go for a sporting hero loved in many parts of the UK. Kenny Dalglish would have support in Scotland, in the North-East (Blackburn, Newcastle), the North-West (Liverpool) and more, and he certainly has top-level managerial experience.

He's a born winner, but also statesmanlike in a crisis. The SNP would back him if their votes were also needed in the new coalition. (He's a national hero, and imagine how much it would upset all those Union-loving Rangers fans.) And he'd be at least as honest and straightforward in debates and interviews as the candidates we have now.

"Prime Minister, are you going to renew Trident?"

"Mibbes aye, mibbes naw."

We can but dream our dreams.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dean

I think it'd be hugely un-satsifying for me (and much of the UK) if they included the SNP, etc. For the simple reason that: even if we wanted to, we can't vote for them.

So the SNP are on, they win the debate, they're clearly the best party… oh.
If they stood people in every constituency I imagine they'd have a claim that couldn't be challenged.

Grant

I'm beginning to worry about what's going to happen.
Take a look at this page, written by an Nate Silver, an American statistics nerd(who correctly forecast 49 out of 50 of the state results in Obama/McCain and whose prediction came within 0.1% of the popular vote):
link to fivethirtyeight.com;
Look at the second table in particular. Based on some very realistic assumptions, he has the Tories really close to victory with Ulster support. This, or anything worse (just 10 more seats for the Tories) and we have the nightmare scenario of a Tory win, and the end of the electoral reform debate. Because you can be sure the news narrative will be that the people have spoken, we wanted the Tories, and in the end we didn't want a hung parliament. Your average joe will go back to being totally disillusioned, and probably voting Labour again in 5 years time for more of the same.
It's probably too difficult to finesse this now, but I believe that if you're in a Labour/Tory marginal, no matter how much you want to up the Lib Dem vote to make a statement, you have to vote Labour to keep the Tory seat total down and bring about the Lib Dem/Labour coalition we want. I
For what it's worth, this guy makes the same argument:
link to guardian.co.uk

Grant

That first link should have been:
link to fivethirtyeight.com

Dean

That sounds perfectly reasonable. I'd also have been in favour of a fourth debate with the three of them plus the Scottish and Welsh ministers.

On the other hand, it's amusing that the Tories were part of the Scottish debate – do they even bother standing candidates there anymore?!


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,689 Posts, 1,208,523 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “re. “Holy Grail secretly know this” Scotland could be presented with the Holy Grail – in its own hands, personally…Jan 12, 23:29
    • Young Lochinvar on Inability To Learn: “Fingers up each others b@ms..Jan 12, 23:15
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “BBC News (UK) @BBCNews: “Facebook and X must comply with UK law – minister” Lord Talbot @Lord_Talbot64: “So the Paedophile…Jan 12, 23:15
    • Young Lochinvar on Inability To Learn: “Agree with you on this one.Jan 12, 23:08
    • Young Lochinvar on Inability To Learn: “CC See recent discussions (for and against) independent candidates as opposed to party drone candidates.. Things have to change..Jan 12, 23:06
    • Jay on Inability To Learn: “Psycho. Not you Gregor!Jan 12, 23:04
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “Socialist Voice @SocialistVoice: “Yes, Labour has questions to answer over Ivor Caplin – but that still does not excuse the…Jan 12, 23:01
    • Jay on Inability To Learn: “Thank you for that link, Confused, it is fascinating and appalling. There has been something strange about travelling up the…Jan 12, 22:59
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “Elon Musk: “This guy was sentenced to 7 years in prison for social media posts. The other guy was sentenced…Jan 12, 22:42
    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “Good choice, Confused – Something to brighten up miserable Scotland…Jan 12, 22:30
    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “SoullessJan 12, 22:06
    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “Joanna Cherry KC @joannaccherry: “Moira didn’t “attack” Nicola Sturgeon, she simply asked her to refrain from her repeated attacks on…Jan 12, 22:02
    • gregor on In Ruins: “…as well as Pete and Patrick (no big deal:)Jan 12, 21:55
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “#Hide #Hunting #MeJan 12, 21:46
    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “War Babies: Quarantine Core: Idiot Proof: “Grade school level PHD Word of Mouth University Can’t trace a single solid fact…Jan 12, 21:15
    • Shug on In Ruins: “I see the national has a heading on Swinney “i plan to finish the job on indy” I can only…Jan 12, 21:02
    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “‘YOU LOT’ can’t even agree to safeguard children: https://wingsoverscotland.com/safeguarding-is-not-right-wing/#comment-2946645 #ChildAbuseMonstersJan 12, 21:02
    • Chas on In Ruins: “Who wrote the book? Is it any good fur wipin yer erse?Jan 12, 20:58
    • Alf Baird on Inability To Learn: “Interesting article, although rather ignorant of the history and significance of the Scots language which was the language of the…Jan 12, 20:56
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “Mark Beggan: “If you do then I know a guy who does a good line in Miu Miu, everything for…Jan 12, 20:52
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “Mark Beggan: “Do you wear women’s clothes?” https://wingsoverscotland.com/inability-to-learn/#comment-2947222Jan 12, 20:48
    • gregor on Eyes Full Of Beams: “Andy Ellis, quotes: “Gregor is the Cameron Brodie “de nos jours”. From memory it took an inordinate amount of time…Jan 12, 20:40
    • George Ferguson on Inability To Learn: “Roddy Dunlop called it. Past the point of basic human rights. Either charge Peter Murrell and Nicola Sturgeon or don’t.…Jan 12, 20:39
    • gregor on Eyes Full Of Beams: “Michael Laing, quote: “I don’t care whose side you’re on, I’m sick of you filling the comments section with your…Jan 12, 20:35
    • gregor on Safeguarding Is Not Right-Wing: “John Burke @Jbur8Burke: “This PEDO thing is bigger than any of us realize. Human trafficking (immigration) is a major component.…Jan 12, 20:26
    • Mark Beggan on Inability To Learn: “It’s a trick question you see. Catch out the fakes.Jan 12, 20:23
    • Mark Beggan on Inability To Learn: “I’m glad because if you said that you were a size 8. It’s a known fact that size 8 women…Jan 12, 20:18
    • Mark Beggan on Inability To Learn: “Craving for the limelightJan 12, 20:16
    • gregor on Inability To Learn: “I’m a 5.6ft male giant (understatement:)Jan 12, 20:10
    • robertkknight on Inability To Learn: “Y’know, the thing about Sturgeon, she’s got lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll’s eyes. When she comes up to…Jan 12, 20:09
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
399
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x