The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


In The Eyes Of The Law

Posted on October 01, 2026 by

Our fundraiser to bring a judicial review of Police Scotland’s decision not to charge anyone with embezzlement in the case of the SNP’s missing £700,000 indyref fund is now live, and can be reached by clicking on this image, or here.

The target of £30,000 represents the cost of the initial application (with contingency for the other side’s costs should it fail).

As the page explains, our intention is to then apply for a Protected Expenses Order which would place a relatively low ceiling on the costs of the case itself. To that end our KC is working pro bono and our solicitors at a greatly reduced rate, because they believe, like we do, that this is a crucial matter to the integrity of Scotland as a nation.

Is it to be the case that the powerful of our country are simply immune from the law, and the police and prosecution service able to refuse any sort of explanation – even when the First Minister himself has publicly admitted the embezzlement took place – and cynically blame each other for the decision? We’re about to find out.

0 to “In The Eyes Of The Law”

  1. Hatey McHateface says:

    Bizarre pic of Swinney taking a leak.

    I guess that was intentional.

    Reply
  2. sarah says:

    I wish you all the best in this legal action [and am sending a modest donation]. This time you have Roddy Dunlop on your side so it stands a better chance than most.

    Just don’t mention justice for people from around Ramallah or your Crowdjustice donations will be seized, as Craig Murray’s have been. Can you draw down the donations before the deadline? It would be a sensible precaution.

    Reply
  3. Northcode says:

    It’s worth remembering that some legal processes are much narrower than the big stories often attached to them. And they very often can’t deliver the dramatic outcomes people expect — they mostly just check procedure and not much else.

    Reply
  4. Rev. Spooner says:

    Done. This is excellent and important work, regardless of which side of the Indy debate we sit.

    All power to your elbow, Rev.

    Signed, Not A Rev.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,984 Posts, 1,252,065 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Rev. Spooner on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Done. This is excellent and important work, regardless of which side of the Indy debate we sit. All power to…” Oct 1, 16:02
    • Northcode on In The Eyes Of The Law: “It’s worth remembering that some legal processes are much narrower than the big stories often attached to them. And they…” Oct 1, 16:01
    • sarah on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I wish you all the best in this legal action [and am sending a modest donation]. This time you have…” Oct 1, 15:54
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Bizarre pic of Swinney taking a leak. I guess that was intentional.” Oct 1, 15:35
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Classic 🙂” Oct 1, 15:31
    • Aidan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “As far as I can tell both questions are the same, so yes it is hard for me to understand…” Oct 1, 15:11
    • Spartan 117 on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Aye, that it is Cap’n. The sheer hatred dripping off its posts is mortifying and amusing in equal measure. That…” Oct 1, 14:52
    • sam on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “It depends on the question asked. Is that hard for you to understand? Check for yourself.” Oct 1, 14:41
    • Mark Beggan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Wings very own Father Jack Hackett. ‘Drink, Drink! Arse. Feckin Girls! Drink!’” Oct 1, 14:23
    • Aidan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “So your polling says that support for a united Ireland in the EU is both 34% and 63% does it?” Oct 1, 14:15
    • Captain Caveman on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““it’s like having a filthy thieving vagrant squatting in your front room, eating all your food, drinking your beer and…” Oct 1, 14:03
    • Captain Caveman on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “It’s not “squealing”, Fatso, it’s “unrestrained, raucous laughter (and pointing)” at you hilariously deranged foamers. Fucking state of you embittered,…” Oct 1, 14:01
    • sam on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Polling in NI says that the current opinion is that support for a united Ireland is at 34%. Polling by…” Oct 1, 13:46
    • James on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““Squeal, piggies, squeal”. LOL.” Oct 1, 13:42
    • Mark Beggan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “– the ones who dream. Dreaming is free. Everything else has a price. Even death has a price. But dream…” Oct 1, 13:29
    • Spartan 117 on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Inebriated idiot.” Oct 1, 13:18
    • Aidan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “We get it mate – you hate the English, and thanks to a complete accident at birth you are somewhere…” Oct 1, 12:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “The real world loves a winner, Confused. That’s the big problem with you instinctive tea towel sympathisers. You’re always sympathising…” Oct 1, 12:51
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““perversion of christianity” Careful, Confused, mask is slipping.” Oct 1, 12:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “I think the issue is many from NI coming to live here. Unionists. Protestants. Stubborn, opinionated ones. And what that…” Oct 1, 12:32
    • Confused on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Sometimes I end up watching the news through the night – it was during such that trump started all this…” Oct 1, 12:25
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““sic as the UN itsel” Last time I checked, Alf, Scots wasn’t a language recognised by the UN. Or at…” Oct 1, 12:25
    • Confused on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “this is why anglos rage – when their theft is blatant, no longer protected by cheap sophistry https://archive.ph/e4Gje “When the…” Oct 1, 12:23
    • Northcode on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “I’ve just realised that the “Three Phases of Decolonization” text functions like a mythic narrative built on the same structural…” Oct 1, 12:19
    • Captain Caveman on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “You cut a truly lamentable, laughable figure, Alf. No one to blame but yourself I’m afraid.” Oct 1, 11:38
    • Mark Beggan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Just another day in the NI. We don’t care. If you care so much then go live there.” Oct 1, 11:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““28 years of no marches, then permission given” Correct, permission given. By the same legal decision making process that didn’t…” Oct 1, 10:52
    • Alf Baird on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““we’ve been shafted by our own kind” Well noticed, although postcolonial theory does tell us that ‘colonialism is always a…” Oct 1, 10:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““unless you class biblical names as Scottish” Superb ignorance of our historic Scottish Christian heritage there. Every now and again,…” Oct 1, 10:33
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “C’moan, Bob, now do the bit where they all awarded themselves medals. Come tae think on’t, that might be the…” Oct 1, 10:19
  • A tall tale



↑ Top