The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Fear to maximum

Posted on July 09, 2013 by

Oh my goodness. Our deep-cover source inside the “Better Together” HQ has well and truly surpassed themselves this time, with a leak of the No campaign’s latest poster so early that it doesn’t even have the “official” logo in place yet.

goodbyesmall

We’re in trouble now, folks.

54 to “Fear to maximum”

  1. John Lyons says:

    I’ve used one stamp this year, I hate Mobile Phones and Tories, I don’t do the lottery and I’ve never even seen an Aircraft carrier.
    Vote no and I’ll be worse off to the tune of one undelivered letter.
    Och well, that’s my mind changed.

    Reply
  2. Ally says:

    The punctuation need improving!
     
    I can’t afford stamps, or, lottery tickets now – so that’s me convinced!

    Reply
  3. Restlessnative says:

    Is it true after independence our weans will walk backwards to?
     

    Reply
  4. Following on from the stamps point – If independence means I stop getting charged a pound just because someone has sent me a Christmas cards that’s two millimetres too thick, then sign me up now! 🙂

    Reply
  5. I’m shakin in ma boots help ma boab jings crivens an aw that

    Reply
  6. Linda's Back says:

    O/T
    BBC Radio Scotland going big on trying to downplay Scottish government’s £5.8 million grant to Tennis Scotland saying its a knee jerk reaction to Andy Murray.
    Not so of course as been in planning for ages and like many others my local tennis club got new playing surface and floodlights a couple of years ago thanks to Sports Scotland.
    And point should be made that for years / decades Scotland was short changed by the (UK) Lawn Tennis Association funding and that lack of support is what drove Andy Murray to head for Barcelona rather than go through the British system.

    Reply
  7. seoc says:

    The Westminster desperation for income – any income, will ensure all commercial activities will be ring fenced.
    Scotland, as a valued customer, will have her bawbees gratefully accepted.

    Reply
  8. Dcanmore says:

    At one time British aircraft carriers were seen as an expensive anachronism by successive Labour and Tory governments. The planned super-carriers of the mid-1960s were cancelled and the last of strike carriers, Eagle and Ark Royal, along with the light carriers Centaur and Bulwark, were scrapped at Cairnryan in the 70s. Then the decision was made by the Tories in 1979 to sell off the brand new HMS Invincible to Australia and old Hermes to India. Then came along the Falkland conflict to save what was left of the Royal Navy. After that the carrier force grew and Trident purchased.
     
    These new carriers are nothing more than allowing the UK to remain in a dick-waving contest with the Americans and French, with the same outcome, to force project bombs and missiles onto mostly civilians in other countries, not to free them, but to police them so Hague and Cameron can be ‘awed’ by people holding their dead children in their arms.

    Reply
  9. Desimond says:

    Will the Post Office being privatised mean no-one can afford a stamp?

    Reply
  10. Shinty says:

    Has to be a wind up, surely? – It’s kind of hard to tell these days as each story is more ridiculous than the last.
    Aircraft carriers FFS – oh yeah that would be my number one priority!
     

    Reply
  11. Bill C says:

    I hear it is rumoured by the NO Scotland campaign that sun cream may be in very short supply in an independent Scotland. Given the current hot weather which again according to the NO Scotland campaign will end come independence, I am now forced to confess that I am now a convert to the NO Scotland campaign, (ony kiddin, in case anybody took me seriously).

    Reply
  12. HandandShrimp says:

    The Tories scoured the BAE contracts with a fine comb to see if they could get out of building those aircraft carriers. They plan to mothball or sell/lease one of them as soon as it is complete.
     
    Murphy is different though, he genuinely seems to love things that go bang and seems to be convinced you are not a real country unless you can bomb people on the other side of the globe.

    Reply
  13. Training Day says:

    Don’t forget food for the poster.  Maitland Mackie reminds us that the Scottish food and drink industry is not strong enough to withstand independence.
     
    We might end up with food banks post-independence. 

    Reply
  14. Doug Daniel says:

    “We might end up with food banks post-independence.”
     
    Well seeing as the UK will refuse to let us use the pound and a Scottish currency will be completely worthless, I can see RBS and Bank Of Scotland becoming Food Banks, since food will become our new currency.
     
    That’s essentially what one of my mates thinks, anyway.

    Reply
  15. Jimbo says:

    They keep forgetting to tell us that our airports won’t be used for rendition flights.
    We won’t condone or be complicit in the torture of suspects on the flimsiest of evidence.
    We will be party to the European Convention on Human Rights – unlike the UK, who appear to want to remove this safety net. 

    Reply
  16. Jiggsbro says:

    We will be party to the European Convention on Human Rights – unlike the UK, who appear to want to ban this safety net.
     
    That ‘safety net’ is a violation of Westminster’s human right to do whatever the hell it likes (or whatever please the readers of the Daily Mail). The sooner it’s scrapped, and malcontents know their place, the better.  Strength through unity!

    Reply
  17. Shinty says:

    No shoe laces in an independent Scotland – it’ll be Velcro only since we are all ‘too stupid’

    Reply
  18. Atypical_Scot says:

    No! Not George!

    Reply
  19. Mister Worf says:

    Daft bit is, unlike Trident, an aircraft carrier actually has defensive uses. I mean, what stops you from trying to blow up an oil rig: Nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow, or a sodding great floating airfield that can drop enough bombs on you to flatten a small mountain?
     
    Yep, gotta be the missiles, yup. That’s a deterrent to a bloke on a speedboat with a bomb. I mean, Trident completely stopped an entire Russian fleet floating up to say hello, didn’t it? Trident stops Tu-95 bombers coming along to see our nice shiny Eurofighters.

    Reply
  20. Iain says:

    @Shinty
    “No shoe laces in an independent Scotland – it’ll be Velcro only since we are all ‘too stupid’”
     
    Shoes?! We should be so lucky.

    Reply
  21. Jeannie says:

    @Doug Daniel
     
    We might end up with food banks post-independence.”
    I can see RBS and Bank Of Scotland becoming Food Banks, since food will become our new currency.
     
    I’d be happy to accept payment in penny caramels.
     

    Reply
  22. Dcanmore says:

    There won’t be any airports in Scotland because they will be bombed by rUK, then we won’t have any friends in the world because friendship will be vetoed by the EU. In fact we will only be allowed to trade with the Faroes and Rockall.

    Reply
  23. handclapping says:

    @Iain
    Shoes?! We should be so lucky to have feet.

    Reply
  24. Dcanmore says:

    @Jeannie … “I’d be happy to accept payment in penny caramels“.
     
    Rich git! 🙂

    Reply
  25. handclapping says:

    Or inches. They are Imperial measures and like pounds we won’t let you use them either

    Reply
  26. Training Day says:

    @Doug Daniel
     
    I dunno Doug, my aim, post-independence, is to steal a march on those unfortunates having to use food as currency by making the best of Ian Smart’s ‘reversion to cannibalism in a separate Scotland’ scenario.  It cuts out the middle man.

    Reply
  27. Doug Daniel says:

    Jeannie – penny caramels will be renamed “thripenny bit caramels” or “bawbee caramels” in a separate Scotland, because we’re not allowed to use Sterling notation!

    Training Day – hmmm, perhaps we’ll still have the pound in a separate Scotland… But it’ll be pounds of flesh rather than pounds of Sterling?

    Reply
  28. Dcanmore says:

    Currency will be in pounds of oats for the porridge-mooths!
     
    Dr Johnson probably didn’t say that, but the sentiment was there … and still is.

    Reply
  29. Max says:

     
    Can you imagine having sex with both Ed Miliband and Ed Balls?
     
    Well it seems the BBC’s economics editor Stephanie Flanders did!
     
    How frightening is that sort of Better Togetherness?
     
    link to dailymail.co.uk

    Reply
  30. Dcanmore says:

    @Max …
     
    Just as we thought, Labour’s tentacles go all the way in the BBC! And here’s me thinking she was just a media whore.

    Reply
  31. Tom Hogg says:

    @DougDaniel
    You need new mates.

    Reply
  32. Desimond says:

    There would be food issues for sure. We couldnt eat it while being held over this latest barrel regards Renewable Energy ( todays scare story attempt). Its hard to eat upside down.

    Reply
  33. Juteman says:

    As we will lose the right to have a letter-box in an independent Scotland  the ‘no stamps” scare is pretty pointless.

    Reply
  34. seoc says:

    Could we have a ‘Scary tale of the Week’ award, please?

    Reply
  35. Andy-B says:

    Forgot to add the border guards with their snarling attack dogs, and razor wire fences……scary stuff indeed.

    Reply
  36. Robert Louis says:

    It’s the pandas I worry about…
     
    link to mirror.co.uk

    Reply
  37. Yesitis says:

    TwitterTory britnat twat plays the sectarian card.
    link to twitter.com

    Reply
  38. cirsium says:

    “We will be party to the European Convention on Human Rights – unlike the UK, who appear to want to remove this safety net. ”

    ah but Jimbo, the UK does not want to be accused of human rights imperialism. At least, that was the defence when the UK was accused of mistreating Iraqis in detention in Basra
    Here is an excerpt from Judge Giovanni Bonello’s decision  ECHR  8 July 2011
    “Human rights imperialism 
    37. I confess to be quite unimpressed by the pleadings of the United Kingdom Government to the effect that exporting the European Convention on Human Rights to Iraq would have amounted to “human rights imperialism”. It ill behoves a State that imposed its military imperialism over another sovereign State without the frailest imprimatur from the international community, to resent the charge of having exported human rights imperialism to the vanquished enemy. It is like wearing with conceit your badge of international law banditry, but then recoiling in shock at being suspected of human rights promotion. “

    Reply
  39. Betsy says:

    @Max,
    Well not both at once!  
    *shudders*

    Reply
  40. Braco says:

    Hi Rev,
    am I in moderation for a reason over on the ‘Loud and Clear’ thread?

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “am I in moderation for a reason over on the ‘Loud and Clear’ thread?”

      I’m not showing anything in the moderation queue. Will check spam.

      EDIT: Nope, nothing there either.

      Reply
  41. Dcanmore says:

    @Mister Worf …
     
    Aircraft carriers, or indeed the greatest militarised power in the world didn’t stop airliners crashing into skyscrapers on 9th September 2001, and their headquarters at the Pentagon. They are OFFENSIVE weapons designed to project power, not DEFENSIVE weapons designed to protect hundreds of dots spread out over hundreds of miles of sea and ocean, that’s what frigates are for. And the shiny bloody Typhoons should be patrolling the airspace, not on the ground waiting to be photographed by a very slow 1950s relic. You should know that being a Klingon 🙂
     
    Scotland doesn’t need aircraft carriers, it needs air patrol and frigates like 98 per cent of other countries in NATO. If you want to do war, like war and especially far away war, then carriers is what you need, and because of that the carriers won’t be parked anywhere near your home country unless they need a refit. And if a carrier is in dock getting a refit then it’s a useless lump of metal until it’s sorted and some refits can take up to 18 months for carriers.

    Reply
  42. Braco says:

    Cirsium,
    brilliant quote! Thanks.
     

    Reply
  43. Braco says:

    Rev,
    I re posted it and it went up as normal. The original is still showing on my thread as in moderation. A mystery?
    Thanks though.

    Reply
  44. john king says:

    “No shoe laces in an independent Scotland – it’ll be Velcro only since we are all ‘too stupid’”
    fits velcro, like? 
    an kin ye tie it?
      

    Reply
  45. john king says:

    “I’d be happy to accept payment in penny caramels.”
    Thats the union dividend fir ye ,
    a mind when penny carmels wir a ha penny 
    an ye hid te pit them in yer back poaket an fa oan the kerb tae brak em cos they wir too big tae pit in yer gob 

    Reply
  46. lumilumi says:

    Oh dear.
     
    Project Fear forgot to include the ultimate penis-extension: Trident and nuclear weapons!
     
    Scotland won’t have those come independence, so North Korea will attack Scotland. Isn’t that what Dave Cameron told the Jocks?

    Reply
  47. john king says:

    “Currency will be in pounds of oats for the porridge-mooths!
     Dr Johnson probably didn’t say that, but the sentiment was there … and still is.”
     
    an jist fits wrang wi parrige exactly?

    Reply
  48. old mikey says:

    Venetian blinds banned in an independent Scotland. It’ll be curtains for us all. 

    Reply
  49. john king says:

    Venetian blinds banned in an independent Scotland. It’ll be curtains for us all. 

      what? this is dreadful. were doomed I tell you doomed.

    Reply
  50. Shinty says:

    old mikey
    You mean we’ll still have windows – gosh that is a relief.

    Reply
  51. velofello says:

    Jeannie: So, “A penny for your thoughts” will still have meaning post-independence? i’m so glad. And tanner ba players? And my wife corners our car like the bend was a thrupenny bit. She fair shoogles round the curves.
     

    Reply
  52. john king says:

    old mikey”You mean we’ll still have windows – gosh that is a relief.”
    which will be taxed,
    to protect the wee birdies you understand 🙁

      

    Reply
  53. JimPicti says:

    I’m having trouble sleeping worrying about this…………. When will our first born die & what have we done to defend against Locust’s?
    🙂

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,736 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “It never ceases to amaze me how many fuckwits actually think they are in the same rich league as these…Jul 10, 03:05
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Wow! Did the paramedics get to you in time and are you alright? Would have sent you a posse of…Jul 10, 02:06
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “That I believe would be the Celtic mythical Tuatha de Danann, the Celtic equivalent of the Gods of Mount Olympus.…Jul 10, 01:48
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Reply to Chas @ 8.26 Oi Chas Leave James alone! It’s me that goes fishing and frankly, it’s no-one here’s…Jul 10, 01:38
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Well that would be you P3nisbreath; posting about “sucking blokes off” (your post), shafting blokes between “spread bum cheeks” (your…Jul 10, 01:13
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Yes, worthless treaties simply used ‘to legalize colonialism’, at least in the eyes of an Imperial justice system. A hoax…Jul 9, 22:59
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Piss off troll.Jul 9, 22:24
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “How’s the carp fishing going James?Jul 9, 20:26
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““–the chair of C-24 is quoted in a Guardian article explicitly saying that C-24 cannot.” Irrelevant, Aidan, because it doesn’t…Jul 9, 19:56
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “I literally asked you to provide evidence for any single one of your dumbass, unsubstantiated assertions. That’s not a “rebuttal”…Jul 9, 19:39
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Treaties are worthless, not unlike cease fires. How many treaties did the imperialist British sign before annexing the other signatories…Jul 9, 19:30
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Aidan She didn’t participate in acts of terrorism, and certainly not of treason (this was in Syria). This same murderous…Jul 9, 19:26
    • Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Ah, jist noticed this post by Aidan trying to diminish understanding of how much energy is exported from Scotland’s geographic…Jul 9, 19:22
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Andrew – I suggest she had her life destroyed by the decision she took to join a murderous death cult…Jul 9, 19:09
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Hatey – “… you expect me to feel sorry for the people who slaughter and abuse my country’s and my…Jul 9, 18:29
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Sam – did the university poll a wide range from the UK? Scotland only would probably throw up different results?…Jul 9, 18:17
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “What, that was your rebuttal? Lol. You surely don’t think I’m wasting any of my time on any of that…Jul 9, 18:11
    • agent x on Too Tight To Mention: ““Police preparing for Donald Trump to visit Scotland The Scottish government said it was working with the UK government to…Jul 9, 17:49
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: “See following Wings over Scotland article ‘Death from above’ (March 13, 2012). Stu writes: « We have a paid subscription…Jul 9, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Midgies tae. When oor junkies and jakies start being stealed an a’, we’ll ken we’re in the end game.Jul 9, 17:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “@AndrewR Sorry, but when it come to that kind of people, being heartless is the only language they understand. We’ve…Jul 9, 17:42
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Captain caveman, 12:04 pm. Actually the programme I am watching is How to Save England, -. The word England being…Jul 9, 17:03
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Does any left of centre politician care about the young people born in the UK, sam? Much of the evidence…Jul 9, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “TL;DRJul 9, 16:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sae true, NC, the scribblin is oan the wa. In fact, it’s only going to be (checks notes) 4-5 years…Jul 9, 16:40
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “When you don’t know what you think you know. Cambridge Journal of Economics Cover Image for Volume 44, Issue 2…Jul 9, 16:36
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “I’ve just run a couple of searches on ChatGPT for for similar search criteria. Which is helpful and revealing because…Jul 9, 16:32
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Not many people agree with you. https://www.derby.ac.uk/blog/margaret-thatchers-legacy/ Survey results In January and February 2019, researchers at the University of Derby…Jul 9, 16:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Great stuff sam. Now do the type of “personality” that posts interminably about pricks, penises, wanking, shirt lifting, glory holes…Jul 9, 16:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “James says: “Brexit” Aw, we need to crowdfund the boy a dictionary. Turn doon the page corner on the letter…Jul 9, 16:16
  • A tall tale



↑ Top