The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Don’t blink

Posted on July 27, 2012 by

When we knocked up this image in Paintshop for a bit of fun a month ago, we had no idea it was going to turn out to be quite so prophetic. The final act of the Rangers saga is going to play out just like the three-way Mexican standoff at the end of Reservoir Dogs, with Sevco, the SFA and the SPL all shouting furiously, pointing guns at each other and daring the other to crack first.

Charles Green’s consortium is still, at time of writing, thought to be refusing to accept the SPL’s right to pursue the dual-contracts investigation against Rangers Football Club PLC (in liquidation) and apply its findings to Sevco Scotland Limited. By doing so, it is in effect holding the whole of Scottish football to ransom. If our game is to survive the next 48 hours with any integrity and meaning whatsoever, the SPL, having (with massive reluctance) come this far, must not blink.

Because any Doctor Who fan will tell you what happens if you blink now.

It’s easy to see why Green is trying his luck. Both sides clearly have something to lose, but he might well feel that the SPL is more frightened than he is. As we’ve seen, he has an escape route no matter what, whereas the SPL has from the very first day of this fiasco been quivering in terror that it might lose its pitiful TV deal with Sky and ESPN. Now that that contract is apparently on the verge of being rescued, at least in large part, Green can hear lily-livered SPL chief Neil Doncaster’s knees knocking all the way across Glasgow, and fancies his chances.

For the record, we still don’t think the SPL will cave in – even though deep down it really really wants to – because it would simply be too much for Scottish football to take after the traumatic summer it’s endured. To grant Sevco an amnesty for the crimes of Rangers, yet allow it to adopt the bankrupt club’s name and badge and history and purport to be the same entity, would send out a message that it’s fine to cheat in every single club football competition in Europe, because even if you get caught you can keep all the trophies you stole.

The SPL is definitely gutless enough to allow that to happen. The SFA probably is. But we just can’t see UEFA and FIFA wearing it. Green sensed weakness in his opponent and tried a bluff, knowing that he could fold if he had to. It’s hard to blame him for that, because he’s a businessman and there was an awful lot of weakness to sense.

But ultimately a small fraction of Rangers’ history has no value to him, and he’ll give it up for the bigger prize of being allowed to play football, sell off his remaining decent players, and get the club stabilised sufficiently that he can realise the multi-million-pound profit that’s the only thing he’s wanted all along.

STV are tweeting that an announcement is coming around noon today. We’re going to stick to our guns and say that Sevco will back down in order to be admitted to the SFA. If we’re wrong, expect Hell to break loose.

28 to “Don’t blink”

  1. kevow89 says:

    what a load of nonesence… green and mccoist are saying no to accepting titles being stripped because Mr Celtic is trying to add a condition where Rangers cannot appeal the final decision… maybe if the investigation wasn’t being done by Celtic’s lawyers (i.e lawyers without conflict of interest) Mccoist and perhaps Green may have a different approach to that offer

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      You’ve got evidence for that, of course?

      Reply
  2. kevow89 says:

    evidence of what? of the proposed conditions? or that harper macleod act on behalf of celtic?

    Reply
  3. Doug Daniel says:

    Amazing. Not only do a lot of Rangers fans like to use Craig Whyte exclusively as the scapegoat for problems that began over a decade before he arrived at Ibrox, but people like Kev there think this is all part of some Celtic conspiracy. He’s by no means the only one, I’ve seen someone on Bella Caledonia trying to claim that the whole thing is a conspiracy to allow Celtic to win more titles.

    Sorry to be blunt Kev, but you’re speaking absolute pish. If ever there was a time for Rangers fans to give the anti-Celtic thing a rest, it’s now.

    Reply
  4. kevow89 says:

    well I dont think its a whole Celtic conspiracy, so I think it’s you that may be talking absolute pish mate. I whole heartedly believe Rangers are getting what they deserve and would not mind them punished for dual contracts… not when the investigation is being done by lawyers who clearly state on there website they work for our biggest rivals.
     

    Reply
  5. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “evidence of what? of the proposed conditions?”

    Yes, of those.

    Reply
  6. rustyarabnuts says:

    before this administration started, I used to think it was the Celtic fans who were totally paranoid.Now I know, it’s the other way around if half of those “sevco” fans were to project their fears and thoughts to any psychiatrist,the self cuddle jacket and the van with the square wheels would be ready and waiting ha ha he he ho ho 

    Reply
  7. An Duine Gruamach says:

    I really don’t understand how “Rangers” can refuse to be stripped of those titles.  I mean, is this not a bit like a team refusing to acknowledge that they’ve lost a game after the whistle has gone and insisting that they won no matter what the league table says?  What can “Rangers” actually do?  Hijack the next printing of the Wee Red Book?

    Reply
  8. bobo balde says:

    Kevow89  Rangers are being stripped ot titles because they cheated. Simple as that. If you were cheated out of something you would feel aggrieved. Sevco shouldnt be allows to play football again for the damage they and they alone have done to the scottish game. Stop pointing the finger, suck it up and support your new team.

    Reply
  9. Juan Solo says:

    Dear oh dear, it’s everyone’s fault but theirs!

    Despite having not been punished for anything as yet, representatives of Sevco’s only defense is to claim that they have been punished enough.

    When imbeciles like McCoist and Brown are lauded as heroes it is no surprise that the club has died.   

    Reply
  10. Embradon says:

    A pundit on Radio Scotland a few weeks ago said that Scottish football fans are broadly 1/3 Rangers, 1/3 Celtic and 1/3 everyone else. I think he is probably about right  – but the exact proportions don’t matter.
    The question is – which third are required for Scottish football to survive?
    If the fans of Rangers or Celtic (or both) find something else to do with their Saturdays, the game will survive at some level – probably quite healthily – after a period of trauma.
    If the “others” lost much more interest than they already have and the league became literally the two team competition the Old Firm already believe it to be, how long would it last?
    I doubt TV, old firm fans or Strathclyde Police would be interested in 30 odd matches per season between the ugly sisters.

    Reply
  11. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Broadly speaking it’s more like 25% Rangers, 25% Celtic, 50% the rest.

    Reply
  12. maxstafford says:

    The entire country would be better without these two sectarian cesspits that pass for sporting teams. I’m sick of all the petty minded bigoted moronS who would sell their grandchildrens’ future for the sake of a poxy football team. F@@@ off to some god forsaken corner of East Belfast where you can have lots of fun hating people for not going to the same church that you never go to!

    Reply
  13. pa_broon says:

    Having as I do no knowledge of football what-so-ever but having followed this thing in an off-hand way…

    I did think they (Rangers or sevco etc) had been punished enough, they’re basically out of big match football for three years but i actually see the point about trophies and wins in the past.

    So, let Sevco go on as it is in the 3rd division, the trophies can go into a display somewhere neutral with a note saying:  “Cheaters never win.”

    With Rangers pretty much dead in the water as a team (I don’t think its reasonable to expect fans to accept losing the name too) and with no trophies (timed from when these EBT things started.) That would be an end of it.

    Basically, Sevco can’t expect to keep the spoils (trophies) and not pay for them (be punished.)

    Other than that, football in Scotland is a bit like the property market, its massively over-bloated. teams are paying way over the odds trying to compete, its clearly not working. Hearts are in trouble as I understand it as are some other clubs. No idea what the answer is except to say, the Premier league is going to be a load of shit to watch with everyone cheering their team for second place because Celtic operate on a completely different economy of scale.

    Reply
  14. DG says:

    “I did think they (Rangers or sevco etc) had been punished enough, they’re basically out of big match football for three years but i actually see the point about trophies and wins in the past.”

    Thing is, being in Div 3 isn’t a punishment for fielding those players.  It’s not even a punishment, it’s a massive favour to admit a new club who don’t meet the requirements for normal admittance after the old club went backrupt fucking over a lot of people who had invested. It happens.

    What we’re dealing with now is literally just titles won with illegal players.  If they wanted to strip extra titles there might be an argument but this is literally just the removal of titles they didn’t actually win. It would apply even if the old Rangers was £100m in the black.  It’s really just a very lengthy version of disallowing a goal for offside or a foul. It’s not even a punishment at all, a punishment leaves you worse off for breaking rules. The Rangers record will be the same as if they’d never done it.

    Reply
  15. pa_broon says:

    I imagine Green will be lucky to get away with the trading name Rangers, it still has a residual value, certainly more in cash turn-over terms than the trophies.

    Reply
  16. maxstafford says:

    After today, I hope everybody just lets it go and moves on. Some of what’s being said in the name of a football team has sickened me to the core today.
    It’s been a funny week, simultaneously proud and ashamed of my country! Well, a corner of it in the case of the latter. 

    Reply
  17. John Lyons says:

    Max Stafford, your hatred of old firm fans is every bit as bad as their hatred for each other!

    Pa Broon, You are wrong.

    Rangers are in division three because they went bust. Being in Division three is not a punishment, it’s a consequence of poor financial management.

    The ten point deduction was a punishment, for the crime of going into liquidation. It wasn’t much of a punishment because Rangers still finished second and were more than ten points behind Celtic anyway, but it was a just punishment as it was the one that was in the rule book.

    The £160,000 fine is a punishment. Again, not much of a punishment for a club with an annual turnover of £55 Million, but since Rangers no longer have that turnover and cash shortages got them into this mess I guess its probably a big deal and a suitable punshment for the crime of appointing a person who was neither Fit nor Proper as Owner. (or was that one for bringing the game into disrepute?)

    And the one year long transfer ban is really only a January transfer ban since it will start after the current window closes, giving Rangers over a month to sign players (and they’re queing up to play in the third division!!!) and due to some irregularity the next Transfer window doesn’t shut until midnight Sept first which means Rangers can line up all of thier signings and complete the paperwork on the last day. Again, not much of a punishment, but, like Neil Lennon serving two bans concurrently instead of consecutively, you can hardly blame Rangers if the SFA are such a joke they cannot apply thier own sanctions properly. (Sanctions a court over-ruled because there’s nothing about them in the SFAs own rulebook!)

    As for the titles, I’m a Celtic fan and I’d hate to see us win ten in a row retrospectively, but I do believe cheats should not be allowed to claim victories if there’s enough evidence to show they cheated. Whether they would have won anyway or not is irelevant. If I was in a boxing match with Mohamed Ali in his prime and he had a horseshoe in his glove and knocked me out with one punch, he still cheated. The fact he wouldn’t need it to win is irelevant. He broke the rules.

    Basically, if Rangers commit multiple breaches of the rules they should get multiple punishments. If a player flattens another player every week, he gets sent off every week. He does not say “I got a red card last week, haven’t I been punished enough?” The answer to that clearly would be no, because he hasn’t learned to behave properly.

    The SFA have blinked first. A temporary membership so they can play Brechin on Sunday is as good as telling Rangers they’ll get membership. This is a stupid move and now takes all pressure off Rangers and puts it on the SFA. They’ve as good as guaranteed Rangers a place in the league. Had they not done this the pressure would be on Rangers. Toe the line or you might be out of football completely!

    Ammusingly I read somewhere Rangers are likely to be given a temporary 90 minute membership. I hope the game doesn’t go into extra time…

    Reply
  18. Juteman says:

    Rangers are in Div 3 because they were treated leniently, and allowed to jump ahead of other candidates.
    The 10 point deduction was for going into administration, not liquidation.

    Reply
  19. Doug Daniel says:

    “the Premier league is going to be a load of shit to watch with everyone cheering their team for second place because Celtic operate on a completely different economy of scale.”

    Pa Broon, this will be a massive improvement from the past couple of decades, where we were all cheering our team for third place because Celtic and Rangers competed on a completely different economy of scale (and Rangers within completely different financial rules, it would seem).

    Don’t believe this idea that the league will be boring now that we know (well, do we really?) that Celtic will be the champions every year for the next three years minimum. That’s a myth perpetuated by Rangers fans, as well as the media (arguably the same thing) who are just annoyed that they’ll have to find something else to write about in their back pages (although we all know they won’t, and Rangers will become the first 3rd division club to be mainstays of the back page). Clubs like Aberdeen, Dundee United and Hearts are gearing up for what promises to be the most exciting season in years, arguably the most exciting in the entire history of the SPL, in fact.

    (And let’s not forget that three years without Old Firm games will allegedly save the taxpayer £120 million – such is the massive cost of policing these hatefests). 

    Reply
  20. DG says:

    ” due to some irregularity the next Transfer window doesn’t shut until midnight Sept first which means Rangers can line up all of thier signings and complete the paperwork on the last day. ”

    I believe this turned out not to be true and the year long ban actually covers the whole next summer. I can’t remember if that was because our assumption on when the window closes was wrong or if they just slightly extended the ban.

    Reply
  21. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    The SFA claimed that Scottish football didn’t follow the same protocol as everyone else when the window closed on a Saturday, and explicitly said that Sevco wouldn’t be allowed to sign anyone on Sep 2nd.

    Reply
  22. Ken says:

    Please dear God- no more! I love the blog, but this football stuff is boring the arse off me!

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Please dear God- no more! I love the blog, but this football stuff is boring the arse off me!”

      Then you should be happy, because it’s pretty much over now. New season starts tomorrow, and Rangers will be in it. The saga’s all but done. (Until they go bust again in November.)

      Reply
  23. Name (required) says:

    +1

    Reply
  24. douglas clark says:

    How come no-one has posted this yet?

    link to scottishfootballleague.com

    the end game / end days, take your pick, are upon us all!

    Sorry Ken.
     
     

    Reply
  25. douglas clark says:

    Reverend Stuart Campbell,
     
    The debate’s all but done.”
     
    Mibbes aye, mibbes naw.
     
     
     
     
     

    Reply
  26. Hugh says:

    This does not look promising. The SPL seems to have blinked one eye. If they blink the other eye and do not follow through with the EBT investigation (and consequent stripping of titles) they will do great damage to the reputation of Scotish football. Scotland will be the country where football has no integrity and is rotten to the core. The SFA should be concerned about that but seem to be cowed by ‘Rangers’. I hope that FIFA or UEFA step in.

    I also dont like the reference to restructuring the game in Scotland. No doubt that will lead to the time that ‘Rangers’ is out of the top tier being shorter than the three years they are claiming as a ‘punishment’.

    The Sevco position is, clearly, logically indefensible. That has been identiifed very well in the comments above. By trying to brazenly force the SFA and SPL to accept their position ‘Rangers’ has come out as a bully and a cheat. Also, if they took off the blinkers of ‘victimhood’ they would see that by trying to hang on to titles won by cheating they are damaging the very history thay seem to be proud of. If they keep the honours won during the EBT period every honour is tainted by association. ‘Rangers’ will always be seen as a team of cheats with no honour, whatever the ‘honours’ board says.

    Certainly, McCoist is now damaged beyond repair. He may be a hero to the ‘Rangers’ bigots but to the everybody else he is an aggressive bully and a cheat. The “cheeky chappy” brand is gone for ever

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,758 Posts, 1,217,912 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “« I’m off out to feed the swans. » (recent Stu Campbell remark) _________ « we may as well do as Rev does…May 17, 21:00
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I’ve enjoyed reading the Grok analysis and assessment of the “debate”. I wonder if it would catch on BTL too.…May 17, 20:58
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I’m not sure it’s not a folk memory now. The place bears little resemblance to what it was in my…May 17, 20:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Sounds like your post needs fixing. How about “explosive stuff regarding the union by a fake KC” Any political and…May 17, 20:20
    • Bilbo on Barbie Stories: “I was trying to stick the dagger deep but others have done so much better than me. She’s certainly no…May 17, 19:08
    • TURABDIN on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Cutting to the crux, unless Scots grow a pair their country will just be a folk memory. There are no…May 17, 19:07
    • Vestas on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Priceless. Well played 🙂 Prepare for the ranting to begin over on his site…..May 17, 18:34
    • 100%Yes on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “This is what annoys me, people who claim to want Independence then advocate two votes for the SNP 1&2 when…May 17, 18:30
    • Willie John on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Thanks.May 17, 18:08
    • aLurker on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “@Willie John Aye, pick a nitter instance that is currently in good health [1]. Then use the nitter service instance…May 17, 17:20
    • PhilM on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Bashing the Bishop, Skip, really? I see you…May 17, 17:04
    • Skip_NC on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Stu, if we are to believe James Kelly’s characterization of you, you were born in Hanover in 1960 (a few…May 17, 17:00
    • diabloandco on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Do you think that the respondent ‘Anonymous’ is himself???May 17, 16:49
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “GLASGOW DAWN (For my brother Stuart, 21 March 2009) Were they not great those hours we spent up in your…May 17, 15:31
    • Ebok on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I think Rev, that you are attacking the system from the wrong angle and playing by the rules of the…May 17, 14:39
    • Willie John on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Anybody got any tips on how I can read the whole saga without joining twitter/x? (Which I politely decline to…May 17, 14:27
    • Skip_NC on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Stu, despite your obvious-self confidence, I am amazed that you actually had a debate on this issue with Scotland’s foremost…May 17, 14:14
    • Jon Drummond on Barbie Stories: “Yes, I remember Zambonini. Just posted pice of her drunken socialising. Lips hanging of her skull with a hundredweight of…May 17, 14:00
    • Jon Drummond on Barbie Stories: “Holy Mother of Christ. How the SNP (NuSNP) have fallen. Her only life/work experience is stocking the printer with with…May 17, 13:51
    • lothianlad on Barbie Stories: “The SNP have been infiltrated, and are now utterly discredited.May 17, 13:15
    • socratesmacsporran on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “The only two things that stop me sending a STOP DIGGINGMay 17, 11:00
    • ScottieDog on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “There are complex algorithms used in portfolio investment decision making, yet research concluded that the use of simple hueristics such…May 17, 10:21
    • MPW on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I asked if he could provide a link as stu had done, he delete the post. Therefore I believe stu…May 17, 10:03
    • Martin on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Kelly is a seriously smelly guy. He needs his hard drive checked.May 17, 09:55
    • Andy Ellis on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “It says a lot (none of it good) about any pro-independence person who is involved in Scottish politics at the…May 17, 09:39
    • A Browne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I fixed on of the ‘Anonymous’ comments: AnonymousMay 17, 2025 at 8:56?AM The problem is that at the moment young…May 17, 09:23
    • duncanio on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Having re-converted to the SNP perhaps he feels the need to go full-on anti-Wings to prove his credentials as a…May 17, 09:06
    • Patsy Millar on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Oops!May 17, 08:57
    • Young Lochinvar on Barbie Stories: “Remember what generations before achieved with little but rural community spirit or in the factory cities; a ball or balled…May 17, 01:54
    • Andrew scott on Barbie Stories: “Ok to that Two useless peas in a podMay 16, 22:25
  • A tall tale



↑ Top