The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Were we watching the same game?

Posted on July 26, 2012 by

The headline above (and slight variants thereof) is a time-honoured response to reports of any event at which the reader’s interpretation of proceedings might differ significantly to that of the writer. Today’s press provides a striking example of the phenomenon.

While the 2012 London Olympics don’t “officially” start until tomorrow, they in fact got underway yesterday with a number of matches in the women’s football competition. Some of them took place at Hampden Park in Glasgow, where ticket sales had been extremely disappointing, in common with the other football venues but in striking contrast to the rest of the Games.

The Scotsman’s take on the opening day was unremittingly positive. Under the headline “A damp squib? Nae chance as Games belong to sunny Glasgow”, it reported a glowing reception in Scotland’s biggest city.

“After all the doubts and fears expressed over the past seven years that the Games would do little for those swathes of Britain north of Watford, the carnival atmosphere in the streets of Glasgow’s southside yesterday was a fitting riposte.

Following several days of unrelenting rain, the sun made a welcome and overdue appearance to greet thousands of visitors pouring in to watch USA play France, followed by Colombia versus DPR Korea, in the women’s football event.”

Sounds like a grand old party down Mount Florida way, doesn’t it?

“In the lead-up, there were fears that Hampden’s seats would be emptier than during the dark days of Berti Vogts’ reign over Scotland’s national side. Organisers reportedly gave away as many as 34,000 tickets for the opening tie in a stadium boasting a capacity of 52,000.

In the event, there were plenty of empty seats. But the 6,000 or so who bought tickets were jubilant to be in Glasgow, many having travelled far.”

It’d be hard to think of how anyone could put a more positive spin on the fact that barely 10% of the available tickets for the event had been sold. But still, with 6,000 tickets bought and 34,000 given away for free in a stadium holding 52,000, and glorious sunshine bathing all of Scotland for the first time in weeks, at least we’d be assured of an impressive 40,000 crowd for the great spectacle, right?

No official attendance figures were released, but we’re going to go ahead and confidently assert that the picture above indicates Hampden operating at rather less than 80% of capacity. The Scotsman’s description of “plenty of empty seats” is technically accurate, but something of an understatement. The Herald carried more details of the crowd figures in a piece by Robbie Dinwoodie that seems to have vanished from the face of the Earth since we read it early this morning, but another report in the same paper suggested that:

 “An estimated 12,000 spectators, many of whom had been given free tickets at the last minute, arrived at Hampden for the kick-off of the game between the women from the USA and France at 5pm.”

That seems a fair guess to us, based on the TV pictures, but filling even 20% of the ground was something of a peak. Later in the evening when Colombia played North Korea (in a game whose kickoff was admittedly delayed by an hour due to an embarrassing cock-up over flags), the vast bulk of those spectators had drifted away, despite the pleasant evening conditions. The Daily Record put the number remaining at just 1,000 and this image taken at half-time seems to back that assessment up:

(The BBC commentator described the attendance as “a reasonable crowd”. If you don’t believe us, or doubt that that’s really a half-time shot, you can check for yourself.)

All we’re saying is, when in future you read The Scotsman reporting on the mood and/or popularity of an event, whether it be an independence rally or a Scottish Labour conference, keep this sort of thing in mind.

11 to “Were we watching the same game?”

  1. pa_broon says:

    Thank god for school kids, I got the distinct impression they were also pedalled out for the olympic flame carry on too. What self-respecting child would to turn down a free half day away from school?

    That last picture looks  as if there are more players and officials than spectators.

    I would also say; ‘…jubilant to be in Glasgow…’ If you say so. And I rather suspect those who ‘travelled far’ were the players.

    😉

    Reply
  2. TheeForsakenOne says:

    Since the torch was running past my place of work I was able to see it without having to leave the office. I was quite surprised at the size of the crowd… until I walked by the local bus station at lunchtime just after it and saw six or eight coaches parked there. It seems Locog were unsurprisingly not against bussing in the crowds.

    On topic, I’m surprised the Scotsman of all people is pursuing that line. I expect that sort of patter from the BBC.

    Reply
  3. Tris says:

    It reminds me of the day that the torch went to Edinburgh, and a BBC woman standing in front of 3/4 empty stands on the castle esplanade declaring that Edinburgh had turned out in force to see the torch. I expect she must have believed that the population of Edinburgh was around 250.

    The venues in London of course will be far busier, as they will be putting on stuff that someone might reasonably want to see, and then filling the venues with free tickets for the sponsors.

    Unfortunately in the aqua stadium 2400 seats have no view of the diving boards and a further 600 have only partial view (despite them having been sold at between 30 and 50 pounds a piece!)

    Scot Goes Pop has photographs of the stadium, which James took himself, showing how empty the place was..
     

    Reply
  4. Doug Daniel says:

    If it was any other type of event, they’d have moved it to somewhere with a more suitable capacity. The Toryglen Regional Football Centre next door, for instance?

    Using a 52,000 seater stadium for a football match with just 1,000 spectators seems like an awful waste, and I suspect it’s not Coca Cola and McDonalds who are paying the stadium costs. 

    Reply
  5. Arbroath 1320 says:

    Oops! 😀
     
    Oh dear, they seem to have had fewer spectators than at a Gretna 2008 game 😆 (I’m not having a go at Gretna you understand)
     
    Mind you I don’t think it helps them very much when the organising committee (LOCOG) can’t even get the correct flag put up on the video they sent up to Hampden! JEEZ! Who are this bunch of no hopers?

    I do love a good comedy routine but this one is just plain ridiculous. 😆

    Reply
  6. Holebender says:

    pa_broon, aren’t the schools on holiday where you are? Or in Glasgow?
     
    I know they’re on their Summer holidays in Aberdeenshire and I’m pretty sure it’s the same throughout Scotland.

    Reply
  7. Juteman says:

    I’m surprised the BBC haven’t blamed Cybernat hackers for the flag cock-up.

    Reply
  8. pa_broon says:

    They are just now but weren’t for the flame when it was bestowing its hallowed glow on our benighted country.

    My point was, they bussed in school kids for the torch thing then gave away free tickets to school kids for the football, hence, thank god (if you believe in that sort of thing) for a steady supply of warm bodies to fluff the numbers up a bit.

    (As an after thought, one wonders if the schools hadn’t been on holiday, would special dispensation be given to attend the football games?)

    Reply
  9. Holebender says:

    Ahhh… OK then. I misunderstood you the first time round. Mea culpa.
     
    To answer your afterthought, probably. I’m sure the Lord Coe Almighty himself would have issued the orders!

    Reply
  10. Juteman says:

    Jim Murphy blames Scotland for the flag fiasco. My earlier post was almost correct.

    link to snp.org

    Reply
  11. shosn says:

    link to dailymail.co.uk
     
    link to thesun.co.uk

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,352 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on The shifting sands of memory: ““The spirit of Britain”? Don’t make me laugh! That’s an Anglo fantasy – “Britain” = “Engerlaaaaand”…. Stale sandwiches, pish beer,…May 24, 01:10
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: “Trolls gonna troll.May 24, 00:48
    • gm on The shifting sands of memory: “DoneMay 24, 00:20
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““the ToU as envisaged has never even been implemented” I firmly believe the Scottish parliamentarians in 1706 genuinely thought they…May 23, 22:40
    • willie on The shifting sands of memory: “Andy, Britain is a hollowed out busted flush heading towards a potential Greek style debt crisis. And that is why…May 23, 22:15
    • willie on The shifting sands of memory: “Interesting how LPG which is much greener than diesel or petrol is being phased out by the Westminster government. Why…May 23, 22:08
    • Scot Finlayson on The shifting sands of memory: “Scott McTominay wins the Italian league for Napoli, Finn Russell wins the Challenge Cup Final for Bath, Wha`s like us.May 23, 22:05
    • Andy Storrie on The shifting sands of memory: “Scotland deserves a gargantuan reparations package when she finally gets tf out of this shit show, Fake country, international GDP…May 23, 21:54
    • Alf Baird on The shifting sands of memory: “Yes, ‘banishment of the natives’ combined with ‘se**ler occupation’ are well established ‘colonial procedures’ (Memmi) resulting in mass population displacement,…May 23, 20:13
    • sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “Since we are now all talking about the key issue of restoring Scotland’s status, there’s another easy thing that may…May 23, 19:15
    • Dan on The shifting sands of memory: “Or alternatively… Why we shouldn’t listen to anybody who’s a climate Armageddon net zero zealot that gets taken in by…May 23, 19:00
    • sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “@ Tartanpigsy: I’m hoping for a zoom link for tomorrow’s AGM in which case I might see you!May 23, 18:53
    • sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “You’re not wrong, Mia!May 23, 18:48
    • David Holden on The shifting sands of memory: “This place smells a whole lot better since Yoon’s cum has left the building and a question over whether he…May 23, 18:25
    • twathater on The shifting sands of memory: “Yes Dan, Leah certainly provides information of the continuation of contempt that the Scottish administration inflict daily especially when there…May 23, 18:11
    • Dan on The shifting sands of memory: “Oh, that’ll be Norway that managed their oil and gas resources somewhat better than the UK’s incredibly bad shitshow of…May 23, 18:08
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “Mia @ 4:59 pm “I wonder if we will ever know what that political fraud Sturgeon got in exchange for…May 23, 17:50
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““plenty are getting a lot denser” Oh dear, are you having trouble keeping up with the pace and depth of…May 23, 17:38
    • Tartanpigsy on The shifting sands of memory: “Hmmm, there is certainly the smell of fear in the myriad unionist posts on this thread. The UN route is…May 23, 17:34
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “James Cheyne I could be wrong, James. But as far as I’m aware Denunciation is just a legal term for…May 23, 17:33
    • Bilbo on The shifting sands of memory: “The idea of independence has been irrevocably tarnished by the actions of Sturgeon and the SNP. Besides, what exactly is…May 23, 17:19
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““today I’ve seen a petition from people in Fife in 1701 asking for the removal of “the army of occupation”!”…May 23, 17:18
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “If the ToU remains valid, then Scotland could have ended it at any time of its choosing. The problem is…May 23, 16:59
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Northcode. I am interested on how denounciation would take effect and what strength it would have say compared to ending…May 23, 16:54
    • sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “@ Mia, Fearghas, Xaracen and Northcode: yeah, let’s focus on denouncing, ending the Union. This stand demonstrates that Scotland has…May 23, 16:36
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““The Monarchy is different, part of 1603 matters not 1707 so if the public will is there it can then…May 23, 16:27
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “I like it. Question in the ballot: “Should Scotland end the union with England?” I think it is very clear.…May 23, 16:10
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “I believe bilateral treaties can be denounced. Legally, Denunciation is a unilateral act by which one party terminates its participation…May 23, 16:04
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The shifting sands of memory: “Or a Proclaimers version: “UNION NO MORE!!”May 23, 15:52
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Westminster is where it’s at, like it or not. Holyrood has been clarified by the so called Supreme Court as…May 23, 15:43
  • A tall tale



↑ Top