The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Vote No, say nothing

Posted on January 26, 2013 by

It’s a real bonus for us when other people dissect something so comprehensively, from a variety of angles, that we don’t have to bother. The solitary piece of what could conceivably be described as solid content in Ruth Davidson’s speech in Edinburgh yesterday appeared to comprise a well-known football chant, which we’ll paraphrase for sensitive readers: “We’re [not of a very high standard], and we know we are”.

Fortunately, we’ve been saved some time in pulling it apart in detail thanks to three excellent and forensic examinations by the unlikely trinity of Lallands Peat Worrier, Alex Massie in the Spectator  and – heavens above – Alan Cochrane in the Telegraph.  We’re off now to check our temperature and make sure we don’t have a fever.

14 to “Vote No, say nothing”

  1. Juteman says:

    I can’t decide. Charlie Chaplin, or Norman Wisdom?

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    If you put the little moustache in, the Chaplin resemblance is quite uncanny. link to twitpic.com

    Reply
  3. Doug Daniel says:

    This is completely off-topic (well, not completely), but for some reason, towards the end of LPW’s piece, I got thinking about how beneficial it would be if the media would use the format from your attempted Straight Debates series. It’s amazing how something so simple is so effective at teasing out the truth from the bullshit folk spout. I would love to see such a debate between the two Blairs.

    Oh yeah, I know why it came into my head. The media really needs to sit them down and say “look, just give us the answer without any waffling pish – why would English MPs vote to give the Scottish Parliament more power?”

    Reply
  4. dadsarmy says:

    OT – can anyone remember how you check if a media article has changed? I could swear the Guardian article was different when I read it first! I may be paranoid …

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “OT – can anyone remember how you check if a media article has changed?”

      Google cache, archive.org or NewsSniffer.

      Reply
  5. Juteman says:

    Nice one Stu! 🙂

    Reply
  6. muttley79 says:

    The No parties were adamant about having only a Yes/No question on independence.  For any promises of more powers to have any meaning they are all going to have to agree exactly on the powers, then have to ensure it is put in their British parties manifestos for the next general election, which happens to be after the referendum.  The likelihood of all that happening is almost 0%.  So basically they only want to defeat Salmond and the SNP, and “separation” as they call self-determination.  That there has not even been one critical critique of the main No campaign in the media is astonishing, if hardly surprising.  Basically it is a dog’s breakfast of a campaign.

    Reply
  7. James McLaren says:

    A line drawn in the sand and washed away by the incoming tide.

    A suitable metaphor for the “scottish” tories.

    RIP,  

    well not really 

    Fekem 

    Reply
  8. Doug Daniel says:

    As I said on LPW’s blog just now:

    The whole premise of the idea of getting more power for the Scottish Parliament from Westminster is completely flawed. When are journalists going to pick up on this? It’s not just that they refuse to detail WHAT powers they would devolve – they won’t tell us HOW they would get them devolved either.

    Devolution is a way of pretending to give the people what they want, while all the time keeping the process completely in the hands of politicians. Any further powers devolved would go the same way – a commission of “experts” would be formed, THEY would decide which powers we can be trusted with, and it would fall a long way short of what the people want. This will always be the case, because the politicians know that once we get what we want, we’ll ask for more, so they must always give us less than we want. This is why the Tories and Tory-minded Labour politicians have always been wary of devolution, because they know it’s put us on the one-way track to independence. Ruth’s attempt to draw a “line in the sand” was futile because she’s drawing it on a surface which is constantly moving forward. You can’t stop destiny.

    If the devolution process was put in the hands of the people, we’d already be halfway independent by now, if not completely. The people want welfare and taxation controlled in Holyrood. This would challenge the authority of Westminster, as Holyrood would stop being subordinate to them. It would come to be seen as Scotland’s main parliament, and soon people would question why Westminster controlled foreign affairs and defence, and thus lead to independence. This is why English MPs will never vote to give Scotland anything resembling the level of powers people want it to have, and if we had been given the opportunity to vote for Devo Max, they would have been given the unenviable choice of doing something they didn’t want to do, or having to tell us “no”, and face the public outcry.

    If we want politicians to decide when Scotland’s grown up enough to have certain powers, people can vote no. If we want to take the powers we want, then we have to vote yes.

    Reply
  9. muttley79 says:

    I was thinking, if Scottish Skier’s theory about Cameron is right, he is bound to dismiss the idea of more powers in the event of a No vote outright in the next year or so (perhaps even during the final few weeks of the campaign).  It is maybe something to watch out for to see if it happens or not.  After his speech on the EU, Cameron would probably need to make just one other untimely intervention, to ensure almost complete distrust engulfs the No camp.

    @Doug Daniel

    Journalists are not going to pick it up because they do not want to draw attention to it. They will make it all about independence.

    Reply
  10. James McLaren says:

    Unashamedly plagiarised and modified from Piet Hein

    It is the week-end anyway

    For the Unionist

    Our choicest plans
         have fallen through,
    our airiest castles
         tumbled over,
    because of lines
         we neatly drew
    and later neatly
         stumbled over.Our choicest plans
         have fallen through,
    our airiest castles
         tumbled over,
    because of lines
         we neatly drew
    and later neatly
         stumbled over.

    A MAXIM FOR SCOTS
     
    Here is a fact that should help you fight a bit longer:
    Things that don’t actually kill you outright make you stronger.

    A REPROOF
     
     
    In view of your manner
    of spending your days
    I hope you may learn,
    before ending them,
    that the effort you spend
    on defending your ways
    could be better spent on
    amending them.

     MAKING SENSE
     
    Life makes senses
    and who could doubt it,
    if we have
    no doubt about it.

     (on Denmark)
     
    Denmark seen from a foreign land
    looks but like a grain of sand.
    Denmark as we Danes conceive it
    is so big you won’t believe it.

    and

    Why not let us compromise
    about Denmark’s proper size,
    which will truly please us all,
    since it’s bigger than it’s small.

    for Rev Stu tongue in cheek

     A TIP
    to members of the literary profession
     
    Those who can write
    have a lot to learn
    from those bright enough
    not to.

    I stumbled across Piet Hein 40+ years ago in Denmark. His ^profession was that of architect.

    Even then he penned mainly in English.

    I have rediscovered them, by way of some his Grook books, as I sell up in France and clear my house.

    Suddenly his simple philiosophy gives me hope and inspiration for Scotland in this phony war period. 

     

    Reply
  11. dadsarmy says:

    Thanks Rev. That NewsSniffer is a great resource.

    Reply
  12. John Jamieson says:

    Ouch!  A Scottish Tory Leader getting the Bronx cheer from Cochrane.  That must hurt.

    Reply
  13. Old Mikey says:

    .Dadsarmy. If you find you are paranoid keep your guard up. Remember the old adage ‘just because your paranoid dosen’t mean their not out to get you’.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,267 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “@ YL Sah! says: 4 July, 2025 at 4:39 am “glory hole frequenter” “boyfriend” “trying to pigeonhole me” You pigeonhole…Jul 4, 07:31
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “@Dan – that is a fair point re immigration, that a competent independent administration could chose who to seek to…Jul 4, 07:07
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “I think you misunderstand. I’m not engaging with whatever senseless rant you’ve posted on the internet in the wee hours…Jul 4, 06:53
    • Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “Is that it??!? Well that’s a great big resounding 0 out of 10 on the witty rejoinder and well thought…Jul 4, 04:58
    • Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “P3nisbreath McP3nisbreathface: Nope; WRONG! Never applied to them, they didn’t do night school and it was too far to travel…Jul 4, 04:39
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Now let’s be honest here “Factchecker”; Tam Dalziel was the doyen of the then Labour awkward squad who delighted (from…Jul 4, 04:17
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “God yes, the Lockerbie case was shocking.Jul 3, 21:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “@Dan The UK doesn’t have control over immigration. That means that Scotland is really no different to England. And no.…Jul 3, 19:56
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Where’s the FUN in THAT?Jul 3, 19:34
    • Dan on The Con Merchant: “@Aidan Scotland does not have control over immigration, so we currently have no way to ensure the type of immigrant…Jul 3, 19:00
    • Andrew scott on Too Tight To Mention: “Better if posts are RELEVANT TO THE ISSUE THE REV PUTS UPJul 3, 18:59
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “I was rather peeved when the Lockerbie trial, run by the Scottish legal establishment, put the wrong man behind bars.…Jul 3, 18:55
    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “Can you tell us which university knocked back your application, YL Sah! My money’s on Edinburgh.Jul 3, 18:44
    • Dave Hansell on Too Tight To Mention: “Something like this, perhaps? https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2020-05-22/thurrock-council-borrowed-1bn-from-taxpayers-to-bet-on-british-sunshineJul 3, 18:03
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “All true. But what are we going to do about it? These grifters have closed nearly every avenue to move…Jul 3, 18:02
    • factchecker on Too Tight To Mention: “The EVEL procedure was an answer to the West Lothian Question, first identified by Scottish MP Tam Dalziell in 1977.…Jul 3, 17:40
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?” That almost no one agrees with your analysis of the situation? It’s…Jul 3, 17:19
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Andrew Scott, Its simply a matter of scrolling on by if you are not interested in realising that Westminsters governance…Jul 3, 16:29
    • 100%Yes on Too Tight To Mention: “The big question is, how is the SNP still alive and kicking. I do not believe for a minute the…Jul 3, 15:34
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Indeed, «hiding»in plain sight and all perfectly normal in Yookay.. It seems the British state functions on the accommodating body…Jul 3, 15:17
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: “And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?Jul 3, 15:02
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “Again we keep coming to this issue of the preservation of sovereignty. In the context you mean it, sovereignty means…Jul 3, 14:52
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: “Semantics, at the end of the day. The substantive point still stands, whether or not you think you’ve answered Aiden’s…Jul 3, 14:42
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: ““Ah, a classic case of hinging an entire argument off a single, extreme outlier argument” Maybe it escaped your attention,…Jul 3, 14:31
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “I think it’s about time we looked seriously at these Trade Union representatives. 1. They don’t understand the Law. 2.…Jul 3, 14:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “this is why I miss, such a lot : RED GEM WOMAN – coz she could sit here all afternoon…Jul 3, 13:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Still rubbish, Main. Still not seeing any “the positive case for the Union”. Surely you don’t lack arguments. Do you…Jul 3, 13:16
    • James on The Con Merchant: “Ooft. I think you nailed it there, Lochinvar. A GOTCHA.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Read books. It will do you good.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““Professor Robert Black KC, FRSA, FRSE, FFCS, ILTM ( Professor Emeritus of Scots Law at the University of Edinburgh), was…Jul 3, 13:06
  • A tall tale



↑ Top