The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


To infinity and beyond

Posted on January 08, 2012 by

Nick Clegg's been upsetting people this week. Now, you might reasonably retort that there was nothing unusual about that, especially in a week when newspaper headlines suggested that the Lib Dems were down to a single voter. But the unusual thing on this occasion is that he's upset people by telling the truth.

Much of the Scottish political village was up in arms about comments the Deputy Prime Minister made in an interview with the Scotsman, which the paper chose to present as Clegg calling supporters of Scottish independence "extremists". The story set various camps off into various types of huff. Liberal Democrats, for example, were angry both at the comments and at the Scotsman – which they accused of "misreporting" Clegg on the grounds that he hadn't actually used the word "extremists" – while some nationalists were predictably outraged at the perceived slur.

But these complaints are wrong on every level. Firstly and most obviously, Clegg DID use the word "extremists" – you can see it in paragraph 8 of the Scotsman piece, where the paper quotes him thusly:

"All the evidence suggests that [greater devolution] is the mainstream of opinion and the extremists are those who either think that we need to yank Scotland out of the United Kingdom tomorrow, or those who say there should be no further change at all."

This statement is, in itself, entirely accurate. When it comes to the constitution, independence and the status quo are the extremes of opinion (discounting the real lunatic fringe who want Holyrood closed down altogether). But even where more sober commentators recognised this fact, they misleadingly left out the last part of Clegg's quote, giving the false impression – just as the Scotsman had done – that he'd only applied it the nationalist camp, when in fact he'd explicitly labelled the supporters of the status quo in the same way.

And, indeed, himself. Because while the Deputy PM was clearly attempting to isolate Labour and the Tories and carve out the popular middle ground for his own party as it embarks on yet another consultation on "Home Rule" (despite the Calman Commission, whose findings the Lib Dems backed, having barely closed its doors), the fact of the matter is that whenever the referendum arrives, the Lib Dems will by default be campaigning for the status quo too, making them just as extremist as everyone else. And despite all the faux-shock, that's something that everyone already knew long before Clegg opened his mouth.

There is absolutely no chance that the latest Lib Dem talking shop will produce a devo-plus proposal to be included in the referendum. Even if they wanted to they'd never get such a thing approved by their UK coalition partners (and unlike independence, any altered devolution settlement requires the consent of the Westminster parliament), and they don't want to anyway – the Scottish Lib Dems have been absolutely unequivocal, along with the other opposition parties, in demanding a one-question Yes or No referendum. And the likelihood of the Lib Dems being in power on either side of the border by then, and therefore in a position to negotiate or grant any further devolution at a later date anyway, is pretty much zero.

So when it comes down to it in 2015 or 2016, by Nick Clegg's definition everyone will be an extremist. Only the two extreme positions will be on offer, and the voters will have to pick one or the other. This blog, for one, commends Nick Clegg on stating that simple and obvious fact, and isn't quite sure why anyone else would be offended by it.

4 to “To infinity and beyond”

  1. rai says:

    so by your reconing the right to self determination is an extremist position??? i wonder how the rest of the civilised independant nations feel about that

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      It’s at one extreme of the debate, yes. If you hadn’t noticed, this blog enthusiastically supports independence. But that doesn’t mean taking offence at what are perfectly accurate descriptions of both the pro-independence and pro-status quo positions. Clegg was certainly trying to create a misleading impression, but what he actually said was unarguably technically correct.

      Reply
  2. DougtheDug says:

    The problem with the use of the words, "extreme", and, "extremist", by Nick Clegg is that although in the context of the constitutional debate they can both simply mean a postion at one end of the spectrum or somebody who supports that position their meaning changes in common usage where, "extreme", usually means a position far from what is necessary or normal and an, "extremist", is someone whose views are fanatical and even tinged with violence.
    Again just as with Ken MacIntosh, Michael Moore and now Nick Clegg the unionists don't like being called unionists. They're devolutionists. Which is like claiming that you are not in any way a bird as you are a duck. In any case I thought the Lib-Dems were federalists which though still a very unionist viewpoint protects the powers of regional parliaments within a constitution.
    Again Nick Clegg is assuming that devolution which is just a variant local government scheme in unionism is somehow in a position which is between the union and independence which it is patently not.
    Has Nick as the leader of a party which is committed to the integrity of the UK but with federal regional parliaments ever worked out that there is no midpoint between Scotland being part of the UK and Scotland being independent.
    The claim that the Lib-Dems are planning more powers for Scotland is just a jam-tomorrow strategy. In the light of the fact that all three unionist parties support and wrote the Scotland Bill which simply fiddles with the current Scotland Act and in the light of the fact that no party has come up with even a draft question for the empty Devo-Max option in the independence referendum ballot paper it is probably fairly safe to say that Devo-max, the maximum amount of power Lodon is willing to devolve to Scotland is already here.
    For those who support Devo-max, enjoy it because it is already here.

    Reply
  3. Gruntus says:

    "Which is like claiming that you are not in any way a bird as you are a duck"
    That Python logic sums up the con/dem/lab ever changing positions in regards to Scotland.
     

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,784 Posts, 1,220,830 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • A2 on And it’s goodnight from he/him: “Missed a trick there! this wee vid has “Legal battles, theft, back biting, progress, marketing campaigns, money, greed & metaphor.”Jun 28, 14:00
    • TURABDIN on The Art Of Noise: “THE SNP indie radicals, assuming such actually exist, ought to have disposed of Swinney last year, now it’s strategically too…Jun 28, 12:55
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Holiday Relief: “Alf, thanks for posting. I have just sent you a reply which frustratingly has gone into moderation. That fate also…Jun 28, 12:44
    • Alf Baird on Holiday Relief: “I see you have attracted a dubious ‘friend’ there Fearghas, which would tend to suggest, as I believe, that I…Jun 28, 12:04
    • Alf Baird on The Art Of Noise: “Scotland’s strategic geographic location on the Great Circle Route has not changed, so we continue to hold that advantage for…Jun 28, 11:43
    • 100%Yes on The Art Of Noise: “I have no idea what percentage of the general public is aware of the SNP stance on Indy, I would…Jun 28, 11:15
    • Andy Ellis on Holiday Relief: “@Fherghas (passim) Good to see you shining a light on Alt’s obfuscations and attempts to re-write history. The fact he…Jun 28, 11:14
    • 100%Yes on The Art Of Noise: “Can you explain as to why my post on Craig Murray recent visit to the UN aren’t being posted. If…Jun 28, 10:40
    • Grendel on Anatomy Of A Lunatic: “Kelly was our LACU Political Officer or some such thing, and in his time in office he did the square…Jun 28, 10:24
    • Stuart MacKay on The Art Of Noise: “Alf. Your fired! Time to pick the the Ports and Transport portfolio once more. I’d be interested to hear what…Jun 28, 10:05
    • Stuart MacKay on The Art Of Noise: “Sounds like Swinney is, quite deliberately, setting himself up for spectacular failure. No doubt with the goal of getting an…Jun 28, 10:01
    • Sven on The Art Of Noise: “Turabdin @ 08.50. Sorry, argument falls down; not even a single reference to what Post Colonial Theory suggests and the…Jun 28, 09:28
    • TURABDIN on The Art Of Noise: “« I want to deliver a significant advance on my political arguments for independence…» AI being so HOT with politicos,…Jun 28, 08:50
    • Colin Dawson on The Art Of Noise: “The only thing that will bring independence any closer is destroying the credibility of the SNP long before the 2026…Jun 28, 08:31
    • Alf Baird on Holiday Relief: “We have to consider the realities of the time, and over time, Fearghas, as well as how languages develop. All…Jun 28, 08:06
    • Jamie on But Don’t Give Yourself Away: “What nonsense to say we can only have 1 referendum election, more like a million consecutively or as many as…Jun 27, 23:55
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Holiday Relief: “My fault Alf for not making my last question tight enough. However unlikely the prospect that you might one day…Jun 27, 22:53
    • Mark Beggan on The Art Of Noise: “Stay on the Downers John boy that shit ain’t doing you no goodJun 27, 22:51
    • Mark Beggan on The Art Of Noise: “Crack cocaine.? What else?Jun 27, 22:49
    • Alf Baird on Holiday Relief: “It is well established that English (and other languages) use many words from various languages. The essential thing for us…Jun 27, 22:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Holiday Relief: “Sure, Alf, and perhaps “cide” is derived from the Humous for “yellow, tunnel skulking, helpless lassie mutilator”, but that’s all…Jun 27, 21:36
    • Hatey McHateface on The Art Of Noise: “Surely Swinney is doing a first-class job? It’s not his fault that nobody ever asked for the job description to…Jun 27, 21:24
    • sarah on The Art Of Noise: “They got rid of the Good Guys and they changed the party rules to permit self-identifying of disability in order…Jun 27, 21:13
    • Alf Baird on Holiday Relief: ““linguicide” (death of a language due to natural or political causes) is derived from the Latin ‘lingua’, meaning tongue.Jun 27, 21:11
    • Hatey McHateface on Holiday Relief: ““Linguicide” 🙂 Loving it, Alf. BTW, what’s the Scots for linguicide? That’s surely gonna be the first question every alert…Jun 27, 20:59
    • Hatey McHateface on And it’s goodnight from he/him: “That’s a thought provoking post, Andy, but tell us true. If we Scots all just shouted “Bairns Not Bombs” in…Jun 27, 20:51
    • socratesmacsporran on The Art Of Noise: “You might have hoped, given what a success Swinney was as SNP leader, first time round, a half-way sensible party…Jun 27, 20:43
    • Hatey McHateface on But Don’t Give Yourself Away: “James’s Mammie gone oot again. Hope she left James plenty of Kleenex!Jun 27, 20:42
    • Alf Baird on Holiday Relief: ““Scots displacing other native languages” ? Hardly. Lets looks at the facts: Gaelic came from Ireland. Norse from Scandinavia. English…Jun 27, 19:33
    • Andy Ellis on And it’s goodnight from he/him: “You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. Many US defence systems actually depend on European (and sometimes Taiwanese, Japanese,…Jun 27, 18:39
  • A tall tale



↑ Top