The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The phantom referendum

Posted on November 08, 2011 by

The theoretical possibility that the UK Government could usurp the Scottish Government and hold its own referendum on Scottish independence is one that's been kicking around ever since the SNP won its historic majority at Holyrood back in May. But one question that nobody seems to have asked is "So what?"

Much of conventional wisdom has it that only the UK Parliament has the ability to grant Scotland independence, and that the Scottish Parliament can't legally bring about the dissolution of the Union. This is essentially a fallacy, based on misunderstanding of the sovereign nature of the Scottish people, but is generally held to be an academic technicality anyway – should a referendum conducted by Holyrood indicate the desire of the Scottish electorate for independence, the idea of Westminster even attempting to refuse would in practice be unthinkable.

But were Westminster to conduct its own vote, would the situation be any different? It's hard to see how. It was recently claimed by the Tories' Lord Forsyth that Alex Salmond had told George Osborne the SNP would boycott any Westminter-led referendum. This would throw up a pretty interesting constitutional brouhaha by itself, but let's assume the referendum went ahead in 2012, the SNP did indeed refuse to collaborate in it, and let's say for the sake of argument that as a result it delivered a resounding "No" vote on a very low turnout. What then?

The UK would continue business as usual (assuming there hadn't been a civil war), and soon enough would arrive at 2015. At which point the SNP would table the referendum for which the Scottish electorate gave them an overwhelming mandate, and invite the UK Government to try to stop it.

It's difficult to identify any legal grounds on which Westminster would be able to block a referendum which the Prime Minister had repeatedly acknowledged was Holyrood's to hold. Short of Cameron sending in the tanks, the second referendum would go ahead regardless of the result of the first. The constitutional sovereignty of the Scottish people would remain unchanged, as would the unthinkability of any refusal by Westminster to accept the result. Once again, beyond military conflict there simply wouldn't be any way to keep the Union together.

(It's not even as if there isn't extremely recent precedent on these very islands for having two referenda on the same subject in the same country in close succession. Less than 16 months separated the people of the Republic Of Ireland's rejection of the Lisbon Treaty from a second vote in which it was accepted.)

So we're going to go ahead and say with some confidence that there will be no Westminster-conducted referendum on Scottish independence. That it would be democratically outrageous ought to be reason enough, let alone that it would likely be highly counter-productive, but more importantly it would be also completely pointless. Only Holyrood has a mandate for a referendum, and only Holyrood – on Holyrood's own terms – will conduct one.

Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,807 Posts, 1,224,660 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Geri on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Read the detail. Scotland is awarded refugees but not an increase in cash to pay for them. That extra money…Aug 20, 19:49
    • GM on Conspiracies For Dummies: “A bbc journalist broke the convention of not revealing the identity of a complainer in court. They also gave a…Aug 20, 19:42
    • GM on Conspiracies For Dummies: “See gordon dangerfield below for a proper explanation.Aug 20, 19:27
    • GM on Conspiracies For Dummies: “If the die was not well and truly cast during the Sturgeon era then the rigged process that elected her…Aug 20, 19:26
    • GM on Conspiracies For Dummies: “It started off with the complaints procedure, Alex fought it. It became a civil case in court. If you recall…Aug 20, 19:13
    • Skip_NC on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Has someone stolen Iain McWhirter’s identity?Aug 20, 19:11
    • robertkknight on Conspiracies For Dummies: “You need to address that question to their London paymasters.Aug 20, 18:59
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Racists are everywhere these days: https://unherd.com/newsroom/scotland-is-feeling-the-cost-of-liberal-asylum-policies/Aug 20, 18:58
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Conspiracies For Dummies: “By (Scottish Solicitor Advocate) Gordon Dangerfield (12 Aug 2021) – LIZ LLOYD’S INTERFERENCE IN THE SALMOND INVESTIGATION: WHAT IT MEANS…Aug 20, 18:42
    • Geri on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Yes & I’m sure even the lawyers advised her there was nothing of any substance & nothing to see here…Aug 20, 18:23
    • Arthur Martin on Conspiracies For Dummies: “What did Leslie Evans and Liz Lloyd stand to gain from Alex Salmond being incarcerated?Aug 20, 18:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Mills and Boon … only without the sex. We are talking about Scots after all. 50 shades of oatmeal.Aug 20, 18:20
    • James on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Why did she jail Craig Murray? I expect both questions have the same answer.Aug 20, 18:19
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: ““Greatest Leader we have ever had” Naw. That was Yousaf. At least, alert readers could be forgiven for jumping to…Aug 20, 18:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Quick Barbs. Start pushing the idea we should gift it tae poot! Ye’ll get a double bonus fer that.Aug 20, 18:10
    • Callum on Conspiracies For Dummies: “It was always Sturgeon at the heart of the conspiracy – guilty as hell – but extremely worrying was that…Aug 20, 18:02
    • twathater on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Alex Salmond in his love for Scotland announced that there were things that should have been aired and exposed but…Aug 20, 18:00
    • James on Conspiracies For Dummies: “That right, aye?Aug 20, 17:57
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Whatever the literary merits of FRANKLY in total, that screenshot double-spread above (beginning with the words “been wrong. Leslie had…Aug 20, 17:54
    • Ronnie on Conspiracies For Dummies: “One bit I still don’t understand, given that the Judge heard all the evidence and points that you have highlighted,…Aug 20, 17:53
    • duncanio on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Mills and Boon … only without the love.Aug 20, 17:43
    • Stuart on Conspiracies For Dummies: “As seen over on the Daily Telegraph. “JK Rowling has accused the liberal arts of “the most craven, bootlicking capitulation…Aug 20, 17:36
    • Geri on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Jeez, there goes comfy slippers failing to keep up as usual. It’s okay, Dreary, she’s gone now. No need to…Aug 20, 17:31
    • Hatey McHateface on The illiterate solicitor: “@ James says: 20 August, 2025 at 12:22 pm “That’s “Reform” for you, Marie. Half wits, bigots and racists.” BBC…Aug 20, 17:22
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Conspiracies For Dummies: ““Out, damned spot!”Aug 20, 17:20
    • Hatey McHateface on The illiterate solicitor: “@Barbs says: 20 August, 2025 at 10:50 am “fuck off” Spare a thought for those unfortunates who go through life…Aug 20, 17:19
    • Ian on Conspiracies For Dummies: “As soon as Salmond was publicly named, Sturgeon had done all the damage she needed to, regardless of the outcome.…Aug 20, 17:00
    • Anton Decadent on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Thank you for fighting for his name and laying out what was done to him. Over on X it is…Aug 20, 16:56
    • panda paws on Conspiracies For Dummies: ““via the sinister Moorov Doctrine” It’s not normally sinister. Serious sexual assaults don’t usually have witnesses, they are the very…Aug 20, 16:56
    • Young Lochinvar on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Forrest..Aug 20, 16:37
  • A tall tale



↑ Top