The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Revenge of the radio star

Posted on March 25, 2013 by

Something’s puzzled me for more than 15 years, viewers, and an article I read today brought it back to mind, so I’m going to raise it very briefly in the hopes that someone might even now be able to answer the question for me.

There’s something odd about the chart above, isn’t there?

Apple makes dizzyingly vast amounts of money selling software, music and iOS apps, yet there’s only a teeny tiny little broken yellow slice of that graph accounted for by videos. But hang on – don’t we live in the age of video? Aren’t we all walking around with amazing high-definition screens right in our pockets? So why aren’t people selling us reasons to look at them?

Pop videos are one of the iconic cornerstones of modern culture. Record companies spend vast amounts of money on making promos for singles, but then – incredibly – don’t offer people a way of watching them on demand.

The App Store doesn’t even have a pop videos section. A couple of half-hearted streaming services offer a pitiful selection from a tiny handful of bands. I’ve never seen any sort of multi-artist Now That’s What I Call Music Videos compilation, and very few artists ever release their own collection, certainly not while the band’s still active.

Much the same goes for YouTube, which would initially seem the obvious answer. Only a microscopic percentage of videos are made available through official channels, and much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising “wraps”.

The rest of the time, the industry actively tries to HIDE its work from consumers, often pursuing reflexive or automated takedown orders if its audience tries to do its promotional work for it.

If you’re lucky you’ll be able to find a logo-strewn version ripped off a TV channel that isn’t at TOO crappy a low resolution, but even then you’re reliant on an internet connection or mobile signal if you want to actually watch it.

If it’s not one of the many videos which are watchable on PC but blocked from running on mobile formats, that is. Funnily enough, the official version of the song in the above example only just reappeared in public view on the artist’s own channel – just two weeks ago when I was searching for it, it was invisible. But even now I can’t play either the official or unofficial versions on my iPhone.

(And that’s without even going into what an increasingly-painful chore it is to use YouTube at all these days. If there’s a way I can access or link to anything in my list of Favourites now without triggering the spewing-out of the entire thing in sequence as a “playlist”, I’m buggered if I can work out what it is. And adding insult to injury, the list is full of “Deleted Video” entries with no way of knowing what they used to be so I can try to find another version.)

Why are pop videos the most tightly-restricted cultural commodity in the world? Why can’t fans of an artist buy their videos as easily as they can buy their songs? Why do record companies spend millions of dollars and huge amounts of creative energy making often-brilliant PROMOTIONAL devices which they then go out of their way to STOP anyone from seeing – let alone giving them money for – other than by watching endless hours of music TV in the vague, remote hope that a truncated, censored, ad-mangled version might just come up?

Seriously, anyone. It’s been 15 years and I’m none the wiser. What the fuck?

0 to “Revenge of the radio star”

  1. James says:

    That Wikipedia list of the most expensive pop videos is amazing. Of the ten most expensive, I can remember the gist of three of them. Four of the songs I couldn't even hum. And all it cost them (and by them, it basically means "Sony") for those ten videos was a total of $37 million. Yes, most of them are around 20 years old, but that was around the peak of my MTV watching days.

    Reply
  2. Blucey says:

    Oh God… that fucking Two Cousins video…. I watched that for DAYS.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Ditto.

    Reply
  4. kwyjibo says:

    I don't think the chart is that odd.  People associate video with Netflix and Youtube, not iTunes or the App Store.
    I do think that monetizing music videos is difficult – most people listen to music when they're doing something else.  I've got a front facing camera on my mobile, but you won't catch me doing a video call.

    Reply
  5. RFox says:

    Ask Duran Duran…..

    Reply
  6. Rusty Shackleford says:

    " much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps"
    You probably already know this, but it bears repeating for those who don't:
    Adblock+
    Ghostery
    Fit these extensions to Firefox or Chrome and never see another YT ad again, and no, not even a video ad.
    If you use IE, well, I can't help you.

    Reply
  7. Da5e says:

    Gods, I love that Andrew WK record. You know he appeared on a Current 93 song? Guitar Wolf, too. The guy might be a genius.

    Reply
  8. Daniel Walters says:

    As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁 “

      What can I tell you? Gamers are absolutely determined not to pay for journalism, a boy’s got to eat, and there are only so many hours in the day.

      Reply
  9. joncfc says:

    SAY SUMMAT STU!

    Reply
  10. We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You've worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.  True, I wouldn't want you to skip meals or lose sleep, but I'm still always interested in what you've got to say.  Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to my own overdue blogs as well (whistles)…

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You’ve worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.”

      I’m happy just watching.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,852 Posts, 1,232,345 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “Sandy Peggie is brave, committed, a nurse, a household name, and a popular Scottish champion for common sense and against…Dec 14, 12:15
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “@Lorncal Thanks for your reply. Purely to be mischievous, and not because I want a rammie, I’m going to point…Dec 14, 12:08
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Sven, Thank you, Indeed been a long road, for quite A while, and you are right to state it would…Dec 14, 12:02
    • Geoff Anderson on How Far To Go, How Far: “https://x.com/ForWomenScot/status/2000165676158521801?s=20Dec 14, 11:58
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““Sitting at home, greeting and whining, eternally calling for somebody else that isn’t them to do something.” Well… it works…Dec 14, 11:53
    • Geoff Anderson on How Far To Go, How Far: “https://www.thetimes.com/article/608d90b4-6587-4f44-b942-e82bc49fa071?shareToken=5ced42e537780e7f15138ba275944069Dec 14, 11:44
    • Bilbo on How Far To Go, How Far: “I see that Moinbot has published an article in the Guardian the other day concerning immigration. I’m not linking it…Dec 14, 11:37
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “It’s the work of literally seconds to discover that public spending per head in Scotland exceeds that in England and…Dec 14, 11:22
    • aLurker on How Far To Go, How Far: “I visit here a lot less often than I used to, but nevertheless I have appreciated your contributions greatly over…Dec 14, 10:31
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “Alf Baird posted an excellent (I think so, anyway… and that’s all that really matters) comment yesterday. I feel it’s…Dec 14, 10:12
    • diabloandco on How Far To Go, How Far: “Moi aussi Madame Cheyne!Dec 14, 09:10
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “Even money that judge will be allowed to crawl away without facing the consequences of his actions. Due to the…Dec 14, 08:27
    • Cynicus on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mark Beggan says: 13 December, 2025 at 6:26 pm “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.” ======== Is that a…Dec 14, 00:21
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “No, Hatey, I get it completely because I’m a woman, and my survival as a woman depends on my getting…Dec 13, 23:37
    • william G Walker on How Far To Go, How Far: “Saffron Robe is right in his forensic analysis as led by Stuart. He is also right in “objective reality” and…Dec 13, 22:30
    • McDuff on How Far To Go, How Far: “Rev you are worth your weight in gold!Dec 13, 21:34
    • Saffron Robe on How Far To Go, How Far: “Forensic analysis of the highest order, Stuart, of immense benefit to all those interested in the pursuit of justice which…Dec 13, 21:00
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “Far more importantly, if the pattern on the carpet has left an indelible mark, what tartan is it? That’s the…Dec 13, 20:26
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “@Alf Baird When you write that the need for decolonisation is “absolute and urgent” I wonder how it is that…Dec 13, 20:22
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “You missed one, Northy, phallusy.Dec 13, 20:06
    • Hatey McHateface on The ginger stepchild: “Multiple accounts, Bilbo? How you must wish that was true. My “stalking” of you was me pointing out the quite…Dec 13, 19:58
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “I meant to do this earlier, but forgot. Here it is now, better late than never. Correction: “through-away” in paragraph…Dec 13, 19:05
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.Dec 13, 18:26
    • Andy Wiltshire on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mistakes tending to both sides of a controversial question roughly equally may well be just mistakes. If they all point…Dec 13, 16:49
    • James Barr Gardner on How Far To Go, How Far: “The real problem is ye jist cannae git the staff these days !Dec 13, 15:40
    • Marie on How Far To Go, How Far: “That’s EXACTLY what it looks like.Dec 13, 15:03
    • Sven on How Far To Go, How Far: “You’d know, I’m sure, I wish you well “James Cheyne”; were every independence minded Scot as single minded, determined and…Dec 13, 14:56
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “Nae bother, James. The longer you stay around here the better as far as I’m concerned. And thanks for the…Dec 13, 14:55
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““But that flame still burns.” I’ll tell you what ‘burns’… YOUR SHITTY RHETORIC! BOOM!!! Northcode drops the “Ad Hominem”, arm…Dec 13, 14:46
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “robertkknight, Better together, as the prime ministers statement once said. Why not have the upper ruling class grouped with the…Dec 13, 14:36
  • A tall tale



↑ Top