The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Revenge of the radio star

Posted on March 25, 2013 by

Something's puzzled me for more than 15 years, viewers, and an article I read today brought it back to mind, so I'm going to raise it very briefly in the hopes that someone might even now be able to answer the question for me.

There's something odd about the chart above, isn't there?

Apple makes dizzyingly vast amounts of money selling software, music and iOS apps, yet there's only a teeny tiny little broken yellow slice of that graph accounted for by videos. But hang on – don't we live in the age of video? Aren't we all walking around with amazing high-definition screens right in our pockets? So why aren't people selling us reasons to look at them?

Pop videos are one of the iconic cornerstones of modern culture. Record companies spend vast amounts of money on making promos for singles, but then – incredibly – don't offer people a way of watching them on demand.

The App Store doesn't even have a pop videos section. A couple of half-hearted streaming services offer a pitiful selection from a tiny handful of bands. I've never seen any sort of multi-artist Now That's What I Call Music Videos compilation, and very few artists ever release their own collection, certainly not while the band's still active.

Much the same goes for YouTube, which would initially seem the obvious answer. Only a microscopic percentage of videos are made available through official channels, and much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps".

The rest of the time, the industry actively tries to HIDE its work from consumers, often pursuing reflexive or automated takedown orders if its audience tries to do its promotional work for it.

If you're lucky you'll be able to find a logo-strewn version ripped off a TV channel that isn't at TOO crappy a low resolution, but even then you're reliant on an internet connection or mobile signal if you want to actually watch it.

If it's not one of the many videos which are watchable on PC but blocked from running on mobile formats, that is. Funnily enough, the official version of the song in the above example only just reappeared in public view on the artist's own channel – just two weeks ago when I was searching for it, it was invisible. But even now I can't play either the official or unofficial versions on my iPhone.

(And that's without even going into what an increasingly-painful chore it is to use YouTube at all these days. If there's a way I can access or link to anything in my list of Favourites now without triggering the spewing-out of the entire thing in sequence as a "playlist", I'm buggered if I can work out what it is. And adding insult to injury, the list is full of "Deleted Video" entries with no way of knowing what they used to be so I can try to find another version.)

Why are pop videos the most tightly-restricted cultural commodity in the world? Why can't fans of an artist buy their videos as easily as they can buy their songs? Why do record companies spend millions of dollars and huge amounts of creative energy making often-brilliant PROMOTIONAL devices which they then go out of their way to STOP anyone from seeing – let alone giving them money for – other than by watching endless hours of music TV in the vague, remote hope that a truncated, censored, ad-mangled version might just come up?

Seriously, anyone. It's been 15 years and I'm none the wiser. What the fuck?

0 to “Revenge of the radio star”

  1. James says:

    That Wikipedia list of the most expensive pop videos is amazing. Of the ten most expensive, I can remember the gist of three of them. Four of the songs I couldn't even hum. And all it cost them (and by them, it basically means "Sony") for those ten videos was a total of $37 million. Yes, most of them are around 20 years old, but that was around the peak of my MTV watching days.

    Reply
  2. Blucey says:

    Oh God… that fucking Two Cousins video…. I watched that for DAYS.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Ditto.

    Reply
  4. kwyjibo says:

    I don't think the chart is that odd.  People associate video with Netflix and Youtube, not iTunes or the App Store.
    I do think that monetizing music videos is difficult – most people listen to music when they're doing something else.  I've got a front facing camera on my mobile, but you won't catch me doing a video call.

    Reply
  5. RFox says:

    Ask Duran Duran…..

    Reply
  6. Rusty Shackleford says:

    " much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps"
    You probably already know this, but it bears repeating for those who don't:
    Adblock+
    Ghostery
    Fit these extensions to Firefox or Chrome and never see another YT ad again, and no, not even a video ad.
    If you use IE, well, I can't help you.

    Reply
  7. Da5e says:

    Gods, I love that Andrew WK record. You know he appeared on a Current 93 song? Guitar Wolf, too. The guy might be a genius.

    Reply
  8. Daniel Walters says:

    As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

      What can I tell you? Gamers are absolutely determined not to pay for journalism, a boy’s got to eat, and there are only so many hours in the day.

      Reply
  9. joncfc says:

    SAY SUMMAT STU!

    Reply
  10. We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You've worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.  True, I wouldn't want you to skip meals or lose sleep, but I'm still always interested in what you've got to say.  Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to my own overdue blogs as well (whistles)…

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You’ve worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.”

      I’m happy just watching.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,478 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “I think you misinterpret my comment against independence promoters Mark.May 26, 02:21
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Gonna break a habit here and respond to your keich. The Scotti were mentioned in panick stricken Roman reports from…May 26, 01:43
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “I think BP Chas for all his issues stood more than just marginally closer to the firing line than did…May 26, 01:24
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Sarah If SHE whose name shall not be uttered turned out to be a tranny banger then it would go…May 26, 01:07
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Well said Mia. People are slowly wising up and the current crop of troughers are at a loss as to…May 25, 23:33
    • Breastplate on The shifting sands of memory: “Agreed, Lorn.May 25, 22:15
    • Breastplate on The shifting sands of memory: “This, I can agree with.May 25, 22:05
    • Breastplate on The shifting sands of memory: “I think you’ve just proved my point about how people debate from several conflicting standpoints. You say Scotland is a…May 25, 21:32
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Or, Fred Flintstone, more prosaically; The Empire in which the blood never dried.. It’s not called the “Butchers Apron” for…May 25, 21:25
    • Lorn on The shifting sands of memory: “Xaracen: yes, the ToU is, indeed, an international treaty and may be challenged only inn international law. I am getting…May 25, 21:02
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The shifting sands of memory: “Wikipedia: « GEORGE BUCHANAN / SEÒRAS BOCHANAN (1506-1582), native Gaelic-speaker, was a Scottish historian and humanist scholar. « According to historian Keith…May 25, 20:26
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The shifting sands of memory: “HERMAN DOOYEWEERD (Professor of Law and Jurisprudence at the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam 1926-1965) explained: «The Roman republic started with an…May 25, 20:23
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “That is indeed very interesting, Sarah. There are rumours as well about the ex PM of New Zealand. It is…May 25, 19:38
    • Xaracen on The shifting sands of memory: ““The ToU does not create any rights or obligations in international law, it is domestic law, so outwith the remit…May 25, 19:16
    • sam on The shifting sands of memory: “Andy, 3 years to complete negotiations. Sets a deadline. It can be done by seats won rather than votes cast.May 25, 19:08
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “Aidan at 2.40pm It’s bad enough that it might be the case without you wishing it so..May 25, 18:55
    • Young Lochinvar on The shifting sands of memory: “SM; Yup. Idle curiosity makes we wonder if SHE who’s name shall not be uttered is still shacked up for…May 25, 18:46
    • sarah on The shifting sands of memory: “@ Mia at 5.16: “Starmer and the three male models/arsonists”. Phil Boswell has something to say about this on today’s…May 25, 18:41
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: ““a major cultural and legal difference lies between what they regarded as nations following the ‘Latin tradition’ compared with the…May 25, 18:35
    • factchecker on The shifting sands of memory: “A voice of reason.May 25, 18:29
    • Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “@Sam 5.04 pm What’s with the 3 year thing? All that’s necessary is for all pro-independence parties who support the…May 25, 18:18
    • Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “@Breastplate 3.19pm Other countries don’t care about the Treaties of Union or 300 year old history, any more than we…May 25, 17:39
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “What is this thing about Starmer and the three U male models? Why is it being said that the three…May 25, 17:16
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “What do you reckon, Marie, did they have a hand in the Dandy Dons victory yesterday? I mean, why not,…May 25, 17:04
    • sam on The shifting sands of memory: “What’s the wording of a plebiscitary election to be? This is a tentative try. A majority vote by seats won…May 25, 17:04
    • Hatey McHateface on The shifting sands of memory: “Well, Mia, at least you managed to reply to Andy without blaming Da Dews. (I think. It’s next to impossible…May 25, 16:55
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““The only plausible route likely to achieve results in any reasonable timescale is to gain a majority in plebiscitary elections,…May 25, 16:27
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “They are going to paragraph themselves into independence. Paragraph by paragraph.May 25, 16:02
    • SilentMajority on The shifting sands of memory: ““N.. S… has argued the law on the definition of a woman may need to be changed to accommodate trans…May 25, 16:01
    • Breastplate on The shifting sands of memory: “Andy, I agree with some of what you say and there’s room for manoeuvre on others. I think many people…May 25, 15:19
  • A tall tale



↑ Top