The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Repeat after me

Posted on January 14, 2013 by

We hate to be banging on this drum again, but we can’t help asking: if these British nationalists had instead been Scottish nationalists, setting cars on fire and attacking policemen because they wanted the Saltire flown more often from public buildings, would the Scottish media be covering it in such a low-key, non-political way?

That’s a rhetorical question, obviously.

38 to “Repeat after me”

  1. Doug Daniel says:

    Now I have Repeat by the Manic Street Preachers in my head. The lyrics are pretty apt for this, mind…

    Repeat after me
    Fuck queen and country
    Repeat after me
    Death sentence heritage
    Repeat after me
    Death camp palace
     
    Useless generations
    Dumb flag scum
    Useless generations
    Dumb flag scum
     
    Repeat after me
    Fuck queen and country
    Repeat after me
    Royal Khymer Rouge
    Repeat after me
    Imitation demi-gods
     
    Useless generation
    Dumb flag scum
    Useless generation
    Dumb flag scum
     
    Useless generations
    Dumb flag scum
    Useless generations
    Dumb flag scum

    Reply
  2. muttley79 says:

    The Scottish media would not only be reporting it prominently for weeks, they would do so with unconcealed glee and triumphalism. 

    Reply
  3. Training Day says:

    Kaye Adams would be hosting a daily phone in show inviting listeners to call in and traduce the notion of Scottishness..

    Hang on, she’s already doing that..

    Reply
  4. Luigi says:

    This is all getting rather awkward for the media. Six days of trouble in Belfast, with no sign of let-up. With each passing day, it becomes more difficult for the MSM in Scotland to ignore.
     

    Reply
  5. muttley79 says:

    @Luigi
     
    As with Cameron about to make a speech on the EU in the next few weeks, they will ignore it as much as possible. In fact, they will probably turn it into yet another argument against independence. They will probably say that a Yes vote will provoke ‘civil war’ in Northern Ireland or some such. They will ignore the source completely, in this case Northern Irish Loyalists.

    Reply
  6. McHaggis says:

    Tweeted yesterday my concerns about the virtually apologetic tone the BBC has taken when reporting… “most of the protests have been peaceful” etc If this had happened at the march for indy last year we’d still be hearing about it as front page news even now. 

    Reply
  7. mogabee says:

     
     Interesting to see those, in last pic, protesting at Nicola Sturgeon’s “closed” office, looked awfully embarrassed. You would almost wonder if they were convinced in their argument!

    Reply
  8. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    They were a truly pitiful sight, all seven of them with their printed-out-on-A4 “banners” and glum expressions. Maybe they drew the short straw and had to give up their tickets to Rangers International vs Berwick?

    Reply
  9. EmbraBoffin says:

    Worth mentioning that in the media, well the BBC, reports this as Loyalists versus Nationalists. Whereas it is simply Nationalists of one stripe squabbling with Nationalists of another. Loyalism is a positive term whereas Nationalism (or rather non-British nationalism) is frowned upon. 

    Does the MSM ever call them ‘Irish Nationalists’ ? 

    Reply
  10. TYRAN says:

    Ah, but are they Belfast Riots or UK Riots? Someone ask a Unionist MSP as there seemed to be beef last time over UK Riots being renamed England Riots. I would go with Belfast Riots but they must side with UK Riots, what with the flag too. ;-P

    Reply
  11. HenBroon says:

    If I were “proud to be British” why would I be seen beside an A4 sheet held by a very embarrassed looking colleague with my face masked? If I am proud of something I want to be seen being proud, not hidden and masked. For example I was at the march for Scottish independence in Edinburgh last September. I marched proudly from the Meadows to Princess Street gardens wearing my “choose freedom” T shirt and flying my Saltire “proudly.”  At no point did I feel the need to mask my face, neither did anyone else who I saw marching, we were bursting with pride. However I then got to the gardens and was disappointed to see some rather knuckle dragging types had turned up to hang Union Flags from the trees and fences, whilst at the same time making rude gestures at us, and a few of them  were wearing masks on their faces. So my question is to you unionists knuckle draggers, if you are so fucking proud of your dirty Union Flag why do you always feel the need to cover your faces when you parade it?
     
    link to keyboredwarrior.blogspot.co.uk

    Reply
  12. cadgers says:

    Why do a lot of these so called ‘proud to be british’ kids feel the need to cover their faces?

    Reply
  13. Luigi says:

    Aye, these Ulster “separatists” in Belfast are causing some embarrassment.

    Reply
  14. Yesitis says:

    The BBC and Scottish MSM treat the Scottish public as idiots. If we vote No in 2014, they will have done their job. The Scots will indeed have been proven to be spineless, weak-minded idiots.
    You see, it`s not just those British flag waving arseholes holding their “protests” we see in Belfast, or, dare I say, Glasgow; it is also the unionist mentality which all Scots are fed by the Scottish/British media which also disrupts and distorts. Do you think those hordes of angry, drunken, (Rangers fans) unionists can really do as much long term damage as a unionist/Labour compliant MSM feeding their day by day, drip drip drip Vote No propaganda to the Scottish public?

    OT
    An Keith Jackson article in the Daily Record suggests ALL Scottish clubs should apply to join the English leagues, and not just Rangers and Celtic. Team GB Team GB TEAM GB TEAM GB
    Divide and conquer #47 Plan “Destroy their football heritage: mop up the mess – send them to play Wycombe Wanderers”
    That was very much a rant. All those British flags sure give you a headache after a while.

    Reply
  15. Training Day says:

    @Yesitis

    Divide and conquer is indeed the No campaign’s best bet.  I was in the company yesterday of a person who loudly proclaims his Catholicism, and has got it into his head that ‘the SNP’ are intent on abolishing Catholic schools, so he’ll vote No.  He’s ‘proud to be British’ too (although he supports a united Ireland with its capital in Dublin).  When it was pointed out to him that his beloved Britain has an Act of Settlement preventing Catholics from becoming King/Queen the look of utter incomprehension was truly sad to behold.  He then attacked Ireland as an example of how we’d end up if Scotland were independent.  You really couldn’t make it up.

    More positively, I said to two other members of the company that I was unequivocally voting Yes.  One said ‘you’re jokin’ but the other said ‘so am I’ – a pronouncement which clearly came as a bolt to the former.  Conclusion: we need to encourage people to feel comfortable in saying they are voting Yes.  Too many still don’t want to ‘look stupid’ by contradicting what everyone in the media is telling them about independence.

    Reply
  16. Luigi says:

    I think that in an independent Scotland, Berwick Rangers should be allowed to continue to play in a Scottish league, on condition that THE Rangers are finally allowed to play in England. Please, please, take them.

    Reply
  17. K Mackay says:

    Doug, you’re a genius. The video’s pretty fitting too 

     

     Think I’ll see if any radio stations are taking song requests today 😛

    Reply
  18. peter says:

    one positive to take from the protesters outside ms sturgeons office, is that that it was such a pathetic turnout.
     

    Reply
  19. Dal Riata says:

    Yesterday’s Sunday Post (I know, I know!) had a  blink-and-you’ll-miss-it “News Briefs” mini-article, with a picture showing two(!) youths, one with an “Ulster is British” wee placard, and another with a ‘Vote no to independence” wee placard. It’s final paragraph (of three) read;
    “One said the protest was a “no to independence and to protect the Union”, -adding the pro-Union Better Together campaign didn’t represent their views.”

    Yeah, right! Well, I’m calling them out on their lies: not what was supposedly said – note the quotation marks – but that anyone ‘added’ that the pro-Union Better Together campaign didn’t represent their views – note the non-appearance of quotation marks!  

    D.C. Thomson lying and misinforming without recourse for the sake of a broken ‘Union’. Shame on them – again!   

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      ““One said the protest was a “no to independence and to protect the Union”, -adding the pro-Union Better Together campaign didn’t represent their views.”

      Yeah, right! Well, I’m calling them out on their lies: not what was supposedly said – note the quotation marks – but that anyone ‘added’ that the pro-Union Better Together campaign didn’t represent their views – note the non-appearance of quotation marks!”

      That’s exactly the phrasing that appeared in the original Herald “target Sturgeon” piece weeks ago.

      Reply
  20. Doug Daniel says:

    K Mackay – cheers for pointing that out, I had absolutely no idea they’d made a video for it (to coincide with the 20th anniversary re-release of their debut album, seemingly). It was originally a double A side with a song called Love’s Sweet Exile, and of course in those days, if you had a double A side, you only did one video.

    Of course, it’s meant to be anti-monarchy rather than anti-UK, but who cares? 😛 

    Dal Riata – that’s shameful, there’s no way a couple of thugs would take the time to say “oh, obviously we don’t represent the official campaign.”

    Hands up everyone who thinks they would have taken the trouble to mention that bit if it had been related to pro-indy folk?

    Reply
  21. Cuphook says:

    O/T I posted this on the Like a Record Thread but everyone appears to have moved on. It’s worth repeating here.
     
    Could Cameron’s compliance in signing the Edinburgh Agreement be anything to do with the Scottish Affairs Select Committee ”Inquiry into the Operation of Multi-layer Democracy” (1998)?
     
    ”It is hard to see how the Scottish Parliament could be prevented from holding a referendum on independence. If the Scottish people expressed a desire for independence, the stage would be set for a direct clash between what is the English doctrine of the sovereignty of Parliament and the Scottish doctrine of the sovereignty of the people.”
     
    15 years ago Westminster recognised that they couldn’t stop the inevitable. The Scottish doctrine of sovereignty has previously been upheld in court so maybe Cameron knew that he would have lost the legal argument.

    Reply
  22. ronald alexander mcdonald says:

    What or to whom are they loyal too?

    To answer my own question-anti catholic bigotry. If the Queen converted to Catholism, they would turn on her like Hitler did to the jews.     

    Reply
  23. Dal Riata says:

    @Rev. Stuart Campbell

    Good spot!

    God almighty, is this what the unionist MSM is resorting to, copying and pasting to save the Union!?!

    I posted on the Guardian’s now-rubbish CiF some time ago on how the MSM UK-wide were probably working in collaboration against Scotland’s hopes for independence. There then followed a string of semi-illiterate and faux-outraged troll posts (which the Guardian’s abominable nesting system accommodates) about independence supporters being ‘separatist collaborators’ in trying to “break up Britain”…[sigh, facepalm, LOL, etc.].

    I still maintain my assertion of MSM collaboration re Scottish independence. What we are now seeing is the UK’s ‘democratic’, ‘free’ and ‘open’ MSM in action!

    Reply
  24. peter says:

     
      doug daniels says

    Now I have Repeat by the Manic Street Preachers in my head.

    i think a montage of the failures and consequences of staying in the Union to the Manics: IF YOU TOLERATE THIS YOU CHILDREN WILL BE NEXT, would be somewhat apt.

    Reply
  25. Edulis says:

    I could never understand the mentality of ethnic Irish catholics who support the Union and the Republic at the same time. Having just read Jim Hunter’s book, A Dance called America, we are seeing a repeat of what happened when the people who were cleared from the land ended up supporting King George against American Independence. History really does often result in headstands. James Wolfe descibed his Highlanders as his best troops having previously despised the Jacobite Highlander. The Highlanders themselves proudly developed the notion of the Fighting Jock in support of an English Empire they previously despiosed. I am still confused. 

    Reply
  26. pmcrek says:

    I notice the BBC are not refering to them as “UK RIOTS”

    Reply
  27. pmcrek says:

    @Edulis

    “I could never understand the mentality of ethnic Irish catholics who support the Union and the Republic at the same time.”

    This basically describes a few of my close friends, never underestimate the power of school teachers and the MSM. There is a disconnect when you point the hypocrisy out, Scottish Independence is parochial, Jubilees and the Proms are not.

    Reply
  28. cath says:

    Of course. Scottish culture is parochial while “British culture” is not. Never any recognition that, it you believe in the union Scottish culture IS British culture.

    Reply
  29. scottish_skier says:

    @Training day

    Conclusion: we need to encourage people to feel comfortable in saying they are voting Yes. 

    True, but then it’s quietly putting an x next to Yes in 2014 that matters. We’ve got to where we are very quietly and in 2014 lots of people will quietly go out and take us on the next stage of their journey. Wait and see.

    If you asked them in a public place surrounded by people they don’t know well if they support independence, the might look awkward and say something like ‘Och I can see why its a nice idea but…’ They’re a yes voter.

    There is a phenomenon called the ‘Shy Tory Factor’ in polling. There’s one for independence support too.

    Although I do agree people should be happy to talk freely about it. 

    Reply
  30. DonUnder says:

    The Masses Against The Classes would be another apt Manics tune for the current political climate

    Reply
  31. muttley79 says:

    O/T  This was in the Guardian about the boundary changes at Westminster.
     
    Cameron will make a final desperate effort in the Commons before the end of the month to reverse the Lords decision, but has only a fragile hope that he can offer something to nationalist MPs in order to win their support, which is needed to defeat the Liberal Democrat/Labour majority. If Cameron fails to win over the Democratic Unionists or Scottish Nationalists, he will be defeated in the Commons, so irrevocably depriving him of a boundary review that most experts believe will give the Tories an extra 15 to 25 seats.

    Reply
  32. peter says:

    I browse the Record, Herald and other pro Union sites, what a sad depressing lot they really are, not a single positive thought or suggestion. I really struggle to think why anyone would vote to retain the union.

    Reply
  33. pmcrek says:

    @scottish_skier

    I would hazard a guess that this effect is the most prominent in Glasgow.

    Reply
  34. Vronsky says:

    @scottish_skier
    On the ‘Shy Tory’ effect, I’ve reported here before that announcing one’s support for independence can lead to curious stares.  We need to find gentle ways of doing it though.  I’m steering away from debates and arguments and towards just saying things like ‘Well, it’s rather obvious, isn’t it?  Run you own affairs or have someone else do it?  Can’t see any difficulty.’  Then I change the subject and refuse to get drawn on border guards, passports, deserted grannies in Bognor or any of the rest of the crap.  My aim is just to normalise support for independence, not argue for it.  It’s important that people who are a little bit interested in the idea don’t get put off by feeling that they are eccentric  or silly.  Independence is just plain common sense: wanting to retain the Union is odd and eccentric, and requires explanation. 

    It’s not easy, though.  Reminds me a bit of Sam Harris’ ‘Atheist Manifesto’:

    “Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply a refusal to deny the obvious. ”
    Just substitute ‘nationalism’ for ‘atheism’.  I’m an atheist about the Union.

    Reply
  35. John Gallacher says:

    It amazes me that so many of these people who claim to be so, so proud hide their faces with hoods and scarves. typical hooligan behaviour.

    Reply
  36. Ken Mac says:

    Rev. Stuart Campbell says:
    14 January, 2013 at 1:24 pm

    They were a truly pitiful sight, all seven of them with their printed-out-on-A4 “banners” and glum expressions. Maybe they drew the short straw and had to give up their tickets to Rangers International vs Berwick? 

    On the other hand maybe they drew the long straw.

    Reply
  37. murren59 says:

    Great tongue-in-cheek article ‘better together’ on EU membership by Tom Shields in today’s Herald.  Apparently no comments allowed as there are no coments shown and my comment of praise was not published. 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,758 Posts, 1,217,964 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Attention is drawn particularly to the DEFINITIVE KEYNOTE SPEECH BY PROFESSOR ROBERT BLACK KC starting at 1.46.35 into youtube version…May 19, 11:11
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “The “Cookie Law” does not cover cookies that are used for the normal functioning of the site – login sessions,…May 19, 10:57
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “My point sailed in one ear and out the other. I posted a link about the American constitution – you…May 19, 10:51
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““always wish to close down the treaty of union topic by any means possible, even threats to Scotland” Hmmmm. I’m…May 19, 10:42
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Hatey McHateface, I recognise your point on how vunerable infrastruture is especially wire,cables and pipe lines, This does seem to…May 19, 10:24
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Englands parliament will manage to end the so called union, merger annexation by its presumptive arrogance, It does not need…May 19, 09:56
    • Breastplate on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Make sure to check under your bed before going to sleep tonight, John.May 19, 09:49
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “If you say so, James. I’m not really understanding who is threatening who. YL Sah! seemed to be suggesting that…May 19, 09:43
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “If the Act of union was never signed does imply that the UK and intel are an illegal entity, that…May 19, 09:31
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Your statement at 7.36 am regards resources and assets is helpful to the independence supporters in confirming that Scotland is…May 19, 09:11
    • David on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “The haters gonna hate! It never fails to amaze me the amount of hate mail you get from all different…May 19, 07:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““How about a draft constitution? A set of well defined rules” How about you explain why any Sovereign Scot should…May 19, 07:42
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““these resources are only vulnerable if we are independent” It’s not exactly rocket science, YL Sah! At the moment these…May 19, 07:36
    • Young Lochinvar on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “You are left to (academically) wonder how the comfortable status quo for UK/US might alter completely if; 1. Dump the…May 19, 03:01
    • Skip_NC on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Aw come on, I thought that was quite good for a Saturday morning before I’d had my coffee. In my…May 19, 01:35
    • Iain M. Conochie on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyse traffic. Your IP address and user agent…May 18, 23:42
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “This is a (very) long but, interesting read, https://sonar21.com/the-constitution-is-dead-long-live-the-constitution/ It gives you an insight on how constitutional-fundamentalists in America -…May 18, 19:06
    • robertkknight on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Back to business… youtube.com/live/Z2lVgoA6UHQ?feature=shared Fantastic and illuminating. Makes you realise, if you didn’t already, what a dead horse the SNP…May 18, 17:02
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Care to elaborate?May 18, 16:35
    • Chas on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I strongly disagree with the first 3 words in your latest piece of drivel.May 18, 16:22
    • diabloandco on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Yeah Rev , take your own advice and ignore trolls. He’s obviously desperate for attention – a bit like Trump…May 18, 15:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Well, James, I guess that 318 years and counting is a mere eyeblink in geological terms. In human terms though,…May 18, 15:00
    • 100%Yes on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “@ Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh Thanks, added your site to my bookmarks. It would help if Wings updated Pro-Indy bloggers on his…May 18, 13:59
    • 100%Yes on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I believe David Henry was saying that the wording of the treaty of Union has recently been changed to say…May 18, 13:44
    • Eagle on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Kelly of course is so full of self righteous anger that he forgets that actually watching it and voting is…May 18, 13:04
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “If anyone has a problem with the above URL link, try this alternative path: SCOTTISH SOVEREIGNTY RESEARCH GROUP CONFERENCE (17…May 18, 13:02
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “100%Yes.. I will away and watch it just now, thanks for the information, I am looking forward to the piece…May 18, 13:00
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Ha, ha the saga of Kelly-gate goes on and on and on. Now we have the prime antagonist lambasting the…May 18, 12:17
    • Angry Weegie on Echoes from history: ““You know the next four words, right?” I (re)read “A Letter from Quebec” and it almost reduced me to tears,…May 18, 12:17
    • Skip_NC on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “James Kelly as a spook-paid disruptor? No, I don’t see it. He’s just an overblown windbag. He’s been spouting the…May 18, 11:55
  • A tall tale



↑ Top