The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Positive-case-for-the-Union update #4

Posted on January 10, 2012 by

(See here for the whole story.)

We honestly thought we were going to get something this time. Not, if we're being honest, from the terminally vacuous Dougie Alexander (writing in famed Labour paper the Telegraph), and he didn't disappoint us:

"Politics is about emotion as well as simple accountancy. So as well as making the economic case for staying in the United Kingdom, we also need to tell a better, more positive story for Scotland’s future to compete with the SNP’s narrative of nationalism." (Actual positive story not included. Nor the economic case, now we come to think about it.)

But we thought there was a real chance from Tory opinionist Andrew McKie in the Herald yesterday. After all, it was practically there in the headline ("A positive reason for the Union? Most Scots want it"), and the article itself was clear about its goal, noting that "Politicians are much given to talking – as Mr Cameron did yesterday – about 'a positive case for the Union' and commentators (I'm one of them) have been asking for the same thing for some time. Since nobody has yet been willing to do this, I'll try to make a modest start".

Sadly, though, the actual case presented by McKie turned out to be, shall we say, not entirely convincing:

"It is a strategic mistake for Unionists to bang on about whether Scotland is subsidised by England. It is, a bit, compared with many English regions (though London is subsidised more), but then we have Glasgow to contend with, as well as huge remote areas such as the Highlands and Islands, which demand higher spending.

The benefit of the United Kingdom is that such costs can be shared among a much larger population; the Union gives freedom of movement, lack of tariff barriers and equal benefit, healthcare and pension entitlement to all citizens.

This should be stressed as a positive advantage, not as a claim that the Scots couldn't afford to go it alone, or that they are subsidy junkies." [paywall link]

In other words, McKie's "positive" reason is basically "Glasgow is such a dump that we need the rest of the UK to bail out all the benefit scroungers there". Or in other words, the same old negative scaremongering, but now simply called a positive boon. (Also, he appears to rather bizarrely believe that an independent Scotland won't have freedom of movement, healthcare or pensions. All this positivity is overwhelming us.)

In fairness to McKie, he does go on to assert the claim made by his headline, namely:

"That positive case for the Union is not one which any convinced Scottish Nationalist will agree with, but it is the most forceful of them all: the positive case for the Union is that most Scots do not want to abandon it."

But that's not so much a case as a statement, of something nobody actually knows yet. We will know after the referendum whether Scots want to abandon the Union, and not before – in 304 years of Union, this will be the first time Scots have been given any vote on it. The manager can say before the game that his team has it won, but you don't actually get the three points until the final whistle.

So sadly, nothing yet. But there's still time! Come on, Unionists! You can do it!

 

TIME ELAPSED: 5 years, 0 months
CONFIRMED SIGHTINGS OF POSITIVE CASE FOR UNION TO DATE: 0

 

8 to “Positive-case-for-the-Union update #4”

  1. Subrosa says:

    Don't hold your breath. I've been searching for a positive unionist statement most of the evening. It's the same old rhetoric.

    Reply
  2. John Böttcher says:

    Indeed, Subrosa.
     
    It's almost as if there isn't a "Union dividend"!
     
    BTW, who invented that fatuas phrase? Blair? Brown?
     
    Regards

    Reply
  3. Ken says:

    I made the mistake of reading the reader's comments after the Alexander article.  I think the SNP should print some of them up and distribute them- I can't think of anything more effective in persuading people to vote for independence! 

    Reply
  4. Clawd Baws says:

    Speaking as someone who wants independence I've been trying to think of how the unionists might best make their case.  Only trying to help!  I've been driven to it because frankly the standard of debate on the unionist side is appalling.  The only answer I've come up with (with my unionist hat on!) is: tear up the Act of Union and have a federal system.  This would give Scotland more powers (which the majority of Scots are alleged to want) and also address the needs and grievances of the other countries that make up the UK. This would mean the SNP would have to focus on what additional benefits independence would bring.  That is to say, what practical difference would it make.  Labour won't do this however, because they're scared that this just hastens the process.  This is why we have the ridiculous spectacle of Scottish Labour fighting ferociously for the status quo (when did that become their sole raison d'etre?) but not being willing to admit publicly (or perhaps even privately Jim Murphy) that they are in cahoots with the Tories.  Scottish Labour does  not want to support more powers for Scotland because if we become independent, Labour UK loses a significant part of their voting base.  Labour are therefore stuffed unless they concede that more powers for Scotland are the way to go.  They will of course eventually be stuffed anyway when Scotland becomes independent.  The unionists sole hope therefore hangs on delaying the process (if you accept as I do that independence is inevitable).  For that Labour needs to make a strong case for devo max.  The Tories have signed their own death knell in Scotland by electing Ruth Davidson who is clearly happy representing the views of an elderly part of the electorate.  When they pass on, so will the Tories in Scotland.  Well done Ruth!
    So in total, a positive unionist case (again assuming most Scots want more powers for the parliament) relies either on Scottlish Labour developing a separate line from their UK masters and arguing for devo max or for Labour UK to change their position. This would distinguish their position from that of the Tories and put pressure on the case for independence, for now at least.
    Thing is if independence is going to happen anyway and the only question is when, does it really make sense to try to delay the process?  I suppose if you are an ambitious unionist politician all you're bothered about is the here and now, so delay by giving more powers to the Scottish Parliament could well be the answer to all their woes!  Come on, admit it, it's better than what Johann or Dave's come up with so far….

    Reply
  5. An Duine Gruamach says:

    The Highlands and Islands are remote?  From whom?

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      From the centre of the Scottish Unionist world, of course – London.

      Reply
  6. Planet9 says:

    Lets not go overboard, somewhere you have to take a ferry to reach is remote from the major population centres — much like the Isle of Wight is somewhat harder to get to than Portsmouth.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      If you’re on a ferry, going overboard is definitely a bad idea…

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,787 Posts, 1,221,944 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Scot Finlayson on According As We Need Them: “`The charity industry in Scotland handles over £15 billion of income each year` 40% and over goes on staff wages.…Jul 14, 09:00
    • James Cheyne on According As We Need Them: “All ill’s and ailments have a foundational beginning, if not recognised and dealt with the illness becomes progressive.Jul 14, 08:55
    • James Cheyne on According As We Need Them: “All politicians seem to be using 1984 as their new go too cult bible. When Scotland comes to terms with…Jul 14, 08:52
    • Aidan on Just Good Friends: “Yes – if the English were forced to pay the highest possible retail rate (the figure you use is above…Jul 14, 08:10
    • Aidan on Just Good Friends: “You also of course exclude Finland, similar in population size to Scotland and around the same GDP, higher GDP per…Jul 14, 08:01
    • Aidan on Just Good Friends: “Ireland’s GDP is distorted by base erosion and profit shifting, and by the impact of depreciating assets (like aircraft) that…Jul 14, 07:54
    • Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: ““Ireland (no oil), Norway (oil), Switzerland (banking) have GDPs in the range of 600-800B USD. Ours is 200B USD. Liechtenstein…Jul 14, 07:32
    • Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: “Scotland’s renewable energy production will soon be worth £100 billion a year, not that us Scots will see any benefit…Jul 14, 07:22
    • Andrew Kidd on According As We Need Them: “There is another article in the Herald where a female politician is complaining that people are disagreeing with everything she…Jul 13, 23:30
    • Young Lochinvar on According As We Need Them: “Unfortunately yes. Add in the DEI obsessed LibDems onto the list though, the shark lurking under the waves on this…Jul 13, 23:00
    • GM on According As We Need Them: “Very true. Nothing for it but to keep the faith and take the genuine option when it is on offer…Jul 13, 22:58
    • Captain Caveman on According As We Need Them: “@Lorn Excellent post, in my humble opinion. How did we get here?Jul 13, 22:39
    • Shug on According As We Need Them: “What is the Herald and National doing getting tied up with such a bunch of self serving weirdos Are there…Jul 13, 22:35
    • sarah on According As We Need Them: “@ GM: I agree. I can’t wait to see the back of them. We all know people in our own…Jul 13, 21:53
    • Lorn on According As We Need Them: “You still haven’t told us who these paragons of modern political action are, Dan. Actually, I read very widely and…Jul 13, 21:52
    • GM on According As We Need Them: “Aye Sarah, there are plenty of good people out there. That does not make the ‘Scottish’ elite any easier to…Jul 13, 20:41
    • Dunx on Just Good Friends: “And English consumers subsidise Scottish renewables. Your point is ?Jul 13, 20:28
    • holymacmoses on According As We Need Them: “A tweet from our Suzanne on journalistic integrity. Her kitchen is full of pots and kettles:-) “Suzanne McLaughlin @Suzemclaughlin Not…Jul 13, 20:08
    • Dan on According As We Need Them: “Maybe try being a bit more alert and receptive to actually reading and taking in what other folk have said…Jul 13, 20:04
    • willie on According As We Need Them: “The Scottish Government under the SNP and the Green is a quack quango Effijy. No one should be in any…Jul 13, 19:38
    • sarah on According As We Need Them: “@ Lorn at 6.34: “who are these paragons?”. I think Dan may be referring to the Independents for Independence who…Jul 13, 19:21
    • willie on According As We Need Them: “If they didn’t publicly fund these faux charities and their loon ball on line trolls to pump out their unwanted…Jul 13, 19:20
    • agent x on According As We Need Them: ““The Scottish National party has voted heavily in favour of introducing all women shortlists and “balanced” regional lists, reversing decades-long…Jul 13, 18:44
    • Lorn on According As We Need Them: “And who were these paragons, Dan? I have never in my life simply ticked a box because the candidate reflected…Jul 13, 18:34
    • Effijy on According As We Need Them: “So much tax payer cash directed to nonsense quangos. I’ve never yet seen one of these bodies produce anything worthwhile.…Jul 13, 18:33
    • Campbell Clansman on According As We Need Them: “Alba would have to “make a lot of ground” to get to 2% of the vote.Jul 13, 18:26
    • twathater on According As We Need Them: “ALL of this pish is our own fault because we stood by and allowed these fuckwits to gain power, and…Jul 13, 18:12
    • Frank Gillougley on According As We Need Them: “And so it goes. Incestuous faux academics shall speak unto incestuous faux academics funded by us the hoi polloi. The…Jul 13, 17:58
    • Dan on According As We Need Them: “Some did try to start electing decent ordinary individuals who weren’t the usual political clone dross, but youse weren’t interested,…Jul 13, 17:53
    • Bill Fraser on According As We Need Them: “I am wondering if this organisations status as a charity could be challenged under the “Charity Test ” it certainly…Jul 13, 17:51
  • A tall tale



↑ Top