The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Little-seen recluse launches blog

Posted on June 25, 2013 by

A new voice in the referendum debate – ladies and gents, Professor John Curtice!

johncurtice3

Thank goodness. We hadn’t seen him on TV in hours, we thought he’d died.

39 to “Little-seen recluse launches blog”

  1. wullie says:

    one can live in hope

    Reply
  2. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Has the Prof morphed into his Worldly form from this?
     
     
    link to upload.wikimedia.org
     
    Is he indeed an alien  or just a foreigner?
     

    Reply
  3. Seasick Dave says:

    I thought that he had died.
     
    Time Team won’t be the same without him.

    Reply
  4. handclapping says:

    Dont have a TV so the sark went right over my head but I went and had a look. On the “why women” post there is a comment from some woman?man georgie kent? who has opted for Yes for a new to me reason that when she has to choose between two uncertainties she chooses the one that gives her the greatest leeway. That seems seriously good thinking. Its choosing to save in an ISA rather than a pension plan, renting when you first move to a new place, walking on the other side of the street.
    That is one that I can use to persuade folk.

    Reply
  5. pictishbeastie says:

    Looking at that photo does actually make me ask whether you’re sure he hasn’t died? 

    Reply
  6. Tom Hogg says:

    I HAVE NO IDEA WHO YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT

    Reply
  7. Bingo Wings Over Scotland says:

    Looks like Prof Curtice has been doing some DIY electrical repairs. Badly.

    Reply
  8. Gordon Bain says:

    Just had a quick scan of his bog only to discover its full of shite. Who knew?
     
    Hail Alba.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Just had a quick scan of his bog only to discover its full of shite.”

      To be fair, that’s true of most people.

      Reply
  9. Morag says:

    I don’t like any web site that won’t let you navigate away from its page using the back button on the browser.  Not going there again.

    Reply
  10. southernscot says:

    I thought it was Professor Heinz Wolff. Do all professors look the same?
     

    Reply
  11. Luigi says:

    I’m glad to learn that Prof. Curtice is alive and well. He is, after all, the only authority in the world capable of commenting on Scottish opinion. Where would the BBC be without him?

    Reply
  12. ianbrotherhood says:

    Q327(C)
     
    Is John Curtice:
     
    a. A psephologist
     
    b. A professor
     
    c. A pseudonomas
     
    d. Overemployed
     
    e. Just having a giraffe
     
    f. None of the above
     
    g. All of the above 
     
    h. I am unable to answer this question
     
    i. I am able, but unwilling to answer this question
     
    j. I am able and willing to answer this question but cannot do so at this present moment in time.
     
    k. Can you repeat the question?

    Reply
  13. Luigi says:

    Interesting article in the Prof’s blog. Worth a read.
    “So the Yes side may be closer to victory than might appear at first sight.”
    Gosh, has wee Duggy been sniffing at the Prof already? He ought to be careful and remember the BBC remit – NO POSTIVE NEWS FOR THE SCOTTISH GOVERMENT OR YES CAMPAIGN WHATSOEVER (cheque in the post).

    Reply
  14. mato21 says:

    Is David Torrance his apprentice? If it’s not one of them it’s the other that’s rolled out

    Reply
  15. Murray McCallum says:

    whatscotlandthinks.org
     
    Quite a claim to say you know what the whole northern Shire “thinks”. On positive side maybe good to see PRISM data being put to good use.

    Reply
  16. Max says:

     
    It looks like he has been polling himself off. 

    Reply
  17. Bugger (the Panda) says:

     
    ianbrotherhood says:
     
    25 June, 2013 at 4:24 pm
     
    Nothing wrong with pseudomani. They have had a bad press.
     

    Reply
  18. Chris says:

    Morag, could you possibly let me know what page you are having an issue with and we will lookg into it.
    Thanks

    Reply
  19. faltdubh says:

    Fed up hearing him on tele.
    What happened to James Mitchell?
     
    Shock horror! The good Prof didn’t mention the Scottish social studies survey 23% support for Independence.
     

    Reply
  20. Tattie-boggle says:

    O/T Came across this video it’s really interesting looking back at how things turned to crap .

    Reply
  21. Memphisto says:

    Well if you visit the article “What Scotland Thinks”
    And go to the 4th paragraph and click the first link in Firefox opening it in a new tab (press ctrl key and click the link), “on why women are less likely to support independence, and Jan Elchhorn on his research” the link goes to “ww3.xxxxxxxx.com” which goes to a porn site … doh!
    I’m not sure that’s the right sample of women they were polling.
     

    Reply
  22. Chris says:

    Memphisto, could you let me know what the text of the link says?  We are looking into this but can not find what you are looking for.
    Is it on this page? link to blog.whatscotlandthinks.org
    Thanks
    Chris

    Reply
  23. Morag says:

    Chris, it seems to be a bit intermittent and it could be my browser.  When returning to the home page after reading an article, the back button on the browser that should return to this page wasn’t working.  It has worked intermittently on a re-try though.

    Reply
  24. Memphisto says:

    @chris
    yes that one, 4th paragraph

    Reply
  25. Chris says:

    Memphisto, that links to: http://www.scotcen.org.uk/media/1102775/gender%20and%20indep%20paper%20final%20260413.pdf  And appears to be working in all versions of Firefox we have tried.  You may have a virus or malware installed on your PC
    Thanks
    Chris

    Reply
  26. Memphisto says:

    @chris
    sorry read it too quickly as im at work…wrong article 🙂 its actually this one, 4th paragraph
    link to blog.whatscotlandthinks.org
    why women are less likely to support independence

    Reply
  27. Chris says:

    @Memphisto, ahh, got it now.  The link is xxxxxxx, I think someone forgot to update.
    Thanks so much for the feedback 🙂
    Chris

    Reply
  28. Rod Macfarlane says:

    Well that was a bit weird…..I just read one of his articles, and I had his voice resounding in my head while doing so…….Just goes to show how often he is on telly…I would probably recognise his voice better than I would some of my old friends who I haven’t seen for a while.

    Reply
  29. Gfaetheblock says:

    Thanks for the link, thought the blog is pretty interesting and balanced.  I have never understood why there is so much ire directed to the prof, he just interprets the polls.  Don’t hate the player, hate the game?
     

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “I have never understood why there is so much ire directed to the prof, he just interprets the polls.”

      Aye. I think sometimes his leanings do show through, but by and large it’s pretty fair comment.

      Reply
  30. Mister Worf says:

    “This isnae even mah final form!”

    Reply
  31. Jonny Mac says:

    They don’t let Prof Kemp on the BBC  to often ,he has quite positive views on Scotland and the future of oil.

    Reply
  32. Richie says:

    Nice that he had a wash for his new blog.

    Reply
  33. Gaavster says:

    For what it’s worth, I reckon that the prof’s ‘polls site’ might prove quite popular amongst the punters out there and will benefit from his never aff the telly profile…
    To that end all I would ask is that we give it a chance, engage in our usual fact based manner and leave the insults at the front door as they won’t serve to convert any don’t knows to the cause…
    By piling in with insults we’ll drag the thing down and give the unionists all the ammunition they need…
    I notice too that Mr Curtice is also engaging in the comments section over there so plenty of opportunity to question his thinking and engage him in debate… (fair play)
    An example here – 
    link to blog.whatscotlandthinks.org
    Finally SS… gie him laldy 😉
    There’s a tete a tete I’d actually pay to see lol…
     

    Reply
  34. Calum Findlay says:

    The reason why Pannelbase show the race much closer is because they weigh using people who say they would be likely to vote in a Holyrood election (84%).

    Taking it through overall opinion, Yes stays exactly the same (30%) but No falls (37%) and Undecided falls (17%). 16% of people say they would be unlikely to vote in a Scottish Election, and all of that figure is from the Nos and Don’t Knows.

    Interestingly, despite the fact that 84% of people are above 8 on the scale saying how likely they would be to vote, the turnout for a Scottish Election is normally around 50%, and a UK Election around 60%.

    Also interestingly, when yes and don’t know are added together they come to the same figure who would vote yes if Scotland would be better off, according to the two polls which have asked that question. (the SNP’s this year and another pollster’s in 2011).

    Reply
  35. ianbrotherhood says:

    @Gaavster-
     
    Curtice may, for all we know, be the most scrupulously fair-minded person who ever walked the earth, but he’s tarnished from over-exposure via the terminally damaged BBC. 
     
    (It’s a sad truism that anyone who appears to be ‘favoured’ by the BBC is, nowadays, automatically suspect.)
     
    That – and he fact that he’s always dealing with relatively blunt instruments (polls and presenters) – puts him in a difficult spot. No doubt he’s a font of knowledge on all manner of demographic/political/sociological subtleties, but those are seldom broadcast, except in the wee hours as talking heads change shifts while awaiting confirmation of results.
     
    The guy clearly enjoys his job, and he’s appropriately boffinesque. But that doesn’t mean he deserves any more respect than HE seems to give to the whole notion of Scottish independence. My gut feeling, watching him in full flow, is that he’d get every bit as animated if he was taking note of his students in the lab, methodically dropping buttered slices of toast.
     
    Does he come across as an avuncular, amiable, slightly eccentric nerd who can be trusted?
     
    Yes.
     
    Does that mean his monopolisation of Scottish MSM psephology is harmless?
     
    Certainly not.

    Reply
  36. Gaavster says:

    @Ianbrotherhood
     
    I agree with what your saying Ian and I’m not defending his utterances in the past, irrespective of how (in)accurate they have been or his monopoly of the airwaves as the lord of all polls 
     
    I might call into question the effectiveness of his negativity towards independence and all things nationalist in general though, as if it was his intention to get everyone to back SLAB at the last holyrood election by saying how far ahead they were in the run up then it backfired spectacularly…
     
    Maybe he’s doing us a favour 😉
     
    All I’m saying is here’s our chance to challenge him directly and done factually, without calling him a bawheid, might work to our advantage…
     
     

    Reply
  37. Andy-B says:

    if I had a quid for everytime Professor John Curtice has been wheeled out, to point out some politicial tactical mibee’s I’d be a rich man, Mr Curtice always has the look of a man who’s been dragged through a hedge backwards.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,966 Posts, 1,248,694 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Oh yes you can.Aug 15, 10:22
    • TURABDIN on Believers In The Ruins: “IRONY, irony, irony……the death of….Aug 15, 09:30
    • Captain Caveman on Anatomy Of A Grift: “Dan’s still grizzling into his coffee, I see. Good grief, it’s so pathetic.Aug 15, 09:28
    • TURABDIN on Believers In The Ruins: “TRAGIC….but a guy «leader of the free west», even more delusional, dangerously delusional, occupies the White House in a veil…Aug 15, 09:12
    • Aidan on Anatomy Of A Grift: ““It gets absolutely nowhere because the same obvious disingenuous disruptors just jump in and shite all over it. That’s mostly…Aug 15, 09:01
    • Dan on Anatomy Of A Grift: “As Aidan states, the genderwoowoo is one of the most important issues in Scottish politics. I’ve never denied that and…Aug 15, 08:33
    • Grace Green on Believers In The Ruins: “You have not read the whole report. The mother reported that on awaking she found the baby purple, and she…Aug 15, 07:44
    • Young Lochinvar on Believers In The Ruins: “HMcH @ 2.11 Sorry, but that is as disingenuous an argument as it was when first put about by Unionists.…Aug 15, 00:59
    • Oneliner on Believers In The Ruins: “At least 1 of the 56,675 was schooled in covert surveillance.Aug 14, 23:26
    • aLurker on Believers In The Ruins: “@sam “Royal Commission on Scottish Affairs 1952-1954 Report.” https://openlibrary.org/books/OL21768224M/Royal_Commission_on_Scottish_Affairs_1952-1954_Report.Aug 14, 21:56
    • Chas on Believers In The Ruins: “I will ask again Alf, who would you replace the dozen or so hapless SNP minosters with following Independence. Some…Aug 14, 21:36
    • Confused on Believers In The Ruins: “every nite is bonfire night in the g4z4 strip; why oh why did those people build their houses within the…Aug 14, 21:03
    • Confused on Believers In The Ruins: “main will one day have to admit to the undeniable logic of every ANGLO subhuman removed en-masse from the blessed…Aug 14, 21:02
    • agentx on Believers In The Ruins: ““The former University of Cambridge professor at the centre of a plagiarism row has been found dead. Jason Arday was…Aug 14, 20:57
    • sam on Believers In The Ruins: “It’s a reply to your post- “Aidan says: 14 August, 2026 at 11:09 am This was considered by the UN…Aug 14, 20:53
    • sam on Believers In The Ruins: “Turabdin, Below you see the reply from Wee Johnny Main. It is a good example of coat trailing, which is…Aug 14, 20:41
    • Southernbystander on Believers In The Ruins: “Totally inventing a scenario and then a reaction to it by the person you want to attack, then castigating him…Aug 14, 20:32
    • sam on Believers In The Ruins: “I’m very pleased to find my posts annoy you even though that is not my intention, not least because I…Aug 14, 20:27
    • sam on Believers In The Ruins: “Wee johnny Main, Your posts are also repetitively boring, always banging on about immigrants. Scotland has always had immigrants. “Using…Aug 14, 20:23
    • Aidan on Believers In The Ruins: “Oh interesting! What UN bodies specifically are taking what action?Aug 14, 20:22
    • sam on Believers In The Ruins: “Is “1954” a typo error? Why would the UN be making such a decision then?Aug 14, 20:03
    • Xaracen on Believers In The Ruins: “The decision was wrong, because the UK government lied. The UN is in the process of waking up to that…Aug 14, 19:50
    • TURABDIN on Believers In The Ruins: “it is not as if the one at westminster is any better, ppe, hs2,to cite but two cases of epic…Aug 14, 18:16
    • TURABDIN on Believers In The Ruins: “IN THE LIGHT of houses burning, vide Daily Dogpile, a wild thought anent the puny temporary prohibition on nasty portable…Aug 14, 18:04
    • Alf Baird on Believers In The Ruins: ““none, of the things delegated to the Scottish Govt in the past decade or more has been a success” True,…Aug 14, 17:09
    • Dj on Believers In The Ruins: “Words are inadequate.Aug 14, 16:54
    • Red on Believers In The Ruins: “Have you seen this in the news today? It turned my stomach. A mother who killed her baby daughter by…Aug 14, 15:19
    • lothianlad on Believers In The Ruins: “Brilliantly put Stu! the comparissons are accurate.Aug 14, 15:09
    • Hatey McHateface on Believers In The Ruins: “Amen, brother.Aug 14, 15:06
    • Wally Jumblatt on Believers In The Ruins: “I really don’t care if in 1632 or quarter to eight some treaty or law was passed. Since don’t have…Aug 14, 14:49
  • A tall tale



↑ Top