The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Labour go 0 for 4

Posted on November 28, 2011 by

As reported by many outlets today, Labour's latest complaint to the Parliamentary Standards Committee – this time an allegation that Scottish ministers conspired improperly in the decision to nominate Brian Souter for a knighthood – has met with an unambiguous rebuke, as the independent inquiry cleared the government of any wrongdoing. Only the Scotsman bothers to print Labour's bitter and graceless response to the committee's findings, one which suggests the party still isn't quite ready to approach opposition (or anything) in a positive and constructive manner.

Labour's previous complaints to the standards committee have all been similarly dismissed, whereas when accusations against the party have been upheld Labour has dismissed them as "partisan" and "politically motivated". It's tempting to wonder why Labour persists in filing complaints with a body it clearly does not consider to be impartial, and how much taxpayers' money it's wasting by doing so.

Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,961 Posts, 1,248,099 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Jay on Or Something: “London Scot, what do you intend to provide by way of information?Aug 3, 16:14
    • CatalogueTrewsers on Or Something: “I got a letter from Bwana today informing me I’d been “Selected ” to take part in the Scottish Crime…Aug 3, 15:51
    • LondonScot on Or Something: “JR?Aug 3, 15:38
    • Richard Denning on Or Something: “There was a related article by Robin McAlpine recently https://robinmcalpine.org/fighting-back-against-the-ruling-classs-reign-of-terror/Aug 3, 15:26
    • Young Lochinvar on Or Something: “I wonder how many people have, or are planning to visit their lawyer to amend their wills removing the SNP…Aug 3, 15:24
    • Douglas on Or Something: “Judging by their responses thus far, I fear you are using too many big words for the intended recipient(s). If…Aug 3, 15:20
    • Captain Caveman on The Nobodies: ““Aw, Confused; don’t be calling Main a cunt. Everyone knows it’s a “Prick”.” Ah yes, your latest pearl of wisdom,…Aug 3, 15:10
    • Effijy on Or Something: “If they insist that there is no crime here and no need for investigation would this set a precedent in…Aug 3, 15:04
    • Hatey McHateface on Or Something: “Vote Indy for revenge? Surely, with Indy support being 50/50 (approximately), that would lose as many votes as it gains.…Aug 3, 14:53
    • James on The Nobodies: “Aw, Confused; don’t be calling Main a cunt. Everyone knows it’s a “Prick”.Aug 3, 14:45
    • Ex President Xiden on Or Something: “There are in fact a third possibility, namely they could be BOTH .Aug 3, 14:29
    • am firinn on Or Something: “I think the idea of independence is to get rid of people like these, and ensure, through greater democratic accountability…Aug 3, 14:19
    • Hatey McHateface on Or Something: “Your post is telling me you have no idea of what constituted the reality of 1930’s Germany (presumably you were…Aug 3, 13:55
    • sarah on Or Something: “Rev, I am sure you are aware of the need to keep yourself safe. Perhaps get some professional advice?Aug 3, 13:53
    • Rookiescot on Or Something: “After what they did to Alex Salmond I expect we will see nothing but partisanship. That alone told me who…Aug 3, 13:48
    • Colin Alexander on Or Something: “An FOI to the Electoral Commission on related Police / SNP matters was also refused with a: “can neither confirm…Aug 3, 13:38
    • Willie on Or Something: “When you read responses like the one thst COPFS has just sent you realise that the COPFS has just issued…Aug 3, 13:35
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on Or Something: “No, there’s a third option: simply explain the reason someone was not prosecuted in the face of what appears to…Aug 3, 13:10
    • Hatey McHateface on Or Something: “OK, so I lazily exaggerated. I’ll re-write. Over the months of July and August, when the schools are out, sufficient…Aug 3, 12:42
    • agentx on Or Something: ““Sandie Peggie’s employment tribunal appeal to go ahead next year. A statement released on behalf of Peggie’s lawyers said a…Aug 3, 12:35
    • Campbell Clansman on Or Something: “The letter demands that the government agency admit they are institutionally inept or corrupted. Here’s a list of the number…Aug 3, 12:33
    • H Scott on Or Something: “‘everybody will be on holiday’ Not in Scotland.Aug 3, 12:20
    • joolz on Or Something: ““there are only two possibilities: COPFS is institutionally inept, or COPFS is institutionally corrupt. Neither would be a good look.”…Aug 3, 11:59
    • am firinn on Or Something: “In fact COPFS have all sorts of duties to explain things. Notably, under section 6 of the Victims and Witnesses…Aug 3, 11:59
    • Skip_NC on Or Something: “As I recall, this started as a criminal complaint to the police following John Swinney’s confession and they kicked it…Aug 3, 11:46
    • David W Aitken on Or Something: “Is there the slightest prospect of a private prosecution here? It seems clear that only this would break the mulish…Aug 3, 11:36
    • AlMac on Or Something: ““Please do not make the mistake of thinking that I will eventually get bored and go away. I will not.”…Aug 3, 11:28
    • Frank Gillougley on Or Something: “I think that what they have said to so far amounts to no more than this: 1. Now be a…Aug 3, 11:14
    • Robert on Or Something: “COPS may well, and quite reasonably, reply that it’s not their job to explain the law to anyone, or their…Aug 3, 11:00
    • DaveL on Or Something: “On number 6 of your listed points, COPFS being either inept or corrupt I have no doubt (despite their inept…Aug 3, 10:31
  • A tall tale



↑ Top