The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Deadpan sarcasm of the day

Posted on April 27, 2013 by

Emphasis, as always, is ours.

lockhart

STATEMENT BY SCOTTISH COOPERATIVE PARTY EXECUTIVE

The Scottish Co-operative Party’s 2011 manifesto is one full of co-operative and mutual solutions to the challenges faced in Scotland, issues of independence, devolution or the constitutional settlement did not feature. The annual Co-operative Party conference has passed motions which promote a view of Scotland playing a vital role in a United Kingdom.

We have noted the personal comments made by Mary Lockhart, a long serving Co-operative Party and Labour Party member. Mary has been a great advocate for co-operative and mutual solutions. Whilst we recognise that members of political parties hold differing, sometimes opposite, positions the views Mary has expressed are not shared by the Party. Mary has offered her resignation from the role of Chair of the Scottish Co-operative Party and the Scottish Executive committee has accepted this.

Mary has issued the following statement:

“The Executive of the Scottish Co-operative Party has accepted my resignation from the role of Chair. I offered my resignation because I accept that no Chairperson should use that role to promote personal opinions that conflict with the policy of that organisation, or may imply a position that the organisation does not hold. I am grateful to my colleagues and comrades for the measured way in which they have handled this matter. I remain a committed Co-operator, and an active member of both the Co-operative Party and the Labour Party, and am glad that both parties are mature enough and broad enough to accommodate a diversity of opinion in their members.””

Hats off to you, Mary. We don’t think they’ve even noticed.

47 to “Deadpan sarcasm of the day”

  1. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Just for the record: Mary Lockhart’s article for Scotland on Sunday did NOT mention the Co-operative Party at any point, except at the very bottom where someone (possibly the newspaper) had added the disclaimer “Mary Lockhart is chair of the Scottish Co-operative Party, but writes here in a personal capacity”.

    Reply
  2. Doug says:

    I think it well worth emphasising that Mary Lockhart was pushed out over an issue which DOES NOT feature in party policy/manifesto, with no published party line to contradict.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Excellent point, Doug. Manifesto here:

      link to party.coop

      I can find no reference to constitutional issues at all.

      Reply
  3. Bill C says:

    I wonder if Mary has had a visit from the “Truth Team”?

    Reply
  4. SCED300 says:

    Extraordinary; A Socialist Party would rather stick with the UK to be ruled by an uberTory machine, demolishing everything that they would consider worthwhile and important, than a Social Democratic Party which encompasses their values.
    Ed Milliband hasn’t promised to reverse what has been happening. In fact he is set to continue what the Tories are doing.
    It would be good to hear what the vital role is that the Cooperative Party see Scotland playing. Is it one goes down, everybody goes down? How do they rationalise their approach?
    Fifty years of almost all Tory Governments. Perhaps they could look at what Einstein said about repeating exactly the same action and expecting a different outcome.

    Reply
  5. HandandShrimp says:

    I think this is just plain sad and has all the hallmarks of the “party machine” in action. You can only be  chair if you are a Unionist then?
     
    It is hard to be a Labour supporter in Scotland these days.

    Reply
  6. Cath says:

    “You can only be  chair if you are a Unionist then?”
     
    To me, as someone who hadn’t heard of this outfit until that article by Mary Lockhart last week, it says a whole lot more than that. It says don’t even think about becoming a member unless you’re a deeply closed-minded unionist. Same message Labour have been offering for the past few years too.

    I find that very sad as their manifesto looks OK, and I could have been persuaded by it. Now it just looks like political posturing to muddy the waters somehow.

    Reply
  7. annie says:

    I wonder if there are hundreds or better still thousands more Mary’s out there who are keeping their heads down and their mouths shut until they get to the ballot box having seen what has happened to her.

    Reply
  8. Aplinal says:

    Well I find the decision to be quite disgraceful.  I am sure that Ms Lockhart was put under pressure by someone. Is it the view of the Co-operative Party that NO ONE can hold a personal view that differs from those of the “Committee” and maintain membership, even though their manifesto has no position on it?  Is it now the case that the Co-operative Party are “Better Together” supporters?  Is it now the case that pro-Independence members should also resign/leave the Party? I would like them to provide some clarity on their position. 

    Reply
  9. mato21 says:

    There are a number of labour MPs who come under labour and co-operative I wonder how they pick the favoured few so yes they are a unionist movement

    Reply
  10. Albalha says:

    @Aplinal
    She’s still  a member of the party, she resigned her post as Chair.

    Reply
  11. DougtheDug says:

    A few facts about the Scottish Co-operative Party.
     
    There is no Scottish Co-operative Party in the same way there is no Scottish Labour Party, Scottish Conservative Party and Scottish Lib-Dem party.
     
    The “The Scottish Co-operative Party” is simply a registered party description for the Co-operative Party, 77 Weston Street, London, SE1 3SD
     
    Party Leader: Mr Gareth Richard Thomas MP 
    Nominating officer: Ms Karen Lynn Wilkie
    Treasurer: Ms Karen Lynn Wilkie
     
    Members are also permitted to be members of the Labour party. The Co-operative party affiliates to the nearest Labour Party, region by region.
     
    It has several MP’s and MSP’s in Westminster and Holyrood but only as joint candidates with Labour. It does not put forward candidates under its own banner for these elections.
     
    Though it is a separate party according to the Electoral Commission the reality is that the Co-operative party can be regarded as just a pressure group within Labour.

    Reply
  12. ianbrotherhood says:

    In response to my request last night for anyone with information about BBC black-listing, I received the following this morning:
     
    Hello Ian, I worked as a journalist at BBC Scotland for eight years,late 70s – mid 80s,and discovered my personnel file with the dreaded “Christmas Tree” sticker on it – although I didn’t know the significance of the innocuous looking green jagged symbol at that time. (The best newspaper coverage of the subject,which you’ve probably read by now,was in The Telegraph strangely enough.) How much that affected my career at the BBC I’ll never know though I left in frustration at the lack of advancement. I put the stigma down to the fact I joined the SNP while at University,though former colleagues who had the”Xmas tree” could only identify things as inconsequential as being born outside the UK.   Please let me know if I can help further and I’d appreciate confidentiality in the meantime. Vote YES…(name withheld).’ 
     
    Pretty much speaks for itself. Anyone currently working for the BBC might want to consider each and every affiliation they’ve had in their lives: if you’ve been active in a Union; had ‘interesting’ friends; studied contentious subjects or expressed anything resembling an unorthodox opinion on anything, there’s a good chance your card is marked.
     
    And once it’s marked? It stays marked.
     
    Again, I ask for anyone with information about this to get in touch –
     
    ian@stevenston4.fsnet.co.uk
     
    As I said in replying to the person who sent the message, we may be nearing the point where the BBC’s hegemony in the cultural life of our society is reaching a natural end, but powerful vested interests will fight tooth and nail to keep it going, no matter how much Pacific Quay comes to resemble a garrison.
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Reply
  13. Craig M says:

    Mary,
    You will do as London dictates.
    You will not have views unless given to you by London.
    You will, first and foremost, look out for the best interests of London.
    London comes first.
    In order to preserve the position of London the following is acceptable;
    Child poverty levels to remain artificially high in Scotland.
    Levels of dependency on the state (i.e. London) to remain artificially high in Scotland.
    Levels of expenses for those within the party who adhere to the above and get a plum role in London (Westminster) to remain artificially high.
    Levels of lies told about Scotland by those representing the party in London to remain artificially high.
    Finally, Mary, your career, or lack of it, is now very acceptable, in order to preserve the enhanced, preeminent position of London.

    Reply
  14. Iain says:

    Much as I’m reluctant to feel sympathy for SLAB MSPs and MPs, this perhaps indicates what a huge step it would be for any of them to publicly display an open-minded attitude to independence let alone come out as a Yes supporter. Their career would effectively be over, and no doubt some version of the forces of hell would be unleashed upon them. It would take a fair bit of guts and principle, and I don’t get the impression that there’s a excess of either on Westminster or Holyrood opposition benches.

    Reply
  15. Jiggsbro says:

    Their career would effectively be over,
     
    For a couple of years, perhaps.

    Reply
  16. Juteman says:

    Maybe this is a stupid question.
    Is it official Labour policy that they are a Unionist party, or have the leadership just decided that it is? Has the membership ever been consulted?

    Reply
  17. DMW42 says:

    Juteman
     
    I can’t answer your query I’m afraid but, I did cancel labour party contributions collected via my union subs.

    Reply
  18. Iain says:

    @ Jiggsbro
    ‘For a couple of years, perhaps.’

    I foresee a scenario on 19/09/14 where all the SLAB timeservers and greasy pole climbers do a collective reverse ferret on independence and repackage themselves as The Labour Party of an Independent Scotland. They’ll still view the ‘premature anti-unionists’ as persona non grata though.

    Reply
  19. Breeks says:

    If she broke no formal rules, and her resignation was not entirely voluntary, ie she was made aware it was the only thing she could do simply because her views were incompatible with the job, then despite resigning, she may have grounds for constructive dismissal.

    Reply
  20. Juteman says:

    @DMW42.
    I cancelled the political levy a while ago, and told the very nice lady that i was doing so for the Tory politics of new/old/whatever Labour. She was also told that my union sub would be cancelled if it ever came out pro-Union. I was told that my views would be passed on up the chain.
    For some strange twisted logic, i had always paid the levy, even though i voted SNP. I hope to vote Labour in an independent Scotland. Hopefully the SSP will amalgamate with a new Scottish Labour party.

    Reply
  21. Doug Daniel says:

    I just wonder if they seriously think people aren’t going to join the dots here. After all, everyone knows these sort of “resignations” are nothing of the sort.
     
    So, after spending months denying the existence of pro-indy Labourites, despite the formation of Labour For Independence, we now have them being forced to acknowledge the existence of such people. Their answer? Make them persona non grata.
     
    What are the chances of a Labour MSP announcing they are pro-indy now? Shame, any that did so would be lauded after a Yes vote and could have spearheaded the revival of their party. Can’t see it happening now.
     
    I’ve heard rumours of there being several quite well known Tory politicians who are pro-indy, but obviously they refuse to say so publicly. Don’t know any names, unfortunately.

    Reply
  22. mato21 says:

    Woods Group boss has no fears over 2014 referendum
     
    link to heraldscotland.com

    Reply
  23. AnneDon says:

    IF neither party has discussed, let alone voted on, the subject of self-determination for Scotland, how is it possible to be out of step with their views?
    I hope she takes them for constructive dismissal!

    Reply
  24. velofello says:

    Isn’t Ian Davidson, chairchump of the Scottish Affairs Committee, sponsored by the Coop?
     

    Reply
  25. jon abroad says:

     
    @velofello
    yes, he is.
    Other politicians sponsored by the Co-operative Party include Johann Lamont MSP
    and George Foulkes when he was an MP.
    link to en.wikipedia.org

    Reply
  26. wee folding bike says:

    And that kind of thing is why I try to avoid shopping in the COOP and using their bank even though their bank has interesting policies.

    Reply
  27. rabb says:

    As a co-op employee and fervent supporter of the co-operative movement I find this disturbing. It stinks to high heaven of Labour interference.
     
    I support independence 100%. Perhaps I’d better start looking for a new job!

    Reply
  28. roboscot says:

    Reads like the Soviet Union of old. Fits nicely with our Pravdaesque media though.

    Reply
  29. Jiggsbro says:

    I foresee a scenario on 19/09/14 where all the SLAB timeservers and greasy pole climbers do a collective reverse ferret on independence and repackage themselves as The Labour Party of an Independent Scotland. They’ll still view the ‘premature anti-unionists’ as persona non grata though.
     
    It would be difficult for them to do that if there was already an Independent Scottish Labour party set up by the premature anti-unionists, though. They’d have to campaign as the Labour party that didn’t believe in Scotland, against the one that did.

    Reply
  30. Cath says:

    “Much as I’m reluctant to feel sympathy for SLAB MSPs and MPs, this perhaps indicates what a huge step it would be for any of them to publicly display an open-minded attitude to independence let alone come out as a Yes supporter.”
     
    But that kind of oppression can only happen if people remain complicit in it. If one person comes out and this happens, and everyone else sticks their head back down, then such repression continues and people are unjustly treated. If those who feel the same have any kind of backbone, they should come out in solidarity, as should those who may disagree but have democratic principles.
     
    I will have absolutely zero truck with any Labour MSP who keeps their head down and pretends to be unionist then says post independence they voted yes and were for it all along. Equally, I will have very little with any who turns pre-referendum but once the writing is on the wall. Now is the time to stand up and be counted, and lead. If they can’t or don’t, they’re worthless as politicians.

    Reply
  31. Albert Herring says:

    @rabb
    I may be wrong, but although they are both part of the general co-operative movement, I don’t think there is any direct connection between “The Co-op” and the Co-operative Party these days, if there ever was.

    Reply
  32. orkers says:

    I quite liked their square sliced inside a roll and butter.
    First Baxters now the Co-op …………….where will it all end?
    Ochone! Ochone!
    I look on it as a sign that SLab is terrified by it’s own private poll results.
    Good!
     
    Albert

    They appear to be the political wing of the Co-op and thus still have ties.

    Reply
  33. rabb says:

    Albert Herring says:
    27 April, 2013 at 8:37 pm

    @rabb
    I may be wrong, but although they are both part of the general co-operative movement, I don’t think there is any direct connection between “The Co-op” and the Co-operative Party these days, if there ever was.
    Albert, the co-operative party is funded to tune of £800,000 per annum from group. A fair amount of this trickles over to Labour too.
     
    In my eyes that’s involvement.

    Reply
  34. wee folding bike says:

    From Wikipedia:
    link to en.wikipedia.org
    Funding and finance
    Most of the party’s income comes from grants made by the retail co-operative societies and from members’ fees. Local retail societies provide most funding for local party councils, which form the basis of members contact with the party. The party recognises several structures which exist without society support (voluntary parties) as being part of the whole. Subscriptions from members also support the party financially.

    Reply
  35. Iain says:

    @Jiggsbro
    ‘It would be difficult for them to do that if there was already an Independent Scottish Labour party set up by the premature anti-unionists, though. They’d have to campaign as the Labour party that didn’t believe in Scotland, against the one that did.’

     
    Maybe, but they’re polling 30-40% on a similar disconnect currently. A bit of bs about a vision of a diffferent Scotland, social justice, the party yer granny voted for blah, blah, and the some of the people who are fooled all the time stick with it.

    Reply
  36. Davy says:

    Dear Mary Lockhart,
                                Welcome to the “YES” family for Scottish independence, we are a very broad kirk indeed with many different ideas, philosophy’s and sense’s of humour. But we have one overwhelming ideal in that no matter what our differences are we are all united in the belief that Scotland’s independence is the right way forward for our country, its people and scottish society overall.
     It was a pleasure to read your article last Sunday in the Scotland on Sunday it showed bravery and honesty and I’am sure has helped people to look with a much more positive light at the reasons for Scottish independence.
    So yet again welcome. 

    Reply
  37. DougtheDug says:

    Albert Herring:
     
    In 2012 the co-operative movement donated £1,041,341.00 to the Co-operative Party
     
    In 2012 the co-operative movement donated £65,000 directly to the Labour Party.
     
    In 2012 the Co-operative Party donated £92,154.77 to the Labour Party.

    Reply
  38. Linda's Back says:

    As a Co-perative  member whose father used to drive one of their vans for many years ago I am well aware that the whole ethos has changed as they now buy up numerous chemist shops on a purely commercial basis.
    My partner was made redundant when they centralised all their Scot Mid wine buying to Manchester and  I am really disappointed, but not surprised,  that they are so beholden to the Labour Party that a principled Chair person feels pressurised to resign,  Not that any Labour place person would have such principles to resign.

    Reply
  39. rabb says:

    Can I just say that The Co-operative Group have NOT declared a position on independence (that I am aware of).

    My personal opinion is that they will take a genuinely neutral stance. They have nothing to gain or lose either way. They are in the business of serving communities and not politicians.
     
    Having said the above, it is still disturbing that the Labour party commands such influence on the political arm of the movement.

    Reply
  40. Marcia says:

    Tomorrow’s Sunday Herald front page:
    link to twitpic.com
    Glasgow can do miles better to quote a previous slogan.

    Reply
  41. cirsium says:

    @ Marcia 10.32
    About time.  I hope that this is not going to be a “theatre for the masses, passes for the leaders” stunt.

    Reply
  42. Albert Herring says:

    @rabb doug bike et al
    I stand corrected.
    Funny there seems to be nothing on either organisations’ website re these links.

    Reply
  43. Laura says:

    I think there will be a lot of MP’s and MSP’s from all parties switching over to the indy camp over the next 12 months.
    However, I’d be very wary of the ones changing over at the last minute (the troughers)

    Reply
  44. EphemeralDeception says:

    link to scotland.party.coop
    “The annual Co-operative Party conference has passed motions which promote a view of Scotland playing a vital role in a United Kingdom.”.
    Note the Lack of “Scottish Co_op” in the line above.
    The annual Co-operative Party conference is UK wide for this UK political organisation. The web site states that the Scottish Manifesto has no policy or anything stated on the constitution.  However as it is really an anglo UK based organisation this UK party only promote Scotland within the UK.
    Tories, Labour, BBC, Co-op, CBI are all “in Scotland” none are ‘of’ or ‘for’ Scotland.

    Reply
  45. Knob Roy MacGregor says:

    Does anyone believe she would have been given the space for an article had she not held the position she did?
     
    Ergo it was not written in a personal capacity.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Ergo it was not written in a personal capacity.”

      It was, though. The clue was where it said “this is written in a personal capacity”.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,775 Posts, 1,219,685 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on What We Don’t Know Now: “Oneliner; You’ve upset the yoons.Jun 10, 00:05
    • Big Jock on Two Of A Kind: “Swinney was a shambles the first time he was leader of the SNP. Salmond rescued them. To reellect this man.…Jun 10, 00:04
    • Chris Downie on Two Of A Kind: “Not for the first time, the lunatic nonce cabal of the Green Party have taken enough votes to prevent an…Jun 9, 23:19
    • James on The Jokers: ““…You’re like one of those ignoramus loud mouthed Yanks who believes WW2 didn’t begin until the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor…”…Jun 9, 23:15
    • James on And No Great Mischief Should They Fall: “Prick.Jun 9, 22:43
    • Eddie Munster on Two Of A Kind: “With odds 15/1 for labour to win, if i lived there, I’d put a tenner or a hundred down and…Jun 9, 22:29
    • Bilbo on Two Of A Kind: “No right minded civilised person who shout and bawl at someone they are having a debate with but with idiots…Jun 9, 20:58
    • Bilbo on What We Don’t Know Now: “Hatey McHateface There is enough on the web that paints the picture of Sturgeon being a toxic personality who ran…Jun 9, 20:51
    • Geoff Bush on Two Of A Kind: “We underestimate both Swinney and Yousaf. If they were intent on independence then what they continue to do – ie…Jun 9, 20:30
    • 100%Yes on Two Of A Kind: “John Swinney is a moron. He deliberately lost the Hamilton seat, please don’t ask me to explain the mind of…Jun 9, 19:17
    • Nae Need! on Two Of A Kind: “The poor lassie just wants her pension. And she’ll sit tight, like the rest of them, until she gets it.Jun 9, 18:16
    • Mia on Two Of A Kind: “I opt for liars. Actually, labourites in disguise, to be more precise.Jun 9, 18:15
    • Mark Beggan on Two Of A Kind: “Aye. If yeh didnae laugh yid greet.Jun 9, 17:58
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on Two Of A Kind: “Yes.Jun 9, 17:50
    • Ian McCubbin on Two Of A Kind: “One is like his pal Anas really a unionist. Oh wait a minute so is the other one. Lol nae…Jun 9, 17:49
    • Ronnie on Two Of A Kind: “Serious question, is Joanne Cherry still a member of the SNP?Jun 9, 17:25
    • Hatey McHateface on What We Don’t Know Now: “On the plus side, after her maternity leave, she should be able to answer the question “What is a woman?”…Jun 9, 16:54
    • SilentMajority on Two Of A Kind: “The pair of them leave me black affrontit as a Scot. One was so useless at whatever he touched, and…Jun 9, 16:48
    • Nae Need! on Two Of A Kind: “Mark Beggan, Frequently you provide ME with a much needed giggle in these ‘trying’ times. Thank you. For ‘trying’ READ…Jun 9, 16:45
    • Nae Need! on Two Of A Kind: “Lying to them comes naturally – cos they are PLAYERS.Jun 9, 16:33
    • KiltedSplendour on Two Of A Kind: “I’d add OnanistsJun 9, 16:32
    • Nae Need! on Two Of A Kind: “Quite. What do we do about the captive, brainwashed party members who keep voting for them? Is it even possible…Jun 9, 16:31
    • Mark Beggan on Two Of A Kind: “Did you know that Wokes can give birth to their own puppy.Jun 9, 16:22
    • Nae Need! on Two Of A Kind: “Massive liars. And wot Jon Drummond said up thread.Jun 9, 16:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Two Of A Kind: “Yousaf would have been on safer ground predicting the colours of the horses. Predominantly white.Jun 9, 15:49
    • Effijy on Two Of A Kind: “I think they both proved they haven’t got a clue about politics. They are the Independence party who are not…Jun 9, 15:46
    • GM on Two Of A Kind: “There is always the chance these two mediocre administrators have plenty in the bank account and aren’t doing an awful…Jun 9, 15:42
    • Hatey McHateface on What We Don’t Know Now: “I know it’s exceptionally difficult for some people to get their heids around, but the idea that one wee wumman…Jun 9, 15:40
    • Jon Drummond on Two Of A Kind: “Aah! Yousaf and Swinney… A pair of (No, let’s include Sturgeon and all the rest of them while we’re at…Jun 9, 15:39
    • Nae Need! on What We Don’t Know Now: “BigJay – “That’s pretty much where the SNP management is now . . .” And unfortunately so is the party…Jun 9, 15:22
  • A tall tale



↑ Top