The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


“Cheat’s Charter” controversy ended

Posted on April 13, 2012 by

From the Scottish Football Association rules on Club Licensing (specifically  Part 3, Section 03 – The Club as Licence Applicant and the UEFA Licence). Emphasis ours.

"3.1.1 The Licence Applicant may only be a football club, that is the legal entity fully responsible for the football team participating in national and international competitions and which is the legal entity member of the Scottish Football Association (Full or Associate Member). The licence applicant is responsible for the fulfillment of the club licensing criteria. This membership must have been in place at the start of the licence season for a minimum period of three consecutive years.

[…]

3.3.1 UEFA Licence Awards for Scottish Premier League Clubs (SPL)
A Licence cannot be transferred from one legal entity to another.
"

NB: "UEFA Licence" does not denote a licence to compete in UEFA competitions, which are governed by an entirely different set of criteria. As the SFA website explains:

"National Club Licensing applies to Scottish FA member clubs and UEFA Club Licensing applies to Scottish Premier League clubs."

In other words, to play in the SPL you must have a UEFA Club Licence, regardless of whether you actually compete in UEFA competitions or not. (SFL clubs, who in normal circumstances wouldn't be expected to qualify for European tournaments, are dealt with separately via an "extraordinary procedure" in the event that they do.)

So, should Rangers FC be subject to liquidation and then reborn as a "newco", the new company would NOT be eligible for the licence required to play in the SPL, for at least three years. Furthermore, it is plainly and explicitly forbidden under SFA rules for such a licence to be transferred from one legal entity (Rangers FC) to another (New Rangers FC 2012). Well, that's that all sorted out, then. As you were.

[Edited for clarity and latest versions of documentation, 13-4-2012]

[EDIT 17-4-2012: We rang the SFA yesterday, and they confirmed our interpretation of the rules above. Half an hour later they rang us back, sounding very nervous, and changed their line, stating that the UEFA Club Licence DID only apply to UEFA competitions, and only a National Club Licence was required to play in the SPL. Later that evening it was revealed that the Association is considering disbanding the SPL and SFL entirely and replacing them with a new National Football League. The SFA did not comment on the possible position of a newco Rangers in such a league.]

14 to ““Cheat’s Charter” controversy ended”

  1. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Kudos to Philip Thomas on the comments pages at Bella Caledonia for the initial work in digging this one out, btw. We thought it deserved more prominence.

    link to bellacaledonia.org.uk

    Reply
  2. steven luby says:

    Let us hope the rules are not 'bendy' rules !
     

    Reply
  3. Philip Thomas says:

    There is, unfortunately, one method of bending those rules.  You can buy another legal entity who already have a license, like Airdrie did after they were liquidated.  Technically it would be within the rules and the only thing stopping it would be the power of various individuals to resist it.  To explain:
    A company representing the old RFC could buy Motherwell, change the name or register a subsidiary called 'RFC', buy up all the old RFC's assets, and carry on regardless.
    They could also buy a lower league team and the SPL, under clause 14, could simply invite them to the SPL.
    The power to resist would lie with, first of all, the current owners of the other club to resist the takeover attempt; the SPL members who could block/revoke their membership; and the general public/supporters.  Obviously it would result in the death of the other club and that would have major political repurcussions in itself.
    I happen to think that whoever buys the assets of RFC, should they be liquidated will already be looking at this.  The potential commercial value of a new, virtually debt free RFC easily offsets the purchase price of almost any moderately well run football club in Scotland outwith Celtic and those who have large debts of their own (so my own team, Aberdeen, are safe).
    I wouldn't put this past some of the individuals who're connected to RFC at an investment level at the moment.  I happen to think that one of the biggest obstacles they'd face are Rangers supporters though.  This would mean the death of their history and the killing of another club would forever haunt them.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Yes, also known as the Airdrie United plan, when they took over Clydebank. But as you say, the problem with that is finding another club prepared to obliterate itself and its history to become New Rangers. And, while I can't share your sentiment that Rangers fans would feel especially guilty about destroying Cowdenbeath or someone, I think that they'd have a lot of trouble coming to terms with the fact that the new club couldn't possibly pretend to lay claim to Rangers' trophy history in those circumstances. They, and everyone else, would forever know the new club was really New Cowdenbeath.

      Reply
  4. Philip Thomas says:

    Should also add, what I've suggested would be morally repugnant but it can't be ruled out.  On a positive note, based on the initial reaction of the general football following public to the idea of a newco RFC being allowed into the SPL, I think the same public would react even more negatively to the scenario I suggested and rally around.  You'd have to have some serious neck to push on with it and the 'new' RFC would forever be tainted.  All the public can do is ensure that the people controlling the levers are aware of how this would be perceived.
     
    I still have some faith in the SFA.  They're quiet at the moment but to be fair to them they haven't been given anything to react to yet other than speculation.

    Reply
  5. Philip Thomas says:

    New Cowdenbeath gave me a chuckle.  That would stick!

    Reply
  6. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    I'd love to hear the Pittodrie crowd singing "Stand free, whoever you may be, for you are the Cowdenbeath FC" every time they came to visit…

    Reply
  7. Angus McLellan says:

    If NewCo wanted to have a glorious history, maybe better to start in the Juniors. How much would Auchinleck cost? And they'd still get to play in the Scottish Cup and have a route into Europe eventually.

    Reply
  8. bobbymc777 says:

    What I have found incredulous since this story has broken is that VERY few people have stated the ONLY COURSE that Rangers CAN take.
     
    PAY YOUR BILLS & LETS GET ON WITH PLAYING FOOTBALL…
     
    Other wise, 
     
    Die with dignity.

    Reply
  9. Auldheid says:

    I'm not so sure that SPL clubs are bound by UEFA Licence Rules as you state.
    In the Club Licensing rules there are different rules for submission of documents for SPL clubs and other clubs so it seems to apply to SPL Clubs as well as others.
    I always thought UEFA Licensing was for clubs who qualify for UEFA competitions and were a device to assure UEFA they would meet UEFA's much stricter requirements.
    There are still parts of National Club Licensing that make it difficult to give Newco a license (Section 8.1.1. and 8.1.2 but the 3.3.1 you highlight is not in Club Licensing and Club licensing does apply to SPL clubs.
    The problem for Newco is that they aint an SPL Club and in effect fall outside the Club License rules that would need changed to accommodate them.
    Hope you are right and I'm wrong as UEFA Licensing is specific on not transferring a license and Club Licensing is not which leaves a bit of wriggle room.

    Reply
  10. McGinleyBhoy says:

    The Con Artist Formerly Known As Clyde !!!

    Reply
  11. Auldheid says:

    Belay that last comment  please. Had a look at the SFA page on UEFA licensing as opposed to UEFA FFP 2010 which was my source and I see why there is reference in National Club Licensing to SPL clubs (they MIGHT be UEFA competetion license candiates so docs required eary.
    However Annex 1 page 43 Exceptions to UEFA FFP 2010 rules like the three year requirement needs to be read. Were it not for the possibility of an exception being made (was this why D&P applied for a UEFA license to get one to play in Scotland, not Europe, it could be stated that Newco could NOT be allowed into the SPL as no license possible.

    Reply
  12. jinky44 says:

    RFC are a disgrace!! Pay your bills.

    Reply
  13. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Blimey. I just picked them at random, but according to this blog post Cowdenbeath actually ARE ripe for takeover and rebranding as New Rangers:

    link to scotslawthoughts.wordpress.com

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,790 Posts, 1,222,518 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Indeed! I hear you’re a racist now, Ted. The moronic idiocy of these people is beyond satire. Almost said ‘suture’…Jul 23, 16:32
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““You are Northcode, why are you referring to yourself in the 3rd person?” The answer to this question can only…Jul 23, 16:31
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Sex is established at conception via the man’s sperm, albeit it takes a wee while to show up, with all…Jul 23, 16:29
    • Young Lochinvar on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Latest breaking: My little Pony, pIssed at all the attention Barbie has been getting has secured a gig as Glasgows…Jul 23, 16:24
    • James Barr Gardner on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/14/green-party-germany-paedophiles-80sJul 23, 16:22
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “crazycat: had these men never been allowed to bring their fetish into the public space, into workplaces and elsewhere, we…Jul 23, 16:18
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@“Northcode” you are right about there being no such thing as debate in this place, but that’s a bad thing,…Jul 23, 15:57
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “You believe what you like, Dan. I have been a nationalist, not just an independence supporter, my whole life, but…Jul 23, 15:49
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Dan – again your not wrong, the conservatives were ideologically against it on television but did very little to stop…Jul 23, 15:45
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “They have.. Super Mario that’s me.Jul 23, 15:37
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Aidan says some stuff about NOT suppressing folk’s views: “I’m not calling for anyone’s views to be suppressed…” Aidan says some…Jul 23, 15:31
    • James on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Is there any software that will replace you?Jul 23, 15:19
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@ Aidan Yawn, even AI can work out this basic stuff. “,i>The saying “Never interrupt your enemy when he is…Jul 23, 15:16
    • James on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “But no-one at all laps your Daily Express unionist shite up.Jul 23, 15:14
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Does anyone have software that will replace the word colonial with the word banana?Jul 23, 14:50
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Dan – I’m well aware of that, and well aware that the nuSNP see gender (and the stuff that is…Jul 23, 14:39
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “I’m not calling for anyone’s views to be suppressed. I’m suggesting the quality of debate might be improved if reasonable…Jul 23, 14:29
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@ Aidan Be more alert! Have you not noticed you’ve been regularly posting on a site that highlights the rather…Jul 23, 14:14
    • Rob on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “I don’t think the gender woo woo was really imported, the idea maybe but the distance that the SNP and…Jul 23, 14:13
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “To quote Northcode. “There’s barely a comment posted here by a unionist (colonialist?) that is anything other than childish insult,…Jul 23, 13:58
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Regarding the colonialism question, the following Vimeo discussion with Bill Rolston will be of interest to Scots, even though its…Jul 23, 13:57
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““heroically restrained” Ok Dorothy We’ve heard enough.Jul 23, 13:37
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Professor Baird may have spent a lot of time on the subject, but that in itself isn’t a validation of…Jul 23, 13:27
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Dan – you’re obviously right, but at the moment there is no place more supportive of this kind of stuff…Jul 23, 13:18
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Of course we always have the option of scrolling on by, but to ignore the endless tide of incoherent waffle…Jul 23, 13:06
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “And your going to colonial hell as a punishment for being a gibbering auld dafty.Jul 23, 13:04
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Lorn says: “I want independence, have wanted it from around the age of 11 to now, and I’m no spring…Jul 23, 12:52
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Alf Baird puts forward a coherent and convincing argument based on sound and methodical academic research. He’s written several papers…Jul 23, 12:51
    • GeoffC on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Aye, some queer thinking around….Jul 23, 12:28
    • Stuart on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “How about readers are freed from the colonialism of Professor Baird colonising this forum with er posts about colonialism? Meanwhile…Jul 23, 12:24
  • A tall tale



↑ Top