I don’t think this is a joke. I seem to remember something like this on the better together site a while back. Of course I could be horribly wrong. I’ll have a wee look through the web and find out.
Can you confirm it one way or another Stu?Â
Â
Â
The t-shirts are genuine, but the pic above has been fiddled with. The kerning, or space between the U and the K, has been increased. The background fill (white) is also incomplete. Sorry to be a spoil sport, but either I’m correct or someone in the BT camp will surely be made to stand in the naughty corner for a very long time. Possibly until 2014.
“The t-shirts are genuine, but the pic above has been fiddled with. The kerning, or space between the U and the K, has been increased. The background fill (white) is also incomplete. Sorry to be a spoil sport, but either I’m correct or someone in the BT camp will surely be made to stand in the naughty corner for a very long time. Possibly until 2014.”
Took a moment for the penny to drop here too but love it. The UKOK slogan is certainly a real BT one. I’m guessing the “thinking of voting no” has been photoshopped on?
@Richie
I had no idea that on social photo sharing site Blipfoto, the No people had/have a journal. And look – the comments are switched off! It’s almost as if they don’t want to have a conversation.
Don’t know why (maybe the colours) but it reminds me of seeing a guy in the shopping mall wearing an enormous Rangers top with ‘We Don’t Do Walking Away’ embossed in the proper lettering – must’ve cost a fortune. But it was on the back of the shirt, so the only time anyone would ever see it? When he was walking away.
Better Together are offering our supporters the chance to win one of 50 limited edition UKOK T-shirts.
Â
After that just email us at info@bettertogether.net to be entered in to the draw for a fabulous UKOK T-Shirt
So after months of waiting, we finally have it – the positive case for the Union!
It’s not a particularly enthusiastic case, but it is a positive case nonetheless: The UK is okay. It’s not great, but it’s not terrible either, it’s just okay. And it’s £1 a year cheaper, which is also okay.
Â
That is pretty much standard practice within the graphic design community. Not often as blatant as this example, but it should come as no surprise given the BT unwillingness to play by the EC’s rules and their propensity to tell the voting public whatever whapers they deem appropriate to their scare agenda.
Didn’t they also rip off the music for their first video? Seems like a lot of copyright infringements going on. Is that what they mean by better together?
Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.
Mark Beggan on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “That’s just a reflective response from the horses nervous system. It’s dead.” Sep 21, 13:18
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Something to remember the next time somebody starts to tell you that an Independent Scotland could be a lot like…” Sep 21, 13:03
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Of course, using Confused’s own logic, allowing “the Anglos” to cash in big on The Falkland’s mucho largesse would wean…” Sep 21, 12:18
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““well established and understood” Ha! I’d wager £100 that hardly any Scot knows of your post colonial boys, Alf. 20%…” Sep 21, 12:07
Confused on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “ANGLO PHILANTHROPY is jawdropping in its chutzpah : down the bottom – https://archive.ph/efFiS AT THE MOMENT, the deal is that…” Sep 21, 11:32
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Nice try, Northcode, but it is well established and understood that “colonialism only ends with the removal of the colonizer”…” Sep 21, 11:30
Northcode on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “BTL looked clinically dead a couple of hours ago. Now it’s twitching again. Interesting shift.” Sep 21, 10:17
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “A fascinating article describing life in the place that has given us so much of what constitutes the modern world,…” Sep 21, 09:34
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Can I just clarify that the above Vimeo link and YouTube link are to two different discussions.” Sep 21, 09:33
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The majority of Scots cared about their religion back then, Mark. Only a declining minority care today. Within the burgeoning…” Sep 21, 08:46
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “It’s a simple fact, discoverable by thought alone, that no revolution can ever be finished. It’s at the moment that…” Sep 21, 08:29
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “FFS, don’t encourage him, 100%Yes. “Perhaps the main difficulty with the dominant national party leadership” is that they’re collectively thick,…” Sep 21, 08:11
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““Those serious about independence desire only peace” Aye, right, Alf. Never an asthmatic peep out of you when those regulars…” Sep 21, 07:55
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “BILL ROLSTON: IRELAND, COLONIALISM AND THE UNFINISHED REVOLUTION Bill Rolston on his new book, co-authored with Dr Robbie McVeigh ‘Anois…” Sep 20, 23:31
Xaracen on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Hi, James; The date you cite for the dissolution of the Scottish parliament has the wrong year. From 1600 Scotland’s…” Sep 20, 22:26
Northcode on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Sam – 19 September, 2026 at 1:48 pm I’ve only just noticed your comment, Sam. And you pose a couple…” Sep 20, 22:26
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““he was the best we had” Indeed so. Perhaps the main difficulty with the dominant national party leadership, according to…” Sep 20, 19:23
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The UN stuff is a changing cymbal, an empty vessel making a lot of noise yet achieving and signifying nothing.…” Sep 20, 19:19
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “As usual, Alf deliberately avoids answering the point, instead dressing up his “reply” in a load of psuedoacademic wibble full…” Sep 20, 19:09
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““hypocrisy is indeed off the scale” Hatey, as regular cheerleader here for England-as-UK supporting the Pales**ne bombing and gen*cide, as…” Sep 20, 19:08
Mark Beggan on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Remember what happened to the last Charles when he tried to impose the Jiggery Popery on the Scots. It ended…” Sep 20, 19:01
Aidan on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “So TH LOVES benefits but HATES business. Is that because a private employer is likely to frown on drunken ranting…” Sep 20, 18:54
Southernbystander on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Yes, the island group was ‘colonised’ but in the basic sense of the word in simply colonising an uninhabited place,…” Sep 20, 18:32
twathater on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “So in FACT you are NOT a factchecker YOU are just another LIAR posting LIES in the manner of the…” Sep 20, 18:22
twathater on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “And let us NOT forget Dan the amount of “IN WORK BENEFITS”being paid out by successive governments People who are…” Sep 20, 18:16
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “It’s Sunday, Alf. Take the night off, why don’t you. If you give it a rest until the morn, maybe…” Sep 20, 18:13
100%Yes on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Salmond wasn’t perfect and some of the crap that came out of his month I questioned. Salmond isn’t a hero…” Sep 20, 18:02
This is a stitch up.
Whilst I wouldn’t put it past their levels of ineptitude, this must surely be a wind up.
( deeply hoping it’s not) 🙂Â
Brilliant, absolutely love it 😀
Whoops!
ha ha ha brilliant!
Took me a few seconds before the penny dropped!
OK. Penny finally dropped. (I’m a bit slow on the uptake….)
Bwahahahaha! Please tell me that’s real? (Though I suppose it’s just a joke,)
‘You cock’?
Seriously, is this a joke? If so,
KOKUPÂ
Ysabelle, I think you’re supposed to leave it for people to figure out for themselves!
That should read, ‘If not,
KOKUP’Â
#TypographersForIndependence.
Morag,
Sorry! But I’d still like to know if it’s for real or not!Â
Obviously not.
I don’t think this is a joke. I seem to remember something like this on the better together site a while back. Of course I could be horribly wrong. I’ll have a wee look through the web and find out.
Can you confirm it one way or another Stu?Â
Oh…that’s good!
Sadly, as actually seen at Ibrox, tho’ the double entendre had not occured to me before
It might be this I remembered but I’ll keep looking
link to blipfoto.com
Edit.
I found this
link to google.co.uk
Â
No spoof. Ladies, why not try and win a t-shirt that says what you really think about that special someone;
Â
link to bettertogether.net
Â
The production is so shoddy that it is obviously a spoof.
Shit, sorry for that messy link Stu. I tried to edit it but it wouldn’t work. It’s similar to Keith B’s post, so none taken if you delete it  🙂
Bless ’em…… they aren’t that bright!
Â
Â
The t-shirts are genuine, but the pic above has been fiddled with. The kerning, or space between the U and the K, has been increased. The background fill (white) is also incomplete. Sorry to be a spoil sport, but either I’m correct or someone in the BT camp will surely be made to stand in the naughty corner for a very long time. Possibly until 2014.
“The t-shirts are genuine, but the pic above has been fiddled with. The kerning, or space between the U and the K, has been increased. The background fill (white) is also incomplete. Sorry to be a spoil sport, but either I’m correct or someone in the BT camp will surely be made to stand in the naughty corner for a very long time. Possibly until 2014.”
Man alive, it’s hard to be a satirist these days.
Took a moment for the penny to drop here too but love it. The UKOK slogan is certainly a real BT one. I’m guessing the “thinking of voting no” has been photoshopped on?
@Richie
I had no idea that on social photo sharing site Blipfoto, the No people had/have a journal. And look – the comments are switched off! It’s almost as if they don’t want to have a conversation.
I rather liked this flashy [Better Together] number.
link to tinyurl.com
Got the whole red, white and blue thing going for it too!Â
hahahahaha priceless.Â
Â
I did say sorry for being a spoil sport. 🙂
Another BT Kok-up. Classic.
Don’t know why (maybe the colours) but it reminds me of seeing a guy in the shopping mall wearing an enormous Rangers top with ‘We Don’t Do Walking Away’ embossed in the proper lettering – must’ve cost a fortune. But it was on the back of the shirt, so the only time anyone would ever see it? When he was walking away.
“Man alive, it’s hard to be a satirist these days.”
Bit of Poe’s Law in action there.
link to en.wikipedia.org
Its ahm, its kind of ?, its an interesting effort.
(what a bunch of dunderheads.)
U DARLING
@KeithB
I never thought I’d be looking forward so much to seeing people running around in Better Together t-shirts. That’s priceless.
From the No site
Better Together are offering our supporters the chance to win one of 50 limited edition UKOK T-shirts.
Â
After that just email us at info@bettertogether.net to be entered in to the draw for a fabulous UKOK T-Shirt
Normally, the UK is over the OK, so I hadn’t noticed the comic possibilities. Nice, though!
“Limited edition of 50” Is that the number of their actual supporters?
So after months of waiting, we finally have it – the positive case for the Union!
It’s not a particularly enthusiastic case, but it is a positive case nonetheless: The UK is okay. It’s not great, but it’s not terrible either, it’s just okay. And it’s £1 a year cheaper, which is also okay.
Real or not its still funny,needs sharing give everybody a laugh,and it took me a few minutes to get it.
@Matt
Love it!
“How flattering. The British Tourism Authority’s new UKOK campaign uses exactly the same slogan that won our Rebranding Britain competition last May.”
“How extraordinary. But it could just go to show that there’s not too many ideas out there.” (Jan 2002)
link to news.bbc.co.uk
Oh dear, so it’s not even an original logo, it’s a rip off of a ripped off logo!
Â
That is pretty much standard practice within the graphic design community. Not often as blatant as this example, but it should come as no surprise given the BT unwillingness to play by the EC’s rules and their propensity to tell the voting public whatever whapers they deem appropriate to their scare agenda.
Didn’t they also rip off the music for their first video? Seems like a lot of copyright infringements going on. Is that what they mean by better together?