The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Scotland’s other shame

Posted on February 10, 2012 by

First Minister's Questions is rarely a hugely edifying spectacle, but this blog could barely watch to the end of yesterday's proceedings. Labour's leader exhibited a heady mix of ignorance and xenophobia, while the FM's Conservative counterpart opted for a barely-believable combination of direct personal abuse (which could truthfully be paraphrased as "You're fat, ha ha!") and petty timewasting. If we tell you, dear readers, that Willie Rennie took on the role of the calm, intelligent voice of reason (with a dull but substantive question about freedom-of-information laws), you'll perhaps grasp the full degree to which the other two opposition leaders lost the plot.

It was one of the rowdiest FMQs in recent memory, with the Presiding Officer forced to repeatedly call for order, specifically warn Labour's Jackie Baillie to behave herself, and on one occasion even resort to a sharp bang of her gavel in order to silence the cacophanous hooting and jeering coming from – mostly – the opposition benches. The First Minister himself looked dismayed, surprised and somewhat ashamed at the picture of Scotland's political elite being portrayed to the world, and it would be hard for any impartial observer to disagree with his judgement.

Johann Lamont had chosen the new Forth Bridge as her line of attack, and angrily demanded to know why filthy foreigners (in this case, the Chinese) had been awarded what she called an "£800m steel contract" to produce the materials for the crossing. Salmond explained that no such thing had happened, noting that the steel accounted for only 5-10% of the sum quoted and that there were no Scottish companies industrially capable producing the type of steel that would be provided by the Chinese. The actual value of that element of the contract, he pointed out, was somewhere between £20m and £60m, rather than the £800m Lamont had claimed.

Lamont wasn't to be deflected by anything so basic and trivial as being utterly wrong. She reasserted that the Scottish Government was "spending £800m on steel" and that "not a single job has been created in Scotland" as a result. Salmond got back to his feet, admonished Lamont for not listening to the previous answer, and added that procurement rules cited by the previous Labour FM Jack McConnell meant that contracts couldn't simply be given to Scottish companies regardless of other tenders.

But it was to no avail, as she ignored the points and rambled on at enervating length about how dastardly foreign workers were profiting from Scotland's bridge before Salmond comprehensively reiterated the hard facts – Lamont's numbers were wildly wrong to the point of comedy (perhaps Andy Kerr had done her research), not a single Scottish steel fabrication company had tendered to supply the core steel for the bridge because there WERE no Scottish steel fabrication companies, and that all contracts had by law to be awarded competitively.

But the worst was still to come. Ruth Davidson for the Tories stood up and decided to show the world that she thought the most important issue requiring to be urgently addressed by the Scottish Parliament was whether the First Minister should be allowed to discuss rugby on the telly or not. She used the first of her allotted questions for a personal assault that was both mind-numbingly vacuous and disgracefully dishonest, accusing Salmond of "likening a BBC employee to a Nazi" and demanding an apology.

We've discussed "GauleiterGate" in some detail on this blog before, and despite his calm tone Salmond could barely conceal his contempt at the cheap, mendacious smear. He pointed out that he'd done no such thing, quoting the Chambers Dictionary definition of the term meaning a petty bureaucrat and noting that its use in such a context is commonplace (of which more very shortly). He then went on to refute Davidson's line – repeated in many newspapers earlier in the week – that he'd proactively "demanded" to appear on the Six Nations coverage, by reading out an email from the BBC Head Of Sport, Carl Hicks, which ran "I'd like to ask if the First Minister will take part…" in the show from which he was later de-invited.

Anyone thinking that the mere establishment of the facts would settle the matter, however, clearly can't have been paying attention during Johann Lamont's questions, and sure enough Davidson wasn't letting it lie. Showing the command of detail for which her FMQ performances have become known, she started off by reassigning Mr Hicks' gender – describing him as "she", having presumably misheard "Carl" as "Carol" and not having bothered to know who she was talking about beforehand (even though Salmond had explicitly referred to "Mr Hicks" and called him "he" no fewer than three times in his previous answer).

But Davidson had further depths to plumb. She announced that she'd been researching the First Minister's qualifications as a rugby expert, sneering that "he has the build for it" and bizarrely going on to list Salmond's educational and employment background, trumpeting as if it was a royal decree the revelation that he'd never played for any of his school, university or work's rugby teams.

So pleased was Davidson with this spectacularly irrelevant information (as far as we're aware most professional rugby journalists have somehow managed to offer their opinions without the benefit of a playing career, and nobody had at any point attempted to ascribe any expertise on the subject to Salmond beyond that of a fan) that she almost forgot to make any sort of point at all, but quickly tacked on some sort of vague accusation about wasting the BBC's time – somewhat ironically, as she'd just devoted her entire allotted amount of dialogue with the First Minister and weekly national broadcast coverage to pursuing this ludicrously insubstantial name-calling rather than anything of more pressing concern to the Scottish people.

None of the opposition's new leaders have covered themselves in glory at FMQs thus far, but Thursday's episode was a new low. We can only assume that the SNP's continued rise in the opinion polls is in some part due to the grotesque, childish and embarrassing ineptitude so often seen in Lamont, Davidson and Rennie's most high-profile weekly display to the voters. The partisan side of us hopes they continue. But the side which doesn't want to cringe every time the rest of the world sees how Scotland conducts its political business can scarcely bear any more of such humilation.

8 to “Scotland’s other shame”

  1. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    And this is going out Worldwide.
     
    What bunch of Numpties and a searing endorsement of the quality of the "opposition."
     
     
    Nothing constructive, nothing of substance and nothing of reality.
     
    Do yoiu suppose that the SNP have cornered the upper gene pool in Scotland or more probably anybody with more that half a brain would not wish to be associated with this rabble.
     
    Sad, for Scotland.

    Reply
  2. Erchie says:

    Munguin's Republuc cover usage of 'gauleiter' in Hansard
     
    link to munguinsrepublic.blogspot.com

    Reply
  3. Doug Daniel says:

    “Do you suppose that the SNP have cornered the upper gene pool in Scotland?”

    They have. The dogmatic fervour which is required to believe in the continued existence of a failing union is completely antithetical to intelligent debate. Belief in the union is comparable to belief in creationism. It requires an ability to completely deny inconvenient facts. Even the remotest semi-intellectual analysis of the arguments in favour of the union show it up to be nothing more than a nostalgic yearning for a history that never quite existed. I've been drawn into a protracted Twitter argument with the son of a Labour MP at the moment, and really, it's like trying to argue with someone who thinks the earth is flat, and refuses to accept any evidence showing otherwise.
    Unionists are intellectually inferior. There, I've said it.

    Reply
  4. bobby mcpherson says:

    Thank you wings over Scotland for this article. I watched FMQ's yesterday with toe curling embarassment and a profound outrage at the appalling, disrespectful and downright disgraceful treatment of Alex salmond by lamont and davidson. I could've cried easily. I used to enjoy the weekly thrashing of the opposition until I realised what was happening. They I'm sure must know the Q's for his Eckness are conjured from lies and manipulations they cannae be that stupit – surely? But what's important is that what they 'hit the First minister w'' is what the right wing anti independence media run with. That's what's presented to us public – and you're right yesterday was a new low. The personal attacks and put downs are unacceptable and an embarassment to the Scottish people.

    Reply
  5. bobby mcpherson says:

    Nae wonder labour politicians are resigning. Anyone wi' any self repect and a smidgeon of insight who cares about Scotland widnae be seen deid hingin' aboot wi' that lot!

    Reply
  6. Erchie says:

    Bobby
     
    You must have been watching the wrong FMQs
     
    according to today's Herald Lamont had Alex Salmond begging for mercy!!

    Reply
  7. douglas clark says:

    The problem, and it is a problem, with this is that other, less sensible outlets than this allow the lie to be repeated.
    There are numerous posters that take it, perhaps with a pinch of vindictive unionist salt, that Lamont was right!
    It is as Doug Daniel says above, you are dealing with creationists here. No matter the evidence, e.g. that no Scottish company even tendered for this work, or that it constitutes, at most 10% of the cost of the overall project, we have people assuming that there is truth in what Lamont had to say. The SNP are selling out the Scottish workforce. It is an irrefutible fact that a £1.5 billion pound project was passed to the Chinese in exchange for two Pandas.
    Well, it wasn't, and she was talking mince.
    Never mind that we can't actually produce this stuff, never mind that our infrastructure is in ruins, a Labour leader said it so it must be true!
    It is desperately sad that anyone keeps their eyes wide shut like that. I seem to recall some other comment that Chinese steel is of poorer quality. I'd have thought the buyer determined the quality and employed metallurgists to make sure we weren't being sold a pup.
    Well, what she said  isn't true and she is enormously above her pay grade.
    I think she knows it.
     
     
     

    Reply
  8. Longshanker says:

    Fandabadozie Lamont is only the product of an ever sliding scale of mediocrity since the death of Big Donald – the only Scottish Labour politician of any stature to have graced the Scottish Parliamentary talking shop.
     
    I don't think she'll recover too quickly, rightly so, from that unbelievably amateurish mistake for a long time. And is it just me, but when I watched this on i-player she looked like she had the mother of skelpet face beamers while haplessly ploughing on.
     
    Surely Doltish Davidson can't be so obtuse as to miss the point over Rugbygate. This is an unequivocal instance of craven behaviour by the BBC which does require serious investigation. Most of the other claims of BBC bias are merely a reflection of the people making the claim though.
     
    I know Labour people who'll quite freely and without irony tell you that the BBC is a Tory institution. And some of the Tories I know can formulate almost plausible sounding arguments against the BBC which make it sound like it's only a matter of time before the old Soviet flag is flying at their headquarters and they rebrand themselves Pravda.
     
     Consequently, I don't think King Alex does himself any favours by proclaiming that he's assembling a dossier. It makes him look and sound just as churlish and finger wagging as any other politician in power with a grudge against the BBC.
     
    The BBC do have some undeniably particularly poor form here though. If I remember rightly – in principle – they did the same thing in 2009 by refusing to broadcast the appeal for the people of Gaza. The arguments for their actons were the same: "journalistic impartiality". But, as I see it, the reasons were pretty similar to the excuses made in King Alex's case i.e.  they caved into the fear of political pressure from the incumbent UK government at the time.
     
    Shocking, if not frightening.
     
    Besides, you don't extend an invitation to someone of the status and office of First Minister and then almost immediately withdraw it. At best it appears crass, amateurish, disrespectful and rude. At worst it looks like its caving into a UK Tory government. Either way, the BBC loses.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,778 Posts, 1,220,160 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • GM on Holiday Relief: “I PDF’ed most of his articles in the period after Iain died. I go back to them from time to…Jun 17, 23:46
    • crazycat on Holiday Relief: “The legislation only applies to England and Wales. It always used to be SNP policy not to vote in cases…Jun 17, 23:12
    • Insider on Holiday Relief: “agent x…… Well, we must all wait with bated breath to see what “post colonialism” tells us ! It will…Jun 17, 22:45
    • Towbar Sullivan on Holiday Relief: “This vote on Abortion – did the SNP go AWOL? There’s no record of them voting at all. WTF? https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/2058Jun 17, 22:35
    • George Ferguson on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “@James 9:56pm Welcome to the World of lost deposits. I was a member of the SNP and Alba. I thought…Jun 17, 22:35
    • Scot Finlayson on Holiday Relief: “What is wrong with this British Labour government, Starving kids, freezing pensioners, allowing the mass rape of young girls, assisted…Jun 17, 22:23
    • James on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “Voting for me? Dunno what planet you’re on, George. I ditched my membership in 2018 when the missing money/Salmond stitch…Jun 17, 21:56
    • George Ferguson on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “@James An SNP thug. Nuf said. When you come up with intelligent policies I will start voting for you again.…Jun 17, 21:20
    • James on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “Ah. Freeport Forbes supporter eh? ‘nuf said.Jun 17, 20:58
    • George Ferguson on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “@James 8:26pm According to Grok I am an Architect from Bristol. Of course I think freeports is an opportunity just…Jun 17, 20:51
    • sarah on Holiday Relief: “Reading some of Iain Lawson’s blog articles today showed what quality of thinking and personality is missing from the SNP.…Jun 17, 20:32
    • James on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “Are you the same George Ferguson who bigs up Freeports?Jun 17, 20:26
    • agent x on Holiday Relief: “How much has the Scotland 2050 thing cost and who is paying for it?Jun 17, 20:17
    • George Ferguson on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “@Hatey McHateface 7:25pm And the tradegy is my wife was friendly with the Murkle cluster. Not long married I represented…Jun 17, 19:59
    • agent x on Holiday Relief: ““Orkney Islands Council has accepted it must remain part of the UK – after spending two years exploring opportunities for…Jun 17, 19:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Holiday Relief: ““preferred the presenter to be a bit more serious” Hmmm. Not with a name like Randy Credico. That handle will…Jun 17, 19:46
    • Chas on Holiday Relief: “783 times. I confess, I may have missed a few as I am not on here every day. Most people…Jun 17, 19:37
    • Hatey McHateface on Holiday Relief: “Wouldn’t a truly representative Scottish Citizen’s Convention reflect Scottish society at large – 52% opposed to Indy? That being the…Jun 17, 19:30
    • Hatey McHateface on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “James will still be able to grasp his chipolata in the dark. That’s all that matters to him.Jun 17, 19:25
    • Hatey McHateface on Holiday Relief: “Nah. It’s them that’s supposed to laugh at you. You’ll never reach Step 3 if you’re doing Step 2 all…Jun 17, 19:20
    • sarah on Holiday Relief: “Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp talking a lot of sense in an email this evening. He says that SNP need to refocus on…Jun 17, 19:11
    • agent x on Holiday Relief: “I don’t think that Swinney’s I have a dream speech will knock Rev. Martin Luther King Jr’s speech off top…Jun 17, 18:36
    • Young Lochinvar on Holiday Relief: “Indeed, or that of sneaky Pete and the 600 grand?Jun 17, 18:25
    • twathater on Holiday Relief: “And yet the cult will gorge on this cold wattery porridge as if they were attending a banquet of the…Jun 17, 18:12
    • Onlooker on Holiday Relief: “How’s the Salmond case coming along?Jun 17, 17:56
    • George Ferguson on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “@James 5:07pm Easy if you understand how the National Grid works. You want to live in the dark and that…Jun 17, 17:22
    • Alf Baird on Holiday Relief: “Yes 100%, I see Indyscotnews now offers the audio in program entitled: ‘WBAI New York: ‘Live On The Fly’ with…Jun 17, 17:14
    • James on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “But don’t we export 8Gw of leccy 24/7 as it is? Why on earth would we want a nuclear power…Jun 17, 17:07
    • 100%Yes on Holiday Relief: “Hi Alf, was listening to Craig Murray, Sara Salyers and yourself on Randy Credico radio talk show, well done all…Jun 17, 16:58
    • George Ferguson on Let’s Not Make Some Plans: “@Mary B 11:26pm You should been at the EDRP Inquiry in Caithness. The cluster theory was well and truly debunked…Jun 17, 16:45
  • A tall tale



↑ Top