The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Back to business

Posted on December 01, 2011 by

Okay, so after yesterday's fit of grand polemic for St Andrew's Day we've got some normal news to catch up on again. We left off mentioning this before because the Newsnet Scotland server had a bizarre extended outage and because the feature itself is horribly written, but the statistical fact that the mainstream Scottish media is 11,319 times more likely to run a story based on the SNP being accused of some terrible wrong than they are to do the same thing to the Tories, and that "accused" stories directed against the SNP make up 88% of all such articles, is definitely worth examining if you haven't already.

Meanwhile, the BBC and Herald run a pair of bone-chilling pieces about the economic future of the UK (the latter one also echoed in the Scotsman). In the coming years before the independence referendum, it's increasingly clear that it's going to get harder and harder for the Unionist parties to credibly push the "stronger together, weaker apart" line, because it's hard to imagine how an independent Scotland bursting with natural resources could possibly be in a bigger mess than successive Labour and Tory governments have left Britain in, even if we elected The Krankies to run it for a laugh.

The Scotsman also runs with an interesting piece linking the gay marriage consultation with the independence referendum, highlighting comments by former SNP leader Gordon Wilson suggesting that the SNP can ill afford to alienate a single voter in the run-up to the vote with such controversial policies. It's a fair enough point, except that with Labour and the Lib Dems on the same side as the SNP on the issue, and the Tories actually led by a lesbian, we're not sure there's much scope there for the opposition to exploit it politically. (Curiously, while the Scotsman piece makes great play of Wilson's SNP connection, it neglects to mention anywhere that Bashir Maan, one of the other opponents of gay marriage extensively quoted in the piece along with Cardinal Keith O'Brien, is a prominent former Labour figure.)

And as with the sectarianism bill and minimum pricing, the SNP is wisely front-loading its more contentious policies into the first half of the Parliament – presumably counting on any furore having long died down by the time of the referendum, as armies of angry Old-Firm-supporting gay couples enraged by the price of booze for their weddings fail to materialise on the streets.

Over in the blogosphere, Kate Higgins takes a surprise angle on the Chancellor's offer yesterday of £50m to upgrade/preserve the London-to-Scotland Sleeper train – contingent on the Scottish Government putting up the same amount of money – by advocating that the SNP should decline the offer. We see her point, to be honest – we suspect the main users of the service are MPs, and that normal folk won't miss it particularly much. (We're also not sure how urgently it needs £100m spent on it, or what that money would deliver.) The sleeper is so pricey that you might as well either get an earlier train and book a night in a hotel, or take a cheap flight to Edinburgh or Glasgow and make the rest of your train journey from there. Either option costs about the same as the sleeper premium, and doesn't involve shutting yourself in a tiny rattling shoebox with a complete stranger for the night. (As we were horrified to discover was the case the first time we ever used the service. We didn't get a lot of sleep.)

Malc Harvey has almost finished Thinking Unpopular Thoughts on the state of the Scottish parties, having rounded up the Scottish Tories, Lib Dems and Greens this week and promising his views on the SNP later today. His conclusions aren't encouraging for any of the first three, with the most intriguing suggestion being that the Lib Dems may have a future as a party of the centre-right, essentially occupying the ground the Tories declined to move onto under Murdo Fraser – if, that is, the Tories don't dump Ruth Davidson quickly and get there first. It's certainly true that there's a substantial minority of Scottish voters of centre-right inclination waiting for someone convincing to vote for, and neither the Lib Dems nor the Tories are going to get anywhere in Scotland for the forseeable future as they are. We'll be watching that space.

And with that, we're off to await First Minister's Questions, and see if Iain Gray has the sheer suicidal gall to challenge the SNP on walking through picket lines yesterday, exactly as Labour's leader and MPs did at Westminster…

Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,690 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Angus on Faces In Sand: ““16th century Scots would have driven them all into the sea by now.” Scots had real spines in those days.” Oct 18, 02:24
    • Cynicus on Faces In Sand: “Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Or- to mark the end of the Mòd, in the tongue of those called…” Oct 18, 01:47
    • Lothianlad on Faces In Sand: “Just did something i rarely do an looked at whingy scot goes pop mealy mouth. Interesting he says nothing about…” Oct 17, 22:47
    • Lothianlad on Faces In Sand: “Proof if any were needed that the SNP is utterly owned by the british security sevices. They allow no prospect…” Oct 17, 22:37
    • Anthem on Faces In Sand: “Q Manivannan, did he ever get a visa extension? The illegality of that seems to have gone quiet.” Oct 17, 22:37
    • Andrew scott on Faces In Sand: “THIS IS BEYOND AWAFUL DOOMED AH TELL YE DOOMED” Oct 17, 22:14
    • Red on Faces In Sand: “Looking at the SNP conference now, they’re just human biotrash. The least intelligent, the least honest, the least courageous and…” Oct 17, 20:02
    • Jim Thomson on Faces In Sand: “In other news – “A Ministry of Defence analyst has been elected rector of the University of St Andrews. Dr…” Oct 17, 19:32
    • Jim Thomson on Faces In Sand: “They’ve obviously never heard of VPNs. “Choose Scotland”, our reframing group developed that slogan way back in 2013 and have…” Oct 17, 19:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Hmmm. Listening to the BBC tonight, I got the impression that Swinney has just announced that Indy is as good…” Oct 17, 18:52
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Crivens, James. Is it usual for yer maw tae stay oot sae long? Hope she’s nae been lifted! Wha’s pitting…” Oct 17, 18:45
    • Tommo on Faces In Sand: “‘The truth is simple: the SNP exists for power’s sake alone. As long as it can keep funnelling fat salaries…” Oct 17, 17:53
    • Ian on Faces In Sand: “I suppose we should look on the bright side. 1. If everyone who still thinks independence is coming via the…” Oct 17, 17:17
    • Alison on Faces In Sand: “Nothing about this surprises me except that Facebook has a 70% reach.” Oct 17, 16:51
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “The smugness emanating from that FAT BALDHEADED TWAT is almost bile inducing” Oct 17, 16:46
    • twathater on Faces In Sand: “We can only hope that the Alex Salmond trial and the EXPOSURE of the vile , despicable actions of Sturgeon…” Oct 17, 16:40
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “My word, some horrendous imagery coming out of France right now, the place seems to be on fire. Tsk, all…” Oct 17, 15:42
    • James on The fight about to come: ““….hurled at those whose ability to construct a coherent, cogent, written statement…” Site Prick. When’s that happening then, wee man?…” Oct 17, 14:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““The talent is there” Where? Serious question. Where are they hiding? Help me out here. Name 20 talented Scots capable…” Oct 17, 14:15
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “SSRG 2026 Saturday 17th October on youtube is working well today. Please watch. Sensible, principled people talking constructively. They are…” Oct 17, 13:49
    • Wally Jumblatt on The fight about to come: “Your perseverance with the moribund SNP is praiseworthy, but I’m sure we are all way past the point where we…” Oct 17, 13:36
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “” What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit” Well, son, “if you have to ask” and all of…” Oct 17, 12:17
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “@James says: 17 October, 2026 at 10:21 am “Prick”? Naw, James, that ane hasnae been devalued. Its meaning remains clear,…” Oct 17, 11:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““Still read the rag though” Me too, the online version. Some good journalism occasionally, although hell will freeze over before…” Oct 17, 11:13
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Yeah, got some sympathy with this, the way what are not unreasonable calls for at least recognition of past crimes,…” Oct 17, 10:32
    • James on The fight about to come: ““Prick”?” Oct 17, 10:21
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Many Scots who are related to the descendants of the thieving, genociding Scottish colonisers of the Canadian province of Alberta…” Oct 17, 09:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““turn German into inhuman gibberish” In our own time, we see the same (quite successful) attempts to turn English into…” Oct 17, 09:04
    • Willie on The fight about to come: “Small diversion on a Saturday evening. Now we know budgets are tight and we know that transport for some children…” Oct 16, 22:44
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “« The Nazis were only too anxious to secure the lustre of Thomas Mann’s presence and the prestige that mere…” Oct 16, 21:00
  • A tall tale



↑ Top