The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Why metagaming is the only true gaming

Posted on June 19, 2010 by

Anyone who's been reading WoS or WoSblog for any amount of time will probably already have noticed that I have very little time for videogames that want to tell stories.

There are plenty of fields of culture available already for people who want to be told stories. Books, films, comics, TV,  theatre and even music are all ideally suited to story-telling, and frequently do a brilliant job of it. You wouldn't hire a footballer to come round and do your plumbing, so why would you look to videogames for storytelling?

But anyway. I bang on about that subject at greater length here and here, so we don't need to go through it again. What I'd like to draw your attention to instead is a glorious example of the art (dang!) of a videogame being a videogame. The unwieldily-titled Pix'n Love Rush, in fact, goes beyond being a videogame – it's a metagame. That is to say, it's a videogame that's about being a videogame.

Metagaming is a sub-genre that was to all intents and purposes kicked off by the immortal Wario Ware on the GBA (though strictly speaking the first examples came many years before, with the likes of Lazy Jones on the 8-bit home computers). It's characterised by games packed with references to other games, and tends to utilise gameplay stripped of all pretence at simulating real-world activities.

Metagames don't want you to think you're driving a racing car or saving the world from armies of evil. They want you to know that you're sitting in your house (or on the bus or in the pub) with a controller in your hand playing a videogame, and they want you to not be ashamed of it.

The genre which Pix'n Love Rush boils down to its barest bones is platforming. The game consists of two modes, a five-minute Time Attack and an endless Infinite game. Both comprise a non-stop sequence of randonly-selected short platforming levels (chosen from a range of 125) where you have to collect coins, avoid minus blocks, shoot bats with your vertically-firing gun and protect (ie not shoot) angels.

Each level can be as short as six seconds or as long as about 20 seconds, and if you complete a level perfectly you get a bonus of 10,000 times your current multiplier. The multiplier (which can be 1, 2, 5 or 10) is increased by making combos, which is to say doing the Good Things (collecting coins and shooting bats) without doing any of the Bad Things (hitting a minus block, getting an angel killed, or stupidly getting shot by your own bullet – it falls back down the screen  in a slight arc if it doesn't hit anything).

Do a Bad Thing and your multiplier goes down a level – as well as costing you a pixel of energy from your "heart", depicted at top left – but you can miss as many coins or bats as you like without damaging it. It's only when you actually cause some harm that you're penalised.

And that's pretty much it for the gameplay. Run out of energy (or in the five-minute game, out of either energy or time) and it's game over. The pace is fast and relentless and the levels are incredibly varied – some are static, some scroll horizontally (both left and right), and some scroll vertically (both up and down).

Some are speed rushes across collapsing platforms, others are intricate and mazy, some are about precision and planning – the only common factor is that you'll have to be on top form to notch a perfect. (You'll need a good few perfects to beat the built-in high scores, and you don't get an online ranking unless you've done so, which is a bit mean.)

But as particularly alert viewers will noticed from the screenshots on this page, the game has a more immediately striking feature too. In keeping with the metagaming theme, Pix'n Love Rush gets bored with its graphical style as quickly as it does of each individual stage – at frequent intervals, regardless of whether you're slap-bang in the middle of a  tricky level or not, PLR simply gives itself an instant makeover.

You might suddenly find yourself playing something that looks like an old mono Gameboy game, or something in the style of The Matrix, or the glowing pixels of Arkedo's Xbox Indie games (PLR's developers Bulkypix, or possibly partner Pastagames, are connected somehow to Arkedo but it's not clear exactly how closely), or Nintendo's infamous Virtual Boy, or my personal favourite, a deteriorating TV picture with scanlines that eventually gets so out of tune it authentically pops up the "AV1" tag.

(Don't panic – the picture sorts itself out after a few seconds, and even at its worst the game remains completely playable, and that's despite having almost exactly the same poorly-laid-out controls as Qwak. They're a fair bit less troublesome here, though, because you have to use the shoot button far less often than the jump one.)

Bulkypix promise even more "skins" in future updates (I'd love to see a ZX81 style myself, along with a three-minute Time Attack option), but while they add enormously to PLR's aesthetic appeal, it's the inventive and challenging (meta)game underneath that's the star. It costs 59p, so I'm accepting no excuses whatsoever.

 

(No, not even not having an iPhone or iPod Touch. As you must be aware by now, WoS subscribers can get one of those for £6.)

0 to “Why metagaming is the only true gaming”

  1. Hypocee says:

    Wow, you are not kidding about the controls. I propose immediate funding for research to determine and screen for the chromosomal duplication that causes people to create directional controls with no dead zone.

    Reply
  2. Whereas I can't deal with Qwak on iOS, this gem's been fine. The controls are imperfect, but I've maybe had a few 'deaths' due to them, but no more. Frankly, it's an absolute steal for 59p – hugely addictive, and one of my current favourites on the platform.

    Reply
  3. Cook says:

    Is this anything like Wiz n Liz (if you haven't tried that then I think you might like it)?

    Reply
  4. MrD says:

    Wiz 'n' Liz is on the iPhone? :O

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,738 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Cheers, YL. They don’t like it up ’em. LOLJul 10, 08:50
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Undemocratic elections, Rigged elections for Scots. They knew they should give the Scots a vote ‘they” had discussed it in…Jul 10, 08:41
    • twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “It never ceases to amaze me how many fuckwits actually think they are in the same rich league as these…Jul 10, 03:05
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Wow! Did the paramedics get to you in time and are you alright? Would have sent you a posse of…Jul 10, 02:06
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “That I believe would be the Celtic mythical Tuatha de Danann, the Celtic equivalent of the Gods of Mount Olympus.…Jul 10, 01:48
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Reply to Chas @ 8.26 Oi Chas Leave James alone! It’s me that goes fishing and frankly, it’s no-one here’s…Jul 10, 01:38
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Well that would be you P3nisbreath; posting about “sucking blokes off” (your post), shafting blokes between “spread bum cheeks” (your…Jul 10, 01:13
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Yes, worthless treaties simply used ‘to legalize colonialism’, at least in the eyes of an Imperial justice system. A hoax…Jul 9, 22:59
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Piss off troll.Jul 9, 22:24
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “How’s the carp fishing going James?Jul 9, 20:26
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““–the chair of C-24 is quoted in a Guardian article explicitly saying that C-24 cannot.” Irrelevant, Aidan, because it doesn’t…Jul 9, 19:56
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “I literally asked you to provide evidence for any single one of your dumbass, unsubstantiated assertions. That’s not a “rebuttal”…Jul 9, 19:39
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Treaties are worthless, not unlike cease fires. How many treaties did the imperialist British sign before annexing the other signatories…Jul 9, 19:30
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Aidan She didn’t participate in acts of terrorism, and certainly not of treason (this was in Syria). This same murderous…Jul 9, 19:26
    • Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “Ah, jist noticed this post by Aidan trying to diminish understanding of how much energy is exported from Scotland’s geographic…Jul 9, 19:22
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Andrew – I suggest she had her life destroyed by the decision she took to join a murderous death cult…Jul 9, 19:09
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Hatey – “… you expect me to feel sorry for the people who slaughter and abuse my country’s and my…Jul 9, 18:29
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Sam – did the university poll a wide range from the UK? Scotland only would probably throw up different results?…Jul 9, 18:17
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “What, that was your rebuttal? Lol. You surely don’t think I’m wasting any of my time on any of that…Jul 9, 18:11
    • agent x on Too Tight To Mention: ““Police preparing for Donald Trump to visit Scotland The Scottish government said it was working with the UK government to…Jul 9, 17:49
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: “See following Wings over Scotland article ‘Death from above’ (March 13, 2012). Stu writes: « We have a paid subscription…Jul 9, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Midgies tae. When oor junkies and jakies start being stealed an a’, we’ll ken we’re in the end game.Jul 9, 17:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “@AndrewR Sorry, but when it come to that kind of people, being heartless is the only language they understand. We’ve…Jul 9, 17:42
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Captain caveman, 12:04 pm. Actually the programme I am watching is How to Save England, -. The word England being…Jul 9, 17:03
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Does any left of centre politician care about the young people born in the UK, sam? Much of the evidence…Jul 9, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “TL;DRJul 9, 16:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sae true, NC, the scribblin is oan the wa. In fact, it’s only going to be (checks notes) 4-5 years…Jul 9, 16:40
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “When you don’t know what you think you know. Cambridge Journal of Economics Cover Image for Volume 44, Issue 2…Jul 9, 16:36
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “I’ve just run a couple of searches on ChatGPT for for similar search criteria. Which is helpful and revealing because…Jul 9, 16:32
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Not many people agree with you. https://www.derby.ac.uk/blog/margaret-thatchers-legacy/ Survey results In January and February 2019, researchers at the University of Derby…Jul 9, 16:28
  • A tall tale



↑ Top