The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The ginger stepchild

Posted on December 11, 2025 by

According to a new poll, fewer than a third of SNP voters even think independence is in the top three priorities facing Scotland.

It’s only five points ahead of immigration in fourth place, and seven ahead of housing. So it’s hardly surprising that the SNP aren’t bothering themselves about it. Their own support, like the party, is very comfortable with the way things are.

And in truth, that’s not much of a change.

Way back in November 2021, the percentage was two points lower at 29%, and indy was SNP voters’ fifth priority. (Immigration wasn’t even an option on the list four years ago, but is now a concern for over a quarter of the party’s voters.)

Support for the SNP has plunged by around a third since those heady days, but it’s clearly not because they’re failing to prioritise independence, which leaves only the party’s wretched performance in government as a plausible reason.

So we probably shouldn’t expect much difference if, as seems overwhelmingly likely, the SNP limps back into government next May with a lot fewer votes but more or less the same number of seats. The party has a strong financial disincentive to achieve independence, and its voters aren’t fussed either.

Both groups, in essence, are lying to each other. SNP voters profess their desire for independence but don’t really want anything done about it, and the party dutifully pretends to be working towards it to maintain the illusion – cherished by both the SNP and its voters – that there’s actually any difference between them and Scottish Labour.

(The only other big divergence in the poll, on Brexit, despite near-identical proportions of SNP and Labour voters voting Leave in 2016, is probably explained by the fact that Labour has lost a large chunk of support to Reform and most of it will likely be those. Although the near-total disinterest of SNP voters in crime and education is odd.)

Only the numbers tell the truth.

0 to “The ginger stepchild”

  1. McDuff says:

    If the SNP never talk about independence and never ever ever explain the benefits it would bring and also the injustices wrought on Scotland by England then it’s not going to be a priority in the minds of the public. Of course the SNP are not a party of independence.

    Reply
    • Dan says:

      Well aye, it seems nobody (not just the NuSNP) will endeavour to articulate the significant point that most of the important priority issues on that list can only be properly addressed in a way that aligns with Scotland best interests until we return to self-governance.

      We are in a position with those priority issues being so high on the list because all the major powers to manage and control these issues are reserved to London Rule, which has had pretty much continual governance by Parties that Scotland has electorally rejected for decades.

      Reply
    • 100%Yes says:

      If the SNP was to do any of these things Independence would look better than the fake Union. Its not in the SNP interest when all they can do is complain about Westminster but never complain about the UK as a whole.

      Reply
  2. PhilM says:

    The SNP and its paying supporters are now just another generic political tribe that puts political identification/differentiation above any meaningful policy list. When political parties gave up their power to corporations and the rich, they gradually let their supporters down little by little so that the experience of political disenchantment was not really felt but the learned political helplessness of party supporters is there for all to see. All that’s left of governing as a form of public action is lying, a veneer of policy difference, and a slow descent into the functional stupefaction of those in leadership positions.
    They have nothing to say to an audience who have lost the capacity to hear what’s being said.
    Now the really important question is can I get through seven seasons of Mad Men between now and when it disappears from Netflix…

    Reply
    • Northcode says:

      Which of these two issues do you think is the most important facing Scotland at this time?

      A: “Scotland’s constitutional future” (question asked in new 2025 poll)

      OR

      B: “Whether or not Scotland becomes independent” (question asked in old 2021 poll)

      Two different issues from two different polls separated in time by four years.

      Some kind of oranges and apples conflation variation – in rhetoric known as “false analogy” or “Argument from spurious similarity”.

      Also, the “new poll” question leads with “The economy and health are seen as the most important…” and lo and behold the top two most important issues put forward by respondents are the economy and health… subconscious pre-conditioning, perhaps.

      The “Scotland’s constitutional future” issue in the “new poll” is so boring that I would have probably placed it just above “Something else” if I had been participating in that poll… and I am a raging Pict desperate for Scotland to reclaim her independence.

      Reply
      • Northcode says:

        In case you’re wondering I wasn’t replying to your comment, PhilM. I posted it under your comment by mistake. Apologies.

  3. Dan says:

    Although the near-total disinterest of SNP voters in crime and education is odd.

    Au Contraire! It actually makes perfect sense and explains a lot!

    Reply
  4. sarah says:

    @ Dan at 3.38. You, I and others can see what is blindingly obvious – that all the ills that are high in poll answerers’ priorities can be solved by independence. [IF the new politicians in an independent Scotland want to, or are required to by direct democracy provisions, that is.]

    This message should be plastered over every billboard and on every leaflet.

    Reply
    • Dan says:

      Aye Sarah, it is pretty obvious, so one has to question the motives of supposedly pro-indy politicians, activists, and bloggers that fail to state the case every single time the opportunity arises to stress that point, such as the above article, rather than just let it slide and give tacit approval to the validity of the polling stats that are produced from the thoughts of a uniformed electorate.

      Re. Striving for the implementation of direct democracy, or at least the electorate having a better ability to hold to account our legislative politicians, and I guess in light of recent events, other power structures like executive, and judiciary.
      Why are folk who believe in the sovereignty of the people asking for this to be implemented by those in power who will be reluctant to give up power and control.
      Power isn’t given, it is taken, so surely better to focus efforts on electing decent folk that stand on a manifesto commitment to implement more direct democracy principles, and also a power of recall to their electorates should they err.

      Reply
  5. Alf Baird says:

    Recovery of the £150bn+ plundered by Westminster and other external corporate interests from an annexed Scotland each year would solve most of the funding crises across all policy areas.

    link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com

    Reply
    • Hatey McHateface says:

      Cart before horse, Alf.

      First you have to get a solid majority of Scots to believe your number.

      Then you have to get that same solid majority to believe that an Independent Scotland would still have that £150+ billion every year after Indy.

      We all remember all too clearly similar promises being made about Brexit.

      So it might be a good idea to stop wangin oan aboot that too.

      Certainly not saying none of this is doable, Alf, but you really do need to consider a new and more credible approach. Just how many times does Rev Stu have to point out that the current one is dead before the penny drops?

      Reply
      • Alf Baird says:

        The only in-credible thing here is the vast GDP-per-capita gap between a much poorer yet resource-rich Scotland and near neighbour independent states Norway, Ireland, Denmark etc, which proves how much the colonial plunder of Scotland is really worth – i.e. at least £150bn per annum.

      • Hatey McHateface says:

        Ah, c’moan noo, Alf.

        It’s quite incredible that you sit on a claim like this one, that Scotland would be £150+ billion per annum better off after Indy, and never make any effort to publicise it.

        Wouldn’t the money frittered away posing at the UN be better spent on a simple campaign to ensure that every Scot in the land knows that after Indy, he/she will be personally richer to the tune of 25 – 30 thousand pounds PA?

        Along, of course, with a parallel campaign to deal with the resounding chorus of “Aye, Right!” that would result from such a claim?

        It’s frankly incredible that I have never yet found a Scot who knows how much he/she is supposedly missing out.

  6. twathater says:

    The rev talks about supporting yoonionist parties in an attempt to destroy or remove the stench of the Scum Nonce Party in HR, he has also stated that it would enable the time and the benefit of building a new or revised independence party to fight for indy, but that didn’t stop him from posting articles and policies from ALBA’S Kenny MacAskill which were and still are mirrors of the snp’s FAILED route to indy or Ash Regan

    YET he has and is totally ignoring a NEWLY formed united independence fighting PARTY in Liberate Scotland consisting of determined no holds barred individuals desperate for Scotland’s independence

    Reply
    • Northcode says:

      The problem, TH, is that if Liberate Scotland gets TOO much attention and – God forbid- gets the mass backing of indigenous Scots… well, fuck me, that might mean the end of the Union.

      Aye, like you and Dan, and Alf tae, I think…a hae ma douts.

      Reply
  7. Karen says:

    I’m surprised that women (and children’s) rights come in at 3% or less.

    Reply
    • Hatey McHateface says:

      Perhaps the pollsters were unaware women are allowed to vote.

      Perhaps when the pollsters asked people, the men refused to let their women speak to strangers.

      Both attitudes are increasingly common in the UK and in Scotland too. Denial of this growing reality is all too common as well.

      Reply
  8. Mark Beggan says:

    We’ll cut aff oor noses to spite those English bastards faces. That’s them telt. Bastards. Soar Giro!

    Reply
  9. robertkknight says:

    The SNP is NOT the party of Independence any more…

    Any member who cared about Indy is long gone, leaving the career troughers, the blue-haired biology deniers and the weak and feeble minded wee ginger fuds.

    Reply
  10. Iain More says:

    SNP are just another Yoon Party now.

    Reply
  11. Bilbo says:

    Hardly surprising that the SNP voters are not interested in independence because the support the SNP for a wide variety of reasons other than that.

    The question is though that once the SNP starts losing it’s ability to form governments, will these SNP voters and SNP politicians start defecting to the Greens?

    Reply
    • robertkknight says:

      Frankly my dear, not a shit will be given either way.

      The SNP are charlatans in tartan suits selling snake oil labelled “Independence Embrocation – Guaranteed to cure Scotland of the Union and all its associated ills”.

      The day after the election the SNP wagon moves on and you’ll not hear Independence mentioned again, at least until the polling booths are on the verge of opening again

      Reply
  12. willie says:

    Sixth on the list is crime. But what is crime and what is the perception of what crime actually is.

    At its most simple crime is I suspect most likely to be widely perceived as murder, rape, assault, drug dealing and that sort of thing.

    But of course crime is much much more than that. Save for widespread public perception of crime only being to the person violent or things like burglary of the person or their home everything else is to a huge extent disregarded.

    But corruption and fraud is the huge crime that dwarfs everything else and impoverish and deprive people more than anything else. And its everywhere aided and abetted by rotten governance. And its why our political system does not work.

    And of course the police do little to nothing to address such crime. White collar, big city, big corporate and two bit trough slurping politico pay.

    Feeding time in a hapless barrel of fish might be the analogy but as the elite get richer, and the vast majority poorer, does not anyone wonder why this actually is. Or are we all just accepting of the fraud that pervades all around feeding of our carcasses. But as this survey options show, corruption is not an issue to be asked about.

    And that’ll be why I believe that its the boat people that have brought all our ills.

    Reply
    • Hatey McHateface says:

      Vast increase in the crime you write of, Willie.

      Vast increase in the boat people, too,

      Vast increase in low level disorder, mobs roaming the streets chanting in Arabic, hassling of women in public places, knife injuries and deaths, carrying of edged weapons, drug dealing, petty theft and reset, etc.

      Correlation is not causation.

      People protesting about the dumping of several hundred functionally illiterate, unskilled, medievalist-mindset young men in the middle of their community, knowing that the very first thing each and every one of these young men did to reach this shores was to deliberately break our law, have, of course, been conned by Farage and his ilk.

      Just keep repeating, correlation is not causation and you’ll be grand.

      Reply
      • The Flying Iron of Doom says:

        I am reminded of that Green party wifie Rachel Millward, she being the one who declared that she wanted Wales to be a “nation of sanctuary” only to become rather shirty when plans were announced to dump a ton of “asylum seekers” within the vicinity of her fancy £1.5 million hoosie. Quelle surprise, eh? 🙄

  13. Peter McAvoy says:

    It looks like the SNP support for Independence is Not Proven and will soon disappear like the legal safeguard they have called a legal idiosyncrisy.

    While early release of criminals will continue.

    Reply
  14. Bilbo says:

    Upon reading a comment in this thread that mentioned PayPal Kavanagh’s site, I made the mistake of having a lurk on it.

    His latest ‘article’, tries to conflate this case with the current immigration political crisis and even has the audacity to call ordinary men heterosexual cisgender.

    This sums up the SNP, much like Labour and the Greens, a hotbed of competing idealogies who are not interested in the core aims of their party.

    As I said previously, once the SNP electorally loses the right to govern in Holyrood, expect the rats to desert the sinking ship including PayPaul Kavanagh.

    Reply
    • Hatey McHateface says:

      Looks like you’ll have another 5 years of saying it then.

      Just think how good your cut-and-paste technique will be by 2031.

      Reply
      • Bilbo says:

        Who’s the loser?

        Me with the cut and paste jobs at every election or you and your multiple accounts stalking everybody on this site?

        Everybody has someone living rent free in their heads at one time in their lives, you have everyone in this site living rent free in your head 24/7

        RALMFAO

      • Hatey McHateface says:

        Multiple accounts, Bilbo? How you must wish that was true.

        My “stalking” of you was me pointing out the quite uncontroversial fact that the SNP currently look most likely to be comfortably in charge of Scotland’s destiny for another 5 years, taking their tenure through to 2031.

        Suck it up. The truth may set you free.

        And for the sweet love of the divine baby Jesus, could some 12 YO explain, using block capitals, cartoon voices and sock puppets, just WTAF “24/7” means to those congenital eejits who keep using the term whilst being abysmally ignorant of what it stands for.

  15. Hatey McHateface says:

    Say what you like about the Covid Spreaders, but they know how to stamp out tranny behaviour.

    Check out the BBC Online report on the undercover investigation into Covid Central’s schools for “rebellious” teens.

    Nothing like a bit of corrective rape to sort out these deluded youngsters!

    Reply
  16. A2 says:

    thing is , If you realise indi isn’t going to be happening any time soon, then you will prioritise things that might possibly be addressed.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,852 Posts, 1,232,333 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Cynicus on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mark Beggan says: 13 December, 2025 at 6:26 pm “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.” ======== Is that a…Dec 14, 00:21
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “No, Hatey, I get it completely because I’m a woman, and my survival as a woman depends on my getting…Dec 13, 23:37
    • william G Walker on How Far To Go, How Far: “Saffron Robe is right in his forensic analysis as led by Stuart. He is also right in “objective reality” and…Dec 13, 22:30
    • McDuff on How Far To Go, How Far: “Rev you are worth your weight in gold!Dec 13, 21:34
    • Saffron Robe on How Far To Go, How Far: “Forensic analysis of the highest order, Stuart, of immense benefit to all those interested in the pursuit of justice which…Dec 13, 21:00
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “Far more importantly, if the pattern on the carpet has left an indelible mark, what tartan is it? That’s the…Dec 13, 20:26
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “@Alf Baird When you write that the need for decolonisation is “absolute and urgent” I wonder how it is that…Dec 13, 20:22
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “You missed one, Northy, phallusy.Dec 13, 20:06
    • Hatey McHateface on The ginger stepchild: “Multiple accounts, Bilbo? How you must wish that was true. My “stalking” of you was me pointing out the quite…Dec 13, 19:58
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “I meant to do this earlier, but forgot. Here it is now, better late than never. Correction: “through-away” in paragraph…Dec 13, 19:05
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “I reckon 3-1 to St Mirren tomorrow.Dec 13, 18:26
    • Andy Wiltshire on How Far To Go, How Far: “Mistakes tending to both sides of a controversial question roughly equally may well be just mistakes. If they all point…Dec 13, 16:49
    • James Barr Gardner on How Far To Go, How Far: “The real problem is ye jist cannae git the staff these days !Dec 13, 15:40
    • Marie on How Far To Go, How Far: “That’s EXACTLY what it looks like.Dec 13, 15:03
    • Sven on How Far To Go, How Far: “You’d know, I’m sure, I wish you well “James Cheyne”; were every independence minded Scot as single minded, determined and…Dec 13, 14:56
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “Nae bother, James. The longer you stay around here the better as far as I’m concerned. And thanks for the…Dec 13, 14:55
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““But that flame still burns.” I’ll tell you what ‘burns’… YOUR SHITTY RHETORIC! BOOM!!! Northcode drops the “Ad Hominem”, arm…Dec 13, 14:46
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “robertkknight, Better together, as the prime ministers statement once said. Why not have the upper ruling class grouped with the…Dec 13, 14:36
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “North code. Thank for those kind words, It would appear that I could be here for as long as the…Dec 13, 14:23
    • robertkknight on How Far To Go, How Far: “I don’t think that there are any depths left to which the NuSNP Govt. won’t stoop. For years they’ve been…Dec 13, 13:55
    • Jill on How Far To Go, How Far: “Me too.Dec 13, 13:45
    • Stu on How Far To Go, How Far: “Lomcal, I don’t think there is. Like I said, if a judge was hypothetically going to go for a specific…Dec 13, 13:17
    • Rob on How Far To Go, How Far: “I normally don’t normally give much credence to conspiracy theories, basic incompetence usually explains most of the screw up. However…Dec 13, 13:16
    • Jill on How Far To Go, How Far: “The most generous reading of this debacle is that the judge is incompetent. I’m inclined to be less generous. Trans…Dec 13, 13:09
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “I for one will be sorry to see you leave this place, James. Your stoical perseverance in acquiring and presenting…Dec 13, 12:58
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “Is that carpet burns on Swinney’s face?Dec 13, 12:50
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Thoughts for today, I will retire and make way for others after the two year long wait from DWP and…Dec 13, 12:36
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: ““…I write, as always, to educate the readers on the world’s most-read Indy website.” We uneducated plebians here on “the…Dec 13, 12:22
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “The gender issue of how to use women and children spaces as a trademark fetish is dangerous. I suppose if…Dec 13, 12:06
    • Northcode on How Far To Go, How Far: “An excellent comment, Alf.Dec 13, 11:45
  • A tall tale



↑ Top