The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The Eternal War

Posted on July 13, 2019 by

Galaxy Wars, released by Universal in 1979, is one of the first wave of "proper" arcade videogames (defined here as coded on ROM chips rather than being semi-mechanical or solid-state like Pong). 

Running on a hacked Space Invaders board (as most of the first wave did), it actually bears a lot of similarities to Taito's 1978 blockbuster. It's got UFOs running across the top of the screen, above a field of asteroids which move one way across the screen, then drop down a level when they reach the edge and start moving back across in the opposite direction.

The screen was a monochrome reflector – sometimes supplemented by sheets of coloured cellophane to mimic a colour display – and all the sound effects are ripped straight from Invaders.

It was a pretty dull game, and other than an inexplicable Japan-only SNES port in 1995 (which seems to have been the only ever licenced home version on any format) it made very little impact on posterity.

Until this week, when it suddenly threatened to become mildly interesting.

A thing I like to do to relax is mess around with my Raspberry Pi, and more specifically its installation of the incredible multi-emulation platform Retropie. I've spent hundreds of hours curating my setup into a definitive gaming museum, with nice artwork on all the game lists, and sometimes that means making my own box art for homebrew games or ones that nobody's preserved a box for.

Below, for example, are ones I mocked up for the brilliant recent Spectrum ports of Kung-Fu Master (as Mister Kung-Fu) and New Rally-X (as Maze Death Rally X), both of which were pleasingly adopted by the games' authors as the "official" box art.

A rich seam of material for such things are the flyers for the original arcade games, and so it proved this week when I knocked up a couple of quick covers for homebrew ports of Galaxy Wars, on the Speccy and obscure Japanese micro the Sharp X-68000.

While digging out the Galaxy Wars flyers ("BIG SCREEN & FANTASTIC ACOUSTIC EFFECT EXPANDING YOUR INTEREST!!"), I came across something that tickled me.

Universal had made a major selling point out of the exciting feature that the game, um, occasionally displayed words on the screen. So with an evening to kill (and a cheat mode enabled), I decided to see them all for myself. The first four took a while, but showed up in due order.

So far so not very interesting. But the final message, "GIVE UP !!", offered up a tantalising prospect. It rather suggested that the game could be beaten, and if so would almost certainly be the first arcade game ever to have an end.

(Early coin-ops just went on forever – unless stopped by bugs in the code, as with Pac-Man and Donkey Kong – leading to incredible endurance feats of people playing a single credit for literally days, before arcade operators wised up that this sort of thing wasn't making them any money. Nowadays a game like Mario Kart Arcade GP not only has an end, but you have to pay for the next race even if you win the previous one, making even a "perfect" completion cost over £120 at £1 a credit.)

At that point, Galaxy Wars turned from "pretty dull" to sheer purgatory. It starts off boringly easy, with just five asteroids onscreen obstructing the path of your missile to the enemy UFOs.

The space rocks move in a fixed pattern. All the ones moving from left to right do so at a uniform speed, taking about 13 seconds to traverse the screen. The ones moving from right to left also all move at a uniform speed, but a much slower one – about a quarter as fast, taking around 52 seconds for the journey.

(This creates quite an effective illusion of chaos for very few bytes of code.)

With every wave you clear, an extra asteroid is added, up to a maximum of 32. 

This makes the game harder, which is fair enough, but after a brief period of enjoyable challenge at around 15-20 asteroids it also rapidly makes it agonisingly tedious to endure, because of a surprise intervention from Galactic Health & Safety.

The bottom level of meteors is low enough to ram into your missile while it sits on its mobile launchpad. So in the same way as in the actual game of Asteroids, the CPU won't bring your new missile into existence after you lose one (either by dying or wiping out a UFO) until it judges that it's safe to do so without it getting immediately crumped by a space rock.

And it interprets that rule very conservatively, to the point where it needs a gap between asteroids that's almost 40% of the width of the screen.

Universal had probably never anticipated anyone making it to the game's maximum difficulty, because with 32 asteroids onscreen, and the twin-speed movement pattern, what happens is that you can have to wait for an eternity before Galaxy Wars feels it's safe to let you play. The longest gap I timed from the explosion of one missile to the materialisation of the next was 1m 54s.

(This is because the bottom level moves right to left, and hence very slowly. Meanwhile rocks from the level above, going four times as fast, catch up with the slow-moving bottom level and close up the gaps before you can get a missile in. The problem would have been far less acute if the bottom row had been a fast row.)

I'd kind of hoped that there'd only be one 32-asteroid level and then you'd win. That'd have meant 27 stages all told, which seemed to fit fairly reasonably with the 3-7-10-15 sequence of the first four messages, and would still mean a demanding 12 tough levels from "FANTASTIC !!" to "GIVE UP !!".

But no. Five increasingly-painful hours in, I'd beaten several 32-rock screens with no end in sight. And thenI had a look on Wikipedia and got a cold chill.

Fortunately, as with so much videogame information on Wikipedia, this turned out to be complete rubbish. Dying with a score of 0 just gets you a straight "GAME OVER". I even tried losing all my missiles on the launchpad without getting any of them airborne, but the result was the same.

So it MIGHT still be the case that we've discovered the first ever finite arcade game. As I write this, I'm another couple of hours into 32-asteroid stages with no sign of an ending. But since everything else on the flyer has proved to be true, there's no reason to believe that the dastardly aliens won't surrender eventually.

The really scary thing, though, is that even after all these levels I'm only on 88,750 points, and the flyer claims a scoreboard going all the way up to a million.

It now takes roughly half an hour to clear a single screen (with a couple of minutes between missiles, eight UFOs to down and multiple attempts needed for each one, because with 32 asteroids onscreen the game is incredibly hard), and if I'm going to need another 900,000 points then at a maximum of around 4,000 a stage – on later levels more realistically under 2,000 – we could be here for a while. 

If I should die, readers, someone come round and take over my save state. The aliens only win if we GIVE UP !! before they do.

.

[EDIT: The "GIVE UP !!" screen appeared a few levels later. The game continued afterwards, slightly disappointingly.]

0 to “The Eternal War”

  1. Da5e says:

    I'm always cheered up when I see my WoS RSS feed ping. I hope we get a weekly report on your progress here, Stu.

     

    Hey, have you played Earth Defense Force 5, yet?

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,762 Posts, 1,218,637 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Sorry Alf. Common sense tells me that even if you accept the existence of the Coloniser (with one set of…May 27, 20:00
    • Hatey McHateface on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Be honest now, Marie. Wouldn’t you be better for shedding a few pounds? If you don’t want to entertain any…May 27, 19:39
    • sarah on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I am really surprised at that response from ISP. I’ve read and thought over the MforI and cannot see anything…May 27, 19:26
    • duncanio on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “twathater I have supported SSRG, Salvo and Liberation since inception, having attended the Edinburgh Proclamation gathering on 1st September 2022…May 27, 19:13
    • Alf Baird on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “We cannot treat “the colonial question…as a subsidiary part of some more important global matter” (Robin D. G. Kelley). And…May 27, 18:47
    • twathater on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I agree with you Sarah regarding Roddy and Peter Bell, duncanio criticises Liberate for having no publicly clear immediate route…May 27, 18:25
    • Marie on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Correct BP.May 27, 18:22
    • Dave G on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I’m glad you even manage to see a “Brit” identity. It is now routine to walk down High Street or…May 27, 18:18
    • Aidan on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Yes, that was the motivation behind the blue sea rule. The legal principles on decolonisation and NSGT’s were agreed by…May 27, 17:42
    • duncanio on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Sarah – We don’t have the luxury of time. Every time there is an election it could be the last…May 27, 17:33
    • Xaracen on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “But, Aidan, how can the ‘blue water’ requirement be “fundamental” when you made it clear to me that its purpose…May 27, 17:04
    • James Cheyne on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I have been squinting quickly through, Textual Amendments to “Scotland union with England” Acts House of Lords ( privileges Committee…May 27, 16:43
    • Northcode on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Hello, Sam. Good to know you’re still about this place. “We are much the same genetic material now as in…May 27, 16:21
    • sarah on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “That is indeed interesting about the party whip system. I’d love to see their candidate win.May 27, 16:14
    • sarah on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “@ duncanio at 11.23 p.m. and twathater at 03.33. Thank you, twathater for correctly pointing out my motivation for supporting…May 27, 16:12
    • Northcode on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: ““Towards decolonization and then liberation.” Indeed, Alf. The third and final phase of Scotland’s decolonization has begun there’s no doubt…May 27, 16:04
    • Kelpie on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I live in Hamilton so we have people canvassing and leaf-letting for the by-election next week. I’ve never had so…May 27, 16:01
    • sarah on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I enjoyed reading this, Robert. Brought a smile, much needed.May 27, 15:51
    • James Barr Gardner on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Wallonia has the right of veto in Belgian Federal decisions, it’s population of 3.7 million is 31.4% of Belgium……..May 27, 15:32
    • Breastplate on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Yes, John, you’re correct, it is something you eat, particularly in Scotland. What the English call rolls, tend to be…May 27, 14:25
    • Alf Baird on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “A soond analysis Robert. Yer deid richt, thar’s faur too mony jubous poleetical assumotions in this piece. Poetry theory is…May 27, 14:10
    • sam on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Hello again Northcode. Genetic studies of the Scots identify how little change there has been within Scots. We are much…May 27, 13:55
    • Hatey McHateface on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “It’s defo interesting you don’t believe in viruses, Billy. Back in the early decades of the last century, the inhabitants…May 27, 13:11
    • Lorn on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Spot on, Susan. In order to do that, we need to create new and sustainable industries across the board, and,…May 27, 12:44
    • Lorn on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “It is true, twathater, that our politicians have gone out of their way to penalize women who do not work…May 27, 12:37
    • Anne Johnston on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Absolute stauncher by Don Paterson.. from a fellow Scot X… Also..Toy Fights.May 27, 12:36
    • Billy Carlin on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “Hatey McHateface Oh Dear! One of those who do not want to use their own brains. First off there was…May 27, 12:32
    • James Cheyne on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “The down fall and hollowing out of Scotland and changing its ethic population and culture were dilberate actions talen, The…May 27, 12:30
    • Hatey McHateface on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “@ Billy Carlin says:27 May, 2025 at 11:31 am So what you’re saying is that we don’t actually need Indy…May 27, 12:25
    • Aidan on What Are We, And Where Are We Going?: “I won’t be aghast, the failure to even address the fundamental ‘blue water’ requirement just continues to show that this…May 27, 12:23
  • A tall tale



↑ Top