The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Rangers FC RIP

Posted on June 12, 2012 by

Rangers Football Club, formed in 1872, will formally cease to exist later this week. In a surprise development (in terms of its timing, not its content), HMRC have officially stated that they will reject the club’s proposed Company Voluntary Arrangement at the creditors’ meeting scheduled to take place this coming Thursday, June 14. The news was confirmed when the club’s administrators Duff & Phelps issued a press release stating their intention to go ahead with a plan to sell Rangers FC’s assets to a consortium led by businessman Charles Green for £5.5m.

There is, however, a great deal of debate about whether such  plan can go ahead. A fascinating blog by Scottish lawyer Paul McConville last week observed that HMRC had already put in place its own preferred liquidators should the CVA proposal be rejected, and it’s hard to see how Duff & Phelps can go ahead with the asset sale in the event of a legal challenge from creditors. Since HMRC has rejected the CVA and has its chosen liquidators standing ready, it seems highly likely that it, or some other creditor/s, would mount such a challenge.

There can be little doubt that the assets of Rangers FC – the playing staff and property portfolio, including Ibrox Stadium and Murray Park – ought to be able to realise significantly more than the £5.5m Green is offering. (Since the money Green proposed to use to buy the club with was in the form of a loan to be recouped from the survival and continued trading of the club, it’s also uncertain whether it’s actually on the table in any real sense.)

Even if the players’s contracts are held to be voided by the liquidation of the club (also the subject of debate) and they can move on without any transfer fees, it’s difficult to see how the property alone, even allowing for its partially- listed status, could fail to be worth at least double the supposed sale price, and the liquidators will be duty-bound to maximise the returns for creditors by at least opening the sale process up to competing bids, including those not seeking to use the property for football purposes.

Duff & Phelps and Charles Green have both insisted that despite liquidation Rangers Football Club will survive, under the same name, and continue to play at Ibrox. Such claims, stated by both parties as certainties, seem to lack any credibility. Further intriguing developments, we’re sure, are not far away.

6 to “Rangers FC RIP”

  1. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Duff and Phillips are now saying that there is a binding contract to sell the assets to a new entity under the control of Green.
     
    Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.
     
    So, how can D & P sell Rangers’ assets and at the price stated, which could be much less than could be achieved and considering that the sales price is in fact a loan and HMRC will get nowt of that?
     
    I can see this staggering through the Court of Session

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.”

    Well, not so much that I say it as that someone far better versed in Scots law than I says it, and not so much “will attempt to” as “already has”. Do read Mr McConville’s blog, it’s very informative.

    Reply
  3. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I have been reading the blog by Mr McConville but my damn browser (Firefox) crashes when I try to follow some of the links within.
     
    Somebody is talking waffle and I suspect the it is D & P; they have form you know.
     
    The BBC is suggesting that HMRC will go for David Murray and the Whyte Night.

    I wonder if that other rumour on an earlier blog of a South African connection could have substance.
     
     
    Popcorn and a (neverending) sixpack called for.

    Reply
  4. Jim says:

    Sorry. Get facts right. The business is liquidated. Not the club or the history of the club. So take RIP and shove it as far up your ………..

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      The business is the club. The clue is in the name of the business: Rangers Football Club PLC. It’s not exactly cryptic.

      It’s all pretty academic, because one way or another there’s absolutely no chance now that any kind of Rangers is coming out of this alive. If the Appellate Tribunal doesn’t do the job and the SPL members bottle it, the dual-contracts case will fill the coffin full of nails and dump it out at sea. And even if it somehow floats back to shore staggers on like a zombie Rasputin after that, Green will sell out to Tesco, because the last thing he ever wanted was to be lumbered with a loss-making football club. It’s worth far more to him broken up for parts than anyone will ever pay for it as a going concern.

      Jim McColl and Douglas Park are worth close to a billion quid between them – £20m is pocket change. So why haven’t they just paid up if they love Rangers so much? Answer: because since the dual-contracts announcement they know it’s doomed beyond salvation. Start making alternative plans for your Saturdays.

      Reply
  5. Bandage says:

    Rangers can’t have it both ways. They want to get rid of the debt but keep thehistory. The debt was used to fraudulently buy every title since the late 80s. 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,753 Posts, 1,217,502 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Yoon Scum on A Poor Example: “Why did Alex Salmond never use one of these magic spells to free Scotland? Surely using a simple incantation is…May 11, 06:08
    • Yoon Scum on A Poor Example: “On the subject of religious articles Seeing that the UN is going to be calling up the king any day…May 11, 06:02
    • Yoon Scum on A Poor Example: “So you want controlled immigration Welcome to the FAR RIGHTMay 11, 05:58
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Poor Example: “Just came across an old paperback in a box of books in the loft. Following is an extract from ‘OUR…May 11, 01:39
    • sam on A Poor Example: “https://www.legalfeminist.org.uk/May 10, 21:17
    • Hatey McHateface on A Poor Example: “Sure. The white English come in for a lot of stick on here, some of it well deserved too. Defo…May 10, 21:07
    • Scot Finlayson on A Poor Example: “The biggest immigrant population in Scotland is white English, nearly 500,000,mostly in Edinburgh,East Lothian and Fife coast, it`s like Spain`s…May 10, 20:36
    • Alastair on A Poor Example: “Sorry but I have to challenge you. This is not a poor example… it an exact example of the absolute…May 10, 20:29
    • Hatey McHateface on A Poor Example: “I see that nice poot boy has insisted he leads his country in providing an “indestructible barrier against Nazism, Russo…May 10, 20:28
    • Hatey McHateface on A Poor Example: “It all starts to make sense if you imagine Mrs Humza is trans. That gets her a bye on all…May 10, 20:14
    • Dan on A Poor Example: “Immigration you say? C’mon YS, thought you said you’d been keeping an eye on us lot. Just because you’ve rocked…May 10, 18:15
    • Yoon Scum on A Poor Example: “That’s a very English attitude you are showing towards the glory of islam there If you’re a TRUE SCOT then…May 10, 17:00
    • twathater on A Poor Example: “If you try to force me to adhere to the laws and regulations LAID DOWN and enforced????? in Scotland and…May 10, 14:58
    • Yoon Scum on A Poor Example: “Should Scotland leave the union so we can have completely unlimited immigration? As the biggest driver behind the Reform vote…May 10, 14:12
    • Yoon Scum on The Last Thing They’ll Expect: “I’m glad to hear that you think we have brilliant apprentices Why aren’t as many interested WELL They can study…May 10, 13:02
    • Captain Caveman on A Poor Example: “O/T @RevStu Just read your post over at BEEX, almost choked on my Bran Flakes! Bravo. Haven’t laughed like that…May 10, 12:47
    • Dan on The Last Thing They’ll Expect: “yoon scum says: at 5:40 am “your post pisses me off and annoys me” Well that’s a result! But most…May 10, 12:35
    • Confused on A Poor Example: “relationship advice? this is un-islamic nonsense; I have 30 clerics opinions which tells me Humza can do what he likes,…May 10, 12:34
    • Andrea on A Poor Example: “This is what I would have thought. As to discrimination to other men, I can discriminate, say, according to educational…May 10, 12:26
    • Cuilean on A Poor Example: “Back to the Humzas original video pitch. The three responses are toe-curlingly sexist, as is the whole scenario depicted. To…May 10, 12:11
    • Dave G on A Poor Example: “Many people with skin in the trans game don’t want to understand the ruling and think if they ignore it…May 10, 11:58
    • Bilbo on A Poor Example: “It does feel that the only concrete outcome of the ruling has been safeguarding free speech and high profile activities…May 10, 11:55
    • agent x on A Poor Example: “https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/25146182.humza-yousaf-writes-india-pakistan-leaders-urge-restraint/ 7th May Former first minister Humza Yousaf and former Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar have written to the leaders of…May 10, 11:46
    • Owen Mullions on A Poor Example: “Can a concerned neighbour please check on James Kelly on SGP as he seems to have suffered a complete mental…May 10, 11:04
    • James Cheyne on A Poor Example: “And I wonder what would happen if 98-% of Scotland refused to vote at local and main elections. And the…May 10, 10:36
    • Neil McKenzie on A Poor Example: “Kin hell, 3 answers to st Yer bawsMay 10, 10:30
    • Vivian O’Blivion on A Poor Example: “Five, Westminster voting intention polls conducted with field work exclusively in May. Average results as follows: RefUK 29.8%, Lab 22%…May 10, 10:21
    • A2 on A Poor Example: “nah, you just need to make sure it is.May 10, 10:15
    • SilentMajority on A Poor Example: “There will no doubt be blatant attempts to ignore or circumvent the law. Hopefully those who have previously been pressured…May 10, 10:15
    • aLurker on The Last Thing They’ll Expect: “Hi Stuart MacKay. This seems like an opportunity to ask you how does that ranking actually work? i.e. how do…May 10, 10:11
  • A tall tale



↑ Top