The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Rangers FC RIP

Posted on June 12, 2012 by

Rangers Football Club, formed in 1872, will formally cease to exist later this week. In a surprise development (in terms of its timing, not its content), HMRC have officially stated that they will reject the club’s proposed Company Voluntary Arrangement at the creditors’ meeting scheduled to take place this coming Thursday, June 14. The news was confirmed when the club’s administrators Duff & Phelps issued a press release stating their intention to go ahead with a plan to sell Rangers FC’s assets to a consortium led by businessman Charles Green for £5.5m.

There is, however, a great deal of debate about whether such  plan can go ahead. A fascinating blog by Scottish lawyer Paul McConville last week observed that HMRC had already put in place its own preferred liquidators should the CVA proposal be rejected, and it’s hard to see how Duff & Phelps can go ahead with the asset sale in the event of a legal challenge from creditors. Since HMRC has rejected the CVA and has its chosen liquidators standing ready, it seems highly likely that it, or some other creditor/s, would mount such a challenge.

There can be little doubt that the assets of Rangers FC – the playing staff and property portfolio, including Ibrox Stadium and Murray Park – ought to be able to realise significantly more than the £5.5m Green is offering. (Since the money Green proposed to use to buy the club with was in the form of a loan to be recouped from the survival and continued trading of the club, it’s also uncertain whether it’s actually on the table in any real sense.)

Even if the players’s contracts are held to be voided by the liquidation of the club (also the subject of debate) and they can move on without any transfer fees, it’s difficult to see how the property alone, even allowing for its partially- listed status, could fail to be worth at least double the supposed sale price, and the liquidators will be duty-bound to maximise the returns for creditors by at least opening the sale process up to competing bids, including those not seeking to use the property for football purposes.

Duff & Phelps and Charles Green have both insisted that despite liquidation Rangers Football Club will survive, under the same name, and continue to play at Ibrox. Such claims, stated by both parties as certainties, seem to lack any credibility. Further intriguing developments, we’re sure, are not far away.

6 to “Rangers FC RIP”

  1. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Duff and Phillips are now saying that there is a binding contract to sell the assets to a new entity under the control of Green.
     
    Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.
     
    So, how can D & P sell Rangers’ assets and at the price stated, which could be much less than could be achieved and considering that the sales price is in fact a loan and HMRC will get nowt of that?
     
    I can see this staggering through the Court of Session

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.”

    Well, not so much that I say it as that someone far better versed in Scots law than I says it, and not so much “will attempt to” as “already has”. Do read Mr McConville’s blog, it’s very informative.

    Reply
  3. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I have been reading the blog by Mr McConville but my damn browser (Firefox) crashes when I try to follow some of the links within.
     
    Somebody is talking waffle and I suspect the it is D & P; they have form you know.
     
    The BBC is suggesting that HMRC will go for David Murray and the Whyte Night.

    I wonder if that other rumour on an earlier blog of a South African connection could have substance.
     
     
    Popcorn and a (neverending) sixpack called for.

    Reply
  4. Jim says:

    Sorry. Get facts right. The business is liquidated. Not the club or the history of the club. So take RIP and shove it as far up your ………..

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      The business is the club. The clue is in the name of the business: Rangers Football Club PLC. It’s not exactly cryptic.

      It’s all pretty academic, because one way or another there’s absolutely no chance now that any kind of Rangers is coming out of this alive. If the Appellate Tribunal doesn’t do the job and the SPL members bottle it, the dual-contracts case will fill the coffin full of nails and dump it out at sea. And even if it somehow floats back to shore staggers on like a zombie Rasputin after that, Green will sell out to Tesco, because the last thing he ever wanted was to be lumbered with a loss-making football club. It’s worth far more to him broken up for parts than anyone will ever pay for it as a going concern.

      Jim McColl and Douglas Park are worth close to a billion quid between them – £20m is pocket change. So why haven’t they just paid up if they love Rangers so much? Answer: because since the dual-contracts announcement they know it’s doomed beyond salvation. Start making alternative plans for your Saturdays.

      Reply
  5. Bandage says:

    Rangers can’t have it both ways. They want to get rid of the debt but keep thehistory. The debt was used to fraudulently buy every title since the late 80s. 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,846 Posts, 1,231,771 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “The NuSNP are part of that system as are the devolved governments. Minor control given but altimate control reserved.Dec 6, 10:15
    • Hatey McHateface on The cost of failure: “Some people like to point out that the Earth has a billion or two more people on it than it…Dec 6, 10:11
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “Repeating the same political policies in every governance over all the nations, most of them have roots (as a tool)…Dec 6, 10:06
    • Hatey McHateface on The cost of failure: ““Next time brown skinned people make you feel uncomfortable have a look in the mirror” Not if they’re coming at…Dec 6, 09:58
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “Treaties being altered, repealed, textual changes, breached, not adhered too, used for annexation purposes, and control taken over by one…Dec 6, 09:57
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “What is interesting is how Canadians are saying prices are rising in every quarter over there causing the economical downfall…Dec 6, 09:43
    • Hatey McHateface on The cost of failure: “So the “gas the Jews” remarks aren’t going to be forgotten, Confused? Wow. Where does that leave you?Dec 6, 09:32
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “Nigel Farage is also someone whom annouced that he would say no to Scotland if he came to power. With…Dec 6, 09:20
    • Confused on The cost of failure: “Farage was a good laff the other day, pointing out what the BBC was up to in the 1970s -…Dec 5, 23:04
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “Stu, good journalism, Catch up in morning, am tired and away to bed.Dec 5, 22:29
    • Colin Alexander on The cost of failure: “There is no pro-indy vs Pro-union division at Holyrood. That’s just a theatrical show for the gullible. The parasite political…Dec 5, 22:28
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “AI primeminster? I think one is being trial right now, he’s like a robert.Dec 5, 22:24
    • Iain More on The cost of failure: “SNP – Bought and Sold for Sassanach Gold sic a parcel o traitors in a Nation.Dec 5, 22:23
    • Mark Beggan on The cost of failure: “France 98′ The penalty against Brazil and that Uri Bellend and his voodoo. Bring it on!Dec 5, 21:59
    • James Cheyne on The cost of failure: “Stu, the network and funding for the likes of Ending Scottish independence and slowly demolishing the Snp funding to negative…Dec 5, 21:45
    • Maxxmacc on The cost of failure: “Apart from Brazil its a good draw. And Brazil arent what they used to be. One victory might be enough…Dec 5, 21:45
    • sarah on The cost of failure: “Groupo del muerte: Brazil, Morocco and Haiti. Sigh.Dec 5, 19:04
    • agentx on The cost of failure: “Hope you have your football wall charts at the ready guys 🙂Dec 5, 17:14
    • Cynicus on The cost of failure: “Hatey McHateface says: 5 December, 2025 at 1:25 pm ‘“Mr el Nakla hails from Dundee, correct?” Sorry, Cynicus, perhaps it’s…Dec 5, 16:02
    • Mark Beggan on The cost of failure: “This is out and it won’t go away. Too many in Scotland think that bad things get stopped at the…Dec 5, 15:54
    • factchecker on The cost of failure: “Every poll suggests that the SNP is unbeatable because pro-union votes are split 3 or 4 ways. Either not voting…Dec 5, 15:06
    • Sven on The cost of failure: “Mark Beggan @ 10.51. No chance in the world, Mark. These grifters only ever stop the gravy train long enough…Dec 5, 14:55
    • Jon Drummond on Ain’t Got Time To Bleed: “Brilliant Stu, You ripped that dude another dozen arseholes with that reply. I’m sure he’ll know what to do with…Dec 5, 13:26
    • Hatey McHateface on The cost of failure: ““Mr el Nakla hails from Dundee, correct?” Sorry, Cynicus, perhaps it’s just me. Mr El Nakla was born in Dundee.…Dec 5, 13:25
    • Cynicus on The cost of failure: “Hatey McHateface says: 5 December, 2025 at 7:50 am “The times they are a-changing, Cynicus.” ====== So too, yet again,…Dec 5, 12:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The cost of failure: “20 years is all it takes: https://unherd.com/2025/12/the-revolt-on-streetings-doorstep/ How far do we think Scotland is into that 20 year period? 5…Dec 5, 12:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The cost of failure: ““So upon the destruction of the SNP we need to immediately get behind the idea of Liberate Scotland” [SIGH] Which…Dec 5, 11:02
    • Mark Beggan on The cost of failure: “Grooming gangs debate today. Will Constance resign?Dec 5, 10:51
    • 100%Yes on The cost of failure: “If our so called leader was a true Independence support he wouldn’t have sacrificed these 39 MPs at last years…Dec 5, 10:34
    • 100%Yes on The cost of failure: “The National Says “Labour unwilling to support Scottish industry, John Swinney says”. Here is a prime example of what I…Dec 5, 09:45
  • A tall tale



↑ Top