The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off

Posted on March 24, 2026 by

The last faint hope of any remotely positive or at least interesting outcome of May’s election just left the building.

It wasn’t MUCH of a hope, and it’s absolutely no surprise in the wake of the comically shambolic, belief-defyingly inept farce that has been the birth of Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana’s fringe-of-the fringe Your Party, but all the same its extinguishing means the next two months will be even more of a waste of time than they looked like being.

Frankly, readers, we may as well not bother having an election at all.

Firstly because it’d save a fortune. A whopping 40 MSPs are standing down at the election, and they’ll all be eligible for redundancy payments (called “resettlement grants”), and some will also be eligible for additional payments for standing down as ministers or officeholders – we reckon Alison Johnstone, the current Presiding Officer, will score the biggest payday, picking up a tidy £105,706.

Most will trouser the maximum (£77,710), and the total will be in the region of £2.65 million. That’s a heck of a wedge for hard-pressed taxpayers to be laying out just because people have voluntarily decided they don’t want their jobs any more. (It’s not like we’re SAVING anything from their redundancies, because their roles will be taken over by new gravy-seekers.)

But it’s small beer compared to the overall cost of the election, which will be in the region of £50 million. The 2026-27 budget allots £37m for the election specifically, but there are various other costs and contingencies that come on top.

So what will we get for this £53m? Well, more of the same. While there’s actually a fairly wide range of possible arithmetical outcomes, they all amount to the same thing. There is zero doubt that the SNP will form the “new” government, and zero prospect of them doing anything differently.

The best-case scenario for the SNP (though it’d actually be a nightmare) is probably around 66 seats, backed up with double-digit Greens. The absolute worst-case for them, if Unionists really get their tactical voting together – which they won’t – is maybe 45-50, which would still be double anyone else, and there’d be no credible way for anyone else to get enough support to form a government.

The Unionist parties will rearrange the deckchairs, swapping a bunch of Labour and Tory MSPs for Reform ones, but all will be equally irrelevant. Polling (which is all over the shop) suggests that Reform, Labour and even the Greens are in the running for second place, but who other than themselves actually cares? (There is no “official opposition” at Holyrood.)

Independence? Don’t make us laugh. Less than a quarter of SNP voters even think it’s a pressing issue, and no other party’s voters are interested in the constitution either. Everyone knows it’s a dead political duck and only political pundits and (during the campaign) candidates are forced for professional reasons to pretend otherwise.

A “pro-independence” majority now looks all but a certainty with the collapse of Your Party Scotland, and an SNP-alone majority is a possibility, but neither outcome would be any different to a minority and more to the point, everyone knows it. Whatever the result, the SNP will bleat pitifully at Keir Starmer for another referendum, Starmer will tell them to sod off, and they’ll scuttle away happily to bag another five years’ wages.

So why are we bothering with six more weeks of wretched, transparent pretence that anything about this election matters? Nothing will change except the names on the paycheques. We’d be as well just carrying on as we are, and if anyone wants to stand down we’ll just have a by-election. The only real losers would be Reform, but pretty much everyone seems to hate them anyway (including, irrationally, SNP voters) so there wouldn’t be much of a protest.

Of course, we’d still be left with a useless government almost nobody likes. Barely half of SNP voters think the party’s record has been even fairly good in anything but the vague, unmeasurable “standing up for Scotland”.

And almost six in ten of them are unwilling to even say John Swinney is “honest”, let alone have faith in him to turn the country around.

But they understandably don’t think any of the other halfwits applying for his job are any better. Hilariously, the least unpopular political leader in Scotland is the Lib Dem UK leader Ed Davey, who gets a negative approval rating of only -9, mainly because 57% of Scots can’t be bothered to have an opinion of him at all.

(Swinney gets -17 in seventh place, just below Russell Findlay and Malcolm Offord on -16 each, and Anas Sarwar gets a brutal -31, although he’ll be pleased to be only seven points behind Nicola Sturgeon. Nigel Farage and Keir Starmer tie for last on -52, so it’s not looking good Prime Minister-wise for the UK for the next nine years. Poor old Humza Yousaf, meanwhile, doesn’t even get a look-in.)

Last night STV called this “the scunnered election”, but we think a better word is “accursed”, because like COVID-19 it’s a plague nobody wants but that we’re all going to have to grit our teeth and endure anyway, at enormous cost to the public purse, to gain nothing.

The Six Nations is over and the World Cup isn’t until June. If you’ve been thinking of taking a lengthy holiday somewhere with no internet access, readers, there’s never been a better time than now.

0 to “Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off”

  1. sarah says:

    Well, this poll proves, yet again, that pollsters ask people who have no idea of what is really going on in politics.

    I think, Rev, that you are mistaken in saying that 10% of poll answers will support anything e.g. eating people. That looks to be a conservative estimate.

    “Standing up for Scotland”? The pollsters must have asked only current SNP and Green MSPs to get over 75% agreeing. They haven’t stood up except to bow to some billionaire or other as they hand over OUR assets.

    I’m afraid that hope is fading on the election bringing in better people into Holyrood. A plague on all their houses is my earnest prayer.

    Reply
  2. Alf Baird says:

    The wages of colonialism.

    Reply
  3. Mark Beggan says:

    Alright everybody. The electron’s here. Beautiful Scotland. Great people. Run by lunatics and morons. Ok. Everybody knows this. You have an undertaker as a First Minister. Unbelievable. Your country is a disaster. You’ve been led by the Alphabet people. Very low IQ people. How will that work out. Not good. Very sad.

    Baby Trump.

    Reply
  4. Cynicus says:

    This was always on the cards- after Craig Murrays’s (latest) defection.

    Reply
  5. James Che says:

    Lets call the whole thing off is a good idea,
    This is meant to be a Scottish election, not parties registered from down south, sucking finances oout of Scotlands people pockets.
    Colonialism in the devolved parliament sent to Scotland under Englands Westminster parliament legislation.
    And Scotland not in the treaty of union or in the Anglo Ireland agreement.
    Colonialism is accurate in phrase legally. Lets call the joke off. And run a Scottish election from Scotland with Scottish parties registered from Scotland.

    Reply
  6. Northcode says:

    “So what will we get for this £53m?”

    A cheap, and not very entertaining, second-rate circus laid on by Westminster to fool the Scots into believing they live in a democracy instead of a colony.

    £53 million is a small beer bribe to keep the Scottish colony’s riches flowing unhampered southward to England only to be pissed away on nostalgic imperial grandstanding and whatever other ‘fancy new clothes’ England wants to pimp itself around the world wearing; flamboyantly spending Scotland’s wealth and calling that stolen wealth its own.

    “Frankly, readers, we may as well not bother having an election at all.”

    And the Scots may as well not bother turning up to vote in Westminster’s cheap-seats farcical circus clown show of democracy.

    England will happily spend billions of Scotland’s money to maintain the illusion of a real and fair Union and an equal partnership and still make billions in profit out of the Scots while the Scots grow poorer and more desperate with each new Westminster-sponsored Scottish Parliamentary dancing clown and puppet show festival for fools.

    Reply
  7. 100%Yes says:

    New poll predicts a 18 Pro-Indy majority lead for May’s election, so what? The parliament has had a Pro-Indy majority before and nothing has come of it.

    For me I’m not surprised at all about Your Party not running. So Westminster here we come and of course I’m talking about Your Party.

    Indy supporters are going to have to look at the next Westminster election if they want Independence. If Your party got its act together and won the Westminster election even with the greens help to form a UK government in everything could change in the UK.

    I feel sure Your Party will be up and running for the Westminster election because that’s where the money and power is and lets remember certain individuals want to be elected again.

    If Craig Murray is correct about Your Party and the information we’ve heard from the Greens south of the border is correct about granting Scotland a new constitutional settlement on the question of Independence the SNP might have just signed there own death warrant on banking everything on Holyrood election.

    The SNP have proven without a doubt that the party cannot deliver Independence and the party certainly cannot win a Westminster election and Your party isn’t going to help the SNP win the Westminster election when Your Party can offer what the SNP have admitted they cannot.

    Lets be honest, all of us part from ManChild realized that if the SNP told its supporters to vote for the SNP 1 and ATLS 2 they’d have the majority they needed, but they didn’t, they told everyone to vote SNP 1 & 2 which isn’t going to work and the only person who believes that is ManChild. The SNP could have formed a new party calling it the SNP2 and told everyone that they needed to vote for SNP2 on the list, but they didn’t. There is so many ways the SNP could have won the election to John Swinney specifications but they didn’t and the leadership might just pay a hefty price in the Westminster election if other party’s In England stand by there guns On Scotland.

    Reply
  8. 100%Yes says:

    I’d say John Swinney couldn’t turn a car around never mind the Country. The man is so unappealing I wish someone would throw him a wig.

    Reply
  9. Rob says:

    The de Hondt system is skewed to stop having a majority but essentially if enough folk wanted the SNP out they could.
    The problem is that a majority of those who actually vote, vote for the SNP.

    Reply
  10. Cherrybank says:

    I think Craig Houston the You Tuber representing the SDP will be a surprise winner of a seat on the Glasgow list vote.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,888 Posts, 1,238,373 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Cherrybank on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “I think Craig Houston the You Tuber representing the SDP will be a surprise winner of a seat on the…Mar 24, 15:42
    • Rob on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “The de Hondt system is skewed to stop having a majority but essentially if enough folk wanted the SNP out…Mar 24, 15:29
    • 100%Yes on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “I’d say John Swinney couldn’t turn a car around never mind the Country. The man is so unappealing I wish…Mar 24, 14:58
    • 100%Yes on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “New poll predicts a 18 Pro-Indy majority lead for May’s election, so what? The parliament has had a Pro-Indy majority…Mar 24, 14:46
    • Northcode on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: ““So what will we get for this £53m?” A cheap, and not very entertaining, second-rate circus laid on by Westminster…Mar 24, 14:42
    • James Che on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “Lets call the whole thing off is a good idea, This is meant to be a Scottish election, not parties…Mar 24, 14:30
    • Cynicus on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “This was always on the cards- after Craig Murrays’s (latest) defection.Mar 24, 14:00
    • Mark Beggan on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “Alright everybody. The electron’s here. Beautiful Scotland. Great people. Run by lunatics and morons. Ok. Everybody knows this. You have…Mar 24, 13:53
    • Alf Baird on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “The wages of colonialism.Mar 24, 13:41
    • sarah on Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off: “Well, this poll proves, yet again, that pollsters ask people who have no idea of what is really going on…Mar 24, 13:36
    • diabloandco on Irony you can’t buy: “Speaking of irony , apparently the Minister for War in the US of A said ,”The problem with Iran is…Mar 24, 11:10
    • diabloandco on Irony you can’t buy: “Thanks Alf! The Caledonian Isles is a bit elderly much like me!Mar 23, 20:30
    • diabloandco on Irony you can’t buy: “Thanks Alf! The Caledonian Isles is a bit elderly much like me!Mar 23, 20:25
    • Iain More on Irony you can’t buy: “Re Iran war . Poor wee stupid Norway is laughing all the way to the Sassanach Offshore Tax Haven Banks.…Mar 23, 20:07
    • twathater on Irony you can’t buy: “It is sometimes extremely difficult to gauge how stupid some people really are , but time and time again they…Mar 23, 18:19
    • Aidan on Irony you can’t buy: “As much as it pains me to say this, I am inclined to agree with James here. This feels like…Mar 23, 18:06
    • Alf Baird on Irony you can’t buy: ““Has your position now changed” Nothing of any significance can change in a colony until it becomes independent and in…Mar 23, 18:03
    • agentx on Irony you can’t buy: ““Alf Baird says: 20 March, 2026 at 9:11 am My preference would be for Scotland to reduce dependence on England’s…Mar 23, 15:52
    • Del G on Irony you can’t buy: “First I wash my clothes. Then I dry them. Then I do the irony.Mar 23, 15:06
    • Geri on Irony you can’t buy: ““London governments sold Scotland’s public utilities including port monopolies for peanuts based on the specific argument that private owners would…Mar 23, 12:43
    • James on Irony you can’t buy: “Yoon Troll X; “A £3m funding pledge…” LOL. ‘Here’s some crumbs, Jock’Mar 23, 11:56
    • Alf Baird on Irony you can’t buy: ““investment in Rosyth from the UK’s Growth Mission Fund” London governments sold Scotland’s public utilities including port monopolies for peanuts…Mar 23, 11:31
    • agentx on Irony you can’t buy: ““A £3m funding pledge for a Scottish port comes with hopes that a new ferry service to France will set…Mar 23, 11:01
    • Alf Baird on Irony you can’t buy: “Fog should not necessarily prevent a sailing. Modern ships have excellent navigation systems, they can tell what is around them.…Mar 23, 10:42
    • Geri on Irony you can’t buy: “The SNP & it’s membership have been completely captured. There is zero point in hoping for a road to Damascus…Mar 23, 09:54
    • Stevie m on Irony you can’t buy: “It was obvious from day one she wasn’t interested in Scottish independence ; the number of Sturgeionites who hassled me…Mar 23, 09:07
    • Mark Beggan on Irony you can’t buy: “What about building tunnels. Lots and lots of tunnels.Mar 23, 09:02
    • diabloandco on Irony you can’t buy: “A question for Alf with his maritime hat on, I thought ships sailed on merrily in fog only to discover…Mar 23, 08:50
    • diabloandco on Irony you can’t buy: “Wheesht YL! – It might hear you and return to make me scroll on by ad nauseam.Mar 23, 08:43
    • diabloandco on Irony you can’t buy: “Brilliant Sven!Mar 23, 08:39
  • A tall tale



↑ Top