The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Do you want to be my friend?

Posted on January 28, 2012 by

Just a quick bit of housekeeping here, folks, nothing much to see. I'm not used to being popular, so I'm a tad mystified by the flow of Game Center friend requests that arrive on my iThings every day from people I don't know, and who, to be honest, I have very little interest in being pretend internet buddies with. I'm 44, y'know? I very much enjoy challenging personal friends, professional acquaintances or WoSland readers at games, but not some random adolescent from Bumhole, Nebraska.

The big problem with the internet, though, is that even many otherwise sane and decent people still insist on using absurd playground nicknames to identify themselves rather than proper human names, or at least – as in my own case with Game Center – the recognisable name of their app/business/whatever. So a request from "sUP3rKEWLd00d__87" might, horrendously, turn out to be from a person I actually do know in some way and would (inexplicably) wish to be "friends" with.

Unfortunately I have nowhere near enough time to scour through dozens and dozens of individual requests searching for clues that might helpfully identify people, and while I have occasional purges I just can't keep on top of the task of filtering the list (especially in the case of the unspeakably dreadful interface on OpenFeint). I certainly don't wish to cause any offence by inadvertently snubbing any readers of this site. So in future, if you want to be my e-chum and I might not instantly recognise you from your username alone, please help me out by putting something helpful in the message text. A simple "WoSland reader" or similar will do.

And in the meantime, if you're any of the people in the image below, please let me know. Otherwise, next week the whole lot's going in the bin and I'll be starting afresh, with a new policy of instantly hitting Ignore on any request I can't immediately identify as a friend or colleague or reader. Sorry.

0 to “Do you want to be my friend?”

  1. Tom K. says:

    I am all of the people in that image.

    One day you will hug me to your bosom, and my venomous fangs will at last taste your succulent flesh.

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Now that's just creepy.

    Reply
  3. Mamemeister says:

    Stu, Matt Allen is Mayhem on the Rodent and Yakyak forums.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Ah, I’d left his request “live” because I vaguely recognised the name from somewhere. Ta.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,266 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “@Dan – that is a fair point re immigration, that a competent independent administration could chose who to seek to…Jul 4, 07:07
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “I think you misunderstand. I’m not engaging with whatever senseless rant you’ve posted on the internet in the wee hours…Jul 4, 06:53
    • Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “Is that it??!? Well that’s a great big resounding 0 out of 10 on the witty rejoinder and well thought…Jul 4, 04:58
    • Young Lochinvar on The Con Merchant: “P3nisbreath McP3nisbreathface: Nope; WRONG! Never applied to them, they didn’t do night school and it was too far to travel…Jul 4, 04:39
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Now let’s be honest here “Factchecker”; Tam Dalziel was the doyen of the then Labour awkward squad who delighted (from…Jul 4, 04:17
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “God yes, the Lockerbie case was shocking.Jul 3, 21:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “@Dan The UK doesn’t have control over immigration. That means that Scotland is really no different to England. And no.…Jul 3, 19:56
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Where’s the FUN in THAT?Jul 3, 19:34
    • Dan on The Con Merchant: “@Aidan Scotland does not have control over immigration, so we currently have no way to ensure the type of immigrant…Jul 3, 19:00
    • Andrew scott on Too Tight To Mention: “Better if posts are RELEVANT TO THE ISSUE THE REV PUTS UPJul 3, 18:59
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “I was rather peeved when the Lockerbie trial, run by the Scottish legal establishment, put the wrong man behind bars.…Jul 3, 18:55
    • Hatey McHateface on The Con Merchant: “Can you tell us which university knocked back your application, YL Sah! My money’s on Edinburgh.Jul 3, 18:44
    • Dave Hansell on Too Tight To Mention: “Something like this, perhaps? https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2020-05-22/thurrock-council-borrowed-1bn-from-taxpayers-to-bet-on-british-sunshineJul 3, 18:03
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “All true. But what are we going to do about it? These grifters have closed nearly every avenue to move…Jul 3, 18:02
    • factchecker on Too Tight To Mention: “The EVEL procedure was an answer to the West Lothian Question, first identified by Scottish MP Tam Dalziell in 1977.…Jul 3, 17:40
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?” That almost no one agrees with your analysis of the situation? It’s…Jul 3, 17:19
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Andrew Scott, Its simply a matter of scrolling on by if you are not interested in realising that Westminsters governance…Jul 3, 16:29
    • 100%Yes on Too Tight To Mention: “The big question is, how is the SNP still alive and kicking. I do not believe for a minute the…Jul 3, 15:34
    • TURABDIN on Too Tight To Mention: “Indeed, «hiding»in plain sight and all perfectly normal in Yookay.. It seems the British state functions on the accommodating body…Jul 3, 15:17
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: “And which substantive point was that, exactly, CC?Jul 3, 15:02
    • Aidan on The Con Merchant: “Again we keep coming to this issue of the preservation of sovereignty. In the context you mean it, sovereignty means…Jul 3, 14:52
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: “Semantics, at the end of the day. The substantive point still stands, whether or not you think you’ve answered Aiden’s…Jul 3, 14:42
    • Xaracen on The Con Merchant: ““Ah, a classic case of hinging an entire argument off a single, extreme outlier argument” Maybe it escaped your attention,…Jul 3, 14:31
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “I think it’s about time we looked seriously at these Trade Union representatives. 1. They don’t understand the Law. 2.…Jul 3, 14:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “this is why I miss, such a lot : RED GEM WOMAN – coz she could sit here all afternoon…Jul 3, 13:26
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Still rubbish, Main. Still not seeing any “the positive case for the Union”. Surely you don’t lack arguments. Do you…Jul 3, 13:16
    • James on The Con Merchant: “Ooft. I think you nailed it there, Lochinvar. A GOTCHA.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Confused on The Con Merchant: “Read books. It will do you good.Jul 3, 13:14
    • Captain Caveman on The Con Merchant: ““Professor Robert Black KC, FRSA, FRSE, FFCS, ILTM ( Professor Emeritus of Scots Law at the University of Edinburgh), was…Jul 3, 13:06
    • Andrew scott on Too Tight To Mention: “@cheyne Your contributions adds what to the debate as to the devious Murrell getting taxpayers money to fight his case?????Jul 3, 13:03
  • A tall tale



↑ Top