The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland

Compromise, Labour-style

Posted on March 14, 2012 by

We greatly enjoyed the intervention of former First Minister and now Lord of Glenscorrodale, Jack McConnell, in the referendum debate last night. Appearing on both Scotland Tonight and Newsnight Scotland, he graced the nation's airwaves to present a statesman-like call for "compromise" on the planning of the vote on Scotland's constitutional question, and generously offering his assistance to the Prime Minister and First Minister in untangling the situation. Our favourite was his explanation of how to compromise on the timing of the poll.

"There are those who are pressing for the referendum to be held this year as quickly as possible, the SNP want it to be held in nearly three years' time – I'm suggesting we compromise on that, let's have an agreement that we hold the referendum in about 18 months' time, maybe 15 months' time."

Now, we're not quite sure who the people allegedly "pressing for the referendum to be held this year" are. We don't know of anyone even remotely sane who's seriously proposed that it could or should be held in 2012 – the UK government's own suggested timetable is for an "early" vote in September 2013. The SNP, meanwhile, want "Autumn 2014", which is widely held to mean October of that year. The SNP have never confirmed that claim, but let's use it for the sake of argument.

What that means is that Lord McConnell's proposal for a "compromise" date between September 2013 and October 2014 is, um… September 2013. (Or alternatively June 2013, ie three months earlier than even the UK government's preferred date, never mind the Scottish Government's.) No wonder he repeatedly struggled to conceal an embarrassed smirk during the Scotland Tonight interview.

Lord McConnell's other envisaged compromises follow surprisingly similar lines.

NUMBER OF QUESTIONS:
Unionists: one question
SNP: open to second question
Compromise: one question

FRANCHISE:
Unionists: no vote for 16/17-year-olds
SNP: vote for 16/17-year-olds
Compromise: no vote for 16/17-year-olds.

LEGALITY:
Unionists: UK Government must give permission to hold the referendum
SNP: Scottish Government has the right to hold the referendum
Compromise: UK Government must give permission to hold the referendum

And so on and so forth. Amusingly, the noble Lord also still hasn't even conceded that independence gets to be the "Yes" answer in the referendum, putting forward the hilarious "compromise" notion that BOTH sides should get a "Yes" option, astonishingly concluding that this would be an aid to clarity and decisiveness. (Though he subsequently went on to talk of "the Yes and No campaigns" anyway.)

We await the logical outcome of Lord McConnell's thought process – that we should compromise between the SNP's position of having a referendum and the Unionist side's ingrained opposition to the whole idea, by simply not having a referendum at all.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Category analysis, scottish politics
Trackback: trackback from your own site.

9 to “Compromise, Labour-style”

  1. peter says:
    14 March, 2012 at 8:46 pm

    watched the interview  on scotland tonight. i found it paternalistic and nauseating.
     

    Reply
  2. Christian Wright says:
    14 March, 2012 at 10:50 pm

    "NUMBER OF QUESTIONS:
    Unionists: one question
    SNP: open to second question
    Compromise: one question"
     
    Stu simply does not understand the genius of the noble lord, Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale's proposal. It wholly concedes to the SNP, the arument for two questions.
    Question 1 Do you agree that Scotland should become and independent country?
    Question 2 Do you agree that Scotland should remain part of the United Kingdom?
     
    This will assure a unified campaign across the Scottish body politic. The barking-mad nationalists and those nice colonial chapies from cheam, seconded to the "YES" campaign, will be able to share "Vote YES" stickers. That devious Salmond fellow and that darling Mr Darling will be able to end their speeches with the same unifying refrain to, "Vote YES on Octorber 18!"
     
    All  of Scotland's electorate will enter the polls with the same intent to vote YES for Scotland. What is the least confusing about that?
     
    In fact, if have written to the Noble Lord that in the interests of economy and brevity, he should ignore the vicious nationalists two-questions nonsense entirely, and demand a single question that requires only a "yes" response:
    Question – Should Scotland become and independent country or remain part of the United Kingdom?
     
    Now what could be clearer or simpler than that?
     
     
     
     
     

    Reply
  3. CW says:
    14 March, 2012 at 11:20 pm

    He was always smirking when he was First Minister. I have no idea why.

    Reply
  4. Bugger (the Panda) says:
    15 March, 2012 at 11:11 am

    LW
     
    Chewin a caramel

    Reply
  5. John White says:
    15 March, 2012 at 11:40 am

    more of the usual rubbish at the Spectator
    link to spectator.co.uk
    I think we can answer them……………………..

    Reply
  6. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:
    15 March, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    Oh dear. I think, for this and numerous other examples, Fraser Nelson needs to be added to the "Zany comedy relief" section of the links column…

    Reply
  7. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:
    15 March, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    Hmm, I don't seem to be allowed to comment on that piece, despite having no problems elsewhere on the Spectator site.

    Reply
  8. John White says:
    15 March, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    They moderate comments – it took some time for mine to appear

    Reply
  9. John White says:
    15 March, 2012 at 2:28 pm

    The difference between Alex Massie and Fraser Nelson is like night and day……….

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.

←
→

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,774 Posts, 1,219,642 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

    and finally and firstly arithmetic fail braveheart klaxon britnats captain darling cartoons Chris Cairns confused cringe crybabies dateline debates Devo Nano Federalists Unionists and Devolutionists flat-out lies foreigner watch from the archives fundraisers galleries Greg Moodie hamish hypocrisy liars light-hearted banter lizards memogate misinformation one nation perspectives poll project fear project feart qft Scott Minto smears snp accused soapbox the positive case for the union The Vow ticktock toldyouso too wee too poor too stupid unionist of the day vote no get nothing

  • Recent Comments

    • Nae Need! on What We Don’t Know Now: “Yip, one of the few things he’s good at is throwing old carrots for the donkeys, like any old circus…” Jun 9, 12:13
    • Oneliner on What We Don’t Know Now: “Guys – you are absolutely correct. If I feel threatened, I can contact my lawyers: Finucane, Nelson & McRae” Jun 9, 11:52
    • sarah on What We Don’t Know Now: “Interesting comment, BigJay – thank you.” Jun 9, 11:37
    • factchecker on What We Don’t Know Now: “There is no secret about what a D notice is. Since MI5 is responsible for counter-terrorism in the UK, it…” Jun 9, 11:27
    • BigJay on What We Don’t Know Now: “I’m sure that most people reading this will be familiar with Donald Rumsfeld’s famous quote – “As we know, there…” Jun 9, 11:07
    • Martyman on What We Don’t Know Now: “If you ask me, Farage would be happy to be rid of Scotland. So I don’t really understand why an…” Jun 9, 10:44
    • Oneliner on What We Don’t Know Now: “Talk to the press and (maybe) they will tell you what a D-Notice means. Keir Starmer well knows their scope…” Jun 9, 10:38
    • Captain Caveman on What We Don’t Know Now: “I agree, people tend to grasp at straws such as the preposterous “deepstate hypothesis” when far simpler, less edifying explanations…” Jun 9, 10:05
    • Stuart MacKay on What We Don’t Know Now: “Breeks, I know you know this already, but you can add to your list the changes to candidate selection procedures,…” Jun 9, 09:46
    • wally jumblatt on What We Don’t Know Now: “I don’t think Nicola Sturgeon was under the thumb of deepstate London, I think she spent her decade poisoning the…” Jun 9, 08:57
    • James on What We Don’t Know Now: ““Fuck around and find out, the angry child recites this every day.”” Jun 9, 08:16
    • Hatey McHateface on What We Don’t Know Now: ““HCB to prosecute and silence any and ALL criticism about their REVILED and vehemently opposed GRB” Did that actually work…” Jun 9, 07:57
    • Hatey McHateface on The Jokers: “She’s safe! Praise be! They’re gonna take her home, but first, like a naughty but badly parented child, she’s gonna…” Jun 9, 07:49
    • Hatey McHateface on What We Don’t Know Now: ““50% must however keep you awake at night in a cold sweat” I guess that could be true, but only…” Jun 9, 07:42
    • Hatey McHateface on What We Don’t Know Now: “The MSM is reporting a new crackdown on dog ownership and dog walking in the Ir@nian shithole. What does our…” Jun 9, 07:38
    • twathater on What We Don’t Know Now: ““My challenge is to make sure that we can turn that aspiration in the public for Scottish independence into a…” Jun 9, 03:47
    • Young Lochinvar on Ball Of Confusion: “Aaaah Souness! Wasn’t he the highly paid sports monkey that said Scotland back in the day should throw the match…” Jun 9, 02:38
    • Young Lochinvar on What We Don’t Know Now: “Well said Geri! What the politico monkeys based in their city offices just don’t get is that having given them…” Jun 9, 01:26
    • Young Lochinvar on What We Don’t Know Now: “50% must however keep you awake at night in a cold sweat. Intrude in your dreams does it? I think…” Jun 9, 01:15
    • Young Lochinvar on What We Don’t Know Now: “Very good post. Regarding Alba; well, they’ll have to start standing at elections and by elections as I’ve certainly never…” Jun 9, 00:48
    • Rob on What We Don’t Know Now: “Never heard of a BME programme in the NHS in Scotland. I would like to see some proof it exists…” Jun 9, 00:13
    • Rob on What We Don’t Know Now: “I look at the Sp and don’t think that they represent me or what I want the country to be,…” Jun 8, 23:07
    • Alf Baird on What We Don’t Know Now: “Here it is in English, Dunx, nae bather at aw: https://salvo.scot/the-scottish-constitution/” Jun 8, 21:57
    • Northcode on What We Don’t Know Now: ““Scots fowk awready hiv thair ain constitution:” aye, Alf. mair than cuid be sayd fir the Inglis fowk wha hiv…” Jun 8, 21:35
    • Peter Joy on What We Don’t Know Now: “Jocky Wilson, in the bath with a pint. I think I get it. ‘As a child, Wilson’s parents were deemed…” Jun 8, 21:13
    • Geri on What We Don’t Know Now: “I don’t think the SNP can even be described as devolutionist – they’ve achieved the grand total of hee-haw on…” Jun 8, 20:29
    • James Barr Gardner on What We Don’t Know Now: “O/T has anyone been booted off Facebook this week ?” Jun 8, 19:43
    • agent x on What We Don’t Know Now: “Oh dear – another topic quoting “polls”. When will people learn?” Jun 8, 19:30
    • Dunx on What We Don’t Know Now: “That would be more useful if it was written in a language that most Scots could understand. It’s current version…” Jun 8, 18:48
    • Breeks on What We Don’t Know Now: “The SNP can reinvent itself as many times as it likes, but unless or until it addresses the cynical brazen…” Jun 8, 18:41

  • A tall tale



↑ Top