The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


An open letter to Scottish Labour

Posted on June 17, 2011 by

I originally wrote this piece for a website recently set up by some Labour MPs and MSPs from Scotland, which had solicited contributions from supporters of other parties. The site had attracted a large amount of comments (almost all of them genuine attempts at discussion, rather than jibes) from non-Labour voters, but some readers got very huffy about this “cybernat invasion”.

Sadly, despite asking me to write the piece after I suggested it to them, they’ve declined to publish it, and the site has now taken to deleting comments from non-supporters wholesale. (I had a minor Twitter scuffle with the Labour MP behind the site last night, and he’s turned out to have a very thin skin. One of his posts on the blog was also so mercilessly shredded for inaccurate facts that its entire comments thread has now been deleted.)

So here it is instead. It’s an entirely genuine piece with no secret agenda, but it looks as though “Scottish” Labour is already closing ranks in order to adopt the same approach to learning the lesson of its 2011 humiliation as it did to the much narrower loss in 2007. Oh well. If it comes to it I can very much live with the SNP in power for a generation or two.

=================================

SCOTTISH LABOUR, AND WHY WE WANT TO HELP YOU

There seems to be very little scope for disputing the fact that Scotland is a predominantly left-leaning country. For the entire 40-plus years I’ve been alive, my homeland has returned overwhelmingly Labour MPs to Westminster and consistently, resoundingly rejected Conservative values.

During that time the fortunes of the Tories in the UK as a whole have ridden a rollercoaster that would have done Alton Towers proud, from Thatcher’s landslides to the laughing-stock years under Hague/Duncan-Smith/Howard and back to power again, yet the Tory vote in Scotland barely flickered from its flat-line.

Let’s speak plainly. Anyone who isn’t delusional to the point of having someone cut up their soup for them knows that the Tories will never achieve a plurality of Scottish seats or votes (let alone a majority) either at Westminster or Holyrood in the lifetime of anyone currently my age – I’ll take any wagers on that proposition that anyone would like to put forward – and the remarkable thing is that the Scottish Conservative Party finds itself in this moribund position despite the left vote in Scotland being so spectacularly and bitterly fragmented.

(Describing Labour as being on the left in anything other than a historical context is of course a position contradicted by most empirical fact, but that’s an argument for another day and it’s not really what I’m here to talk about.)

Labour’s hatred of the SNP is so venomous that in the last Scottish Parliament it found common ground (measured by Holyrood votes) with the Tories more often than with a party that – independence aside – shares the vast majority of Labour’s traditional values. (Or at the very least, shares a lot more of them than the Tories do.)

Even allowing for the fundamental nature of opposition that’s a staggering statistic considering the supposed ideological positions of the three parties, and it’s very much reflected in the angry reaction of many Labour supporters on this blog to the presence of a few SNP-leaning commenters.

But the most noteworthy thing is that this fury at “cybernat invasion” has been directed at comments which are, by a huge margin, constructive in nature. People have tried genuinely to explain to you why a predominantly left-wing Scottish electorate, with hundreds of thousands of disenchanted anti-Tory former Lib Dems looking for a home, so comprehensively rejected Labour and instead voted for the party that some in Labour still embarrassingly try to smear as the “Tartan Tories” (a slur a mere 40 or so years out of date).

We’ve tried to tell you that in an internet age people see through the tired old lines, that nobody’s scared of the SNP any more, and that maybe you should try to engage the electorate positively and truthfully.

With a couple of honourable exceptions, your reaction to this magnanimous offer of insight and a helping hand has been to shove your fingers in your ears, shout “LA LA LA WE’RE NOT LISTENING” and revert to partisan type, with an outpouring of exactly the sort of snide negativity, petty name-calling, denial and occasionally outright lies that handed the SNP the most spectacularly crushing election victory on the British Isles in living memory.

(With a greater share of the vote than either Thatcher or Blair in their pomp ever secured, and more incredible still because the SNP achieved it in a four-party system rather than a three-party one, and despite that system being specifically designed to prevent majorities and even more particularly SNP ones.)

Of course, it’s an understandable response. Firstly because you’re still hurting, secondly because it’s hard to face up to uncomfortable truths about Labour’s real location on the political spectrum nowadays, and thirdly because it’s easy to be sceptical about advice from your enemies, particularly enemies you’ve loathed so bitterly for so long. I’m not an SNP member or activist, but I’m a believer in independence and also proudly a socialist  – remember those?

The purpose of this piece is to offer, with sincerity and honesty, an attempt to explain why myself and others like me are actually, genuinely, trying to help you.

(And not even “help you come round to our way of thinking”, either. I mean actually help you to oppose us.)

The problem with – and for – the organisation operating under the kid-on brand of “Scottish Labour” (a term banned in European elections for being misleading) is that it’s neither Scottish, nor Labour. Its leader is in truth the “leader” of nothing and no-one, a ceremonial figurehead entirely answerable to London – a position made starkly clear when Wendy Alexander tried to throw the reins and end the MSP group’s destructive opposition to a referendum on independence, only to be swiftly slapped back down into line by Labour’s one and only actual leader, Gordon Brown.

Scottish Labour’s policies are therefore in practice those of UK Labour, and UK Labour is a right-of-centre authoritarian party.

(If you doubt this, imagine yourself a time traveller visiting the Britain of 1960, or 1970, or 1980. Picture yourself encountering a random inhabitant of that world, and telling them of a political party in their near future that stood for nuclear weapons, nuclear power, slashing taxes on the rich, handing billions of pounds to private companies to build hospitals for massive profits, wasting untold billions more in a failed attempt to introduce ID cards and the prosecution of illegal imperial wars despite millions marching in protest, creating thousands of new crimes, cramming the prisons and trying to lock people up for months on end without trial or charge, inflating a property bubble while letting social housing go to rack and ruin, doing nothing for unions, talking tough about immigration, presiding over a huge increase in the gap between rich and poor, demonising and victimising the unemployed and the sick, etc etc. Would that person decide you were describing the Labour Party, do you think?)

While it’s by far the most left-wing of the four main parties in Scotland, the SNP is a social democratic one, not a socialist one. Alex Salmond no more saw through the fantasy economy led by RBS and HBOS than Tony Blair, Gordon Brown or Alastair Darling did, and he has less excuse for being fooled than they did.

(By virtue of his own experience in banking, and the fact that he wasn’t being blinded by a pile of Treasury tax receipts.)

Those of us who don’t accept that socialism is a discredited ideology are therefore supportive of the SNP almost by default rather than through choice. There is no hope in the forseeable future of the UK electing a socialist government again – because that would require the sort of shift in Labour ideology that takes a generation to enact – and so the only practical way of living even in part under a broadly left-minded government is to elect one to Holyrood.

(As we’ve just seen, voting Labour is not currently a valid option in terms of that goal, because “Scottish Labour” has no power to reverse the edicts of UK Labour, which is in thrall to the right-wing votes of Middle England and tailors its policy cloth accordingly. If you suffer from the delusion that “Scottish Labour” is in any meaningful sense autonomous, ask yourself which of the policies listed three paragraphs above it did anything to obstruct.)

Westminster Tory governments are the awkward skeleton in Labour’s closet, the cousin you don’t like to talk about. An independent Scotland would be about as likely to elect a Tory government in the next 50 years as to adopt Sharia law or choose “Itsy-Witsy Teeny-Weeny Yellow Polka-Dot Bikini” as its new national anthem, yet staying in the Union condemns us to one on a regular and inevitable basis.

When Labour in Scotland opposes independence it is inescapably (because English voters outnumber Scots ten to one) saying “We’d rather Scotland’s government was chosen by English Tory voters than Scottish Labour ones”, and that’s a tough position to defend while you’re still pretending to be the alternative to the Conservatives rather than a watered-down version of the same thing.

As a basically socialist country, Scotland needs more than one party of the left. I celebrated as wildly as SNP supporters did on May 6th, but the sober reality is that absolute power does, as the old saying goes, corrupt absolutely – I celebrated wildly too in 1997 as Blair kicked out the Tories, and look where that ended up. It’s in nobody’s interests for the SNP to govern Scotland unchallenged, because the nature of power is that it destroys even the best of intentions.

For reasons which are both as obvious and as certain as night following day, “Scottish Labour” is doomed as long as it remains a toothless adjunct to the UK party. Such talent as you might manage to raise will continue to hightail it to the “big-boy” Parliament south of the border as soon as it possibly can, where it will be employed in shaping the party to the greater good – the needs and wishes of Essex Man.

If you’re worried about abandoning your English comrades to the tender mercies of the Tories, don’t be. UK Labour doesn’t need you. Every single one of Blair’s election victories would still have delivered absolute control of Westminster on English and Welsh seats alone, while conversely Scotland’s huge block of Labour MPs could do nothing to affect Thatcher’s majorities. The myth that Labour would be doomed to permanent Westminster opposition if Scotland were independent is just that – a total myth, easily disproven by the simplest arithmetical facts.

(In fact, Scotland’s Westminster MPs – of all parties – are a complete irrelevance to both Scotland and the UK, a pointless waste of money and resources. They have a say in the governance of either of those nations/states in the same way Kilmarnock have a say in the running of the SPL – that is, their voice is heard only so long as it agrees with everyone else’s.)

So when we come here and offer you advice, it’s not sarcasm, it’s not a double-bluff and it’s not an artless attempt at sabotage. We truly WANT an effective opposition – to keep the SNP honest and stop Alex Salmond turning from the respected, admired leader he is into a power-crazed megalomaniac, which I’m sure he’d concede is a constant danger – and an effective opposition means one with a chance of winning.

The fact of the matter is that nationalists would much rather the government of Scotland – the WHOLE government, not just the crumbs of power Westminster deigns to let fall from its table – swung between a left-wing Labour and the SNP (as it surely would in an independent Scotland) than between a right-wing Labour and the Conservatives, as it always will in Westminster.

We truly don’t understand why you’re so scared of the former prospect, and so determined to keep being a wee pretendy “party” with the training wheels permanently on and Big Brother constantly watching over your shoulder from London to make sure you don’t do anything daft.

You tell us constantly that you’re as Scottish as we are, that you have the best interests of Scotland at heart, and that you hate the Tories. Yet you regularly, needlessly, condemn the people of Scotland – YOUR people – to years and decades of Tory governments that they’ve overwhelmingly rejected at the polls, by insisting our fate stays tied to the vagaries of English opinion. What sort of concern for the people of Scotland is that? Tough love?

And if you’re Scottish and you prefer the latter scenario I outlined, you might want to take a step back, put down your Alex Neil voodoo doll for a second and ponder why it is that you hate the left-wing social-democratic SNP more than you hate Cameron and Osborne’s vicious Bullingdon Tories, and what that says about your own beliefs and the nature of your opposition in the Scottish Parliament.

Be Scottish, be Labour, and not only might you have a chance of victory at Holyrood, but the people of Scotland will be the winners. The way you’re headed now, to paraphrase a well-known slogan, things can only get worse.

0 to “An open letter to Scottish Labour”

  1. It would also help if Labour didn't run election campaigns based around slogans such as (only slightly para-phrased on my part) "Scotland is a useless bankrupt hell hole that can only survive whilst parasitically feeding off England".  It's not hard to see why that didn't resonate whilst the SNP's "Scotland – Fuck Yeah" did.

    Reply
  2. At least your country's political leaders aren't wingnut religious fanatics being egged on by a bloated heroin junkie on the radio.  Also, your population isn't drool-bubble-on-the-nose stupid.  So it could be a lot worse.

    Reply
  3. Steve, from the internet says:

    Well said, Rev. Campbell, well said. Hear hear, not that they will.

    Reply
  4. orkers says:

    I hadn’t discovered ‘Wings’ at the time so I missed this Post by Rev Stu.

    A stunning piece of writing.
     

    Reply
  5. Seasick Dave says:

    Well found, Orkers.

    I can’t believe that this excellent piece only has four comments.

    Well worth getting it out again and giving it a dusting down. 

    Reply
  6. muttley79 says:

    Labour’s hatred of the SNP is so venomous that in the last Scottish Parliament it found common ground (measured by Holyrood votes) with the Tories more often than with a party that – independence aside – shares the vast majority of Labour’s traditional values. (Or at the very least, shares a heck of a lot more of them than the Tories do.) Even allowing for the fundamental nature of opposition that’s a staggering statistic considering the supposed ideological positions of the three parties, and it’s very much reflected in the angry reaction of many Labour supporters on this blog to the presence of a few SNP-leaning commenters.


    Oh dear, the more things change, the more they stay the same…(with an honourable exception to LVI).

    Reply
  7. Grouse Beater says:

    Worthy sentiments, but alas, a waste of time.

    Scotland’s Labour branch is the last I’d write to, in effort to illustrate where they’ve gone wrong. Let them work it out themselves.

    My American friends might be tempted to add, never give a sucker an even break.

    Reply
  8. Thepnr says:

    @Grouse Beater

    What brings you here? 🙂

    Your right though, the advice offered by the Rev back in 2011 was accurate but ignored. Pointless giving advice to those that will not listen.

    Even after the events on Thursday they are still not listening. Hell mend them.

    Reply
  9. Helena Brown says:

    Well said Stuart, we do need a principled opposition not the bunch of frequently lying toadies that masquerade as one in the Scottish Parliament.
    This will not happen until Labour either regain control of their Scottish Branch or preferably let it go. Labour or indeed a totally new Party would be better, a remade Socialist one, one which has principles. I think hell may freeze over before that ever happens. We have a bunch of troughers masquerading as Politicians who have been well subverted by the British Establishment, bought out with seats in the Upper House and chances of Directorships.

    Reply
  10. Alan Mackintosh says:

    Well said and even though this was 5 years ago, it could have been written today. If they thought it was bad in 2011, wait til we see the results this May.

    Reply
  11. jimnarlene says:

    And yet they, SLab, will continue down the path of self a destruction; still blinded by their hatred of the SNP.

    Reply
  12. K1 says:

    This should have been a front page lead across the Scottish msm at the time of writing Stu, absolutely prescient and the vast majority of people in Scotland could have done with this kind of analysis at the time of writing.

    It’s a ‘keeper’ as Mac would say.

    Reply
  13. jamero66 says:

    Great piece,

    Obviously even more relevant now.

    Reply
  14. Auld Rock says:

    This piece is like a good malt – it just gets better with age. You can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink, so it is with SLAB still pretending to be ostriches.

    Auld Rock

    Reply
  15. Latten says:

    Thanks for linking to this article recently. it’s quite shocking really that Starmer’s current government are once again going down the same road for the UK as you highlighted in 2011. Your time traveller would still be saying exactly the same things…
    And as for current ‘Scottish’ Labour – no further comment needed.
    Once again you show what a talent you have for clarity in vision and expression.
    Please keep on telling it like it is if only for others who have long agreed with your pov but lack your talent for insight.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,967 Posts, 1,248,914 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Peter McAvoy on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “The Herald today mentions that more student accommodation is to be built on the site of the former Herald premises…Aug 19, 01:58
    • Alex towns on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Swinney gave it in private but means diddly. He was open about not having a committee membership etc so wasn’t…Aug 19, 00:25
    • Alex towns on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “What utter pish. A indie Scotland would have the same career driven assholes in the same positions making sure they…Aug 19, 00:24
    • Ian Smith on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “If police were made aware that the SNP had pilfered the cash, are they duty bound to sit on their…Aug 18, 23:13
    • Hatey McHateface on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Aidan, I don’t think that’s what was said. I think the lady simply agreed with James. I think I understand…Aug 18, 23:08
    • Hatey McHateface on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Marie says: 18 August, 2026 at 2:54 pm “Monarchy – a relic. Time to get rid.” You were doing so…Aug 18, 22:51
    • Hatey McHateface on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Even if every poster on here agrees with Alf tomorrow that Scotland is a colony, Alf still fails to provide…Aug 18, 22:43
    • Hatey McHateface on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “If another fit of boredom strikes you, Northy, why don’t you re-write the lawyer’s letter in a superior form? Not…Aug 18, 22:35
    • Hatey McHateface on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Fucks sake, Jay Main. It’s a well-known quote, widely repeated. Why don’t you educate yersel? And yes, if a nation…Aug 18, 22:29
    • Insider on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Aidan 9:24 pm Indeed! And don’t even ask Alf who the publisher of his book is !Aug 18, 22:23
    • Strathglass on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “replying to Northcode (A) OK. not really important in the scheme of things. (B)Ditto. (C) So Police Scotland are saying…Aug 18, 21:39
    • Aidan on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “@Alf – if it is the high-quality work you say it is, then why is it published in a student-run…Aug 18, 21:24
    • Aidan on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: ““A distinction is appropriate, here, because Alf has been accused of obsessive references to various writers who deal with Colonialism”…Aug 18, 21:20
    • Alf Baird on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “An extensive summary of the ‘Doun-Hauden’ book’s findings and theoretical framework developed to explain Scotland’s colonial condition, inclusive of extensive…Aug 18, 21:14
    • Spartan 117 on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “I don’t always agree with Alf however he does make compelling points and makes his points without any disrespect or…Aug 18, 20:48
    • Saffron Robe on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “I’m not sure I agree with your conclusion, Stuart. What if independence is the only way to bring about justice?…Aug 18, 20:28
    • James Che on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “The devolved Scottish governance is English by nature and law under legislation and Statues from the Westminster parliament in which…Aug 18, 20:15
    • Northcode on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Police Scotland’s reply… tone, structure, and meaning. This letter is calm, procedural, factual, standard, professional, and non?reactive. It’s exactly what…Aug 18, 19:19
    • Jay on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Anthem and Alanm, your assessment is correct. Thatcher and her associates intended to corrupt potentially democratic politics with a massive…Aug 18, 18:16
    • Northcode on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “You’re wrong, Jay. Alf only references those pioneers of postcolonial theory to punt his book, “Doun-Hauden: The Socio-Political Determinants of…Aug 18, 17:56
    • Jay on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Confused as to the utility of your comment (referring to J. Arday) for remedy of the ills with which Rev…Aug 18, 17:24
    • James Che on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “With Scotland not having a legal parliament of its own, ( as presently its under the legislation and statue’s of…Aug 18, 16:17
    • James Che on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “It would appear that Stu is dealing with the wrong Crown offices of England and english laws, not Scots law,…Aug 18, 16:01
    • James Che on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Union minded people are beginning to fight a losing battle in its efforts to hold Scotland even as a Colony.…Aug 18, 15:47
    • Aidan on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: ““So universities now teach there is no union between Scotland and England” Which universities teach that?Aug 18, 15:39
    • Northcode on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “A fit of boredom came upon me… so I had a closer look at the lawyer’s letter for something to…Aug 18, 15:30
    • Jay on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “They say your name is J. Main: you speak only for yourself.Aug 18, 15:21
    • James Che on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Just talking to a lady from England with full qualifications on studies on geography and world war one and world…Aug 18, 15:16
    • robertkknight on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Agreed, Alf. Ignore the site pricks/usual suspects.Aug 18, 15:08
    • Marie on The Land Of Do-As-You-Please: “Monarchy – a relic. Time to get rid.Aug 18, 14:54
  • A tall tale



↑ Top