The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


You don’t know what you’re doing

Posted on March 07, 2013 by

(Title to be read in the style of the famous football chant.)

Independence supporters have a slight tendency to exaggerate the (nevertheless real) bias of the BBC. We couldn’t face watching Newsnight Scotland last night, but on catching up via the iPlayer this morning it was far less objectionable than many reports on Twitter had led us to believe.

duh

What we’re a bit more concerned by is the Corporation’s growing rank incompetence.

Yesterday’s website report of the GERS story, for example, ran with a headline and text making (repeatedly) the brainless schoolboy error of confusing “debt” with “deficit”.

debtdeficitdummies

Debt, of course, is the money you owe someone. Deficit is when your income is lower than your expenditure. If the UK’s debt (well over £1 trillion and rising) was only the size of its deficit (a mere £90 billion in 2012), everyone at the Treasury would be having the party of the century right about now.

Of course, it might just have been that the BBC was trying to avoid tricky words it has trouble spelling, as subsequently suggested by this embarrassing fiasco on that evening’s edition of Reporting Scotland:

rsdefecit

That wasn’t the end of the hapless Douglas Fraser’s problems, though – later on in the report his script required him to read this gem out to the nation:

“On jobs, though – the part of the economy that matters most to most households – the economists forecast a rise this year and next. The better news: it doesn’t look as steep a rise as previously feared.”

Well, um, thank heavens jobs aren’t going to rise as much as we thought, eh?

This follows hot on the heels of a series of humiliations for the state broadcaster over an independent Scotland’s relationship with the EU, when a succession of European foreign ministers have angrily corrected BBC misrepresentations of their views.

Readers can decide for themselves how many and which of these errors are due to ineptitude rather than conspiracy. But neither explanation offers much in the way of grounds for confidence in the performance of the country’s main news source.

42 to “You don’t know what you’re doing”

  1. balgayboy says:

    Any guess what the BT attack dogs question’s will be at FMQ today? It’s becoming so predictable it’s almost become comedy now.

    Reply
  2. Gotta love the media!!

    Reply
  3. tartanfever says:

    Recently the BBC in Scotland have taken to being ambiguous when they use the term ‘government’. Usually on bad news regarding the economy they will not differentiate between Holyrood and Westminster. 
    Yesterday’s example (pictured above) is a fine example of this manipulation. The graphic behind Fraser’s head says ‘Scotland’s public finances’, but it can’t be Scotland’s public finances as we have no borrowing powers. If we have no money borrowing powers, how can we have a debt/deficit ?
    Holyrood receives a block grant, once that has been extinguished, thats it. Yes the UK govt can effectively increase our spending by giving extra money for capital investment and the like, but in terms of the debt, that is all UK borrowing that comes from Westminster and is then divided amongst us.
    Now, while we all know this and I’m bleating to the converted here, the most important group of people in Scotland are the ‘don’t know’ voters, that 20% that will swing the outcome of the referendum one way or the other. 
    Put yourself in their shoes. Maybe they don’t follow politics, maybe they have little interest in the subject – but with certainty I think we can assume that they universally have some fears about an independent Scotland’s economy and ability to provide. You can’t have decades of ‘too poor, too wee and too stupid’ without it having an effect on the population. And in this scenario, yesterday’s BBC reporting must at least have many of them asking questions. Even if you don’t follow politics, it’s hard to avoid every single media outlet – all of which have carried the most exaggerated, negative press.
    I wonder how the ‘don’t knows’ are feeling this morning ?

    Reply
  4. Indy_Scot says:

    I do not believe you can exaggerate bias. Bias is bias in the same way as a tin of beans is a tin of beans. I also believe we will never know the full extent of information and subliminal manipulation that BBC Scotland have gone to, and will go to, to achieve their aim.

    Reply
  5. pa_broon says:

    I watched news night Scotland last night and wished I hadn’t, it was dire.
     
    The SNP MSP tripped up when he started parroting some lines, I hate when they do that. Although the biggy for me was Gordon Brewer’s total inability to understand the concept of a forecast.
     
    As for this ‘leaked’ document which seems to be a year old, was there not something leaked at the beginning of the year that turned out to be out of date too? I can’t quite remember what it was…
     
    In any case, putting the comedy top secret stamp on it was a risible move, I’d love to know who’s idea that was because, as we all very well know, that is the exact stamp governments world wide use to label top secret documentation…
     
    Isn’t it?

    Reply
  6. Iain says:

    What’s most interesting psychologically is that every time one of these brouhahas gets whipped up, the Unionist alliance (and I think it has to be accepted now that the BBC in Scotland is part of it) believes it has found the silver bullet; Megrahi, lapsed tax raising powers, EU legal advice, hapless transport ministers resigning, they’re all leapt upon with an ‘Ah hah, now, at last, you can see how laughable independence would be and what an incompetent, duplicitous shower the SNP are!’ It must be bitter gall to them that after each killshot support for both remains pretty much impervious.

    On topic, I wonder how much the quality of the BBC Scotland’s increasingly shaky operation is due to redundancies, cuts and low morale?

    Reply
  7. Albert Herring says:

    No.2 on the search return. They must have been in a hurry. 
    link to google.co.uk

    Reply
  8. mato21 says:

    Here is another list of Labour luvvies from 2010 Some are still hanging around like a bad smell
    link to gaiusmarcellus.blogspot.co.uk
     
     

    Reply
  9. Doug Daniel says:

    Maybe “defecit” is a new term meaning “shit debt”?

    Reply
  10. muttley79 says:

    I believe that it can’t really be put down to incompetence.  Anybody with any intelligence, and I include children at school, would know that when Cameron effectively said there was going to be a referendum on the EU the obvious question to the No campaign would be is this not the uncertainty you argued about against independence?  Did we see any questions of this nature to the No campaign?  Did we fuck…The simple truth is that the media have not scrutinised the No campaign at all.  When the triple AAA rating was reduced did the media ask difficult questions of the No campaign?  Again none were asked or sought.  Compare this to the media frenzy over the SG’s position on the EU last year, which is continuing even at the moment.  This tells us that it cannot possibly be incompetence.  This has, and is being planned baby… 

    Reply
  11. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Any chance of you reproducing the SUN’s editorial today. A ship of good sense in a sea of shite elsewhere

    Reply
  12. ianbrotherhood says:

    Lamont on FMQ’s – ‘Look, there’s a squirrel!’
    WTF? Is it some in-joke? This woman is an embarrassment, not only to Labour, but the whole nation.

    Reply
  13. Richie says:

    @Dave
    A link would have been handy. I nearly had a heart attack looking at the Sun’s front page 🙂
    link to thescottishsun.co.uk

    Reply
  14. muttley79 says:

    A link to Craig Murray on the BBC:
     
    link to craigmurray.org.uk

    Reply
  15. Bill C says:

    @Dave and Richie – Just had a look at the Sun, palpitations only now subsiding.  Quite astounded that at long last some honest assessment of the independence debate.  Is it a straw in the wind?

    Reply
  16. TheGreatBaldo says:

    Bill C says:
    7 March, 2013 at 12:44 pm

    @Dave and Richie – Just had a look at the Sun, palpitations only now subsiding.  Quite astounded that at long last some honest assessment of the independence debate.  Is it a straw in the wind”
    Actually from the Leveson Inquiry we know the Editor and Political Editor of the Scottish Sun we’re both keen to back the SNP in 2011…….and Rupert let his men on the ground make the call.*
    The Sun hasn’t been slavishly Pro Indy….but they are balanced…..
    And it’s the latest in an increasing long list of media who are exasperated by Better Together (including the Sunday Mail)……Kevin McKenna, Joyce McMillan and lets be honest recent columns indicate Ian MacWhirter is out as Indy in all but name.
    *Obviously the idea that a Newspaper would endorse the SNP is a no no…..Newspapers are meant to be Pro Union
     

    Reply
  17. Vronsky says:

    If you want to make sense of Unionism, give up now.  Check the comments from Chris Ryan on this Herald piece on the death of a climber on Ben Nevis.  Mr Ryan is vexed that a disproportionate number of those offing themselves on Scottish hills are English.  He admits that England itself has fewer hills so well-suited to inadvertently killing yourself, but nevertheless feels that Scottish tribalism and bigotry is preventing us taking our share of the punishment.   Apparently our southern neighbours will ‘show us and our visitors how to get the most out of our beautiful country’ – by toppling off it on a regular basis.   So c’mon guys, walking boots and blindfolds on – let’s keep our end up. 
    link to heraldscotland.com

    Reply
  18. Luigi says:

    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
     
    Whilst Hanlon’s razor fully explains the actions of Scottish Labour, the BBC are a more balanced organization – malice and stupidity in equal measures!

    Reply
  19. Heather McLean says:

    Richie says:
    7 March, 2013 at 12:18 pm

    @Dave
    A link would have been handy. I nearly had a heart attack looking at the Sun’s front page
    link to thescottishsun.co.uk
    WOW!!! Can hardly believe this from The Sun, no wonder you nearly had a heart attack!! BUT… everyone knows that Rupert Murdoch will only ever back a winning side SO I’m taking heart from the fact that they appear to be turning in favour of the Yes Campaign!

    Reply
  20. Craig M says:

    There was an element of good sense evident on Sky News this morning when a Lib Dem Lord (I forget his name) was wheeled in front of the cameras.
    The noble Lord then went on to state that London was effectively an offshore entity, separate from the rest of the UK and for the Westminster Government to kick start
    a home building exercise to assist the economy. You had to admire the bravery of this Lord as he was committing political heresy in being critical of the position of London within the
    context of the greater UK economy. I can see his career and social circle going badly wrong as a result. Wait for the London centric press to start attacking this guy.
    What I thought was interesting about this was comparing this viewpoint with the Better Together efforts and their fellow BT foot soldiers in BBC Scotland.
    With statements highlighting the fact that London is moving, if not having already moved, to a position almost identical to that of Singapore and Malaysia, the Better Together campaign is
    completely out in the cold with regards to the stark reality of the economic and political position within the British Isles. What does that say about their vision and intellect?
    But, chillingly, it also says a lot about their humanity. Better Together, by supporting the status quo, is condemning generations of ordinary people to penury.
    It is also contributing to a process that will actually see the UK split apart but not in the way that occupies their thinking.
    The UK may remain together on paper, on maps, but it is very quickly fragmenting at a line that can be drawn close to the route of the M25.
    Frightening stuff, but a very strong likelihood the way current trends are developing.

    Reply
  21. ianbrotherhood says:

    @Vronsky-
    Had a swatch at the man’s comments – sounds a couple of spikes short of a crampon.

    Reply
  22. rabb says:

    I’ve always maintained that BBC aside, the media will follow the majority. It makes commercial sense. At the end of the day, the media aren’t “guardians of the free world”, they are commercial entities with shareholders who demand their dividend.
     
    I have been deliberately shy of berating them for a reason. We are now seeing a shift in support to independence and a smattering of pro indy articles have followed.
     
    When the scale tips in favour for indy, expect a raft of pro indy media to follow. It’s all gravy and cream for indy after that.

    Have faith in Yes HQ. They are playing the long game.
     
     

    Reply
  23. GP Walrus says:

    I think “defecit” is Latin for “He shat.”
    Quite appropriate for Fraser’s report really. 

    Reply
  24. Slaughterhouse says:

    Just wondering is someone can answer a question for me. If Scotland choose to nationalise oil production at the point of independence, it would be down to the UK Gov to compensate the oil companies for any loss, as after all, the leases have been signed by which-ever company and them?
     

    Reply
  25. BlueTiles says:

    Slightly O/T – Just had a debate over social media concerning the benefits of Independence, the results of the GERS, Sweeney’s ‘leaked’ do etc.
    I mentioned the ways in which Scotland is badly managed by Westminster and the prospects we can hope to see after a No vote ( Tutions Fees, Trident, eventual NHS privitisation, Labour government).
    Instead of a rebuttal to any of the points I raised, I was told – ‘Those arguments aren’t for Independence, they’re for an SNP government’. 
    No positive case for the Union forthcoming.
    Sigh.
    Just how do we get through to these people?

    Reply
  26. Nairn says:

    There is a third option between deliberate bias and incompetence – laziness. I think that’s much more likely – there’s only a few hours in the day to get the broadcast into shape and, hell, economics is hard, and the viewers are distracted, so let’s just cut and paste off wikipedia, folks.
    Journalism is a lost art, because who has the time to develop actual knowledge on a subject any more? that’s hard, and it requires effort.

    Reply
  27. John Lyons says:

    Lamont on FMQ’s – ‘Look, there’s a squirrel!’
     
    That’s awesome. Did she really accuse the SG of trying to distract people from the real Story when in the Last 48 hours she and everyone else on the unionist side have done thier damndest to distract people away from an up to date GERS report which tells us how well off Scotland would be by getting us to look at a one year old opinion???
     
    Laughable doesn’t begin to describe them!
     

    Reply
  28. The Man in the Jar says:

    @mato21 at 11.24am
    Good link. Thanks I will forward this one on.

    Reply
  29. ianbrotherhood says:

    @John Lyons –
    Aye, and the expression on Salmond’s face when she said it was priceless – he leant over to Sturgeon, baffled, and muttered something, as if to say ‘wtf is that roaster on about now?’

    Reply
  30. NorthBrit says:

    Beeb were running Bitter Together FUD story on the Swinney “leak” on the Today programme this am (they may even have run it twice).  Didn’t listen as switched off to protect my kitchen from collateral damage.
     
    But given that the GERS report came out yesterday it is incredible (in the literal sense) that they chose to take this angle.

    Reply
  31. The Man in the Jar says:

    @muttley79 at 12.39
    Thanks, another excellent link worth forwarding on.

    Reply
  32. Angus McLellan says:

    @Luigi: Hanlon’s Razor? James Morton came up with the excellent Morton’s Razor: Never rule out the possibility that the stupid bear malice.

    Reply
  33. R Louis says:

    Even if I were to suspend credulity for one second and believe that the bias from the BBC was down to rank stupidity, it would still mean they are simply not up to the job of being the main broadcaster in Scotland.  In reality however, i think it is no mistake whatsoever, due to the reasons others have alluded to above – principally never questioning the nonsense from the Bitter together campaign itself, or the utter contradictory tripe from the gob of Lamont.

    I’d like to thank Muttley 79 above for the link to the article by Craig Murray;

    link to craigmurray.org.uk

    as in it he explains that were Scotland to have an allocation of the oil money from the REAL Scottish waters (not with the fiddled maritime boundary), the GERS would have shown Scotland to be in SURPLUS.
     
     

    Reply
  34. Dee says:

    Would be grateful if someone would organise a mass non-payment of the bbc license fee, 

    Reply
  35. Weedeochandorris says:

    Hi Craig M.  would you mind explaining what you mean “With statements highlighting the fact that London is moving, if not having already moved, to a position almost identical to that of Singapore and Malaysia”.    Just interested to know. Thanks 🙂

    Reply
  36. Malcolm says:

    Weedeochandorris:

     
    He means that London is becoming a separate entity from the UK in nearly every sense, much as Singapore has been politically, financially, religiously separate from Malaysia since the 1960s.

    Reply
  37. Weedeochandorris says:

    Thanks Malcolm, I’ve always understood Singapore to be a country in its own right and very separate from Malaysia.  Didnt get the comparison as London is obviously a city but I can get the gist.  Just a stretch of the imagination to think that London could ever be a country how ever hard they try to separate themselves from the rest of us riff raff :-0

    Reply
  38. douglas clark says:

    Weedeochandorris,
     
    I should get a prize for just typing that in!
     
    I think London would really like to be the next Singapore. I think London thinks it doesn’t need the rest of the UK, well, not really,
     
    Just my thoughts.
     

    Reply
  39. balgayboy says:

    Don’t reckon the Londoner’s could stand the rules and regulations one needs to obey to assimilate Singapore’s success. A few strokes of the rattan would soon have them screaming for the reintroduction of human rights the Tory UK government is considering repealing. Presently there is seems to be an abundance of likely contenders for such punishment in the “City”

    Reply
  40. scotchman says:

    Went onto the BBC website to complain about BBC Scotland coverage of GERS v distractions. Online form offers a number of options for the TV service you’d like to complain about.
    These include the main terrestrial channels BBC 1-4, CBeebies, BBC Parliament / America / Canada / Knowledge / Lifestyle etc. BBC Alba even has an option. The one option which is missing is BBC Scotland!
    It’s all too easy to become paranoid……

    Reply
  41. Jingly Jangly says:

    Re debt v Deficit, its not only dear old aunty beeb that doesnt know the difference
    a couple of years ago, channel four news ( I think ) asked several politicians from New Labour and Conservative what the difference was and if I remember correctly none of them knew or they were confused  thinking that the debt was the same as the deficit.
    Never mind when the IMF comes in to sort out bankrupt britain in the not to distant
    future we will all know the level of debt and thats  not just the trillion or so on the books but the trillions of  unfunded obligations such as public sector pension liabilities, PFI, Bank Bailouts, etc plus very high business and personnel debt, there is only one way to
    go which is down the swanney. This will happen before the Referendum where  the
    Scottish people will be given a choice of between a rich country with the potential
    to be one of the most successful in the world or a busted flush with only infraltion and
    a john bull printing press to slow down its descent  into becoming like a south american tinpot state of the seventies.
    I know which one I will be voting for….

    Reply
  42. annie says:

    Whit was one of my favourites – think i’ll go and look it out for another read.  I didn’t realise that Iain Banks was a fellow independence supporter hope he makes it to the vote.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,726 Posts, 1,214,982 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Just two? You’re not paying enough attention 🙂Apr 2, 08:37
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “While many in the world are celebrating the “end of woke”, the legions of woke, fully insinuated into positions of…Apr 2, 08:33
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““Colonialism is over” But wait, Geri. Haven’t you to duly punish them at the ballot box first? You’re trying to…Apr 2, 08:21
    • Chas on The Gender Of Mountains: “I suspect that Geri and Billy Carlin are the same person, with two user names?Apr 2, 08:19
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Ah ken YLS, but I still think there’s hope for you yet. And so I soldier oan.Apr 2, 08:12
    • Young Lochinvar on The Gender Of Mountains: “It’s an unprofitable exercise arguing with drunks, trolls, bots or spooks (y’all).. Good-bye ya roaster..Apr 2, 02:40
    • Geri on The Gender Of Mountains: “It’s been a deliberate distraction because, like Scotland, NI may soon have voted to leave but instead has been railroaded…Apr 2, 00:10
    • Geri on The Gender Of Mountains: “Shiteface – learn to read. No, it’s not because of the gender woo but that shit is one example of…Apr 1, 23:59
    • Geri on The Gender Of Mountains: “The EU is reverting to type, fascism. Just remove, assassinate, cancel or jail political opponents. Especially all the ones not…Apr 1, 23:29
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The Gender Of Mountains: “‘OUTRAGEOUS’ NORTHERN IRELAND CONVERSION THERAPY PLAN COULD JAIL PARENTS FOR OPPOSING CHILD’S ‘SEX CHANGE’ « Plans for a new ‘conversion therapy’…Apr 1, 23:10
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Wow, Geri. So BRICS is the rest of the world fighting back against the genderwoowoo. Who’d a thunk it! And…Apr 1, 22:47
    • Geri on The Gender Of Mountains: “The USA already own the UK & have done since WW2. & I wish you’d do some research. The gender…Apr 1, 22:16
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““New article required” Sure OLS. The genderwoowoo legislation has been repealed. All the politicians, civil servants, administrators, etc. responsible for…Apr 1, 21:05
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Cheers, J Galt. The idea of joining the USA ordinarily would have much to commend it, whether or not we…Apr 1, 20:35
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “@Bob says: “snivelling shitebag” “coward” “racist” “joker” “despicable , trolling prick” “obnoxious cunt” Uh oh, the missus must have another…Apr 1, 20:25
    • agent x on The Gender Of Mountains: ““Stephen Flynn secures backing from SNP members for Holyrood seat The Times reports that Flynn is believed to have formally…Apr 1, 20:02
    • Mike D on The Gender Of Mountains: “Yeah the orange turnip only wants to talk to the organ grinder(starmer). Not the monkey,(scotland).Apr 1, 19:55
    • PacMan on The Gender Of Mountains: “@ John Main Do you not think that the posters you were talking about were winding you up? You do…Apr 1, 18:41
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Two minds with but a single thought. 🙂Apr 1, 15:51
    • Young Lochinvar on The Gender Of Mountains: “New article required Rev..Apr 1, 14:49
    • J Galt on The Gender Of Mountains: “For once I agree with you Hatey, a thousand dollars would buy my vote for Scotland to become the 51st…Apr 1, 12:28
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – JPTi’s lead advocate left university last year so I wouldn’t put too much weight on that. This is…Apr 1, 12:03
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “Blethers, Aidan! I asked ChatGPT only the two questions I posted, so you know exactly what I asked. Also, the…Apr 1, 10:55
    • Robert Hughes on The Gender Of Mountains: “the snivelling shitebag – such a coward he won’t even put his own name to the non-stop playdoh propaganda n…Apr 1, 10:34
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – as a follow-up, what criteria do you think define lack of self government if the geographic separation requirement…Apr 1, 10:12
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – I don’t know what question you asked and how you framed it but the answers, or at least…Apr 1, 10:04
    • Stoker on The Gender Of Mountains: “FFS! Main, you not got a home to go to? WOS’ resident barfly.Apr 1, 10:00
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “A rare case of our elites being smarter than France’s elites. Le Pen technically isn’t married though, so she doesn’t…Apr 1, 09:38
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “Aidan, you said; “it absolutely is a strict , foundational requirement. It is probably the single most important defining feature…Apr 1, 09:07
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “This is top class product, My Lady Geri, more please. Give us chapter and verse on how the Brits have…Apr 1, 08:59
  • A tall tale



↑ Top