The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Trust me, I’m a liar

Posted on February 13, 2012 by

This is Scottish Secretary Michael Moore in The Times (Saturday 11th February 2012, paywall link), in an interview widely interpreted as a pledge to move forward with greater devolution for Scotland should the country vote No to independence in 2014:

“The central point is to let Scotland decide whether it’s part of the part of the United Kingdom or not.  I’m confident it will say ‘we are’. Then we can work through the detail of what the next stages of devolution will be… The referendum is the start of the conversation, not the end.”


This, on the other hand, is Scottish Secretary Michael Moore, quoted by the Telegraph on the 22nd of December 2010 on the subject of the coalition government:

“Tuition fees [are] the biggest, ugliest, most horrific thing in all of this. I signed a pledge that promised not to do this. I’ve just done the worst crime a politician can commit, the reason most folk distrust us as a breed. I’ve had to break a pledge and very, very publicly, in what is a car crash, train wreck, whatever metaphor one wishes to put in terms of the politics of this, and it is deeply damaging to my party, to me individually and lots of others.”

Far be it from us to suggest that Mr Moore’s promises literally aren’t worth the paper they’re signed on. We don’t need to, because he’s just told you that himself. You’ll have to make your own mind up how far you trust him to deliver more powers to the Scottish Parliament if you decide to leave those powers in the hands of Westminster.

But when you’re doing that, be crystal clear on how things will stand in 2014 – a No vote is a vote for the status quo. Anything after that depends on the honesty of liars.

7 to “Trust me, I’m a liar”

  1. Jen says:

    I think people have seriously lost confidence in the lib dems as a political party.  Letting the students down in the way they did for power and a seat at the goverment table.   To believe in jam tomorrow is the biggest mistake the Scottish electorate can make as none of the parties will deliver.  Histroy shows that very well.
     
     

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    It would be insane to believe it. Ruth Davidson has already said that the Tory position is "No more powers at all". The Lib Dems aren't going to be within a million miles of power for a generation. So it's all down to Labour, their ability to win an election in England, and Scottish Labour's ability to actually decide what its policy on devolution is – particularly, what powers they want to hand to Holyrood if the SNP is still in power. And if you're prepared to entrust your country's future to any of those things, you deserve what you get.

    Reply
  3. An Duine Gruamach says:

    New headline: "Yes vote would win Scots all tax powers".  Hmmm.
     
    Does anyone honestly think that London would ever devolve so much as control over toothpicks if the nuclear option of independence wasn't there?

    Reply
  4. Shodan says:

    Everything you are saying makes sense, Stu, but it is hard not to expect the worst or believe that something like this could ever happen even if it seems like it is in reach. It's like winning the lottery. You don't really expect to win the jackpot with every ticket…

    Mind, it's not like there haven't been many attempts before now, so it's got to be our time to win through. Hopefully people don't squander this chance due to fear or ignorance and vote "no".
     
    I also hope that everyone  understands that there certainly will be consequences to a "no" vote if they end up going that way in majority. It won't be status quo or blow over. They will certainly start stripping powers and changing the rules over these things, just in case. There's no way the Scottish public or independence movement will get a chance to work from where they are now again in even another generation as so much will be changed before then to scupper it. People shouldn't think of the "yes" being the only one with consequences or changes.

    Reply
  5. Shodan says:

    I also expect them to be jeering and taking full advantage to strip Scotland bare for a generation, secure in the knowledege they can keep pointing to the results of the vote to back them up. It will be brutal.

    Reply
  6. I can agree with almost all that has been written.I fear a no vote by trickery,like last time,just how they are going to do it is the big question.Really please don't blow it as I don't think I'll last another 30 years or so.

    Reply
  7. Jen says:

    I agree with many commenters here.  A no vote is invitation to remove free education, privatise the NHS and ensure econonic hell for those residing in Sccotland for the next 60 years or more. 
     
    This is our chance.  Hail alba

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,807 Posts, 1,224,652 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Conspiracies For Dummies: “By (Scottish Solicitor Advocate) Gordon Dangerfield (12 Aug 2021) – LIZ LLOYD’S INTERFERENCE IN THE SALMOND INVESTIGATION: WHAT IT MEANS…Aug 20, 18:42
    • Geri on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Yes & I’m sure even the lawyers advised her there was nothing of any substance & nothing to see here…Aug 20, 18:23
    • Arthur Martin on Conspiracies For Dummies: “What did Leslie Evans and Liz Lloyd stand to gain from Alex Salmond being incarcerated?Aug 20, 18:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Mills and Boon … only without the sex. We are talking about Scots after all. 50 shades of oatmeal.Aug 20, 18:20
    • James on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Why did she jail Craig Murray? I expect both questions have the same answer.Aug 20, 18:19
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: ““Greatest Leader we have ever had” Naw. That was Yousaf. At least, alert readers could be forgiven for jumping to…Aug 20, 18:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Quick Barbs. Start pushing the idea we should gift it tae poot! Ye’ll get a double bonus fer that.Aug 20, 18:10
    • Callum on Conspiracies For Dummies: “It was always Sturgeon at the heart of the conspiracy – guilty as hell – but extremely worrying was that…Aug 20, 18:02
    • twathater on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Alex Salmond in his love for Scotland announced that there were things that should have been aired and exposed but…Aug 20, 18:00
    • James on Conspiracies For Dummies: “That right, aye?Aug 20, 17:57
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Whatever the literary merits of FRANKLY in total, that screenshot double-spread above (beginning with the words “been wrong. Leslie had…Aug 20, 17:54
    • Ronnie on Conspiracies For Dummies: “One bit I still don’t understand, given that the Judge heard all the evidence and points that you have highlighted,…Aug 20, 17:53
    • duncanio on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Mills and Boon … only without the love.Aug 20, 17:43
    • Stuart on Conspiracies For Dummies: “As seen over on the Daily Telegraph. “JK Rowling has accused the liberal arts of “the most craven, bootlicking capitulation…Aug 20, 17:36
    • Geri on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Jeez, there goes comfy slippers failing to keep up as usual. It’s okay, Dreary, she’s gone now. No need to…Aug 20, 17:31
    • Hatey McHateface on The illiterate solicitor: “@ James says: 20 August, 2025 at 12:22 pm “That’s “Reform” for you, Marie. Half wits, bigots and racists.” BBC…Aug 20, 17:22
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Conspiracies For Dummies: ““Out, damned spot!”Aug 20, 17:20
    • Hatey McHateface on The illiterate solicitor: “@Barbs says: 20 August, 2025 at 10:50 am “fuck off” Spare a thought for those unfortunates who go through life…Aug 20, 17:19
    • Ian on Conspiracies For Dummies: “As soon as Salmond was publicly named, Sturgeon had done all the damage she needed to, regardless of the outcome.…Aug 20, 17:00
    • Anton Decadent on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Thank you for fighting for his name and laying out what was done to him. Over on X it is…Aug 20, 16:56
    • panda paws on Conspiracies For Dummies: ““via the sinister Moorov Doctrine” It’s not normally sinister. Serious sexual assaults don’t usually have witnesses, they are the very…Aug 20, 16:56
    • Young Lochinvar on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Forrest..Aug 20, 16:37
    • desimond on Conspiracies For Dummies: “The difference in Salmond dignified action in reacting to the defeat of 2014 and Sturgeons victorious ascendency is hard to…Aug 20, 16:29
    • Alf Baird on The illiterate solicitor: “Lorn, you are perhaps forgetting that the main actors in this case included senior UK civil servants, crown and police,…Aug 20, 16:29
    • Oneliner on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Are we even sure that is an original Sturgeon line? Sounds a bit Mills & Boon to me.Aug 20, 16:23
    • Young Lochinvar on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Run Forest Run!Aug 20, 16:03
    • Skip_NC on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Jim Bowen would be proud of you for this piece.Aug 20, 16:01
    • Mark Beggan on Conspiracies For Dummies: “Well put Rev. Yes indeed the end is nigh! The carrot crunchers of the SNP grassroots are now demanding, yes…Aug 20, 15:50
    • Mark Beggan on Conspiracies For Dummies: “There goes the MI5 theory.Aug 20, 15:38
    • Lorn on The illiterate solicitor: “I agree, Geri, that at least a number of the women were not co conspirators at all but were drawn…Aug 20, 15:31
  • A tall tale



↑ Top