The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Too much news

Posted on May 25, 2012 by

We need to clone ourselves – there’s so much going on today we can’t possibly cover it all. The official launch of the Yes Scotland campaign was better than we expected, with particularly good contributions from Tommy Brennan, Dennis Canavan and a showstopping closing speech from Brian Cox all highlighting the broad base of support for independence – Alex Salmond was the only SNP politician on show, taking up just a couple of minutes of the hour-long presentation.

Online Labour activists were particularly keen to vilify Cox, unleashing a deluge of bitter attacks which succeeded only in drawing attention to how desperately the party wants to silence the 20% or so of Labour voters who actually back independence.

In an attempt to spoil the media coverage, the nascent No campaign chose the eve of the launch to release a YouGov poll they’d commissioned, with a headline figure of 33% in favour of independence and 57% against. Curiously, though – and little reported by the media – the poll didn’t ask the actual question that’s likely to be on the ballot paper, choosing instead the comparatively tortuous “Do you agree Scotland should become a country independent of the rest of the UK?”

Creating such an obvious hostage to fortune is a clumsy and guileless piece of work – especially given the enormous public fuss the Unionists have made about the precise wording and the possibility of bias therein – but the anti-independence parties presumably knew the media could largely be relied on to focus solely on the numbers and not mention what the actual question was.

Our favourite thing today, though, was an extraordinary outburst from Labour MSP Kezia Dugdale, who apparently wants the word “Yes” itself to be outlawed in the years running up to the referendum. On first reading of the piece we thought it was just a complaint that a democratically-elected government was daring to actively pursue the policies it had been elected on, but in fact it’s even nuttier than that – the leaflet and website Dugdale is objecting to isn’t actually anything to do with independence at all, but merely promoting a positive, “can-do” approach to Scottish enterprise.

To Labour, of course, promoting jobs and the Scottish economy is simply despicable populist cheating on the part of the Scottish Government – worse still when, in the immortal words of George Foulkes, the SNP are doing it deliberately. As Labour cling ever more tightly to negativity, as Ms Dugdale herself says: expect more of this.

9 to “Too much news”

  1. TheMaganator says:

    The wording of the question will undoubtedly sway some – that is why the SNP favour their own wording. Fair enough. 

    Are you at all surprised by the figures for people that voted SNP in last election that said they do not support Independence?

    “In another damaging finding for the pro-independence movement, the poll also suggested that only 58% of people who voted for the SNP in last May’s landslide victory for Salmond would back independence in a snap referendum, while 28% of SNP voters opposed it.” 

    Reply
  2. Doug Daniel says:

    “TSB: the bank that likes to say yes.”

    Or in Kezia’s world, “TSB: the bank that actively promotes the nationalist conspiracy, and how much of your precious tax monies are spent promoting this sick propaganda?”

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Are you at all surprised by the figures for people that voted SNP in last election that said they do not support Independence?”

    Not at all, no – I’ve drawn attention to it here before. I’ve seen it reported as high as 40%.

    Reply
  4. Shirley says:

    I have found no film on the BBC, radio or TV, of the Launch. Have they really not shown it, or have I missed it?
    And did people see the midday Politics show? I hope you will put it on your blog.
    Andrew Neil interviewed one person who had been at the Launch. This was introduced by a package which consisted of “unanswered questions about Independence”, and left viewers with the impression that we are being asked to vote without knowing what we’re voting for.
    After the interview the two studio guests were asked for their opinions – both anti-Independence. No pro-Independence views in sight.
    It was appalling.
     
     

    Reply
  5. TheMaganator says:

    @Shirley:

    I have not seen any myself – but judging by twitter – many were saying that STV had the best coverage. 

    Reply
  6. Longshanker says:

    Brian Cox was the best Hannibal Lecter by a mile as well. Didn’t catch everything he said, but yes, an excellent and fantastically eloquent proponent for the case of independence.

    I’ve always enjoyed listening to him on Question Time as well. Did he not give Starkey a bit of a booting?

    Denis Canavan was excellent on Good Morning Scotland this morning. I’ve always liked him – more so after he turned independent and didn’t have to worry about curbing  what he had to say. Reminds me of the Labour old school who recognised the value of a Michael Foot in the political sphere.      

    Are they enough for the leap of faith to be made? I don’t thinkso. But the more media time Canavan gets, the better.    

    Reply
  7. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “I have not seen any myself – but judging by twitter – many were saying that STV had the best coverage. “

    It was the best by a country mile. The BBC stayed at the launch for mere minutes before switching back to Leveson, and the YesScotland site was late starting and had dreadful muffled audio.

    Reply
  8. Suth says:

    I don’t know how the BBC manage to be so awful at covering these things or why they insist on only showing a handful of minutes of any big event to you before spending hours talking about it in the studio instead. I’d rather see it for myself. They did the same with the big international press event too.

    Reply
  9. Doug Daniel says:

    It’s almost as if they’re trying to undermine it…

    They certainly have no concept of the enormity of these events. Scotland is changing, regardless of the result in 2014. Depending on how things pan out, BBC Scotland staff could find themselves out of a job. I certainly see no reason why we should continue to fund a public service broadcaster that utterly failed in its purpose before we became independent. It’s a complete dereliction of duty on their part. 

    If they don’t buck up their ideas a bit, then perhaps indy Scotland should start from scratch with a brand new public service broadcaster, populated by people who have some sort of idea how to run such an institution properly, rather than running it like a village community TV station.

    Although we’d keep Isobel Fraser and Mark Daly on, obviously… 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,870 Posts, 1,235,082 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Xaracen on Shield Of The Phantom: “You’re still avoiding the point, Aidan. Keen’s statement was not a blog comment, it was a legal submission. It states…Jan 28, 16:02
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Yelling at the tide: “REPUBLIC OF IRELAND GOVT: NO LEGAL OBLIGATION ON SCHOOLS TO USE PREFERRED PRONOUNS The Irish Govt Department of Education and…Jan 28, 14:44
    • James Cheyne on Shield Of The Phantom: “Simplified version. England parliament waited until Scotland signed. Then chucked Scotland out of the treaty. Then England altered its dates…Jan 28, 14:04
    • James Cheyne on Shield Of The Phantom: “Most of the supposed builds are avenues to erase the trace of funneling money out of Britain, I suppose one…Jan 28, 13:43
    • Confused on Shield Of The Phantom: “the myth of british competence was always a fiction for domestic consumption – no one anywhere else fell for it…Jan 28, 13:02
    • Confused on Shield Of The Phantom: “remember silicon glen? – not many do; it happened, sort of, but not really and then died a death. After…Jan 28, 12:58
    • TURABDIN on Shield Of The Phantom: “& the Scots were originally Irish Gaels and were so into early medieval times, causing much historic confusion, Scots Scots…Jan 28, 12:52
    • Alf Baird on Shield Of The Phantom: ““Picts, became known as Scots along with the Gaels now living in whats is called Scotland.” Much like some Scots…Jan 28, 12:30
    • James Cheyne on Shield Of The Phantom: “Eventually and slowly it comes to the attention of people in Scotland, and then one wonders does Scotland need to…Jan 28, 12:29
    • James Cheyne on Shield Of The Phantom: “To continue the records, England left what remained of its vision of a 1707 treaty with Scotland when it chose…Jan 28, 11:53
    • Alf Baird on Shield Of The Phantom: “A colonized people, or at least those suffering from a colonial mindset, do tend to celebrate their oppressor, nae maitter…Jan 28, 11:24
    • James Cheyne on Shield Of The Phantom: “Reverting the conversation back to the Laws at the present time in Scotland and the difference of Englands laws that…Jan 28, 11:01
    • 100%Yes on Shield Of The Phantom: “@robertkknight 27 January, 2026 at 11:55 pm “I think you’ll find they were Picts, or ethnically similar to them. As…Jan 28, 10:20
    • Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “Firstly “acknowledged by the law to be separate entities” does not mean separate legal entities with legal personality. Secondly, and…Jan 28, 08:59
    • Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: ““untrustworthy wordsmiths” Not sure the evidence supports that, YL. Take Scotland’s greatest living half-son, for example, President Donald J Trump.…Jan 28, 08:50
    • Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: “Why’s that then, 100%Yes? Are they claiming the hostages are a’ still undergroond somewhere? Fit aboot the ham asses then?…Jan 28, 08:37
    • Hatey McHateface on Shield Of The Phantom: ““You can’t be asking seriously” Wisnae me asking, Aidan, it wis Sooty. And he’s a verra serious glove puppet. At…Jan 28, 08:24
    • Xaracen on Shield Of The Phantom: “Like I said! From APPENDIX 2 Case for the Lord Gray . . . 36 Firstly, its purpose so far…Jan 28, 08:13
    • Young Lochinvar on Shield Of The Phantom: “Is this not just the way things are and we are ,mostly, now just finding out as we are now…Jan 28, 06:28
    • Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “We’re talking about you not to you James, sit down.Jan 28, 06:08
    • Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “Perhaps you’ll be able to provide us with the specific explicit text from the Lords Privileges Committee on which says…Jan 28, 06:05
    • robertkknight on Shield Of The Phantom: “I think you’ll find they were Picts, or ethnically similar to them. As were the pre-Norse inhabitants of the Northern…Jan 27, 23:55
    • Young Lochinvar on Yelling at the tide: “James Are you sure you spelt the last word correctly? 🙂Jan 27, 23:38
    • James on Shield Of The Phantom: “Aw, “Aidan”, look in the mirror, petal.Jan 27, 22:46
    • bobo bunny on Shield Of The Phantom: “I have flip flops, so I’m good to go…Jan 27, 21:40
    • Insider on Shield Of The Phantom: “What illiterate gibberish !Jan 27, 21:07
    • Xaracen on Shield Of The Phantom: “Aidan said; “Of course that isn’t true at all Xaracen, in any way shape or form, the Lords Privilege Committee…Jan 27, 20:42
    • 100%Yes on Shield Of The Phantom: “Didn’t they get there arse kicked more than once and sent packing. I fail to see the point of a…Jan 27, 20:25
    • 100%Yes on Shield Of The Phantom: “I wouldn’t believe everything you hear from the BBC and GB News there known for lying and distorting the truth.…Jan 27, 20:14
    • Aidan on Shield Of The Phantom: “You can’t be asking seriously why James can’t engage with a subject of a post, I doubt he can even…Jan 27, 20:03
  • A tall tale



↑ Top